User talk:Velvet/Archive 1

Image:Mirroirs paraboliques opposés.JPG edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 09:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Buildings by Auguste Perret in France edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Buildings by Auguste Perret in France has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Coyau (talk) 16:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Roubaix martyrs resistance.JPG edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Roubaix martyrs resistance.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Teofilo (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pommiers cloitre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 20:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Berlin_musee_juif_feuilles.JPG edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Berlin_musee_juif_feuilles.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Calais bourse du travail entree.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Calais bourse du travail entree.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 13:35, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Le Havre vue de la plage.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bravo, une photo très réussie ! Archimatth (talk) 11:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Église_Saint-François-Xavier-des-Missions-Étrangères edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category discussion notification

Category:Église_Saint-François-Xavier-des-Missions-Étrangères has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 12:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Auchan edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour/Hello!

Je voudrai une photo du siège social d'Auchan (40, avenue de Flandre - BP 139 59964 CROIX cedex France), á Croix, s'il vous plaît Hello - for the article en:Auchan would it be alright if you photographed the head office of Auchan (40, avenue de Flandre - BP 139 59964 CROIX cedex France)?

Merci/Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 02:55, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Zwin_Flanagan.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Zwin_Flanagan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ComMonster (talk) 13:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mons_en_Baroeul_mosquée.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Mons_en_Baroeul_mosquée.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Civa (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Roubaix Emile Bernard garcon.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Roubaix Emile Bernard garcon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Common Good (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Velvet,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Amiens_monument_leclerc.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Amiens_monument_leclerc.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 16:19, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:LaM entrée.JPG

And also:

File:Villeneuve Ascq musee art moderne.JPG

Yours sincerely Jean-Fred (talk) 23:41, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wiki loves monument edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour,

Comme vous le savez sans doute, un grand concours de photographie organisé par l'association a eu lieu au mois de septembre : Wiki Loves Monuments. L'événement sera conclu par une soirée de remise des prix, qui aura lieu le 9 décembre 2011 à Paris, dans la salle Notre-Dame de l'hôtel de Cluny (qui abrite le musée national du Moyen Âge). La cérémonie aura lieu à 19h30, mais il sera auparavant possible de visiter gratuitement le musée (à partir de 18h).

Pour ceux qui veulent rester ensuite, on pense réserver un restaurant (chacun payant alors sa part), à partir de 22h.

Si tu souhaites venir, merci de me contacter par mail.--Thesupermat (talk) 11:30, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lille metro porte valenciennes.JPG

Yours sincerely PierreSelim (talk) 12:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Liege gare pano.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely PierreSelim (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Bondues_cour_sacrée_fusillés.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bondues_cour_sacrée_fusillés.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.139.62 20:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lille PdBA plan relief ypres.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 14:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Chicago art inst demuth spring.JPG edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Velvet,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 12:11, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Hall at Chicago Union Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille halle aux sucres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted ccw. a bit. - A.Savin 18:47, 1 November 2012 (UTC) - OK, is it better ? - Velvet 23:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC) Yes, but still needs correction at the very right. - A.Savin 13:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC) - Done Velvet 13:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC) OK now. - A.Savin 18:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix archives travail 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Useful and QI for me. --JLPC 20:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille (exterior)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chicago rookery escalier face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, but the perspective should be corrected. - A.Savin 22:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC) - Done But might not be that nice. - Velvet 21:39, 8 November 2012 (UTC) Support Good. - A.Savin 23:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Padula certosa cloitre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:32, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Institut de zoologie de Liège (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gratot chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is it possible to darken the sky a bit ? --JLPC 13:54, 13 November 2012 (UTC) -- Done Darkened a bit, tricky to go further Velvet 23:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
(I think it's possible !) Anyway, QI for me now. --JLPC 20:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaux le vicomte chevaux.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. - A.Savin 20:58, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille noble tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Selbymay 07:51, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prieuré de Champdieu, France (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stonehenge ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chatillon sur Seine Seine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Polémique en VI edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nous polémiquons en VI sur la Porte de Douai. Si tu veux bien rajouter la date des travaux et que tu ne connais pas l'architecte çà devrait apaiser le débat. Pour ma part je trouve ce débat stérile mais nous sommes une communauté. Je continuerai à me pencher sur tes images si tu veux bien les mettre en VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blandy les tours chateau pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Somewhat high colour saturation, but still good quality. --Smial 10:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxford magdalen college new building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too much contrast and saturation, IMO--Jebulon 18:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC) -- Done A bit less contrasted Velvet 19:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC) Support --Iifar 12:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix mairie arriere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment shadows disturbing, but acceptable. QI for me --Rjcastillo 00:38, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Padula certosa ecce homo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte de Valenciennes in Douai, France (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Le Cateau-Cambrésis (Nord, France) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hospice Gantois in Lille (Nord, France) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Savigny sous malain église.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaux le vicomte plafond angelots.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:54, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulogne chateau cote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais Rihour in Lille, France (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND Treille Ste Chapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Problème en VI edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nous avons l’émergence d’un intégriste, comme rencontré par le passé pour d’autre type d’image. Ce personnage exige pour les images de bâtiments, le nom de l’architecte, et l’année de construction. Ce n’ai pas, en soit, une mauvais idée, elle peut faire l’objet d’une remarque systématique, mais pas d’un vote négatif. En conscience voyez ce que vous pouvez faire pour éviter, comme ce fut le cas pour User:Velvet, de voir une image « tomber » injustement. Il serait bon qu’il la représente comme prévu par le règlement pour que nous puissions lui rendre justice. Je dépose ce message dans la page de discussion pour qu’il n’y ai pas d’équivoque sur un éventuel complot. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Lille ND Treille Ste Chapelle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lille ND Treille Ste Chapelle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

This one is yours --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:54, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arts et Métiers ParisTech School in Lille, France (rear view, exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille CCI int gd hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NY battery park city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 05:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Courthouse of Douai, France (exterior, Scarpe side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille St maurice porche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Paris XIXe arrondissement (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Th nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rang ass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Please add English description. --Kadellar 19:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille anges 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

VIS Promotion edit

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: The tomb of the diver in Paestum.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
The tomb of the diver in Paestum.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hospice comtesse salle malades.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:54, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Gd place bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Good sharpness and mood, but the bottom crop is unfortunate. --Iifar 17:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
OK. Little wider crop uploaded. Velvet 22:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC) Support --Iifar 19:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille porte paris bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- MJJR 09:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille gd place colonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bourse ass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 16:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La defense statue 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND treille archange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:54, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille place bettignies 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamber of Commerce of Lille (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Thought this was an institution, but fr: says it's the building. Support the scope, but not the image. MVR. --Ikar.us (talk) 01:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Support Best photographic quality. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Support Per Archaeo.--Jebulon (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Support like it better. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Scores: 
1. Lille CCI 2.jpg: +3 <--
2. Lille CCI.jpg: 0
=>
File:Lille CCI 2.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Lille CCI.jpg: Declined.

--Myrabella (talk) 20:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille gilles de la boe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice but CA at the roof on the right side.--Hic et nunc 15:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille palais rihour conclave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:16, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris gare nord face 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bourse cartouche Berthollet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison coilliot ass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beaune hospice cour ass 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Grondin 05:19, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prefecture of Lille (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ohlain chateau arriere ass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ooidonk Castle, Belgium (facade on courtyard).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

St amand tour s ass.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Le lien de ton scope était faux, regarde la modification. Sinon parfait. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Merci pour la modification (et ta vigilance de tous les instants).--Velvet (talk) 07:47, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Piatus church in Seclin, France (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seclin hospice cloitre ass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I'd appreciate to have EXIF data --Moroder 10:10, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower of the old abbey church of Saint-Amand-les-Eaux, France (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:Lens maison projet louvre.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lens maison projet louvre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

81.244.109.14 13:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwold salle marins.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 22:39, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lowestoft gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Nino Verde 17:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vieille bourse profil.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 23:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opéra de Lille, France (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duomo di Santa Maria Assunta in Naples, italy (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naples galleria umberto I bis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great shot. Heuschrecke 23:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral of San Michele Arcangelo in Casertavecchia, Italy (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille deesse beffroi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK Support --Rjcastillo 23:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naples spaccanapoli.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice Composition --Xicotencatl 19:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille palais des beaux arts face 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I like the little girl running, it's like she was painted on purpose. TintoMeches 08:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel petipas de walle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Ostende monument marins.JPG edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ostende monument marins.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ghouston (talk) 08:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle of Loppem, Belgium (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synagogue in Neuilly-sur-Seine, France (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hospice comtesse arr bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 11:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vieille bourse aile.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lille couvent dominicains.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Croix villa cavrois arriere bis.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 23:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hospice comtesse int.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kilmainham Gaol, Dublin, Ireland (Victorian wing, interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synagogue of Lille, France (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille porte paris vue int ter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille porte paris vue int ter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille prefecture cote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Wasnon Parish Church in Condé-sur-l'Escaut, France (Facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Why did you delete? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo, may you please explain why you did delete my vote here? Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:55, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lezennes eglise st eloi cote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 08:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Velvet,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de la Muette in Paris, France (View from the park).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle of Rumbeke in Rumbeke, Belgium (SE view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Column of the goddess in Lille, France (NW view of the statue).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maubeuge Hotel de ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 11:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Velvet,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tonnerre fosse dionne pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting and good --Poco a poco 12:21, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Pierre church in Sennevoy-le-Bas, France (SE view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Jean-Baptiste church in Chaource, France (NW view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noyers mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction (on the left).--XRay 17:28, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Done Slight correction. Is this better ? --Velvet 21:53, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 16:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Sylvestre church in Tanlay, France (Facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notre-Dame Basilica in Dadizele, Belgium (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement edit

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue gd place.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 23:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open! edit

⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry of Béthune, France (SE view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hydraulic lift bridge of Tourcoing, France (South view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:Paris musee immigration.jpg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Paris musee immigration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rybec (talk) 05:15, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Paris musee immigration.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris musee immigration.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hospice gantois trois quarts N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --AntanO 09:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris invalides dome face 4 Rbis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 09:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ambleteuse dunes slack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 01:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wimereux estuaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Please don't remove exif data. --Iifar 09:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Whitfield Des Rousseaux Apotre.JPG edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Whitfield Des Rousseaux Apotre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

176.35.177.83 15:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Whitfield Des Rousseaux Apotre.JPG edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Whitfield Des Rousseaux Apotre.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Whitfa (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maastricht notre dame massif occidental.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:11, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Picture of the Year 2013 Results edit

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Velvet,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Léger Church in Lens, France (SW view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry of Gravelines, France (SW view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Quesnoy-sur-Deûle, France, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix piscine 1 bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Andrew's Church, Moretonhampstead, Devon (SW view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Tour du Guet in Calais, France (NE view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dartmoor pano 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calais eglise notre dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Louis Church in Sète, France (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeneuve avignon chartreuse pavillon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 01:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris musée Gustave-Moreau, 19 mai 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance of Fort Saint-André in Villeneuve-lès-Avignon, France (SW view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris invalides cathedrale int.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Ok --Cccefalon 06:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of cathédrale Saint-Louis-des-Invalides, Paris (nave).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Éloi Church in Dunkerque (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malo maison blockhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Lmbuga 00:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matera maisons sassi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morano Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giovanni Battista church in Matera, Italy (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cologne cathedrale vue sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lecce amphi romano pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Chiara Church in Lecce (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Missing Email Contact / N'oubliez pas de saisir votre adresse de courriel edit

Madame, monsieur,

merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Monuments 2014. Il semblerait que vous n'ayez pas saisi votre adresse de courriel dans les préférences de votre compte utilisateurs Wikimedia Commons. Cette adresse est nécessaire afin que nous puissions vous contacter en cas de victoire de l'une de vos images. Vous pouvez la saisir dans vos préférences > options de courriel. Bonne fin de concours.

Hello, it seems you haven't entered your email address in vos préférences. This address is needed so that we can contact you if any of your picture is selected as a winner of the competition. Have fun with the competition.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie edit

Hallo Velvet,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.

Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.

WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

File:Wambrechies liniere.JPG edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wambrechies liniere.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostende front de mer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 12:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blockhaus d'Éperlecques, France (SW view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Invitation to the prize giving ceremony of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Velvet,

You took part in the photo contest Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 in Belgium and Luxembourg. In the past weeks, the jury has judged the photos and has came to their conclusion. Out of the more than 2500 uploaded photos, the ten best photos have been selected. The uploaders of these ten photos will receive a prize at 26 November 2014. We also give away some extra prizes.

The prize giving ceremony will take place on 26 November 2014 at the Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage in Brussels and starts at 19:00. The doors will open at 18:30. Afterwards the host of the venue will offer us a snack and a drink and we have the opportunity to talk with each other.

More information can be found at our website and on the wiki of Wikimedia Belgium:

Please inform us before 26 November if you will be there.

See you at the prize ceremony!

On behalf of the team of Wiki Loves Monuments in Belgium and Luxembourg, Romaine (talk) 02:49, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colombier eglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Laurent Church in Arnay-le-Duc, France (Front view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinidad vue centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris mairie XIX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Charlesjsharp 10:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catedral de la Virgen María de la Concepción Inmaculada of Havana, Cuba (Facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palacio Ferrer, Parque Marti in Cienfuegos, Cuba (East view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vinales vue mogotes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA galerie ceramiques bis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 00:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons vue depuis terril 1 bis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Rather interesting composition. --Crisco 1492 03:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La havane plaza vieja.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Please see my notes.--XRay 11:55, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
  Comment New version uploaded : sky cropped et shade removed but I am afraid I cannot give more space on the right--Velvet 19:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
  Support It's much better and IMO OK for QI now. The space at the right is only a minor problem.--XRay 06:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Au sujet de la photo : Plateau Californie Kern.JPG edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour Velvet

Au sujet de cette photo : Plateau Californie Kern.JPG, je me suis posé la question quant à savoir si la diffusion de la photo de cette sculpture ne posait pas un problème de droit d'auteur dans Commons. Apparrement oui. Mais je voulais avoir votre avis avant de lancer la demande de suppression. Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 15:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Plateau Californie Kern.JPG edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Plateau Californie Kern.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Poudou99 (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notre-Dame à la Rose hospital in Lessines, Belgium (NW view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Pont des boulangers edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour Velvet, es-tu sûr que cette Photo montre le pont des boulangers? Je dirais cet plutôt celui la. Le tien est le pont du Perthuis-au-Loup ;0]. --Хрюша ^?? 13:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC) (ami de ponts)Reply

En effet, il semble bien que ce soit le pont du Perthuis-au-Loup si j'en crois les autres photos de la catégorie. A vrai dire, j'étais simplement de passage à Chatillon et j'ai dû me tromper en notant le nom.--Velvet (talk) 22:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen edit

Hallo Velvet,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cahors vue pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good work! --Hubertl 15:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Abbatiale Sainte-Foy in Conques, Aveyron, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:Croix villa cavrois ar.JPG edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

File:Croix villa cavrois ar.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Trizek ^{from FR} 22:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

J'ajoute que ça me fait aussi mal au cœur qu'au cul, sachant que la photo sera restaurée au 1er janvier prochain... :( Trizek ^{from FR} 22:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille PdBA gauthier cleopatre 2.JPG edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lille PdBA gauthier cleopatre 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 18:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 edit

Beste deelnemer,

Bedankt voor het insturen van jouw foto’s van cultureel erfgoed in het kader van Wiki Loves Monuments 2015. Een professionele jury kiest straks uit alle inzendingen de beste foto’s in drie categorieën: beste foto van een monument, beste foto van een ornament en beste foto van een Dudok monument. Daarnaast is er ook een speciaal klassement voor de inzenders van de meeste foto’s van unieke monumenten. Wil jij ook kans maken op één van de vele prijzen, beschikbaar gesteld door onze partners en sponsoren? Vergeet dan niet om op Wikimedia Commons, onder voorkeuren (rechts bovenin, naast je gebruikersnaam) het vinkje bij e-mail van andere gebruikers toestaan (onder het kopje e-mail in het gebruikersprofiel), aan te vinken. Alleen deelnemers met een e-mailadres maken kans op prijzen. Benieuwd welke prijzen je allemaal kunt winnen? Kijk dan op http://www.wikimedia.nl/projectpagina/prijzenoverzicht

Groeten,

De Wiki Loves Monuments werkgroep 2015 13:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:ND treille face ensoleillee.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:ND treille face ensoleillee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Trizek ^{from FR} 10:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille PdBA bonnard le cannet.JPG edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lille PdBA bonnard le cannet.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.204.209.237 17:40, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille St maurice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lisbonne covento do carmo int.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Fernando Pessoa in Jerónimos Monastery in Belém, Portugal..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Henin beaumont eglise st martin.JPG

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour Velvet,

En 2014, vous avez participé au concours photo Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. Nous organisons aussi ce concours de photo en 2016.

Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments en Belgique & Luxembourg
Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments (international, autres pays)

Nous organisons aussi 4 balades photo à Gand, Malines, Anvers et Liège. Visite : http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/fr&setlang=fr

Soyez les bienvenus ! Romaine 18:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Carolus duran l'homme endormi pdba lille.JPG edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

J'ai annulé ton intervention sur cette image car il existe deja une version de meilleur qualité et sans cadre. a+ ;-) --Chatsam (talk) 08:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Paestum_tombeau_plongeur, Aix_dom_int_vue_cote and Aix_dom_int_vue_cote edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Velvet, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your images from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paestum_tombeau_plongeur_c1.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aix_dom_int_vue_cote.jpg AND https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aix_dom_int_vue_cote_int.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 14:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 14:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen! edit

Beste Velvet,

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is vorige week begonnen! Aan deze fotowedstrijd nemen dit jaar 54 landen deel, waaronder bijvoorbeeld Nederland, Groot Brittannië, Thailand, Rusland, Oekraïne, maar ook de eilanden Aruba, Bonaire, Curaçao, Saba, Sint Eustatius en Sint Maarten in de Nederlandse Caribean. Je wordt dus van harte uitgenodigd om te kijken tussen de deelnemende landen of jouw vakantieland er ook bij zit dit jaar en je foto's uit die landen ook te delen!

Net als voorgaande jaren hebben we prijzen voor de mooiste foto en de meeste foto's en een keus gemaakt voor een speciale categorie. Heb jij een foto gemaakt van een monument waarvan voor 1 september 2017 nog geen afbeelding op Wikimedia Commons bestond? Dan doet de afbeelding mee in de speciale categorie! Heeft een monument nog geen foto in de monumentenlijst op Wikipedia, dan is het aannemelijk dat we er nog geen foto van hadden. Om het zoeken naar monumenten zonder afbeelding wat makkelijker te maken, kun je op Wikipedia lijsten en een kaart van Nederland vinden.

Tot slot nodigen we je nog van harte uit om volgende week met ons op pad te gaan. Op zaterdag 16 september wandelen we tijdens een Wiki Takes rond in Hoorn: op zondag 17 september doen we hetzelfde in Leiden. Onder ervaren gidsen wandelen we langs monumenten in de stad en nemen we ruimschoots de tijd om de monumenten goed op de foto te zetten. Aanmelden verplicht en plaatsen gelimiteerd!
Tot en met 30 september heb je de tijd om je foto's up te loaden: de top 10 gaat door naar de internationale wedstrijd, waar de hoofdprijs de nieuwste Canon EOS 5D camera is!

Veel succes gewenst,
het Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments team 17:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:La defense cnit int.jpg

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strepy thieu ascenseur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lima cathédrale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bilbiothèque municipale de Lille edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Salut à toi,

Je me demandais, avons-nous le droit de librement ré-uploader les fichiers de la BM de Lille sur Commons ? Bien à toi, Dldwg (talk) 13:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille Plan fort st sauveur.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lille Plan fort st sauveur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dldwg (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille Plan fort st sauveur.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lille Plan fort st sauveur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dldwg (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lille lyderic et phinaert.JPG

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Concorso Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018 (English version)

Gentile Velvet, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Rouen eglise jeanne d'arc int 1.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 13:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

	The Original Barnstar
	Bravo pour votre image "Vue ouest de Lille depuis le beffroi de l'hôtel de ville". Je recherche exactement le même plan pour un film pour le cinéma, pouvons nous utiliser votre photographie dans le film ? A quelles conditions ? Merci ! Elo524 (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pas de problème, vous pouvez l'utiliser à votre guise --Velvet (talk) 09:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot Velvet ! Could you please get back to me on that adress : elodie.soulie@imediate.fr in order I give you details about the utilization. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.215.169.8 (talk) 14:41, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merci beaucoup Velvet. J'aimerais pouvoir vous donner tous les détails d'utilisation, et peut être contractualiser avec vous afin que les choses soient faites parfaitement pour nos dossiers. Pourriez vous revenir vers moi à cette adresse elodie.soulie@imediate.fr , ou si vous le préférez m'indiquer votre email. Merci beaucoup. Elodie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elo524 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica and Convent of San Francisco in Lima, Peru..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:Roubaix piscine burthe arethuse et alphee.JPG edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello! Since File:Roubaix piscine burthe arethuse et alphee.JPG is a photograph and includes the frame in the photo, that part isn't covered by {{PD-Art}}. Would you be so kind to add a license tag to the photograph (such as {{Cc0}}), or help crop out the frame. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Jonatan Svensson Glad, it's done.--Velvet (talk) 16:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Carte IGN environs Lille 2019.png edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Carte IGN environs Lille 2019.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No permission.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 14:04, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso! edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

English | Italiano | +/−

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calais hotel de ville face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019 edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Image Permission edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Velvet,
I wrote to you before on 11 May 2017 but I couldn't get reply and I would like to repeat my mail.

I am currently redacting my compiled course notes into a book named "History of Interior Design and Furniture” which will be in turkish language and will be distributed in Turkey. It is a cultural and educational reference book. I would like to use your image which belongs to your copyrights and I reach from the link below,
https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Belem_Igreja_de_Santa_Maria_int.jpg
I will appreciate if you let me know your terms and conditions for the image's usage permission. Your name will be indicated at the end of the book in the photo credits part. And how do you prefer to use your name in the credits part?

Yours Sincerely
Prof. Arch. Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com
--Mustidede (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mustidede, no problem, you can reuse the picture as you like, for commercial or non commercial use. I'm glad one of my pictures did draw your attention. Sincerely --Velvet (talk) 17:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dear Velvet,
Thank you very much for the image permission.
Sincerely,
Mustafa
--Mustidede (talk) 08:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic