Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CH.SZ.Stoos Fronalpstock Sequence Rescue-Helicopter REGA 16K 16x9-R.jpg

File:CH.SZ.Stoos Fronalpstock Sequence Rescue-Helicopter REGA 16K 16x9-R.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2021 at 10:27:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Helicopters
Info created & uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 10:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wonder how this was done at this high resolution --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably done in two stages. First a series of shots centering on and tracking the helicopter. After it's gone, you do a normal panorama and merge it all. --Cart (talk) 11:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wohohow. Great job. 150MPix with a 21 MPix camera. Made of 207 images. Original size: 32800x20500. wow. -- -donald- (talk) 12:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey -donald-, where did you find those facts/numbers? It would be great to add them to the photo, just needs to be verified. --Cart (talk) 13:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They are in the exif. -- -donald- (talk) 05:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added it. -- -donald- (talk) 08:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! It would be nice if the dustspots would be removed from the sky, but such trivial details do not spoil the big Wow. --Aristeas (talk) 14:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! And including an M. C. Escher-effect with an impossible perspective (See note). --Llez (talk) 14:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great picture, indeed, but I would like the dust spots, or at least most of them, to be removed before we feature it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, great shot --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Co mmon ists 19:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 17:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support cool and unusual. I see some weird blurry patches in the foreground triangle of snow in the bottom right corner (stitching error?) but the merits of this photo more than make up for it. Buidhe (talk) 23:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 19:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool! --Mosbatho (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nosferattus (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:33, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 15:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Helicopters