Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Don Quijote de la Mancha en el Teatro Teresa Carreño, Caracas, Venezuela 3.jpg

< Commons:Featured picture candidates
edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2017 at 11:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
@Ikan Kekek: I was trying to force the rule of thirds and I did not realize I was making a cut background, now it is fixed. BTW, I tried remove the bizzard noise or dust on the lens, please, let me know what do you think --The Photographer 12:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support - There are still a few tiny white spots here and there, but this version is a really harmonious picture with what I consider a great composition, and I give it my strong support for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Please sir, could you add a note to remove the white spots? I almost blind myself trying to eliminate it --The Photographer 12:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I gave it a try. They're really tiny. The area on the left probably extends down a little; the area on the right, probably a bit further to the right. I don't think it's crucial for you to zap them all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help, I think that now is better. I know that it's not crucial, however, i love a perfect image. Thanks for the review --The Photographer 13:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. If you want to be really perfect, I see 6 really tiny specks above the soloist's hands, forming a triangle above her left (viewer's right) hand and a much flatter one starting above her right (viewer's left) index finger. I think you zapped all the rest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, now it look "perfect" :). I remember that this shoot was in really poor light conditions maybe that is dust in the aire creating a reflex with the light, I don't remember (Or simply censor camera noise) --The Photographer 13:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
citing @Fæ: In Venezuela the show producer's rights for reproduction of the performance in photographs or recordings works in a similar way to most other countries (such as the US or UK), going by the explanation given in Chapter II (Performance Contract) in the Law on Copyright, 1993.[1] The costume and stage design rights are reasonably assumed under the show production rights, it is these that would need validation. A release providing evidence of this via OTRS, or a statement about this performance elsewhere (i.e. an official event website which explained how photography is allowed at the event) would be sufficient. And BTW, you can see the author @Laura Fiorucci: (Admin on wp-es) commenting here --The Photographer 16:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I knew we'd gone over this with respect to Venezuela before. Thanks. Daniel Case (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, @The Photographer: Sí, la obra es mía, fue estrenada en el Teatro Teresa Carreño en 2013 y puesta de nuevo en 2016. Agradezco a The Photographer las hermosas fotos que hizo de mi obra. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
De la misma manera muy orgulloso de haber sido invitado a tan majestuosa e impecable obra y haber conocido a tan humilde, talentosa e inteligente mujer! --The Photographer 22:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support --XRay talk 18:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment Very good but I compare with your first upload and there's a loss of detail to the main dancer. The highlights are lost on her dress front -- you could see sequins shining against the cream colour, now it is all bright. Also, to incorporate all of the left dancer, I suspect you've been a bit creative with Photoshop and the dancer's friend has lent a hand! It's well done, but should be documented on the File Description page. I'm puzzled about Ikan's complaint about white spots. In the previous versions I can only see them if I turn up the brightness/gamma in my image program -- they are barely visible let alone troublesome normally. I wonder Ikan if you have your monitor adjusted properly and displaying blacks as black rather than dark grey. While these dots are visible also in the earlier noisier versions of the file, they are hidden among the noise. It certainly isn't dust on the sensor (which appears as large semi-transparent blobs) or the lens (which is effectively invisible as it is totally out-of-focus). If it isn't just also image noise that escaped your NR software, then it may just be dust in the air lit up by the stage lights, and in that case, part of the scene. -- Colin (talk) 19:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  Done Colin Nice review like always, I restored dress details. About the white dusts, I don't remember any special effect or light effect in the presentation. Please, Colin, let me know if this change is ok for you or if I need do something. I added retouch template information (I forgot it, however, I docummented each change in the history less the hand cloning) Thanks --The Photographer 21:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  Support now. Your local brushwork to darken her dress is a little crude but only at pixel peeping magnification (it spills a tiny bit onto her chest). -- Colin (talk) 21:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Colin: Maybe now it is done, also I fixed severals micro pixelation and sharpening problems in her face, I added another tone level. Please, let me know what do you think --The Photographer 21:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good. -- Colin (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Colin, the front of the stage (below and in front of the surface on which the ballerinas are dancing) sure looks black to me, as does this type, so I'm clearly able to perceive black on my screen. Just thought I'd address that, for what it's worth. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support Muy hermosa foto, @The Photographer: , justo en el momento donde la bailarina está en quinta antes de seguir con la variación... es un momento tan corto... El light effect puede ser que es una escena muy oscura y atrás están los molinos iluminados tenuemente ¿será eso?. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 22:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Es mas como una especie de microbolitas o lentejuelas volando. Eso formó parte de la escena?, yo no me acuerdo. --The Photographer 22:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Es posible que sean restos de alguna producción anterior que hayan quedado atrapadas en el puente 2 de luces. Muchas veces caen las de El Cascanueces, que son como cuadraditos plateados de 2x2 cm muy brillantes. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 22:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Es muy probable que haya sido eso, justo en ese momento bajaron, la incognita comienza a resolverse --The Photographer 22:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 21:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events_.28Arts.2C_concerts.2C_shows....29
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Don_Quijote_de_la_Mancha_en_el_Teatro_Teresa_Carreño,_Caracas,_Venezuela_3.jpg&oldid=229427358"