User:Cephas/Archives 2012-2018
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Simon! I love your bird photos - I'm a hobbyist birder, actually, so they are even more meaningful. Thank you for sharing them with the world, and congratulations on creating such spectacular quality and featured images. SarahStierch (talk) 00:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sergey Lapushkin Stoneham 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion edit
| |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Sergey Lapushkin Stoneham 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sergey Lapushkin Stoneham 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Picoides pubescens f CT3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion edit
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Picoides pubescens f CTB.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Picoides pubescens f CT3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Charadrius vociferus CT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dryocopus pileatus MP2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Setophaga coronata MP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion edit
| |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Dryocopus pileatus MP2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dryocopus pileatus MP2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Empidonax minimus CT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion edit
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Melospiza georgiana MN1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Melospiza georgiana MN1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
FP Promotion edit
| |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Setophaga coronata MP.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Setophaga coronata MP.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porzana carolina CT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gallinula chloropus MP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
User:Cephas/Archives 2009-20011 edit
Bonjour, je pense qu'il doit y avoir une erreur car tu as mis cette page parmis les galleries. Ne voulais tu pas plutôt la mettre en sous-page utilisateur ? Otourly (talk) 09:41, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- User:Cephas/Archives 2009-20011 J'ai renommé la page. Otourly (talk) 09:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pinus sylvestris penjing JB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phlox divaricata JB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Test edit
FP Promotion edit
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Cistothorus palustris CT2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cistothorus palustris CT2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lithobates catesbeianus PP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tyrannus tyrannus PP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vulpes vulpes PO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canis lupus PO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canis lupus arctos PO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tyrannus tyrannus CT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bombycilla cedrorum juvenile CT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your recently uploaded videos edit
Hi Cephas, thank you for sharing your nice videos. For categorization please use also the video related subcategories of Category:Videos of Chordata and Category:Videos by country. On higher taxonomic levels it helps to find useful videos for wikipedia. Regards, --Pristurus (talk) 10:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion edit
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tyrannus tyrannus.ogv, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Salut Cephas, Ça doit faire drôle de savoir son travail visionné par des millions de gens. Bravo. --Lusilier (talk) 01:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rivière Manitou - chute.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rivière-au-Tonnerre embouchure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monolith Quarry.jpg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monolith Quarry 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monolith Quarry.jpg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kitesurfing Natashquan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quarry island Mingan 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krummholz Quarry island Mingan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Juniperus communis Quarry island Mingan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calidris pusilla Quarry 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Balaenoptera acutorostrata Saint-Laurent 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rivière du Sault Plat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île du Père-Conan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rivière Pontbriand 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rivière Aguanish 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Île-Michon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Côte rocheuse Aguanish.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Galets de Natashquan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rivière Matamec 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
| |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Galets de Natashquan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Natashquan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sépulture Pointe-Parent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Quality Image Promotion edit
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Strix nebulosa CT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement edit
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement edit
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open! edit
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archives 2012-2018⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement edit
Picture of the Year 2013 Results edit
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Cephas,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Alces alces NA.svg edit
 |
File:Alces alces NA.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
File:Phaethornis longirostris map.svg edit
I think the map you uploaded was updated by Neotropical Birds Online--84.158.98.220 11:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
POTD notification edit
Hi Cephas,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Setophaga coronata MP.jpg is due to make an appearance as the English Wikipedia's Picture of the Day on August 9, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at en:Template:POTD/2014-08-09. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Nouveau modèle utilisateur edit
Salut.
J'ai créé un nouveau modèle utilisateur : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2
Je l'ai utilisé sur ma page utilisateur.
Cordialement. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion edit
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Crotophaga sulcirostris CR bis.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crotophaga sulcirostris CR bis.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Category names edit
Why are you complicating category names when not necessary? For instance, you added "(Abitibi-Témiscamingue)" to the unique category name of Category:Lac Kipawa, and "(Nord-du-Québec)" to the unique category name of Category:Lac Mistassini. This is an unnecessary disambiguation. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:08, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello P199 I'm adding a precision for categories when more than one lake of that name exist in the province. For example, There are 14 different "Lac Deschênes" in Quebec. I'm using the "Commission de Toponymie du Québec" website to do this (http://www.toponymie.gouv.qc.ca/ct/). --Cephas (talk) 14:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I thought so. But that is still unnecessary if there are no photos of these other lakes. Disambiguation should only be added if it is needed. If photos are uploaded of the other lakes, then it should be disambiguated. But, it is very unlikely we will ever get photos of all the other lakes. For instance, the other 2 Mistassini Lakes are both small obscure lakes in remote wilderness. And even if we did, the largest natural lake would be primary topic. (BTW, no need to answer on my talk page, I'll watch this conversation, or just use {{Ping}}). Regards, --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion edit
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Myioborus torquatus Santa Elena.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Myioborus torquatus Santa Elena.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Map Request edit
I noticed that you created the map for the article on English Wikipedia. Is it possible for you to create a 2nd map that shows it ZOOMED in on the state of Kansas. The current map is a great high level over view, but a 2nd ZOOM map would be helpful. Thanks in advance. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 01:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Commons:WikiProject Sports edit
Hello, Cephas! You're welcome to join the Commons WikiProject Sports. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 00:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion edit
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Elite Residential Area Ottawa Lamanai 10.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elite Residential Area Ottawa Lamanai 10.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
FP Promotion edit
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Pelecanus occidentalis Caye Caulker 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pelecanus occidentalis Caye Caulker 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Category:Rhodopis edit
|
Rhodopis has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Hi Cephas! I've been through your work here and I have to say your contribution to Wikimedia Commons and free knowledge in general is spectacular. You're a big inspiration of mine, thanks! Podzemnik (talk) 01:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC) |
Category:Grande_rivière_Noire edit
|
|
Grande rivière Noire has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Laurianna2 (talk) 06:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer edit
Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
edit
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Nature pictures edit
Dear Cephas, I`m living here in Québec city and I was thinking that maybe we could do a photowalk. Btw, I speak french --The Photographer 01:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 |
New Aim, New Dreams, New Achievements Everything Waiting for You. Forget The Failures. Correct Your Mistakes. Surely Success is yours. Happy NEW YEAR 2018. . --The Photographer 14:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC) |
Your picture in Medellín (Colombia) edit
Do you know a picture of yours is shown at Parque Arví, Medellín Colombia? It is just with source, not author. Nice picture! See here https: //photos.app.goo.gl/ 9iseDZDsVTADHneR2 (copy without spaces the URL). DPC (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Update request edit
Hello.
If you have the time, can you update these maps you uploaded, over an extended period, because South Sudan is missing in these maps (and include South Sudan and also Montenegro in future uploads)?
I am adding South Sudan (as well as Montenegro and other possible missing updates) in the PNG maps in Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries and then remove this category after updating them. There were close to 1100 maps since I started to update these files on 1 March 2018, now it is reduced to less than 670 maps, but there is a long way to go.
Unfortunately I don't know how to edit SVG maps myself, that is why I asked you.
Here is the list the maps you uploaded where South Sudan is missing:
File:Hylochoerus meinertzhageni map.svg
File:Connochaetes taurinus map.svg
File:Tragelaphus eurycerus map.svg
File:Tragelaphus buxtoni map.svg
File:Tragelaphus larkenii map.svg
File:Tragelaphus selousi map.svg
File:Tragelaphus gratus map.svg
File:Tragelaphus spekii map.svg
File:Tragelaphus sylvaticus map.svg
File:Tragelaphus ornatus map.svg
File:Tragelaphus fasciatus map.svg
File:Tragelaphus meneliki map.svg
File:Tragelaphus decula map.svg
File:Tragelaphus bor map.svg
File:Tragelaphus phaleratus map.svg
File:Tragelaphus scriptus map.svg
File:Tigriornis leucolopha map.svg
File:Potamochoerus larvatus map.svg
File:Phacochoerus aethiopicus map.svg
File:Loxodonta cyclotis map.svg
File:Connochaetes gnou map.svg
File:Phalacrocorax lucidus map.svg
File:Phalacrocorax neglectus map.svg
File:Phalacrocorax fuscicollis map.svg
File:Phalacrocorax pelagicus map.svg
File:Cygnus olor map.svg
File:Ardea melanocephala map.svg
File:Ardea humbloti map.svg
File:Botaurus stellaris map.svg
File:Ixobrychus sinensis map.svg
File:Ixobrychus minutus map2.svg
File:Dupetor flavicollis map.svg
File:Ixobrychus sturmii map.svg
File:Ixobrychus eurhythmus map.svg
File:Ixobrychus cinnamomeus map.svg
File:Gorsachius magnificus map.svg
File:Gorsachius goisagi map.svg
File:Gorsachius leuconotus map.svg
File:Gorsachius melanolophus map.svg
File:Nycticorax nycticorax map.svg
File:Butorides striata map.svg
File:Bubulcus coromandus map.svg
File:Bubulcus ibis map.svg
File:Bubulcus map.svg
File:Ardeola grayii map.svg
File:Ardeola ralloides map.svg
File:Ardeola bacchus map.svg
File:Ardeola speciosa map.svg
File:Ardeola idae map.svg
File:Ardeola rufiventris map.svg
File:Ardea intermedia map.svg
File:Ardea insignis map.svg
File:Ardea goliath map.svg
File:Ardea purpurea map.svg
File:Ardea alba map.svg
File:Buphagus africanus map.svg
File:Buphagus erythrorhynchus map.svg
File:Otocolobus manul map.svg
File:Felis margarita map.svg
File:Felis bieti map.svg
File:Prionailurus viverrinus map.svg
File:Prionailurus planiceps map.svg
File:Egretta garzetta map.svg
File:Egretta eulophotes map.svg
File:Egretta vinaceigula map.svg
File:Egretta ardesiaca map.svg
File:Geococcyx Velox Map.svg
File:Dendroica caerulescens map.svg
Kindest regards.
Maphobbyist (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- Can you update these files, when you have the time, over a very extended period? Thank you. Maphobbyist (talk) 23:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Rene Richard Marine.jpg edit
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Rene Richard Marine.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rene Richard Marine.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:René Richard Homme assis sur un traineau.jpg edit
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:René Richard Homme assis sur un traineau.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:René Richard Homme assis sur un traineau.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
- File:René Richard etude.jpg
- File:René Richard croquis 01.jpg
- File:René Richard croquis 02.jpg
- File:René Richard Draveurs 1975.jpg
- File:Rene Richard Draveurs 1978.jpg
- File:Rene Richard Campement.jpg
- File:Rene Richard Bivouac.jpg
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)