Саня Новиков

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Саня Новиков!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Вики любит памятники 2015

noframe

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

• File:Костомаровский Спасский монастырь - 1.jpg
• File:Костомаровский Спасский монастырь - 2.jpg
• File:Успенский Горицкий монастырь - 2.jpg
• File:Церковь Сицилийской иконы Божией Матери - 2.jpg
• File:Церковь пещерная Иоанна Предтечи - 1.jpg

оказались среди 1083 из почти 24 тысяч загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошли в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью об объекте культурного наследия, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и культурному наследию!

Организаторы российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015

Мосты

Здравствуйте, Саня, я откатил несколько десятков ваших правок: не следует добавлять к файлам категорию "железнодорожные мосты", если они уже находятся в категории какого-либо из железнодорожных мостов (например Category:Yaroslavl railway bridge) см. COM:OVERCAT. Надеюсь, вы не обидитесь, в остальном ваш вклад полезен и качествен :) --A.Savin 01:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Да, действительно, не до конца разобрался с деревом категорий. Дико извиняюсь за доставленные неудобства. Саня Новиков (talk) 08:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Утки на Набережной - 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Утки на Набережной - 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Утки на Набережной - 2.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Именование некоторых статей

Здравствуйте! Поскольку вы создали в русской Википедии статью о географическом объекте с укороченным названием Чистоозёрное (озеро, Тамбовская область), приглашаю вас ознакомиться с материалами по теме топонимов-прилагательных, собранными вот здесь.

Верю, что вы хотите сделать Википедию лучше и при этом не навредить русскому языку. Ознакомившись с источниками по ссылке, вы убедитесь, что ваша статья «Чистоозёрное (озеро, Тамбовская область)» на литературном русском языке должна называться «Чистоозёрное озеро (Тамбовская область)» либо «Чистое озеро (Тамбовская область)». В подобных случаях усечённые названия статей об озёрах и других физико-географических объектах противоречат главными принципам именования статей: узнаваемость, естественность, точность (см. правила именования статей).

Почему нельзя выбрасывать слово «озеро», «бухта» или «гора» из словосочетаний с названиями-прилагательными? Ответ простой: потому что в таких названиях существует прочная синтаксическая связь между словами, так устроена русская речь (и не только русская).

Названия объектов на географических картах и в табличных списках не являются связным текстом, поэтому такие источники не годятся для обоснования отбрасывания нарицательных определяемых слов при топонимах-прилагательных. Посмотрите для примера, как называются статьи о заливах и бухтах в Крыму. А вот названия энциклопедических статей об озёрах в «Большой российской энциклопедии»:

• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/1854478
• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/4186396
• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/4181116
• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/3528565
• http://bre.mkrf.ru/geography/text/1877063

Спасибо. Всего доброго. — 2A00:1370:810C:9747:A1FE:F585:3AB2:7003 23:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railway Bridge in Rasskazovo - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Rasskazovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot-air balloon - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenin in Rasskazovo - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments How old is the statue? --C messier 21:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC) @C messier: This is a typical soviet sculpture of Vladimir Lenin, but I haven't any ideas about author and creation date. Alexander Novikov 14:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Panteleimon the Healer - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Adoscam 22:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berezka-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 22:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pokrovo-Prigorodnoe-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 22:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Squirrel in Friendship Park - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! USSR street sign - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! USSR shop sign - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --UnpetitproleX 19:56, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a bit soft in the background (more contrast might have been better) --Michielverbeek 09:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Xopolino 19:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Xopolino 19:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 08:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Summary/Description in these 5 images could be more specific and descriptive, mentioning what each image depicts. --Tagooty 03:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)  Done More specific description added. Alexander Novikov 06:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --aismallard 23:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dagestan-015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dagestan-015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amusement Park in Tambov - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amusement Park in Tambov - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amusement Park in Tambov - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:48, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 08:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roofs of Tambov - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice framing and background. Neck could be a bit sharper, but good quality overall. If the pigeon had been superbly sharp all over and the photo were perhaps 2.5 times as big in resolution with the same composition, it could have been an FP. -- Ikan Kekek 10:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residential building on Komsomolskaya Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 09:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --KartikiGonsalves 02:56, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the most beautiful building, but quality is good --Michielverbeek 19:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staraya Titovka - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staraya Titovka - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staraya Titovka - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ximonic 22:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Weak support. IMO noise reduction could be better. --XRay 13:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicherin Estate - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Здание губернской земской управы - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration Cathedral - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration Cathedral - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 12:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration Cathedral - 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Terragio67 03:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechenga Monastery in Luostari - 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:31, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lermontov Square in Tambov - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A red-linked Category should be corrected. --Tagooty 16:14, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Done Thank you for review, red link corrected. Alexander Novikov 21:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aseev Estate - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A red-linked Category should be corrected. --Tagooty 16:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Done Thank you for review, red link corrected. Alexander Novikov 21:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 21:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration Cathedral - 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)  Comment Very nice capture. There seems to be a very small dust spot to the right of the second level of the tower. -- Ikan Kekek 02:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Thank you, I fixed it. Alexander Novikov 09:11, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dagestan-055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 16:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murmansk-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for me, but focus might have been a bit more to the left --Michielverbeek 22:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:36, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Glory - 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, although I think it should say 'goal' rather than 'gate'? --BigDom 15:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC) I fixed it, thank you :-) Alexander Novikov 18:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:37, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Nikel-060.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikel-072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:13, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Transfiguration Cathedral FP nomination

Hello Alexander,

with my remarks about the chromatic aberrations (CAs) I did not want to spoil your nomination. CAs can be removed from photos; it’s easier when you have got a raw image file (in your case, a CR2 or CR2 file), but it is also possible when you have taken the photograph in JPEG format. Your photo of the Transfiguration Cathedral is good, it certainly deserves the additional work to remove (or at least reduce) the CAs. If you need help with editing the photo, just ask, I am sure that somebody can help you (I would do it myself, but I am quite busy right now).

Best regards, --Aristeas (talk) 10:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Саня Новиков,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaula-Kotselvaara-Mine-034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaula-Kotselvaara-Mine-037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaula-Kotselvaara-Mine-041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaula-Kotselvaara-Mine-030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot-air balloon in Tambov - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot-air balloon in Tambov - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolskaya-sverhglubokaya-021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 04:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolskaya-sverhglubokaya-025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 08:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolskaya-sverhglubokaya-026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolskaya-sverhglubokaya-018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chegem-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 12:20, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chegem-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chegem-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Good composition. The sign at the right is a little bit disturbing. Otherwise may be a FPC. --XRay 11:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC) @XRay: Thank you for review. I cropped the sign and will try FPC nomination. Alexander Novikov 12:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC)  Comment Please denoise the left side of the sky before you nominate. Chegem-002.jpg looks like better quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 03:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Thank you, done. Alexander Novikov 07:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chegem-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot-air balloon in Tambov - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaula-Kotselvaara-Mine-042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaula-Kotselvaara-Mine-036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Дух времени.jpg

File:Дух времени.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 00:06, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Здание губернской земской управы - 4.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 14:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sculpture in Kotovsk - 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Sculpture in Kotovsk - 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 19:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2023 - June - tents/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Chegem-001.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge tents, in June 2023. You can find the results of the challenge here.

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Chegem-002.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge tents, in June 2023. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 05:54, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Лоси на Рассказовском шоссе.jpg

File:Лоси на Рассказовском шоссе.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Nikel-060.jpg

File:Nikel-060.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza-Hutor-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mushrooms of Tambov Oblast - 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot-air balloon in Tambov - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 15:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza-Hutor-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 17:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza-Hutor-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza-Hutor-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza-Hutor-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza-Hutor-012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good one. --PetarM 20:51, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza-Hutor-009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza-Hutor-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support On the noisy side but still ok. --MB-one 17:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza-Hutor-010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments slightly tilted CW, otherwise good --MB-one 11:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC) @MB-one: New version uploaded. Alexander Novikov 11:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:WLM/6830573000

WLM/6830573000 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jmabel ! talk 22:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:WLM/6830575000

WLM/6830575000 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jmabel ! talk 22:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:WLM/6831165000

Category:WLM/6831165000 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Prototyperspective (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mushrooms of Tambov Oblast - 001.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mushrooms of Tambov Oblast - 001.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hot-air balloon in Tambov - 02.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hot-air balloon in Tambov - 02.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 06:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some tilt (look at the water level on the right) --Poco a poco 18:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)  Done Alexander Novikov 09:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 11:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 23:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted --Poco a poco 18:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Thank you, rotated. Alexander Novikov 07:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zhigansk-024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

File:House of Saint Luke - 001.jpg

File:House of Saint Luke - 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Monument of Saint Luke - 001.jpg

File:Monument of Saint Luke - 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)