User talk:1Veertje

Notice Please be aware that the only reason I'm at the top of the list of administrators is because the list is ordered alphabetically.
Please consider the Help Desk first

TUSC token 785b80298ff6e11d5ffcda0270158badEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Christmas cardEdit

Hi Vera, I just noticed there's something wrong with User:1Veertje/xmas2012. It says "no fallback page found for autotranslate" rather than showing the image. I hope there's a quick fix for this problem. Take care. INeverCry 23:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi INeverCry, yes I'm either bad at implementing multilingual templates, or something changed recently. I was mentioned here recently in relation to the same error message showing up in a template I made for the legend to a large data project Harvard MIT had. Let's see if they've figured out what's up with it. --Vera (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
It's showing again, so someone fixed it. It was ok up until a few weeks ago, so I don't see how you could've been at fault. Someone else had to have changed a component. Now I've got to make one of my own for this year. But I'll procrastinate for atleast few more days... INeverCry 21:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear 1Veertje,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Happy HolidaysEdit

Christmas Belles at Crown - 11366677816.jpg Happy Holidays!
G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


Joyeux Noël !Edit

Hartelijk dank ! vrolijk kerstfeest

--Jebulon (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

2014 !Edit

Christmasornaments.png * * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello Vera! Thank you for your wishes. I also wish you stress-free days and a happy new year! Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 23:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Buildings in MenaldumadeelEdit

Hoi Vera, zou je als je een categorie hernoemt de nieuwe naam bij de verwijdering willen melden? Dat maakt herstellen van links een stuk gemakkelijker. Alvast bedankt, Multichill (talk) 15:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

like this?--Vera (talk) 16:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
En kun je bij het hernoemen dit ook op Wikidata aanpassen (of als het nog ontbreekt: toevoegen). Dank! :-) Romaine (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Had ik al gedaan. --Vera (talk) 16:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 AnnouncementEdit

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Image deletionEdit

Hello,

Do you know how I can delete File:Alcobaca12.JPG , File:Alcobaca11.JPG , File:Alcobaca7.JPG and File:Alcobaca6.JPG ? There are recognizable people from my family.

Best Regards!

Andrevruas (talk) 12:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, as you can see in the {{Welcome}} template, if you want to speedily delete your own files by adding the {{speedy|reason for deletion}} tag. --Vera (talk) 12:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Image deletionEdit

Edit

CC-by

Hoi Vera, tijdens de Kunst & Feminisme edit-a-thon werd er gesproken over de CC logo (het is "mannelijk") en ik dacht misschien is het leuk om het een rokje te geven en roze te kleuren en dat te gebruiken als logo voor een Gendergap project, zowel hier op commons als voor op Wikipedia. Wat denk je? Jane023 (talk) 11:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

copyright violationEdit

Hello, who can inform about copyright infringement uploading photographs on Wikipedia? It is the user who uploaded photos VadimS we belong (eg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/5/5e/20140213103453%21Cetatea_Sorocii.JPG). Please delete these photos and block the user. Regards, Constantin Photographer, Art Style Studio

Hello, can you link to where your studio would have published this photograph? --Vera (talk) 16:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

File:3d lego terracotta army.jpgEdit

Hi Vera, Question regarding File:3d lego terracotta army.jpg I got this message that you marked the above file as a possible copyright violation and also has been deleted. I am the one who made this picture. The artist of this artwork also gave me permission to use the image for wiki and other. Could you please restore the deletion of the image. Or let me know the reason why you think this picture should be deleted? Dufois.

I recognized the picture as one that has been around the internet and back again. You don't have a long history of contributing to Commons, so this raised suspicion. I found this Daily mail article where the exact same picture is credited to Carters News Agency. :News agencies ought to know what copyright is, the lay person contributing to the Wikimedia projects often has a hard time when they start of getting up to speed.
As a side node, the artist doesn't have to give permission for the use of the image since the US has something called Freedom of Panorama, it's the copyright of the photographer that we are concerned with here. I would like to note that we don't accept images that have only been cleared for use within the Wikimedia projects. Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia, meaning that everyone is free to reproduce sections or the whole of the works that we've gathered, with only the condition that the various authors are credited for their work and that derivatives have the same sort of free license. (Free as in speech, not as in beer). In the future, please post comments on talk pages at the bottom of a page and sign them using ~~~~.--Vera (talk) 12:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

rename requestEdit

Please change my name from gundu to gunduu because this name is already exists on wikipedia. So i registered wikipedia as gunduu please merge or rename as gunduu--Gundu (talk) 09:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

You can request changing your username here. Vera (talk) 10:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

copyright infringement on images from pizza boxes?Edit

Hi. I understand your point but these were just photos of pizza boxes without any noticeable marks, certainly no copyright or attribution on them. I hardly can imagine that WikiMedia will get in trouble for putting them online. I don't see why you removed these and allow for example Image:French_Domino's_Pizza_box.JPG, which displays prominently a logo. Thanks. Miguel Andrade (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Do you actually remember what your photo's look like? Because they were everything but simple markings. Those boxes had full color graphics on them, a pure example of copyrighted packaging if there ever was one. You don't need to have a signature on copyrighted works in order to get copyright protection. We are a database of freely licensed images, we don't wait around for law suits to happen, the aim is to stay clear of even too gray areas. These boxes were clearly copyrighted and didn't even approach the grey. The existence of other copyright violations doesn't make others OK. - 12:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Understood! Thanks! Miguel Andrade (talk) 14:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of files without discussion !Edit

Hi,

Is there a way to discuss about this File Deletion ?

I tried to give some information to justify to cancel your deletion request, but got no answer, and even worse : files are now deleted by another user !

I am really disapointed, and feeling just helpless and alone in a humanless Kafkaian world of Wikimedia Commons... Can you help me ? Thanks.

--Frip0uille69 (talk) 15:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Aaron Goodrich, Minnesota Supreme Court.gifEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aaron Goodrich, Minnesota Supreme Court.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Trlkly (talk) 23:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

So what's the deal here? The {{PNG}} tag specifically says to use the {{supersededPNG}} tag, and the {{supersededPNG}} tag specifically states that files that use that tag cannot be automatically deleted, and must go through the traditional deletion process. Yet, you, an admin, are telling me just to mark it as a duplicate.
I was under the impression that the {{duplicate}} tag only applied to images of the same filetype. I remember there being a big fight over whether GIFs could be deleted once a PNG version became available. The consensus was that each image had to be handled on a case by case basis. If things have changed, I think the text of {{supersededPNG}} needs to be updated. Trlkly (talk) 00:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
I don't know exactly. But I think a DR in this case is a bit too much drama. I might have to look into this. --Vera (talk) 00:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Please notify me on my talk page if you find out anything. I don't like watching people's talk pages, as I also get updates from other sections. I do hope things have changed, because that decision was silly, and only based on SVG images.--Trlkly (talk) 00:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De Meidoorn, Rotterdam (1).JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:De Meidoorn, Rotterdam (1).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

thanksEdit

your are welcome :)--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:50, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Requests for comment/Place categories above content, but below image on file description pages, by defaultEdit

Did you ever intend to publicize this RFC at Template:Centralized discussion? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 10:02, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

I think I did do that at the time. It might not be there anymore because of its age. --Vera (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

VI ProblemEdit

Hi Vera, The three images promoted in VI are blocked. I think it is your name that blocks bot. Replaces by User: 1Veertje it should break the deadlock. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean. You want me to change my username? Because I'm not willing to do so. --Vera (talk) 08:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Not only within the appointments of 3 images. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Ok it worked! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Robin Ince - EdSciFest 2014.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robin Ince.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Peter Atkins - EdSciFest 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peter Atkins.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Prof Jim Al-Khalili - EdSciFest 2014 (10).JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jim Al-Khalili.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

David Harvey's Reading Marx's CapitalEdit

Hi! Caught this on Wikisource and I noticed what might be a problem but I'm not sure. Since you're a Commons admin I figure you'd know better than me. The official web pages state that the course is CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0, which would be a problem for Wikimedia sites. But the Youtube pages are CC-BY 3.0. I guess that might constitute a re-licensing, although maybe not a deliberate one. Is it enough for Wikimedia sites though? Prosody (talk) 20:11, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, yeah I saw that too. The YouTube license is a free license though. Legally you can't publish things under one license and than make it more restrictive later on. --Vera (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Photo of ballot in ballot-boxEdit

Hallo Vera, last night I have been pleased at your fresh taken photo File:EP 2014 ballot Netherlands .jpg and set 2 links in the de-Wikipedia (de:Mai 2014 and de:Europawahl in den Niederlanden 2014). But today in the morning I'm worried: Have you asked the "Wahlvorstand" at the polling station by taking your photo? They allowed the photo? If "yes" – I hope – please tell it in the description of your photo. (Ach wenn ich doch besser Englisch könnte! Ich hatte mich wirklich über das frisch aufgenommene Foto gefreut, doch möchte ich nicht, dass Du Probleme bekommen könntest, was mir erst nach ein paar Stunden Schlaf bewusst geworden ist: Zumindest in Deutschland sind Fotos im Wahllokal ja während der Wahl verboten (geheime Wahl!), es sei denn Du hast die Erlaubnis dazu. Vielleicht ist dies andernorts in Europa (in den Niederlanden) weniger streng geregelt? Wahlgeheimnis ist ja mit den Wahlrechtsgrundsätzen "Transparenz und Öffentlichkeit der Wahl" abzuwägen. Transparenz finde ich persönlich ja wichtiger, doch was sagt die Wahlordnung im Europawahlgesetz? Hab die WP-Links vorläufig wieder raus genommen – wenn meine Sorge unbegründet ist, dann können wir das Foto ja wieder einbinden! ich hoffe jetzt, Du hast meine Sorge besser verstanden, als ich es in der Schnelle auf Englisch hätte ausdrücken können). Have a sunny day, instead of my sorrows! --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 14:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

as you can see, I haven't actually filled out the ballot yet in this picture. A fellow Wikipedian posted a picture of a notice reminding people about how no one could ever force you to publish a picture of your vote. But this isn't my vote, it's just the ballot. Vera (talk) 16:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:AeuP poster 2012 elections.jpgEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AeuP poster 2012 elections.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AeuP poster 2012 elections.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

MoiraMoira (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright EU-documents?Edit

Dear 1Veertje,


© European Union, 1995-2014
Reuse is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by a Decision of 12 December 2011


Plaats dus alsjeblieft het document dat je hebt verwijderd terug. Dank je,  Klaas|Z4␟V:  10:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

EU parties are independent of the EU. Their logo's are protected by copyright. --Vera (talk) 11:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
so this one too  Klaas|Z4␟V:  14:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Pano-RamahEdit

Since you fixed my Leith library panorama brilliantly, ... To the extent that Edinburgh Central Library staff dug out a book with a 50-odd year old near-identical angle as it the shot? Here's another.

Wonderful what a decent amount of memory helps you do - in terms of abusing a collection of images

. --Brian McNeil / talk 01:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Did you see my panorama shot of Old Town? --Vera (talk) 11:40, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
That's an absurdly-high resolution! (Which meant I found a few joins :P) Although, it's a stunning photo when you pull it up with the Flash viewer and keep away from the few of those I found. I was a little less-ambitious resolution-wise with my most-recent effort. Can't be bothered redoing the whole thing as JPEG to get the purty zoom tool, though. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Leiden109.JPGEdit

Waarom heb je deze verwijderd? Klaas `Z4us` V

ik heb deze genomineerd voor verwijdering omdat het een auteursrechtenschending betrof. Zie com:dw - Vera (talk) 14:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:1VeertjeEdit

See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:1Veertje. (courtesy notice) Jee 11:28, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File:EYE en toren Overhoeks Amsterdam.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:EYE en toren Overhoeks Amsterdam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 16:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Sex PistolsEdit

Hi! I see that you deleted two Sex Pistols files I uploaded years ago. Those files were authorised publishing through OTRS (ticket number 2008071310014853 as you can see here). {Sirabder87}Static age 10:27, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

It's a copyright violation not because the source or the license the photographer gave to it is erronous. It's that the photogapher took a photograph of a screen on which the concert was projected. It's therefore a derivative work that's not his/hers to release. --Vera (talk) 10:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
I should clarify: I nominated the images for deletion, another administrator then agreed with me and deleted them. --Vera (talk) 10:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Alien pictureEdit

Hi Vera. I just see your message and i'm give you thank for the warning about the deletion request about one of my files, although i don't understand why the picture could be delete. Also i see several images connected with the Alien's saga, but in my point of view, those files could be useful for some Wikipedia with "non-fair use" politics. --Ravave (talk) 16:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

it's usefulness is not disputed, but let's keep the discussion in the DR - Vera (talk) 23:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Toren Overhoeks Amsterdam.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Toren Overhoeks Amsterdam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gouwenaar (talk) 05:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Alien/Terminator images from UK MuseumEdit

Hi Vera. Can you take a look at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Terminator.27s_head.jpg? Just as the Alien-related images from the UK are copyrighted in the US, so too are the Terminator images. Just like you, I can't see how UK FoP law can override US copyright. The above image is also from the London Museum category like the Alien images you DR'd on August 4, for which I've put in a {{vd}}. INeverCry 17:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in KürzeEdit

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo 1Veertje,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Request for the Deletion of a FileEdit

Hello Madam,

I am P Sv Rns Srikanth,

My humble request to you is :

Please delete the Following File : File:Raghusri image.jpg because, i left Wikipedia long ago and i don't want this file to be used else anywhere in Wikimedia.

Regards,

Raghusri (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much madam, for the Faster response and also for Deletion. Raghusri (talk) 11:36, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Deleted filesEdit

I do not understand why you marked my images "File:Welcome to sajmiste.jpg" and "File:Welcome to novo naselje02.jpg" as "copyright violations". I made these images by myself with my photo camera. What is the problem here? PANONIAN (talk) 19:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

you made a photo of a poster. The poster is protected by copyright. See com:dw Vera (talk) 20:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
not in Serbia. Please see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Serbia PANONIAN (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
FOP applies to objects permanently placed in the public space. Vera (talk) 13:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

FOP issuesEdit

Hi,

I think that FOP issues should never be speedied. There are too many possible criteria to consider. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:46, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

They're not actually FOP issues. --Vera (talk) 16:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
The picture itself is under a free license, so yes, these ARE FoP issues (or lack of). Regards, Yann (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
No they're COM:DW --Vera (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

marks for speedy deletion?Edit

Hi, I was notified that you marked my photo for deletion. I only know the basics of how copy right works, so hope to use this as a learning opportunity. I commented on the talk page, can you take a look?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Benetton_unhate_Hu_Jintao_and_Obama.jpg

File:Eichelberg Leopold Marburg Barfüßerstr40.JPGEdit

Hi 1Veertje, I do not understand your objection because this seems to be clearly FoP. It's a tourist sign in a public place. What's wrong? Regards, Evergreen68

a, sorry. I thought it was the back of a book cover. Please sign posts on talk pages with -~~~~, the 3rd button on the toolbar does that. --Vera (talk) 13:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, INeverCry 21:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

License review flagEdit

Beste Iveertje,

Ik zag dat je Mrs Kartoshka de license review flag had toegekend. Ik heb dit, gezien deze gebruiker zelfs minder dan 10 edits op dit project heeft en minder dan 100 edits globaal heeft, direct ongedaan gemaakt. Normaliter hebben we een speciaal proces hiervoor, zie com:LR voor meer informatie. Deze flag is voor ervaren, vertrouwde gebruikers die weten waar ze mee bezig zijn. Ga je mensen die dit niet zijn deze flag, zonder dat de reguliere procedures doorlopen zijn dit soort rechten toekennen kan dit serieus afdoen aan de waarde van een LR. Ik reken erop dat je jezelf in het vervolg onthoud van dit soort acties. Natuur12 (talk) 19:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

The same for Special:UserRights/Magioladitis, Special:UserRights/Timelezz. This is completely out of process, please revert your actions. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
And i noticed that you edited after Natuur12's comment, why you ignore his comment? --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
I sug in an edit in the middle of the night. anyhow. There are no fixed rules. Point me to one instance where these rights were inapropriately used. I gave these rights because they enable users to upload flickr images trough the UploadWizard. Giving them this oportunity is way more productive to the project that nitpicking about protocol. --Vera (talk) 12:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
The 'protocol" is in place for a good reason. You'd be wise not to ignore it. -FASTILY 17:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Please reply on AN/U, i will file a de-adminship request if needed. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Teruggedraaide verwijderactie File:August Falise Cello Player Bronze.jpgEdit

Beste Veertje. Al weer enige tijd geleden ben je een actie gestart om de foto van een beeldje van Falise (File:August Falise Cello Player Bronze.jpg) te verwijderen. Gelukkig heeft een wakkere gebruiker e.e.a. rechtgezet. Maar waarom al deze acties. Had je er belang bij om voor Falises rechten op te komen? (Ben je soms een erfgenaam?) Zijn alle foto's van beelden nu copyright violations? Nou dan heb je nog wel wat te doen. Succes ermee.--Butch (talk) 12:15, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons is een database met vrije media bestanden, daarom moet er wel eens wat verwijderd worden. Nee, ik heb geen belang bij Falises, ik hecht er waarde aan dat Wikimedia Commons vrij blijft van auteursrechtenschendingen. Voor beelden die niet onder Panoramavrijheid vallen kunnen ze alleen hier worden gepubliceerd worden als de auteur al redelijk lang geleden overleden is, doorgaans 70+ of zelfs 100+ jaar voor de VS. Dit was niet duidelijk in de omschrijving van uw afbeeldingen. --Vera (talk) 17:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

COM:AN/UEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−


float  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#1Veertje. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2006-08-22 - Road Trip - Day 30 - United States - New Mexico - Roswell - Gifts - The Real Reason For 4889604158.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2006-08-22 - Road Trip - Day 30 - United States - New Mexico - Roswell - Gifts - The Real Reason For 4889604158.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

FF een vraagje voor je VeraEdit

Moet het plaatje "Pepsi logo.gif" verwijderd worden?

Alvast bedankt.

FritsHG eh?

Lege categorieënEdit

Hallo Vera, ik vroeg me af wat het idee was achter (bijvoorbeeld) de Category:Gemeentelijke_monumenten_in_Geitenkamp,_Arnhem met, ook een jaar later nog, uitsluitend lege categorieën daarin. Een aanmoediging tot vullen? Groet, Apdency (talk) 20:12, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey, Geitenkamp in Arhnem heeft heel veel gemeentelijke monumenten, zie lijst, dus ik denk dat het handig is dat de categorie er blijft. Ikzelf woon niet in de buurt van Arnhem, en zal dan ook niet snel daar gaan fotograferen. Wel heb ik een collega die dagelijks redelijk ver reist voor zijn werk er toe aangezet in Arhnem, zijn woonplaats, aan de slag te gaan. 1Veertje (talk) 13:40, 9 December 2014‎ (UTC)
Tja, een lijst met wel data maar geen afbeeldingen is één ding, een categorie met helemaal geen inhoud en zonder duidelijkheid of die er gaat komen, lijkt me weer wat anders, en ook niet erg gewenst. Maar eerlijk is eerlijk, ik heb ook wel eens zulke cats gevuld (zoals onlangs nog Category:Gemeentelijke monumenten in Nieuwegein, na 2 jaar leegstand...). Apdency (talk) 18:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your hosting needsEdit

Hi,

You've stated in a recent Phabricator upload request task you were a little tight on your hosting capabilities to put videos.

How many GB do you need? I can setup you a SFTP account on one of my servers, for a capacity of 100 GB, or add a disk to allow 1 To. --Dereckson (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

The total size of the CGPGrey photographs is about 10 GB so 100 would do fine. Vera (talk) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Rename requestsEdit

Hi, See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:1Veertje, is your script out of control? --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Techs has stopped the server side upload. I suggest you to add the files to a maintenance cat or using the filename in the {{rename}} as filename :). Have a nice evening and thanks for all the uploads. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Seasons bleatings ...Edit

... From The Ferry Tap!

.


--Brian McNeil / talk 17:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

DekkerEdit

Beste 1Veertje, Je meldt dat deze foto DekkerLeiden2014.JPG een gedeeltelijke overtreding van auteursrecht was. Ik heb de (veel te donkere) foto zelf niet meer. Kan je me melden wat de overtreding precies was? Vysotsky (talk) 18:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Er stond een scherm op de foto waar een opname van het gebeuren op werd uitgezonden. Dit is een afgeleide werk niet anders dan als je een foto van een foto zou maken. --Vera (talk) 18:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Permanently placedEdit

Hi Vera. Thank you for your care about copyright issues.

As regards so-called "FOP" in the Czech Republic, do you know some valid interpretations of the words "permanently placed"? In fact, nothing in our world is absolutely permanent. What is your criterion? And what is based on? --ŠJů (talk) 11:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Please keep the discussion in the DR. --Vera (talk) 11:16, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
In the discussion about particular DR we can discuss about application of the rules. But a principial discussion about the rule should precede and transcend its particular application. We should avoid the situation that all FoP content will be challenged and endangered. --ŠJů (talk) 11:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Can I rely on you that you really look for any valid criterion of "permanency"? As you initiated the discussion, you should not retire from it untill the issue is resolved. If you made a mistake, it is no shame to withdraw your deletion request. If you insist on it, you should ground it properly. If you have any doubts, we should seek for clarification together. This problem of "permanentness" of FoP works is very serious and can have huge impact on thousands of files. --ŠJů (talk) 12:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
FOP simply isn't meant to cover advertisements. I've had these discussions before and found them to be very tiresome. --Vera (talk) 12:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
FoP is given by the law, not by some hypothetic weird wishes. The law simply doesn't distinguish advertisement works from non-advertisement works (and such an intention is not even indicated in the act). The crucial criteria are simply whether the work is "trvale umístěno" (permanently placed) and whether it is at "veřejné prostranství" (public space). Permanently placed advertisements fall decidedly under so-called "FoP". An open question is how to judge the "permanentness" which can never be absolute eternity. However, you permanently avoid to answer the question. It is very tiresome to be forced to defend files against baseless assaults, even if the proposer is not willing to discuss factually and to accept relevant arguments. --ŠJů (talk) 06:18, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
It really is quite clear cut: FOP applies to objects placed permanently in the public space, billboards display advetisments only temporarily. "Tiresome" is a bit of an understatement actually, stressful to the point that I want to quit all things WP is more accurate since it has happened at least 5 times now that discussions drag on for 500+ words with the same result: removal of the image. The last time this happened I avoided stressing myself out over it with the same result, so I concluded that I wasn't going to let myself get dragged down by this any more. --Vera (talk) 09:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Deletion requestEdit

Hallo Vera,

Wilt u astublieft dit bestand verwijderen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:House_Kassotis_Of_Nicaria.png ?

Alvast bedankt,

FritsHG Question? 17:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

HmmmEdit

Saw your message on my talk page about the deleted file. I probably had it in a Flickr upload - the mass upload tool is handy, but sometimes grabs more images than I needed. May want to look to that particular upload's "original" photographer on Flickr to see if there are other problematic images (now that it's deleted, I can't tell you which one it was...) I've ran across a couple of unreliable Flickr accounts, and commons has "blacklisted" at least one from even being used for uploads. Good luck. Montanabw (talk) 03:27, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This was a com:FOP issue. I wouldn't block a Flickr account for that. Even if the user lives in a non FOP country. Vera (talk) 09:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
No worries, just wanted to clarify that I wasn't the photographer, only the uploader...  ;-) Montanabw (talk) 05:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Vera!Edit

  • Happy new yeaaar, a 2015 of good things, wishes happy holidays --Pava (talk) 14:50, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, you too. --Vera (talk) 18:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2005-08-26 - London - National Gallery - Waiting Alone (4887652297).jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2005-08-26 - London - National Gallery - Waiting Alone (4887652297).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ham II (talk) 09:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, The Haz talk 10:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Picture of David HarveyEdit

Dag Vera,

vandaag kwam ik dit artikel tegen: [1], een interview met David Harvey (overigens een uitstekend stuk!). Er stond ook een foto bij, en onder de foto staat eigenlijk dat ie van jou is. Ik geloof dat dat niet helemaal klopt. Jij hebt zijn colleges geupload naar Commons. En het zou natuurlijk heel mooi zijn als je ook foto's van hem had gemaakt. Maar dat is toch niet zo? Ik vond het in ieder geval wel leuk om het je even te laten weten. Groet, Dick Bos (talk) 22:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, ik ben enkel degene die dat snapshot heeft geüpload. Het was onder een CC-BY licentie op YouTube gepubliceerd. --Vera (talk) 22:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Glenn Kurtz - IFFR 2015-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glenn Kurtz - IFFR 2015-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Please restore File:Kiwix-ui.main.searchFor-0.pngEdit

Hi 1Veertje. Please restore that file, it's really needed on translatewiki.net. I have asked you question and you don't have answered it, see here. I also request the restore of File:Kiwix 0.9 alpha1 screenshot en.png and File:Kiwix 0.9 Ubuntu Wikivoyage.png, for the same reasons. Kelson (talk) 16:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Hannah Murray - IFFR 2015-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hannah Murray.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

VerzoekjeEdit

Hi Vera,

Als je tijd hebt. Kan je me dan even aanschieten op IRC? Er kwam een OTRS-ticket binnen over een interview dat je opgenomen hebt en de persoon zelf is er niet zo content mee dat dit bestand nu op Commons staat. Voordat ik iets antwoord wil ik eerst even jouw kant van het verhaal horen. Natuur12 (talk) 17:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Ik zag je bericht maar IRCcloud had last van en Ddos dus mijn cloud loopt 1.5 uur achter. Vandaar dat ik niet antwoordde. Als je morgen nog even hebt ja graag, zo nee dan stuur ik een berichtje terug dat het even wat langer duurt omdat ik jou eerst wil spreken :). Natuur12 (talk) 23:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Dit was het nieuws 200.jpgEdit

Hallo 1Veertje. Even ter info: je hebt onlangs mijn afbeelding File:Dit was het nieuws 200.jpg aangedragen voor verwijdering en ik zag het (uiteraard/helaas) te laat om nog te reageren. Ik heb daarom maar een verzoek tot terugplaatsing geplaatst.[2] Mvg, Caudex Rax (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done--Vera (talk) 17:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Dat was snel! Dit houdt in dat ik de afbeelding weer kan terugzetten in Wikipedia-artikelen, nietwaar? Ik ben er niet helemaal zeker van omdat er nog een label op de bestandspagina staat met de mededeling dat de file genomineerd is. Mvg, Caudex Rax (talk) 18:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
yeah, dat is geen probleem. Als de DR gesloten wordt met de beslissing worden ze weer verwijderd, maar dat gaat automatisch en is niet extra werk ofzo. --Vera (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Oké, bedankt voor de info. Mvg, Caudex Rax (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

File:James Napier Robertson - voice - en.flacEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:James Napier Robertson - voice - en.flac has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:The most boring skyscrapers 4891889718.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The most boring skyscrapers 4891889718.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 00:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Picture requests/Requests/Europe includes images that are fair use/against COM:FOP because other projects need themEdit

Hi, 1Veertje! Thanks for your contributions!

One thing I noted at Commons:Picture requests/Requests/Europe was the removal of fair use image requests. I have restored them.

The Wikimedia Commons requests page is for all Wikimedia projects so therefore it should include requests for images even if the images aren't eligible for Commons. What should be added, however, is a note saying that the Commons itself cannot accept the image in the request, but that it may be accepted at the French Wikipedia or other Wikipedias which take fair use images.

Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 12:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Signeren?Edit

Dag Vera. Van de foto's die je onlangs hebt geüpload van het Feest der Letteren had ik er een zestal voorzien van de categorie over boeken signeren. Die heb je weer verwijderd. Was er geen sprake van de activiteit die die categorie behelst? Uit een filmpje dat ik heb gezien over dit festijn meende ik op te kunnen maken van wel, maar jij hebt het zelf rechtstreeks gezien, dus je weet het vast beter. Apdency (talk) 18:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

ik heb de categorie "feest der Letteren" zelf in de categorie "signeren in Nederland" gezet. Het was lekker score qua fotograferen dus ik ben van plan de komende jaren terug te komen. Vera (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Ah, ik had nog een catje hoger moeten kijken dus. Goed, zo kan het ook, tenminste als signeren daar als een kernactiviteit wordt gezien. Apdency (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Zeker, zie overzichtsfoto--Vera (talk) 19:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Juist, heel wat pennen geteld. Ik ben overtuigd! Apdency (talk) 19:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Rotterdam photo request: Rotterdam Japanese SchoolEdit

Hi! Are you interested in doing a Rotterdam photo request? If so, I would like to have somebody take a photo of the en:Rotterdam Japanese School at Verhulstlaan 19 3055WJ, Rotterdam

Thanks! WhisperToMe (talk) 08:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I've been aware of this photo request for a while, and have it marked in the map on my phone. It's not exactly anywhere nearby but I will probably get to it at some point. --Vera (talk) 19:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Ah, ok. Thanks in advance :) WhisperToMe (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

See:

--Vera (talk) 17:36, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

T-shirt barnstarEdit

Beste 1Veertje, ik heb je genomineerd voor een T-shirt. Bedankt voor je bijdragen aan Wikimedia! Met vriendelijke groet, Taketa (talk) 05:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Ha, thanks :) --Vera (talk) 10:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Bonnie Bassler TED talk in 2009.jpgEdit

I wonder if you could explain why File:Bonnie Bassler TED talk in 2009.jpg was deleted. Thanks. edward (talk) 06:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

The main part of the photograph was the projection behind her. It's in all likelyhood a copyright protected graphic of the inside of a bacteria. This makes the picture a derivative work and thus a copyright violation. --Vera (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Jack-Layton-2003-NDP-Leadership.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jack-Layton-2003-NDP-Leadership.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

File:AudreyHepburn leggings.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AudreyHepburn leggings.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Appeal noticeEdit

FYI: I entered a brief appeal on the talk page of File:Google Cardboard - Unopened.JPG. Runner1928 (talk) 12:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Veenhuizen (geen veenkolonie)Edit

Je plaatste een serie van 9 portretten van bedelaars en landlopers die tussen 1895 en 1901 werden gemaakt in de gestichten van Veenhuizen en Ommerschans in de categorie "veenkolonies". Deze negen portretten behoren tot een serie van 5600 signalementskaarten uit het archief van de Maatschappeij van Weldadigheid. Dit heeft totaal niets te maken met de veenkoloniën, een gebied op de grens van Drenthe en Groningen, ten oosten van de Hondsrug. Gouwenaar (talk) 11:28, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


You have been nominated for a gift from the Wikimedia Foundation!Edit

You have been selected to receive a merchandise giveaway. Click the following link for more details: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Merchandise_giveaways/Nominations. Please send me an email (jmatthews@wikimedia.org) for instructions on how to claim your shirt. Thank you again for all you do! --JMatthews (WMF) (talk) 06:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

BotsEdit


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Picture of me on Boom Chicago Wikipedia is labeled as my friend...Edit

Veertje,

I just saw a great picture of me you took at TNW and uploaded to Boom Chicago's Wikipedia page. The only problem: I'm Pep Rosenfeld, but you landed it Andrew Moskos (who is a swell guy and my good friend... but not the dude in the photo). I edited the subject of the photo, but couldn't edit the caption itself. Would you mind changing it?

Thanks! And once again - great picture!

Pep Pep Rosenfeld (talk) 09:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi, sorry about that :S I fixed it. Here are all the pictures of you from TNW Conference that I uploaded. Here are all the pictures from that conference btw. --Vera (talk) 12:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

verwijderingEdit

Hallo 1Veertje, ik benader jou even omdat ik je dagelijks wel zie hier en lekker nl kan praten. Het gaat om het volgende. Zoals je (misschien) weet teken ik wapens voor Wikipedia. Nu is dat met de meeste geen enkel probleem omdat ze antiek zijn, echter van een dertigtal ontwerpen van recente tijd wil de ontwerper ze van Commons verwijderd zien. Voor mij geen enkel probleem, ik ben enige auteur ervan, ik kan nieuwe afbeeldingen maken in een klassieke stijl, probleem opgelost. Alleen die dertigtal afbeeldingen moeten z.s.m. weg. Dan kan ik nadien weer nieuwe uploaden. Hoe pak ik dat het beste aan? Kan je bijvoorbeeld het lijstje weggummen voor me, of moet het persé met sjablonentoestanden? MVG --Arch (talk) 13:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Dit soort dingen worden in een Deletion Request gediscusieerd doorgaans. Ik denk dat de kans op verwijdering relatief klein is. Ook contemporaire vlaggen van gemeenten worden op Commons tot nu toe gerekend onder het besluit van de Hoge Raad van de Adel waaraan ook gerefereerd wordt in het template wat onder wapens wordt toegevoegd. --Vera (talk) 14:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hmmm.... Dus al die afbeeldingen stuk voor stuk nomineren dus... Waarvan de kans ook nog is heel klein is dat ze weg gehaald worden? De meeste wapens zijn antiek, daarvan is geen copyright aanwezig. Maar die afbeeldingen van 't Jong stammen uit de jaren '80. Hij claimt zijn auteursrecht als kunstenaar op de afbeeldingen. Het gaat om deze wapens: Zederik, Zeewolde, Drecht en Vecht, Flevoland, Franekeradeel, Geffen, Gulpen, Korendijk, Maasdonk, Menterwolde, Mook en Middelaar, Wsch Noordoostpolder, Wsch Ommelanden, Oudenbosch, Roggel en Neer, Schinnen, Susteren, Voerendaal en Winsum. MVG --Arch (talk) 14:24, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Als het goed is moeten ze hier nu bij elkaar staan: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of Zederik.svg. Als hij je gemaild hebt is het handig dat mailtje door te sturen naar permissions-commons@wikimedia.org--Vera (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Geweldig! Top! Heel erg bedankt voor de moeite! :) -PS- Ik hem hem gevraagd dat mailtje zelf te sturenm ;) Nogmaals dank! MVG --Arch (talk) 14:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Geert van der Varst.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Geert van der Varst.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gvdvarst (talk) 17:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Oude foto verwijderenEdit

Hallo 1Veertje,

Zou deze foto verwijderd kunnen worden: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/5/54/20150718152720%21Geert_van_der_Varst.jpg Hij is destijds meteen vervangen bij de PvdA, want ze hadden de verkeerde geüpload (zoals je ziet was ik behoorlijk grieperig toen die foto genomen werd). Probleem is dat de 'oude versie' eigenlijk al die tijd op Wikimedia heeft gestaan en als tweede resultaat bij Google naar voren komt. Ik heb inmiddels de nieuwe juiste foto geüpload naar Wikimedia, vraag is of de oude nu ook daadwerkelijk van de server verwijderd kan worden. Dan is de foto bij Google straks ook niet meer te vinden. Dit is de bijbehorende pagina: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geert_van_der_Varst.jpg

Hartelijke groet, Geert

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnenEdit

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo 1Veertje,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

dezoomifyEdit

thanks for the dememorixer! Added interesting PD-images and old maps in high resolution! Especially maps are interesting as we can use this with the cropping tool to create detailed images. Could you have a quick look (only a quick look ;) for this one? http://www.stelling-amsterdam.nl/kaart/index.php It's an old high res map from the Nationaal Archief about the stelling van Amsterdam, I can't find it there. I tried http://ophir.alwaysdata.net/dezoomify/dezoomify.html and that downloads the parts in html5 canvas, but the browser can't handle that as the image is too big. --Hannolans (talk) 07:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, Chrome crashed there on me too. Firefox didn't but didn't load the whole image. I'm going to look into executing dezoomify.py. I don't have much experience with Python, but I had decided a while ago that I should master it. --Vera (talk) 13:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
It seems a bug caused in the browsers (was not sure if this is a platform specific bug, I'm using os x): https://github.com/lovasoa/dezoomify/issues/24 ... --Hannolans (talk) 13:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Are files like these also suited? http://dpc.uba.uva.nl/u/umpor/thumb/0/1/3/2000_07_13_013.jpg Vysotsky (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC) PS Painting is by Thérèse Schwartze (1852-1919). Vysotsky (talk) 10:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
UVA uses dezoomify. You need to copy the URL from the pop-up to http://ophir.alwaysdata.net/dezoomify/dezoomify.html (works best in FireFox, please convert PNG files to JPEG before uploading) --Vera (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I did a print to pdf and that worked for the file of the stelling, not the highest quality level, but still pretty good. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AInundatiekaart_Stelling_van_Amsterdam.jpg --Hannolans (talk) 22:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

GeschiedenisEdit

Hoi Vera, ik zag [3]. Je hebt een nieuwe versie van dezelfde afbeelding geupload, wat geen probleem is, en waarschijnlijk goed. Echter je hebt ook de geschiedenis van de oude versie verwijderd. Ik hoop dat je begrijpt dat ik het niet leuk vind dat de moeite die ik heb gedaan om dit bestand te uploaden opeens niet meer zichtbaar is. Ik ben verwijderd uit de geschiedenis. Ik zou het op prijs stellen als je dit wilt herstellen. Je kunt in de toekomst beter de nieuwe versie in de oude uploaden en de file vervolgens hernoemd zodat de geschiedenis blijft bestaan of op zijn minst de redirect laten bestaan. Wat je doet mag volgens CC0, maar het moedigt mij niet aan om bij te dragen. Mvg, Taketa (talk) 07:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Het is op dit moment niet mogelijk een jpeg bestand over een png bestand te uploaden. Jpeg heeft wel een betere kwaliteit dan png voor fotomateriaal. Vera (talk) 08:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Formeel heeft 1Veertje wellicht helemaal gelijk, maar ik begrijp Taketa helemaal. Psychologisch werkt het natuurlijk zo dat je graag je eigen inspanningen vertaald ziet in een vermelding. Als iemand op een feestje een taart presenteert die ik gebakken heb, vind ik het ook aardig als ik daarvoor een complimentje krijg –als de taart tenminste lekker is. Soms kost het uren om geschikte afbeeldingen te vinden, de naam van de schilder/fotograaf te traceren en het copyright uit te zoeken. Uploaden gaat relatief snel. Dank aan 1Veertje voor het beter geschikt maken van deze afbeeldingen, maar zo moeilijk hoeft het toch niet te zijn om bij de omzetting een vermelding (in bijv. het source-veld) te zetten als: Original uploader: UserX (orig. upload date 22-04-2013). (Bovendien is het nu vreemd om afbeeldingen te zien die schijnbaar in 2015 in Commons ingebracht zijn, maar al in 2013 in Wikipedia gebruikt werden.) Vysotsky (talk) 09:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hoi Vera, bedankt voor je antwoord. Ik snap het probleem. Ik zie dat je ondertussen de redirect hebt teruggeplaatst. Dank daar voor :). Ik denk dat de oplossing van Vysotsky ook zeker nuttig is. Mvg, Taketa (talk) 19:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Ik heb vanmiddag nog zitten hannesen met of het mogelijk was de bewerkingsgeschiedenis te behouden en alleen de foto te verwijderen en vervolgens de pagina-titel te veranderen om .jpg te krijgen, maar dat ging niet. Volgensmij was de redirect er al hoor. Die wordt standaard aangemaakt als het {{Duplicate}} sjabloon wordt verwerkt. Het is echter ook standaard dat de bewerkingsgeschiedenis verwijderd wordt.
Ik was de afbeeldingen met Defensie als bron hadden aan het nalopen omdat ik onlangs de Dememorixer heb ontwikkeld waarmee de hoogste resolutie foto uit o.a. de beeldbank van Defensie kunnen worden gehaald. Foto's die nog niet verwerkt zijn staan bij elkaar in Category:Dememorixer defensie. Tot nu toe weinig succes met foto's die niet de beeldbank al als bron hadden, al was dit een hele verbetering --Vera (talk) 20:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Blijkbaar is er een officiële manier is om de oorspronkelijke uploader credits te geven: Original upload log. Zie deze file op Commons, die ik van EN-Wiki had gehaald met vermelding van de originele link. Deze vermelding werd netjes omgezet naar een Original upload log. Dat lijkt me duidelijk. Vysotsky (talk) 21:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Voor het overzetten van bestanden van een Wikipedia naar Commons zijn er tools, eenzelfde upload log op Commons maken voor PNG->JPEG vergt handwerk. Het is al erg veel handwerk om dit om te zetten. --Vera (talk) 23:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Zeker. Maar voor mij is de kwaliteit van bestanden evenveel waard als blijvend enthousiasme van mensen die tijd en moeite in Wikipedia stoppen. Dus het lijkt me de moeite waard dat stukje extra tijd te investeren. Vysotsky (talk) 23:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

De Ree archievenEdit

Was wondering if the Ree archives is also interesting for you for a script. (http://www.archieven.nl and others). If you walk through the rendered code you can get the fullsized images and that might be handy for old works for uploading to Commons. Also, probably this fund is interesting for you? https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG --Hannolans (talk) 18:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Kila&BabsieEdit

Dag Vera, wij kregen een melding op onze wikipedia pagina dat jij onze foto’s had gerapporteerd. Wij hebben toestemming van de fotograaf (Linda van den Berg) om deze foto’s te delen. En de rechten van de omslag van onze bundel liggen geheel bij ons. Kan jij dit ongedaan maken zodat de foto weer op onze pagina verschijnt? Hartelijke groet, Kila&Babsie

Het probleem is dat van deze kant weinig verschil te zien is tussen een upload van de rechtmatige eigenaar en een upload van een fan die de foto's van de site heeft geplukt. Via WikiPortret kunnen dit soort beelddonaties beter geregeld worden. --Vera (talk) 14:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Geert van der Varst.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Geert van der Varst.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gvdvarst (talk) 15:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Bestand:Bulletin of the Natural History Museum Zoology (2002) (20501526081).jpgEdit

1Veertje, wil U een kijkje nemen op de OP van Wikiklaas? betreffende de Potamonautes principe? Alvast bedankt. Lotje (talk) 09:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


Code issues in User:1Veertje/common.jsEdit

Hi 1Veertje, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:1Veertje/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue -- the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 1 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');
  2. ISSUE: line 35 character 1: Expected '(end)' and instead saw '}'. - Evidence: }

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 16:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC).


Code issues in User:1Veertje/common.jsEdit

Hi 1Veertje, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:1Veertje/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue -- the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 35 column 1: Unexpected token }

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 16:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC).

Copyright status: File:Solomon prays for wisdom.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Solomon prays for wisdom.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

DememorixerEdit

Hoi Vera, ik zag op mijn volglijst je toevoegingen van de Dememorixer-categorie. Ik neem aan dat eventuele vervanging van de foto's handmatig moet gebeuren? Kan ik na uploaden van een hogere resolutie de categorie weer weghalen? Ronn (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC) PS Ik heb zowel voor Wikipedia als voor privé al een aantal keren gebruik gemaakt van Dememorixer. Bedankt voor het mooie tooltje! :)

Hey, ja het is een onderhouds-categorie. Na verbetering (of als er geen hogere resolutie te halen valt, zoals vaak bij RKD schilderijen) kan de categorie verwijderd worden. Ik ben bezig om afbeeldingen van Category:RKDimages met wat automatisering te verbeteren, maar voor de rest is het veel handwerk vrees ik; ook omdat de permalink in de afbeelding-omschrijving in veel gevallen niet klopt of afwezig is. --Vera (talk) 13:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Zie overigens onderaan mijn common.js een stukje JavaScript dat knoppen aan het klassieke upload formulier toevoegd dat je tegenkomt als je een nieuwe versie upload. Daarmee kan je snel de rede opgeven waarom je een nieuwe versie upload. Door dat stuk aan jouw common.js toe te voegen krijg je die knoppen er ook bij. --Vera (talk) 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Ik ben klaar met het met automatisering upgraden van afbeeldingen. Category:Dememorixer is nu geslonken van ~700 naar <150 items teruggebracht :). --Vera (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Goed werk! Gr. Ronn (talk) 13:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

DememorixerEdit

Hello Vera, at the moment your are uploading hi-res pictures obtained by Dememorixer. Thank you for your effort. Some files, however, are not in a higher resolution, see f.i. File:Jacob Cornelisz van Neck (1564-1638).jpg. They only seem larger because the previous upload was a crop. As these images are merely used as an illustration of certain persons I think the crop is sufficient. Do you mind if I make the crop the current version again? Regards, Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 08:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

no problem. I've made a large dent in upgrading files this weekend by automating the process, reducing the number in the maintenance category Category:Dememorixer from a little over 700 of about 200. I've been careful but there will always be errors. In case of crops it might sometimes still be an improvement to crop the new upload than to reverse to the older version. Vera (talk) 08:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Pictures of OckenburghEdit

Hi Vera/1Veertje
Ik zie nu pas dat je twee plaatjes die ik had geupload, hebt verwijderd, nl:
File:Netherlands, Den Haag, Ockenburgh, opgravingen, 1930s (1).jpg, en
File:Netherlands, Den Haag, Ockenburgh, opgravingen, 1930s (2).jpg
In beide gevallen gaat het om krantenartikelen, uit 1930 resp. 1938. Je stelt dat er een copyright-problem was. Dat is volgens mij onjuist want: "In the Netherlands copyright expires 70 years after the death of the author or 70 years after the creation of the work in the case of anonymous or pseudonymous works or works published by a legal entity." Omdat beide artikelen anoniem zijn (er staat immers niet de naam bij van de journalist die ze geschreven heeft) gaat het niet om de dood van de schrijver plus 70 jaar, maar geldt de 'kale' termijn van 70 jaar die van toepassing is op de publicerende rechtspersoon (de betreffende krant dus). Als je het daarmee eens bent zou ik het op prijs stellen als je de plaatjes weer kunt oploaden. Groet! Loranchet (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

De meeste auteurs vallen niet dood vlak nadat ze iets gepubliceerd hebben. Er kan niet vanuit gegaan worden dat de auteur al 70+ jaar overleden is. In de krant zelf kan de naam van de auteur niet genoemd zijn, maar onachterhaalbaar zal waarschijnlijk niet zijn. Ik ben niet degene die de afbeeldingen heeft verwijderd, ik heb ze genomineerd voor verwijdering. --Vera (talk) 23:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Dan geloof ik toch niet dat die verwijdering correct was. Het gaat erom dat de publicatie anoniem is en/of gepubliceerd is door een legal entity, en 70 jaar oud is. Dat is alledrie het geval! Dat je heel misschien nog zou kunnen achterhalen wie die artikeltjes geschreven heeft doet niet terzake. De publicatie IS anoniem, en IS gepubliceerd door een rechtspersoon (de uitgever in kwestie) EN is meer dan 70 jaar oud. Je hebt de publicaties niet zelf verwijderd, maar zou je wel zelf terug willen zetten? Dat zou ik erg weten te waarderen. Dank! Loranchet (talk) 20:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Netherlands, Stompwijk, Grote Drooggemaakte Polder (3).JPGEdit

Hi Vera, ik zie dat je ook bovengenoemd plaatje van mij hebt gedeleet. Ik kan me bijna niet voorstellen dat ik geen adequate copyright-info had verstrekt. De rechterhelft van dit plaatje bestond uit een krantenartikel uit 1882 en is dus zonder twijfel in het publieke domein; en de linkerhelft was een eigen foto van mij van een gevelsteen. Had ik dat er niet bijgezet? Ik herinner me dat ik een vrij uitgebreide inhoudelijke uitleg bij het plaatje had staan (doe ik altijd) maar nu moet ik dat weer helemaal boven water halen omdat ik me al een tijdlang niet meer heb beziggehouden met de betreffende materie. Heb jij die tekst nog? En zou je het plaatje weer kunnen oploaden als je het met me eens bent? Dank! Loranchet (talk) 17:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Ik heb de afbeelding terug gezet. Graag een betere link naar waar het werk op de website te vinden is. --Vera (talk) 23:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Dank voor het terugzetten. Het krantenartikel had ik gevonden op deze website: http://leiden.courant.nu/ (althans, de vorige versie daarvan, want deze site is de afgelopen jaren al 3x gewijzigd of zo.....), Groet, Loranchet (talk) 20:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
De website heeft rechtsboven een "delen" knop waar je de permalink, die zij "dieplink" noemen, kan vinden. --Vera (talk) 20:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Revert by your botEdit

Hi Vera, could you have a look at File:GK van Hogendorp Johann Christoph Frisch RKD IB-nummer 63382.jpg. You uploaded a higher resolution. I removed the frame, but by uploading that version I somehow overwrote the description. My attempt to fix that was reverted by your bot. What happened here? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I uploaded the higher resolution version with the one tool (Commonist), and reverted the last edit of overwriting the filedescription with another (iMacros). This went wrong for this one file because you edited the page in the intervening minutes. I fixed it so all should be fine now. --Vera (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Vera. --Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
See Help:Zoomable images btw on how to get the highest resolution version from various sources. A lot of images from Dutch databeses can be improved with the Dememorixer, foreign ones with Dezoomify. Sotherby's anoying block of the context-menu can be helped with a browser extension1. --Vera (talk) 15:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Berlaymont (Commission européenne) - Union de l'énergie.JPGEdit

Excuse me but which right has been violated as I took the picture myself ? Is it related to the right of panorama ? Treehill (fr) Treehill 18:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

the graphic in the picture is protected by copyright. It doesn't look like a permanent part of the building, making it not a part of FOP. You can try to blur it out if you want to keep the image. Vera (talk) 19:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Beeldbank GroningenEdit

Dag Vera, je schreef op mijn overlegpagina "de website van Beeldbank Groningen is wat vervelend in dat ze de permalink verstopt hebben". Ik heb geprobeerd deze afbeelding gemaakt door de Groningse fotograaf Abraham Salomon Weinberg (1869-1932) met behulp van Dememorixer te bewerken. Wat ik ook probeer, ik blijf de melding krijgen "Er is iets misgegaan". Ook als ik de link gebruik bij doorsturen per email ed. Ook deze url naar de afbeelding werkt niet. Doe ik iets verkeerd of werkt het hier niet? Gouwenaar (talk) 09:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Als je op Archieven.nl / Groningerarchief.nl zoals hier een verwijzing hebt naar een item uit de Beeldbank Groningen moet je de link naar de beeldbank nemen om in de Dememorixer te plakken. Dit is al de permalink. Archieven.nl heeft een andere image-viewer dan Beeldbank Groningen. Hanno Lans had me er in september al op gewezen dat deze veel gebruikt wordt, en of ik hier ook een list op kon bedenken. Ik zal hier nog eens naar kijken. --Vera (talk) 12:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Ah, dank. Dat hoeft niet via archieven.nl en kan ook rechtstreeks via de website van beeldbank Groningen. Ook daar is dezelfde link te vinden, maar op een andere plaats dan ik hem zocht. Ik zal hem uploaden. Met vr. groet, Gouwenaar (talk) 12:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Overigens heb ik een Greasemonkey script geschreven wat het vinden van de permalink bij de Beeldbank Groningen makkelijker maakt. Voor Chrome moet je dan eerst Tampermonkey extentie installeren, in Firefox Greasemonkey. Vervolgens is het "user script" hier te vinden. Deze veranderd de "deel op Facebook" link naar een link naar de permalink. --Vera (talk) 12:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Ik gebruik meerdere browers o.a. Safari, Chrome, Firefox en Seamonkey. In Safari heb ik de module "Ontwikkel" geïnstalleerd waardoor dit soort links ook vaak snel te vinden zijn. Gouwenaar (talk) 12:54, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Inmiddels met de composermodule van Seamonkey de link naar het desbetreffende record bij de Beeldbank Groningen ook kunnen traceren. Ik neem aan dat het verwijderen van het beeldmerk slechts is toegestaan bij afbeeldingen die gegarandeerd in het publieke domein vallen? Gouwenaar (talk) 12:19, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Werk wat niet mag worden aangepast, mag niet op Wikimedia Commons. --Vera (talk) 13:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Dat begrijp ik. Maar de Beeldbank Groningen denkt daar kennelijk anders over. Zij stellen nl. "De bezoekers van de Beeldbank Groningen hebben het recht om de afbeeldingen die via deze site toegankelijk zijn op te zoeken en te bekijken. Indien men op andere wijze gebruik wil te maken van het aangeboden materiaal dan moet men dat vooraf (schriftelijk) zijn overeenkomen met de beheerder van de betreffende afbeelding(en)." Ik neem aan dat een dergelijk disclaimer nooit betrekking kan hebben op materiaal in het publieke domein. Deel jij die opvatting? Gouwenaar (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Dat heeft meer te maken met database recht. Het is wat grijs of we daar iets mee doen. Het is erg Europese wetgeving. Zover ik weet hebben we er niet echt beleid op. Vera (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Ik deel die opvatting, Gouwenaar. Je kunt als eigenaar van PD-materiaal naar mijn mening geen beperkende rechten laten gelden, maar ze kunnen het altijd proberen. ;) Gr. Ronn (talk) 12:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Interessante disclaimer. Maar helaas voor de Beeldbank Groningen zal die opvatting bij de rechter geen stand houden. Zie de¨Nederlandse auteurswet, artikel 37. Uiteraard moet je natuurlijk wel in de gaten houden dat de auteur of fotograaf echt meer dan 70 jaar geleden is overleden. Vysotsky (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

uit het Wikipedia artikel over databankrecht: De rechtmatige gebruiker mag niet dingen met de databank doen waarvan hij weet dat ze in strijd zijn met de bedoeling van die databank. Voor zover ik weet hebben we nog niet echt iets met databankrecht gedaan, we zijn doorgaans al lang blij genoeg als er aan het auteursrecht gehouden wordt. Vera (talk) 13:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Ter informatie: ik gebruik regelmatig deze juridische wegwijzer voor archieven en musea, waar hier al door Vysotsky op werd geattendeerd. Gouwenaar (talk) 16:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Duidelijk verhaal, al denkt dit museum daar anders over. ;) Ronn (talk) 15:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Minecraft Halloween Creeper 5115052986.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Minecraft Halloween Creeper 5115052986.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Liance (talk) 03:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

And also:


Copyright status: File:Adrine Winther - SAP.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Adrine Winther - SAP.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Thuresson (talk) 18:57, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

DememorixerEdit

Hi Vera, I tried to download [4] with the dememorixer tool, but something went wrong. Do you know a way out of this? Thanks, Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 11:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey, Ik heb een patch uitgevoerd waardoor de nieuwe permalinks van Beeldbank Groningen ook begrepen worden. Dit is specifiek een paar regels code voor deze beeldbank dus als andere beeldbanken ook deze update gaan uitvoeren moet er gekeken worden wat het overeenkomstige patroon is. De afbeelding die je linkte was relatief groot, ik heb 'm hier neergezet zodat je niet hoeft te wachten op het aan elkaar rijgen van de tegels. --Vera (talk) 19:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hartelijk bedankt, Vera. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Ronn found another image database today that had implemented the new style of permalinks. I've adapted the code to make it easier ad new instances of this format for permalinks and gone through the list of known databases that use the Memorix Maior image viewer. For future reference these are already on the list. --Vera (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 31 DecemberEdit

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

Wmf logo vert pms.svg

I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum@wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 December 2015 deadline.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 06:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC) • Please help translate to your languageHelp center

File:Apple-box2.jpgEdit

I took out[5] the second upload log you added,[6] as it wasn't in the original history. I'm not sure why you added it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

If you look at the history of File:Apple-box.jpg you see it wasn't the first time this file was uploaded. I linked to it in the left column --Vera (talk) 11:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Nyan tomcat.gifEdit

Hey, how is that a copyright violation? I did it myself, completely from scratch, no reused parts or anything. (It was a hell lot of work.) Just reusing the concepts in your own art shouldn't make it a copyright violation, otherwise paraphrasing some text would do so as well.--Pink kitty111 (talk) 13:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Have you even watched them side by side?.. :-( --Pink kitty111 (talk) 13:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
You didn't make it from scratch, you copied it from the original. The way you copied it doesn't matter. What you're referring to with "paraphrasing" is the fair use principle, we don't allow fair use material on Wikimedia Commons. --Vera (talk) 12:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Just a little "thank you" for your work with GSoW. Tim D. Williamson (talk) 03:54, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome --Vera (talk) 15:36, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Help decide the future of WikimaniaEdit

Wikimania logo with text.svg

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 22:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

DememorixerEdit

Hi Vera, I frequently use the tool Dememorixer. I like it a lot. Thanks for the work you spent on it. I would like to ask one thing; the images I download are compressed by jpeg, but the compression is not optimal, it seems. Files generally are one third of the size they could be by using least compression. Is that something you have built in the tool, or is the amount of compression determined by the provider of the image? Regards. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I've used the functionality native to PHP to combine the tiles into one big image. I could look into if there is some aspect of this functionality that can be configured to give a more optimal result but I doubt that the default settings are not far from optimal. Vera (talk) 00:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Chemistry drawing WP MoS compliance assistanceEdit

Hello, user Edgar181 has gone a long way in assisting me, but if you'd like to contribute; there are a lot of images needed for the list of phenyltropanes on the English WP. If you make any, let me know and add them to cat. phenyltropanes here in commons. The main research paper I've been referencing is Singh, but RTI has similar patents that are linked on the WP page itself. Thanks! Nagelfar (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC) It's not me that is the chemist, but my friend who is yet to join the Wikimedia projects. Would you be ok to ad him on Facebook so you two can chat on what sort of things need to be done? --Vera (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Maarten Toonder (1972)Edit

Hi Vera, I re-uploaded that image because I don't feel there is a breach of copyright. If you don't agree, follow the right procedures and nominate it. I believe you are misusing your ability to delete images when it is done so quietly, without informing the people involved. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:obviouslruary 2016 (UTC)

it's a really really obvious copyright violation Vera (talk) 14:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Marten Toonder (1972).jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Marten Toonder (1972).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Towards a New Wikimania resultsEdit

Wikimania logo with text.svg

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

WatermerkEdit

Dag Vera, is het mogelijk om met jouw tool het watermerk uit deze foto te verwijderen. De afbeelding is rechtenvrij, want de maker Hendrik Coenraad de Graaff (Photographie Société anonyme) is op 1 januari 1932 overleden. Met vr. groet, Gouwenaar (talk) 19:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Heb je een link naar waar deze afbeelding is ingesloten in de database ipv deze hot link naar de jpeg? Het ziet er niet uit als iets voor de Dememorixer maar misschien kan Dezoomify er iets mee, of zijn er andere trucjes. --Vera (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Overigens is op https://rkd.nl/nl/explore/images#filters[kunstenaar]=Graaff%2C+H.C.+de de foto's te zien die het RKD heeft van deze fotograaf. Die zijn op 1 na watermerk-vrij te maken met de Dememorixer --Vera (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
De afbeeldingen van het werk van De Graaff bij de RKD ken ik, maar daar zit helaas geen foto van Anna Weill bij. Deze foto is afkomstig uit deze verzameling. Gouwenaar (talk) 09:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Het is een lastige. De thumbnails op de site hebben geen watermerk en zijn wel gegenereerd dus het is niet zo dat de afbeelding met watermerk en al in de database staat. Ik heb gemerkt dat afbeeldingen in dit overzicht die op _w.jpg eindigen geen watermerk hebben als je dat vervangt voor _fs.jpg. Zie voorbeeld Lily Pavey:

De foto's die al op _fs eindigen, zoals de foto van Weill, hebben echter deze optie niet - lijkt het. Ik heb mijn computer naar alle mogelijke een en twee letter-combinaties laten kijken en alleen fs en tn (=thumbnail) kwamen voor de afbeelding van Weill terug als niet 404. Je kan het Graphics lab vragen om het watermerk weg te poetsen. Dan kunnen ze ook gelijk die kras over haar kin weghalen. --Vera (talk) 13:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Dank voor de moeite, vooralsnog heb ik deze bewerkte versie geplaatst. Gouwenaar (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:De humani corporis fabrica 1543Edit

Thanks, I don't know where I put it but I placed File:De humani corporis fabrica (29).jpg in the correct sub folder. I think I still have to clean up a bit as there were so many images with similar names. I'm a kaskoop. WayneRay (talk) 00:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I think you mean kaaskop. You removed them from the category, instead of putting them in a subcategory. --Vera (talk) 12:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Upload of exact duplicateEdit

Hello Vera, in 2014 you've uploaded File:2005-11-20 - United Kingdom - England - London - Hyde Park - Speakers' Corner 4887907963.jpg not realising, that it is an exact duplicate of File:Imveryclever.jpg. Since your an admin you should be able to fix this alone. If you think, though, I should add the {{duplicate}} template, let me know. BTW: In my eyes your version should be kept because of the better image description, and I guess the file is part of a series, so the name is not accidentally selected. — Speravir_Talk – 01:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

yeah, in late 2014 I uploaded and categorized almost all photographs from that Flickr account. I did try my best to remove duplicate but this was done manually so errors were inevitable. I've since gotten better at automating so in the future I can first get the Flickr identifiers from Commons of images that have already been uploaded. On a side note, the images I uploaded from this Flickr accounts have hardly been used on the Wikipedia's since then. Somebody might like to take a look at them and see if there is a known article that can use them. Vera (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Well, I found this while searching for a Speaker Corner's image for my talk page (but decided later not to use one). BTW: Nice sig! But let me suggest one thing: Instead of these two <big>…</big> pairs with in total 22 characters you could add the css rule font-size: 142%; (value according to Firefox inspector; you could change this, of course), and with removing some insignificant spaces you even could save some more characters:
  • Vera (your version)
  • Vera (my suggestion)
— Speravir_Talk – 17:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, I used it. --Vera (talk) 12:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome. :-) — Speravir_Talk – 14:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

I checked out your uploads. You seem to focus on PD archive footage. A help page I liked when I found it was Help:Zoomable images, it has instructions on various ways of getting the full resolution when a image bank has tiled the high resolution version of an image. --Vera (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Oh, interesting, thank you. I will look at this. — Speravir_Talk – 17:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Deleting my userpageEdit

Hello, could you please remove my user page ? My meta's userpage will be displayed instead. Thanks Archi38 (talk) 11:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Archi38, I guess if you empty your userpage a bot will take over Face-smile.svg. Lotje (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
It won't work if I empty my usepage. The page has to be deleted, not emptied Archi38 (talk) 13:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC).

Tracy MetzEdit

Dag 1Veertje, dank je voor de foto's van Tracy Metz, goed gevonden! Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Hey, en jij bedankt voor het compliment. Face-smile.svg --Vera (talk) 21:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Hackathon 2016 (441).JPGEdit

Hoi, als een foto op zichzelf niet gejat is, maar er staat ergens op die foto iets afgebeeld dat mogelijk voor een copyright-probleem zou kunnen zorgen, dan is daar altijd een normale DR voor nodig. Daarnaast is het niet de bedoeling als een 'speedy' eenmaal is afgewezen opnieuw voor 'speedy' te nomineren. Je kunt dan een normale DR starten. Jcb (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Want oneindig lang praten over dingen die als een paal boven water staan is een goede besteding van tijd? het logo is niet oké voor Commons, het is het enige wat wordt weergegeven in de foto. --Vera (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Er kunnen redenen zijn waarom er toch geen sprake is van inbreuk. In dit geval bijvoorbeeld, is COM:DM waarschijnlijk wel van toepassing. Er hoeft niet eindeloos over gepraat te worden, maar het moet wel netjes met een DR. Jcb (talk) 17:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy DeletionEdit

Dag Veertje, kun je de middelste versie (door een bot, uploaddatum 1 mei) van File:Dercy (Aisne) mairie (1).jpg verwijderen. Zie mijn commentaar HIER. Groeten --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done --Vera (talk) 17:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:PP Poster 2010 01.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PP Poster 2010 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

czar 22:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Another photo idea: Head office of the Algemeen DagbladEdit

Are you interested in photographing the head office of the nl:Algemeen Dagblad? It is at: Central Post, Delftseplein 27K 3013 AA Rotterdam (From contact page)

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 12:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

DeletionEdit

About this nomination, I didn't meant to be hostile, I just wanted to point out two more images that should be deleted because they are infringing copyright. I myself have deleted lots of images on rowiki which were infringing copyright and I was met with a lot of opposition. So no, you're not Hitler ;), you're just fair as everybody should be.Ionutzmovie (talk) 21:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Oh, no I didn't see it that way. Maybe I shouldn't have brought up the incident with the name calling a few years ago. Deleting photographs of campaign posters is a bit more frustrating than dealing with other copyright violations since the uploaders are usually well intentioned and actually relatively invested in the project. --Vera (talk) 08:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "1Veertje".