Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alandmanson!

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Alandmanson!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syncordulia gracilis Yellow Presba 2013 02 26 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

SVGsEdit

 
Blausen 0864 ToothDecay

Hi, I saw that you recently opposed my nomination of a decaying tooth for Quality Image status on the basis that it was "too small". While I am glad the image finally got reviewed, I am wondering if you are familiar with SVG image formatting (?). This image is a vector graphic, which means it can be scaled to any size without loss of image quality (unlike a photograph). Such files are meant to be memory-efficient (small file size) while still highly detailed and (hopefully) informative. Anyhow, just wanted to check— I myself only discovered SVGs while trying to illustrate a teletherapy capsule several years ago, and it was an eye-opening experience! KDS4444 (talk) 12:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bradypodion melanocephalum 0306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Azuragrion nigridorsum 2016 10 08 12 08 22 5631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Colotis eris 2011 12 16 13 31 Mkhuze.jpgEdit

Hi Alan. I'm not sure which colitis butterfly you have photographed, but I'm pretty sure it's not colotis eris. Check out the three dot pattern and the upper wing markings you can see through the wing underside. Best wishes, Charles

well we can't argue with THE expert! Thanks for checking. My 'bible' is Mark Williams' BUTTERFLIES AND SKIPPERS OF THE AFROTROPICAL REGION, but he doesn't illustrate the female forms at all. Charles (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paragomphus cognatus, rock hooktail 33119-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support - Impressive quality. I don't see the URL in the nomination; I guess it was removed? -- Ikan Kekek 17:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
  Comment Yep, I removed it since it corrupted the code and made the text of the nom not showing up. --W.carter 18:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karoo Scrub-Robin 2017 03 24 1598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crombec, Long-billed Alan Manson 2009 10 03 10 29 42 07548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zebra 2013 10 06 1274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
nice shot. Charlesjsharp 12:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Troublesome codingEdit

Hi! Just wanted to explain why I altered your post on QIC CR. Some characters corrupts the code if they are placed inside the double brackets ({{}}). One of them is the =. I have replaced your equations such as "1816×1635px = 2.97MP" with "1816×1635px equals 2.97MP" so that the whole box and all the text will be dislpayed properly. Hope you don't mind.   --cart-Talk 11:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC) Thanks! I could not work out what the problem was --Alandmanson (talk) 11:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harpagomantis tricolor 2017 05 01 6363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harpagomantis tricolor 2017 05 01 6346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White Rhino 2013 10 05 0438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
slightly over-exposed. Charlesjsharp 12:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)   reworked --Alandmanson 08:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Good now. Charlesjsharp 09:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karoo scrub robin 2017 03 24 1625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 05:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dwarf mongoose 2014 04 29 4153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - May - Mammals/WinnersEdit

  Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Zebra 2013 10 06 1274.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Mammals, in May 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campicoloides bifasciatus 2017 06 17 15 18 43 9253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support OK. --C messier 14:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campicoloides bifasciatus 2017 06 17 15 18 39 9252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI for me. --C messier 14:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thamnolaea cinnamomeiventris 2016 10 10 11 25 50 7732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thamnolaea cinnamomeiventris 2016 10 10 11 24 51 7674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 20:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cercotrichas leucophrys 2016 10 11 12 04 18 8926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality IMO. --Peulle 14:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! African veined white 2017 07 02 0194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Shankar Raman 04:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harrier African Marsh 2013 08 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality - albeit with a slightly wide left crop. --Peulle 20:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-winged Starling 2014 02 23 6113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, sharp enough I think. --Peulle 20:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-winged Starling 2017 07 08 0571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 22:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cape cormorant 2011 07 10 03481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI for me. --C messier 17:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firefinch African 2017 07 02 11 45 37 0106c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice and good quality -- Spurzem 16:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cape cormorant 2011 07 10 03481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southern masked weaver 2011 10 12 3390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good -- Spurzem 16:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Disa chrysostachya 2016 01 02 4349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Beautiful rythm. --MirandaAdramin 19:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spectacled weaver 2011 07 12 04161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Secretarybird 2011 11 27 5815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 12:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grasshopper 2017 07 02 0352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 19:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grasshopper 2017 07 02 0382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. This is the better one. --Peulle 19:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grasshopper 2017 07 02 0442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swarthy sprite 2015 10 10 4841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andropadus importunus 2016 10 08 4975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Shankar Raman 01:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Satyrium hallackii subsp. ocellatum 2016 01 18 0346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spectacled weaver 2011 07 14 04924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spectacled Weaver 2011 10 12 3300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 21:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Male pink-throated twinspot 2014 10 19 0374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 14:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pink-throated twinspot (Hypargos margaritatus) 2014 10 19 0188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Azuragrion nigridorsum 2016 10 08 12 08 22 5631.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Azuragrion nigridorsum 2016 10 08 12 08 22 5631.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue waxbill 2012 10 08 6421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 14:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Waxbill 2015 01 18 2316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 13:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Waxbill 2015 01 18 2104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 13:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little egret 2017 07 14 2113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 12:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little egret 2017 07 14 2173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 13:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little egret 2017 07 14 2381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 12:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little egret 2017 07 14 2409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ground woodpecker 2013 10 23 1928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Shankar Raman 13:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ground woodpecker 2013 10 23 1969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Shankar Raman 13:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ground woodpecker 2017 02 06 3172c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swee waxbill 2008 05 18 08 42 33 5796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Shankar Raman 14:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Zebra 2013 10 06 1274.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zebra 2013 10 06 1274.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellowjack 2014 03 01 6686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Anax imperator 2015 11 23 6807.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anax imperator 2015 11 23 6807.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Little Egret 2013 05 12 9241d.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Little Egret 2013 05 12 9241d.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

"Field by crop" categoriesEdit

Hi Alan,

I would like to inform you, that I've switched the South African crop categories from you to the standard scheme: Category:Fields in South Africa by crop

I hope you can get along with it. Additionally I've created Category:Cedara Research Station.

I think generally that we need more agricultural experts at Wikipedia!

Best Regards, ISIL-KP (talk) 22:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

On the whole, I have no problem with your moves - however, I did not feel that pictures of single plants or leaves fitted a "fields" category Alandmanson (talk) 12:10, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Better?--ISIL-KP (talk) 10:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Cool - Thanks! --Alandmanson (talk) 11:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cape vulture 2017 08 23 5935.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cape vulture 2017 08 23 5935.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Next Wiki Science CompetitionEdit

Hi, I am contacting all active commons users I can find more interested in the management of pictures related to scientific topics. If you have time could you take a look in Commons:Village_pump#Upcoming_Wiki_Science_Competition. Thank you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - August - Panning/WinnersEdit

  Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Southern ground hornbill 2015 11 26 8461b.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Panning, in August 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 01:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Agriocnemis falcifera 2017 10 22 1465.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agriocnemis falcifera 2017 10 22 1465.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

POTY 2017Edit

Hi, congratulations for having one of your pictures in the 2017 POTY contest! I noticed that you edited it to remove a spot, but in the process the image was enlarged and the EXIF info was lost. I'd humbly suggest that the original size be kept, as well as the EXIF info. If I may suggest yet another improvement, there's a small white dot right above the hair on the insect's back, and another one on the picture's lower right corner that could also be photoshopped. Kind regards, —capmo (talk) 15:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Alandmanson".