User talk:ArildV/Archive 2017

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Landsorts fyr December 2016 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Landsorts fyr December 2016 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokskär December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bastugrundet January 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bastugrundet January 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

God Jul!

Jag har just spritt "Kalle Ankas Fotografiska Expedtition" till resten av de inte ont annande gänget på FPC, men du kan ju antagligen denna "hyllning" till fotografer utantill lika väl som jag, så jag får istället bara önska dig en riktigt God Jul och ett Gott Nytt År! :) cart-Talk 16:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Jo, jag har sett den några gånger ja:) God jul och gott nytt år!--ArildV (talk) 21:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be improved, but OK. --XRay 14:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungan December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right upper border could be sharper but still OK for me. Nice water flow! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen December 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bensinmack Ljungdalen December 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 12:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora borealis Torkilstöten December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is fine for this kind of photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy new year!

	Merry Christmas, ArildV!
	English: Hellow ArildV, Merci/Gracias/Thanks my friend for do it posible, this family of Commons, beleave that we can change world improving the educational media disponible. Take care by your self --The Photographer 02:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC) --The Photographer 02:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen December 2016 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen December 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 19:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen December 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:58, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ol-Ers July 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ol-Ers July 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 01.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich Subway Station Großhadern 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Råcksta träsk October 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Råcksta träsk October 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rådhuset metro station December 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birger Jarlspassagen December 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholms slottspark January 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyårsafton Hässelby gård 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. :-) --XRay 11:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tekniska högskolan metro station January 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very striking, and as the motion blur et al. is integral to the photo, good quality in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 18:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokskär August 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --ArildV 21:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumafabriken January 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emelie January 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emelie January 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bosquet Drottningholm Palace January 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumafabriken January 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Emelie January 2017 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emelie January 2017 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Östra Sörmlands järnvänd May 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok.. --A.Savin 17:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Östra Sörmlands järnvänd May 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunnebo slott September 2012 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Man, that guy in the entrance disturbs your shot. Kill him. ;) No, it looks quite good. Do I see a slight tilt, though?--Peulle 23:42, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment at least he is properly dressed! Cw or ccw correction? --ArildV 08:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Yes, he is. Am I the only one who think he helps the composition? -- Ikan Kekek 10:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC) I am happy to correct any tilt but I cant see the tilt. Is it cw or ccw?-ArildV 17:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Support Looking at the roof, it looked like it needed CW tilting but reexamining other parts of the building, I think it's just the structure itself that's not entirely straight.--Peulle 23:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luma Jetty January 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm Palace January 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I understand. I guess this way, you are forced to look through the gate, not at it ;-) --DXR 08:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slussen February 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Industrilandskapet Norrköping February 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motala ström February 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Industrilandskapet Norrköping February 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Industrilandskapet Norrköping February 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gladan 7 February 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västermalms Atrium February 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västermalms Atrium February 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katscha February 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - January - Railways/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Tekniska högskolan metro station January 2017.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Railways, in January 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 15:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Pier March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Katscha February 2017 06.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Katscha February 2017 06.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embassy Court March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 01:59, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Pier Brighton March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK. --Peulle 15:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birling Gap March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Comment I agree on the image quality, but could we perhaps get a more accurate description?--Peulle 13:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Thank you Ermell and Peulle. --ArildV 14:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belle Tout lighthouse March 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seven Sisters March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtenay Gate March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What a dreary British day! Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embassy Court March 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birling Gap Marsch 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment One question: those edges on the roof, are they really that jagged or are those compression issues?--Peulle 09:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC) Compression issues seems very unlikely here, jpg-quality set at 97.--ArildV 17:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC) Support OK, I'll go for that; if anybody disagree they can take it to CR.--Peulle 21:42, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastbourne Pier March 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastbourne Pier March 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtenay Gate March 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:West Pier March 2017 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:West Pier March 2017 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastbourne Pier March 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. --A.Savin 01:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:23, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seven Sisters March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastbourne Pier March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embassy Court March 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtenay Gate March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastbourne Pier March 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --ArildV 07:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)  Support some minor issues, but overall QI to me --Carschten 18:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belle Tout lighthouse March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Haze March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunswick March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brighton March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birling Gap March 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kings House March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brighton March 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment It's not much but it's leaning in on the left side, maybe you could correct it, please? --Basotxerri 09:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 09:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Regency March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norfolk Square Brighton 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunswick March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brighton March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birling Gap March 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Pier March 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:24, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birling Gap March 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That`s a very smart one. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bollard Södra Hammarbyhamnen 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Pier March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

FYI

Your image! Greetings from Vienna --Hubertl 04:52, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Pier March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--ArildV 18:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear ArildV,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 3 April 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 3 April 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 3 April 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 3 April 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferdinand April 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 3 April 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 2 April 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olaus Petri kyrka April 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härjedalsgatan 17 April 2017 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härjedalsgatan 17 April 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 3 April 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question The tubes on the right, are they something like this? Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC) Yes it is thank you I added the category Pneumatic refuse conveying system--ArildV 11:19, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härjedalsgatan 17 April 2017 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 2 April 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Pudelek 08:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olaus Petri kyrka April 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal College of Music in Stockholm April 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härjedalsgatan 17 April 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 3 April 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 2 April 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Sjöfallet 1 April 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härjedalsgatan 17 April 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härjedalsgatan 17 April 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volkswagen SP2 June 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volkswagen SP2 June 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pontiac Firebird June 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 22:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pontiac Firebird June 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH.80 Puss Moth 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH.80 Puss Moth 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:57, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot rods June 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 09:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot rods June 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good photo -- George Chernilevsky 09:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Deluxe 77 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nya Carnegiebryggeriet July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, possibly a decent FP candidate. -- Ikan Kekek 23:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palace Pier March 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palace Pier March 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH.80 Puss Moth 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Botvids kyrka February 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karklö July 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karklö July 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karklö July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Livioandronico2013 20:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlkö July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add geo location. --XRay 17:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)  DoneThank you.--ArildV 19:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karklö July 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karklö July 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karklö July 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karklö July 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 05:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gällnö July 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gällnö July 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gällnö July 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karklö July 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments House seems tilted, but image quality is good for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Thank you--ArildV 05:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fredriksdal May 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fredriksdal May 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Muddus April 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katscha February 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houseboats Shoreham-by-Sea March 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm city station July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 19:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Odenplan station July 2017 11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Odenplan station July 2017 11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birling Gap March 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birling Gap March 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kings Court March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odenplan station July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Industrilandskapet February 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality! --Ermell 22:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaxholm July 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC) IMO the image is too dark. --Till.niermann 10:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC) I think you are right, new version uploaded. Thank you--ArildV 10:23, 22 July 2017 (UTC) Reverted to Promotion, thx. --Till.niermann 11:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enköping July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO too dark. The vessel is painted white, isn't it? --Till.niermann 10:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)  Info New version uploaded.--ArildV 10:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC) Reverted to promotion after correction. --Till.niermann 11:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordan July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda March 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda March 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 13:49, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embassy Court March 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. But IMO WB too warm. --XRay 07:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:41, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda May 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice modern street view; I also would like to see a photo when the job at the right has been finished --Michielverbeek 18:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC) Sorry forgot to promote --Michielverbeek 07:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gällnö July 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gällnö July 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland DH.80 Puss Moth 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Belle Tout lighthouse March 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belle Tout lighthouse March 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quality Hotel Globe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An excellent photo, a nice piece of modern architecture, a surprising reflection, well done --Michielverbeek 20:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stortjärnen July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/MS Skarpö, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/MS Skarpö has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaxholm July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image and interesting clouds! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riksförsäkringsanstalten April 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OMG! One of the streets where I grew up. :) Thanks for making it look good. Good quality. --W.carter 20:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stortjärnen July 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 08:35, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KDM Dannebrog May 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheraton Centre August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto Financial District August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 00:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pantages Tower August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Matches the guide lines but looks unnatural. The problem are the guide lines I think. --Ermell 13:23, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The 250 August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rogers Centre August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:51, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yonge Street August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:51, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yonge Street August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Toronto Financial District August 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Toronto Financial District August 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto Railway August 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de la Bourse August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto Railway August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 01:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto Railway August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC) I really like this composition, and when looking at the thumbnail, I was thinking FP, but at full size, it doesn't look sharp enough. Do you have a sharper photo of this motif? I love the "future is now!" feel of it. -- Ikan Kekek 02:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC) Thank you for your comment Ikan Kekek, since the photo was taken in the evening I had to compromised with ISO and aperture to avoid blurred the train. I uploaded a new version, with some more sharpness. --ArildV 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC) I get your point about shooting in the evening. It's better, and maybe it's good enough for FP now. -- Ikan Kekek 02:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue McTavish August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wikimania Hackathon 2017 07.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wikimania Hackathon 2017 07.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de la Bourse August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:22, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:22, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10th Avenue August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The motion blur is well applied on this image, nice! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Terrace August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice - there's a bit of green CA, though, that should be removed.--Peulle 19:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)  Done (also more exposure). Thank you--ArildV 02:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC) Yep.--Peulle 06:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Terrace August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice - there's a bit of green CA, though, that should be removed.--Peulle 19:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)  Done Thank you--ArildV 02:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC) OK. --Peulle 06:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dundas Street West August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ritz-Carlton Toronto August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Breathtaking view and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McGill University downtown campus August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sharp Centre for Design August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McCaul Street August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halo Brewery August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Junction August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dundas Street West August 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would remove the small flying twig on the right but already OK for a QI. --Basotxerri 05:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks.--ArildV 11:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Broadcasting Centre August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But improvable with more contrast and geo location. --XRay 06:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks--ArildV 11:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honest Eds August 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ--Nikhilb239 02:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto Campus August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ--Nikhilb239 02:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Montreal from Mount Royal, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Montreal from Mount Royal has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMHO, but there is a slight perspective distortion IMHO.--Nikhilb239 02:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)  DoneThank you, new version uploaded.--ArildV 19:50, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Good quality--Nikhilb239 01:51, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shangri-La Toronto August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roundhouse Park August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenset Falun July 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kristine kyrka July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 06:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Toronto City Hall August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenset Falun July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siljan July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 09:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna kyrka September 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really Good! --Sixflashphoto 21:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna kyrka September 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 17:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.PumpkinSky 23:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.PumpkinSky 23:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons Conference project

Hello ArildV,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 10:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna kyrka September 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna kyrka September 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice place (and the photo, too). Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:51, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality despite the lighthouse leans a little bit to the left.--Capricorn4049 17:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kristine kyrka July 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. IMO it's leaning out. And there are minor CAs, for example at the cross at the top. And please add the geo location. --XRay 04:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC) What I see is a barrel distortion, the flag is leaning in but the building below it leaning out Poco a poco 04:53, 2 September 2017 (UTC)  Info Thank you. I will upload a new version tomorrow.--ArildV 21:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Done--ArildV 06:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort coastal artillery bunker December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks deformed for me, but I cannot find any serious error, so a Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blidösund July 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto Railway Museum August 2017 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort lighthouse December 2016 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort lighthouse December 2016 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator 5 Annex August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator 5 Annex August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator 5 August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Sixflashphoto 16:08, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort lighthouse December 2016 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator 5 August 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort lighthouse December 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort coastal artillery bunker December 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bunker is well done, but the horizon is not straight --Michielverbeek 06:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:23, 9 September 2017 (UTC) now, it's a Q1 --Michielverbeek 10:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort lighthouse December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge July 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DC3 Skå June 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Marie-Reine-du-Monde 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place d'Armes August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me, Tournasol7 00:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jan Ainali Fotosafari Kiruna 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, sharp photo --Michielverbeek 06:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DC3 Skå June 2017 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transformatorbyggnad Falu koppargruva July 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falu koppargruva July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort lighthouse December 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna kyrka September 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 09:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare Windsor August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Marie-Reine-du-Monde 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very interesting light and beautiful reflections in the sunshower. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DC3 Skå June 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 12:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kiruna kyrka September 2017 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kiruna kyrka September 2017 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roundhouse Park August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DC3 Skå June 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort coastal artillery bunker December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But why only f/5.6? --XRay 18:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC) No particular reason, I think I was using f/5.6 for a different images and forgot to change. The lens is slightly sharper at f/8 but not a big difference.--ArildV 19:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Scottish Life Insurance Building August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop on the extreme right, with someone's elbow, is a little distracting, but good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 18:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place d'Armes August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Certainly a well-made photo, but why does the right-hand tower of the Cathedral look flat? Also, there's a tiny speck to the right of the top of that tower. I removed a tiny dust spot from the images. I think its because of the wide-angle lens and some perspective correction. Thank you for reviews.--ArildV 18:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transformatorbyggnad Falu koppargruva July 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sky could be improved. --XRay 04:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DC3 Skå June 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator 5 August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna station 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. It's sharp enough, but f/5.6 not the best choice. --XRay 04:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto Railway Museum August 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Toronto City Hall August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto Railway Museum August 2017 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge July 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolagshotellet September 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blidösund July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna kyrka September 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator 5 August 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please add the geo location. --XRay 13:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilson Chambers building August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality --Shishir 13:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolagshotellet September 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna stadshus September 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkaden June 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto August 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Scottish Life Insurance Building August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto August 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kensington Market Toronto August 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support It's acceptable, but not the best one. A little bit noisy in the shadows, sharpness/DoF could be improved. --XRay 07:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transformatorbyggnad Falu koppargruva July 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thanks--ArildV 19:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)*little crop left, and significant crop below ?--Jebulon 22:04, 11 September 2017 (UTC)  Done --ArildV 18:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Now, very good quality. --MB-one 12:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

An update from Wiki Loves Monuments UK

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 2px solid #C0D9D9;" |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Thank you for taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments UK'''||rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:WLM United Kingdom.svg|100px]] |- |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | More than 300 people have contributed a total of 4,000 photos to this year's competition and we wanted to say thank you for helping us get this far. The competition runs until the end of September, and you can upload as many images as you want - so feel free to document some more sites. Or why not go through your old images to see if you have any others that could be submitted? Since you've already submitted some pictures to the competition, you might be interested in the banner mini-contest; to take part you crop your images to a 7:1 and upload a new version. You can find out more about how to do that [[Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2017/banners/en|here]]. In the meantime, we hope you enjoy the competition and share it with others! [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 12:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DC3 Skå June 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!! Good quality. --W.carter 20:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica August 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkaden June 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort lighthouse December 2016 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkaden June 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 07:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kensington Market Toronto August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beachy Head March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful photo, no doubt at least a Q1. It's only difficult to see if horizon is horizontal --Michielverbeek 05:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto Railway Museum August 2017 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kristine kyrka July 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator 5 Annex August 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brighton West Pier March 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkaden June 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volvo V60 September 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brighton West Pier 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator 5 Annex August 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkaden June 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Union Station Toronto August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DC3 Skå June 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groyne Brighton Pier March 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariefreds ångsbåtstation May 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 12:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastbourne Pier March 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto city hall August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal August 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator 5 August 2017 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC) The photo is no doubt good. But it seems to me that the elevator and the pillar of the fence are tilted to the left. I do not insist on correction. Just paying attention.--Aeou 13:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)  Done Thank you. --ArildV 22:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica August 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spot near the top margin, above the further spire of the church. And what are the weird undulating shapes above the sidewalk, next to the wall beyond the steps in the foreground? -- Ikan Kekek 09:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC) Dust spot removed. I am not sure I understand your second comment, its some blurred people.--ArildV 19:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC) Thanks. Those don't look like ghosts, though. People turned into luminous, wavy curves? -- Ikan Kekek 20:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)  CommentI have no other explanation, they are there in the original raw file (no strange post-processing).--ArildV 22:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC) Thanks for checking. Well, it's a mystery, but overall, the quality is good, so  Support. -- Ikan Kekek 22:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gripsholms slott May 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teater Gripsholm 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midtown August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal August 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gripsholms slott May 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality Sixflashphoto 06:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East 42nd Street August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midtown August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC) ArildV, you're looking north, not west toward the Hudson River, and you are looking up the East River. The Hudson River is all the way on the other side of Manhattan. Please correct your file description. If you check a map, you'll see that Manhattan is connected to New Jersey by only one bridge - the George Washington Bridge. The other trans-Hudson connections between Manhattan and New Jersey are tunnels. All the other bridges from Manhattan are either on the East River (to Brooklyn or Queens) or the Harlem River (to the Bronx), with the Triborough (officially, the RFK Triborough Bridge) connecting Manhattan to both Queens and the Bronx. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC) Done Thank you--ArildV 07:35, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merchants Refrigerating Company Warehouse August 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macy's Herald Square August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like this. -- Sixflashphoto 23:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macy's Herald Square August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow! The sharpness is not perfect, but the composition fully compensates for that --PtrQs 21:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teater Gripsholm 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 01:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gripsholms slott May 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good indoor shot! --PtrQs 21:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge August 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I keep coming back to this and it's a QI to me -- Sixflashphoto 02:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkaden June 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2017 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The perspective argument wont convince me. This is a absolutely a QI -- Sixflashphoto 06:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! High Line August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning shot - could you do something about the noise though? --King of Hearts 04:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you for your review. I uploaded new versions.--ArildV 21:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)  Support Potential FP. --King of Hearts 05:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Marie-Reine-du-Monde 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, a larger version would be appreciated if available. --C messier 10:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you for review. Its is a crop.--ArildV 15:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Marie-Reine-du-Monde 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A white triangle bottom left and a big dust spot above the near lamp post (not easily seen). --C messier 15:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC) Done Thank you for review and sorry for late response--ArildV 21:34, 27 September 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Moahim 09:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Federal Hall August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Focus is not optimal on every part of the building, but it's good enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 03:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Stock Exchange August 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Challenging light situation as usual on those narrow streets. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Stock Exchange August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Solid work. -- Ikan Kekek 03:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falu Rådhus August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wyndhams New Yorker Hotel August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good job getting that all in, considering the angle you needed to use, and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hjalmar Lundbohms gravmonument August 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West 34th Street August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1. It gives me real the feeling that I am walking in this city. --Michielverbeek 06:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You can increase the educational content by posting that you are looking toward the Brooklyn side. -- Ikan Kekek 03:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)  Done--ArildV 11:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midtown August 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are at least 3 dust spots toward the upper right corner. When they're fixed, this will be easily a QI. I'm still not satisfied with the file description, though. I'd call it a view looking north on the East River from Midtown Manhattan, with the Queensboro Bridge in the background. I wouldn't say you were looking toward the East River. -- Ikan Kekek 03:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)  Done I understand your linguistic point. Thanks for reviews.--ArildV 11:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC) Thanks. Good quality, nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 20:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal August 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment dust spots, otherwise great (just too much sky for my taste). --Carschten 21:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 11:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)  Support --Carschten 00:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna station August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Pier 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hjalmar Lundbohms gravmonument August 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems a little too much tightened. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna kyrka August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Simply Fantastic. -- Sixflashphoto 08:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falun August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kristine kyrka July 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Verticals are well done, but it looks deformed for me --Michielverbeek 06:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC) New version uploaded.--ArildV 22:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC) Sorry, it stills looks deformed for me, please a 3rd opinion --Michielverbeek 05:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)  Support Worm's-eye view and straightening create a feeling of distortion, but I think that's normal. QI for me --Carschten 10:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto city hall August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Östra Sörmlands järnväg May 2016 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariefreds ångsbåtstation May 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The sky could have more structure. --XRay 04:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica August 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But I would clone out the lonely parts of the tree at the right. --XRay 04:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace Pier 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great, Your eye follows the pier and the sky complements it very well -- Sixflashphoto 17:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good Quality, really like this -- Sixflashphoto 17:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gooderham Building August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West 34th Street August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 08:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna station 2017 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Subject is plenty sharp. Ok by me -- Sixflashphoto 22:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruvfogdegatan September 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 06:56, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna station 2017 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Union Station Toronto August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kensington Market Toronto August 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kristine kyrka July 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 07:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrkogatan September 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kengisgatan 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arent Grapegatan August 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lappgatan September 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a touch of magenta in the sky. --XRay 05:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC) Done New version uploaded. Thank you for review.--ArildV 08:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hermelinsgatan September 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a touch of magenta in the sky. --XRay 05:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Thank you for review.--ArildV 08:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinholtzgatan August 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terrassgatan September 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality that balcony? From Ikea? --Livioandronico2013 07:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arent Grapegatan August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Träarbetaregatan September 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiirunavaara September 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruvfogdegatan September 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna Krematorium September 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arent Grapegatan August 2017 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna brandstation September 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left part is not very sharp but good enough. --Selbymay 06:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna Krematorium September 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arent Grapegatan August 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Förmansklubben September 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 06:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna stadshus September 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Perspective not perfect but given the wide angle I think it is OK for QI. --C messier 13:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sjövägen December 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna centrum September 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiruna kyrka August 2017 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 07:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sjöstadsparterren October 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sjöstadsparterren October 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 09:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chinatown Toronto August 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you add some tramway-related category, please? --Basotxerri 15:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC) Done--ArildV 20:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:46, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Öresundsbron October 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västra Hamnen October 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, too! Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Ortdrivaren September 2017 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. It's leaning out. --XRay 12:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)  Done and some additional improvements. Thank you for review and sorry for late response.--ArildV 18:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)  Support Better. Thank you. --XRay 04:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västra Hamnen October 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christianshavn metro station October 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 11:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malmö By Bike October 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- PumpkinSky 12:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States – Results!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2017}} to your userpage!

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States during the month of October! The United States contest saw over 1,400 people (the most of any nation this year) contribute over 8,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. Hundreds of these photos are already being used to illustrate pages on various Wikimedia projects.

We're excited to announce that our national judging process has concluded, and that we have selected the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States! These photos are recognized for their photographic quality, artistic merit, and their encyclopedic value as illustrations of unique historical sites. We were amazed by all of the uploads, and regret only being able to formally recognize the top 10. That being said – congratulations to our national winners and their amazing shots! Our 10 winners will be sent to the international Wiki Loves Monuments jury, who will then select the winners of the international contest. If you're interested in seeing the winners of the other national contests, you may do so at Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 winners.

If you would like to view all the photos submitted for the U.S. this year, you may do so here.

Finally, we have also created a feedback form for all U.S. participants to fill out. The survey is optional and anonymous, and only takes a minute or two – we hope to use the feedback to organize better events in the future!

A quick thank you to our national jury, as well as Commons editors who have helped categorize and place photos for the event. And finally, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments and helping to preserve our history through photography - we hope to see you again for future Commons photography events!

~Kevin Payravi & Nikikana, from Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States (16:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC))

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, ArildV! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedvig Eleonora kyrka December 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 16:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedvig Eleonora kyrka December 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2018 (UTC)