User talk:Chabe01/Archive 5

Latest comment: 3 months ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrêt Bus Rue Point Jour Boulevard République - Boulogne-Billancourt (FR92) - 2021-02-21 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Accès Station Métro Boulogne Jean Jaurès Rue Château - Boulogne-Billancourt (FR92) - 2022-01-22 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immeuble 45 Rue Chabrol - Paris X (FR75) - 2021-06-27 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:15, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Logo JS Canton de Pont-de-Veyle.svg

 
File:Logo JS Canton de Pont-de-Veyle.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ixfd64 (talk) 17:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bâtiment 46 quai Gallo Boulogne Billancourt 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality, very atmospheric --FlocciNivis 11:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Thiers - Paris IX (FR75) - 2021-06-27 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 12:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:25, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Erratum: File:Plan Linéraire Transilien Ligne H - 2017-07-01.svg

Cher @Chabe01,

Merci beaucoup pour votre plan de la ligne H, je me permets de vous faire remarquer cependant une petite coquille qui y figure. En effet, la gare entre Chaponval et Valmondois n'est pas celle d'Asnières-sur-Oise, mais celle d'Auvers-sur-Oise, (qui est d'ailleurs la ville de la dernière résidence de Vincent van Gogh).

En vous saluant bien, 21stCenturySloth (talk) 14:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour, merci de votre retour, la correction vient d'être effectuée. Bien cordialement, Chabe01 (talk) 14:56, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I've seen that you uploaded the same Italy national football team logo of the Italian Wikipedia. Can you please do it also for the Italian Football Federation logo? 87.14.92.11 22:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, this logo already exists : Logo_Federazione_Italiana_Giuoco_Calcio_-_2021.svg Chabe01 (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, is this File:Logo_Federazione_Italiana_Giuoco_Calcio_-_2021.svg exactly the same logo of the one in the Italian Wikipedia? 5.169.102.184 18:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Tramway de Lyon

Hello ! Tu es l'auteur de File:Plan Réseau Tramway Lyon (2021).svg... Pourrais-tu, éventuellement, le mettre à jour avec les travaux du T6 nord qui ont commencé ce début de mois et si oui, as-tu besoin d'un tracé précis du genre https://destinations2026-sytral.fr/processes/t6-nord pour modifier ton svg ? Nonopoly (talk) 08:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, merci

Hello

I work at Europeana. I thought you might like to know that we used one of your Wikimedia uploads in a recent blog.

It was your photograph of Rue Nicot and the blog is here: https://www.europeana.eu/blog/how-did-nicotine-get-its-name

Many many thanks for uploading and sharing your photographs!

Best wishes,

Adrian 2.136.78.141 11:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Accès Station Métro Château Eau Boulevard Strasbourg - Paris X (FR75) - 2022-01-30 - 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Ok, after adding 2 new cats --Poco a poco 17:27, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Bornes royales

Bonjour Chabe01

Pour faire suite à tes demandes de renommages de quelques-unes de tes photos de bornes royales (6 à Châtenay-Malabry, 4 à Paris av. de Nogent), est-ce que tu penses qu'il serait possible de créer des sous-catégories pour ces bornes comme il en existe déjà pour d'autres bornes fleurdelysées qui se trouvent déjà dans la catégorie Bornes royales ? --Poudou99 (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrêt Bus Auberge Route Bourg - Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon (FR01) - 2022-10-26 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rame Tramway Station Tramway IdF Ligne 5 Garges Sarcelles - Garges-lès-Gonesse (FR95) - 2022-01-01 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Totem RER Gare Rosny Bois - Rosny-sous-Bois (FR93) - 2023-03-15 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 01:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Sacrot - Saint-Mandé (FR94) - 2023-03-18 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

RER Vélo

Salut,

Pour info toi qui a importé masse de pictos franciliens, le projet "RER Vélo" a été intégré à la charte IDFM : https://www.iledefrance.fr/sites/default/files/medias/2022/11/RER-V_COPIL_2022-11-07_PPT.pdf Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Salut, merci de l'information ;) Chabe01 (talk) 13:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 
File:Arrêt Bus Baron Roy Boulevard Poniatowski - Paris XII (FR75) - 2023-03-24 - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Logo AS Nancy-Lorraine - 1970.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo AS Nancy-Lorraine - 1970.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Research first on a building or artwork in France

Hello. Kindly make some research first on who designed the buildings or public artworks (like monuments) of France before publishing your photos on WikiCommons under commercial CC license (CC-BY-SA-4.0 is commercial by nature). For example, not all "old-looking" buildings are authored by architects who have died for more than 70 years, like the landmark building from Nantes that I just nominated. We all know France does not grant commercial freedom of panorama, and their politicians have opposed Wikimedia movement on commercial freedom of panorama for years, being backed by artists' societies and collectivities of France (see also this EuroNews concerning the European Parliament events of 2015). As the entire Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Chabe01 is FOP-related, I felt best to notify you regarding this. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Les plans linéaires

Bonjour,

Je serais très intéressé de connaître la méthode que je vous utilisée pour faire les plans linéaires comme les lignes du métro de Paris par exemple. Pourriez-vous prendre contact avec moi sur des réseaux sociaux comme Discord (Nolux Transport#4737) ou autres s'il vous plaît ?

Merci. Bonne journée à vous. Sunset.garlic (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurant Fontaine Gaillon - Paris II (FR75) - 2021-06-14 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Avenue Bourdonnais - Paris VII (FR75) - 2023-04-13 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Conservatoire - Paris IX (FR75) - 2023-04-18 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Colonel Driant - Paris I (FR75) - 2023-05-23 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Palestro - Paris II (FR75) - 2023-05-23 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Saint Denis - Paris II (FR75) - 2023-05-23 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Beaubourg - Paris III (FR75) - 2023-04-15 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaques Rue Beauce - Paris III (FR75) - 2023-05-23 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Necker - Paris IV (FR75) - 2023-05-24 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Quai Henri IV - Paris IV (FR75) - 2022-02-19 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Deux Ponts - Paris IV (FR75) - 2023-05-25 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Quai Béthune - Paris IV (FR75) - 2023-05-25 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Place Baudoyer - Paris IV (FR75) - 2021-05-25 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Louvre - Paris II (FR75) - 2023-05-23 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borne Incendie 07 Route Bourbouillon - Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon (FR01) - 2022-12-31 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panonceau Défense Toucher Fils Route Coudes - Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon (FR01) - 2021-11-01 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bois Fasses Inondé Crue Rivière Menthon - Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon (FR01) - 2021-12-29 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bazar Hôtel Ville - Paris IV (FR75) - 2020-09-30 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 15:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

 
File:Centre Georges Pompidou - Paris IV (FR75) - 2023-05-07 - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

 
File:Plaque Boulevard Pershing - Paris XVII (FR75) - 2021-08-20 - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tribune Nord Stade Marcel Verchère - Bourg-en-Bresse (FR01) - 2022-04-22 - 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Navire Santa Maria Manuela Armada Promenade Normandie - Rouen (FR76) - 2023-06-17 - 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Navire Étoile Roy Armada Promenade Normandie Niemen - Rouen (FR76) - 2023-06-17 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rame Tramway Station Jardin Parisien Tramway IdF Ligne 10 - Clamart (FR92) - 2023-06-28 - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rame Tramway Station Vallée Loups Tramway IdF Ligne 10 - Châtenay-Malabry (FR92) - 2023-06-28 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bâtiment Léon Figaret - Paris XI (FR75) - 2021-05-23 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avant Passage Étape 13 Tour France 2023 Avenue Clément Désormes - Châtillon-sur-Chalaronne (FR01) - 2023-07-14 - 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Relativity 02:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château - Châtillon-sur-Chalaronne (FR01) - 2023-07-18 - 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
File:Logo Essor Bresse Saône.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

And also:

Best regards Jonteemil (talk) 03:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escalier Saint Charles - Marseille I (FR13) - 2023-07-22 - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:55, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escalier Saint Charles - Marseille I (FR13) - 2023-07-22 - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:55, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escalier Saint Charles - Marseille I (FR13) - 2023-07-22 - 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:55, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilique Notre Dame Garde - Marseille VI (FR13) - 2023-07-22 - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:55, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

License of SVG Cycling Jerseys

Dear Chabe01/Archive 5,

You uploaded a series of cycling jersey SVG icons to Wikimedia Commons. Great work, thanks for that! See the list below for the items it concerns.

However, the shape is exactly the same as the file:Jersey yellow.svg   that I created, and uploaded under CC-BY-SA. This means that if you create derivative works', you must

  1. credit the original creator(s), and
  2. share it under the same license

You did not credit me as the original author of the work you made a derivative of.


Could you make changes to the images you uploaded? You can do this very simply by adding the following line to the icons you originally created (and removing the current license template line)

{{Self |1= cc-by-sa-4.0|author=Chabe01/Archive 5 |attribution= Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey yellow.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]}}

and if there is a summary table, change the line that reads |source={{own}} with a line that reads something like

|source={{own}} Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey Yellow.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]

If you based this icon on another icon than File:Jersey yellow.svg, you can substitute that and credit the creator thereof as well as the authors of the work they based their work on.

See also: User:IIVQ/Cycling Jerseys and Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Cycling Jersey Icons

With regards, IIVQ (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

File Looks like a derivative Date of first upload License User Properly references my work References which work Remarks
  Jersey cyan.svg Yes 2020-4-23 CC-by-sa 4 Chabe01 (talk) No
  Jersey_white_dots_on_light_blue.svg Yes 2020-10-2 CC-by-sa 4 Chabe01 (talk) No
  Jersey_white-black_strip.svg Yes 2020-10-9 CC-by-sa 4 Chabe01 (talk) No

IIVQ (talk) 20:33, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Jitendra Parmar

jitenda parmar 2409:4081:9C84:2E9D:84A3:8F63:ACBA:EFE3 09:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Georgia National Football Team Logo 2022.svg

 
File:Georgia National Football Team Logo 2022.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Logo
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Jonteemil (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Plans Orlyval/CDGval

Salut,

Pour info sur les derniers plans de secteur IDFM (voir les plans 14 et 52) les VAL aéroportuaires reprennent le même code couleur que les lignes 3bis et 13 et le pictogramme Métro. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 08:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Je me corrige, sur la version définitive du plan 52 c'est bien en orange. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 16:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

 
File:Stade France - Saint-Denis (FR93) - 2022-09-22 - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

 
File:Monument Général Leclerc - Antony (FR92) - 2023-08-05 - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Sainte Anne Butte Cailles - Paris XIII (FR75) - 2021-07-21 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 21:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Notre Dame Gare Paris 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint Germain Charonne - Paris XX (FR75) - 2021-10-18 - 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

 
File:Plaque Ici Vécut Louison Bobet 41 Rue Roublot - Fontenay-sous-Bois (FR94) - 2022-06-27 - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjp24 (talk) 21:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

 
File:Plaque Ici Vécut Louison Bobet 41 Rue Roublot - Fontenay-sous-Bois (FR94) - 2022-06-27 - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjp24 (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Antoine Chintreuil - Pont-de-Vaux (FR01) - 2023-09-26 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Antoine Chintreuil - Pont-de-Vaux (FR01) - 2023-09-26 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château - Châtillon-sur-Chalaronne (FR01) - 2023-07-18 - 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Acceptable. More space around would be good. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 03:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autoroute A40 vue depuis Pont Route Bâgé - Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon (FR01) - 2023-09-22 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:32, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Ville - Ivry-sur-Seine (FR94) - 2023-02-05 - 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Photo de la Pagode Khánh Anh d'Evry-Courcouronnes

Bonjour Chabe01

Je pense que vous devriez demander vous-même la suppression des photos de la Pagode Khánh Anh d'Evry-Courcouronnes car l'édifice est très récent et toutes photos de cette pagode font rapidement l'objet d'une demande de suppression pour raison "NoFop in France". Poudou99 (talk) 16:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Use of pictures

Good morning I'm doing an Non-profit Art Nouveau Inventory. and I'm using some of your pictures I think this is correct. I put your name as the author of them as 'CHABE01 / CC BY-SA XX'. If you want that I put another name, please let me know

examples: https://www.arquitecturamodernista.cat/obres/fr/paris/tots/estacio-de-metro-breguet-sabin-linia-5 https://www.arquitecturamodernista.cat/obres/fr/ablon-sur-seine/tots/casa-farmacia

Valentí Pons modernismevpt@gmail.com 79.153.113.95 08:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Lord Byron - Paris VIII (FR75) - 2023-10-07 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château Brie - Brie-Comte-Robert (FR77) - 2023-09-30 - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Morts - Brie-Comte-Robert (FR77) - 2023-09-30 - 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Rue Washington - Paris VIII (FR75) - 2023-10-07 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Agents SNCF Tués WWII Gare Corbeil Essonnes - Corbeil-Essonnes (FR91) - 2023-10-21 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Morts - Vigneux-sur-Seine (FR91) - 2023-10-21 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good for a phone camera. --BigDom 14:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Ville - Corbeil-Essonnes (FR91) - 2023-10-21 - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Morts Nièvre - Nevers (FR58) - 2023-09-21 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château Brie - Brie-Comte-Robert (FR77) - 2023-09-30 - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Michelin Entrée Asnières Rue Bourguignons - Asnières-sur-Seine (FR92) - 2022-10-22 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 10:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Michelin Entrée Suresnes Boulevard Henri Sellier - Suresnes (FR92) - 2023-09-02 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 10:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Entrée Sennecé Mâcon Rue Vrémontoise - Mâcon (FR71) - 2022-10-29 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 12:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rame SNCF Z23539 Gare Mâcon Ville - Mâcon (FR71) - 2023-09-27 - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 13:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Chemin Mayer - Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon (FR01) - 2023-07-19 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Four Ferme Grange Clou - Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon (FR01) - 2022-04-23 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Logo AC Amiens - 2019.svg

 
File:Logo AC Amiens - 2019.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bloody-libu (talk) 06:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 15:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Logo AS Saint Étienne Panthère.svg

Template:Autotranslate --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --Benoît (d) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --Benoît (d) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --Benoît (d) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --Benoît (d) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --Benoît (d) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --Benoît (d) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --Benoît (d) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate --Benoît (d) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Logo AS Saint Étienne 1988.svg

Template:Autotranslate 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 15:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate I8jdj8ee ([[User talk:I8jdj8ee|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Chabe01/Archive 5".