Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ixfd64!

BotMultichillT 05:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ixfd64!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the welcome! By the way, I thought I added a category using the built-in HotCat gadget, but I guess it didn't work. :\ --Ixfd64 (talk) 11:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:CopBlock1C.gif edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CopBlock1C.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

TLSuda (talk) 19:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • The licensing information is a little hard to see, but it can be found on the bottom of the every page on the Cop Block site. It states:

© 2009-2014 by its author and licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license unless specified otherwise.

There is no exception listed on the page for the logos. --Ixfd64 (talk) 20:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm not 100% sure that the company intended to release the logo (something that identifies their organization) under a free license, but it is in black and white on their website. Sorry about that. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
No problem. I also had doubts that an organization would release their logo under a free license, but if their copyright information says otherwise... --Ixfd64 (talk) 16:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:24OCT01IWXSRV01.gif edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:24OCT01IWXSRV01.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:GSI Commerce.png edit


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:GSI Commerce.png to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ebay enterprise.png edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ebay enterprise.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

   FDMS  4    15:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:SoapUI Pro 3.6.1 screenshot.png edit

Copyright status: File:SoapUI Pro 3.6.1 screenshot.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SoapUI Pro 3.6.1 screenshot.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 12:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given edit

 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Ixfd64 (talk) 18:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:06-claycenterchautauqua-ad.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:06-claycenterchautauqua-ad.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 05:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The source and author are in the description. I've copied them to the appropriate fields. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Whitespace removal edit

Hello, I've noticed a file that you recently uploaded, specifically File:Nectar-sleep-logo-vector.svg, has unneeded whitespace, are you able to remove them? 大诺史 (talk) 12:04, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Done! Ixfd64 (talk) 16:55, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:SAIL Logo.svg edit

 
File:SAIL Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

大诺史 (talk) 02:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:IndependenceMine Stone347.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:IndependenceMine Stone347.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jcb: The source was in the description. I've moved it to the appropriate field. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:36, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


File:First West Credit Union logo.svg edit

 
File:First West Credit Union logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmehus (talk • contribs) 23:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bray Wyatt deletion edit

I specified by saying it is from Facebook profile page if you know it can vandalize Commons delete it but just make sure you take the fiend because people love it due to my review about it Tbiw (talk) 19:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello! This file was marked as "Logo of non-notable organization". Just curious what is notable? This is officially registered NGO. I can provide all needed info, in case. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiidumyk (talk • contribs) 19:37, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I was not able to find any sources about an organization called 001. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for late reply, I didn't receive an email notification about your reply. So here is the link https://youcontrol.com.ua/en/catalog/company_details/41938372/ Sergiidumyk (talk) 21:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Prime95 quad-core.png edit

 
File:Prime95 quad-core.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.250.17.211 02:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bidgee (talk) 02:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Rollback edit

Hello. Thanks for your anti-vandalism work here! Do you want rollback to make things easier? --Minoraxtalk 13:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Minorax: Sure, I think that would be useful. Thanks! Ixfd64 (talk) 16:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
 

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Minoraxtalk 23:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Minorax: Thanks so much! Ixfd64 (talk) 00:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Laura Secord Chocolates logo.svg edit

 
File:Laura Secord Chocolates logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Fma12 (talk) 22:38, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Fma12: I've changed this to a normal DR because the original JPG version appears to have been uploaded by the copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Baby-Ruth-Wrapper-Small.jpg edit

 
File:Baby-Ruth-Wrapper-Small.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fail re-upload to Wikimedia edit

Good evening, I am writing as a beginner who can not translate a photo from Wikipedia to Wikimedia:( If necessary, I wanted to translate the logo of AMD Eyefinity, but the original owner put there restrictions on the license. I tried to pick them up, with the help of an assistant "Move-to-commons assistant" to put it out (because the same logos are already there and you personally re-translated them). So I want to ask can you somehow explain how you did with the licenses to re-translate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitaliy2005 (talk • contribs)

@Vitaliy2005: Could you please provide a link to the image in question? Ixfd64 (talk) 18:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
File:AMD Eyefinit Technology logo 2014.svg — Wikipedia I changed the license, but still an error due to the template. Vitaliy2005 (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
That's because the image still had a fair-use template. I've transferred it to Commons for you. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for doing this. However, in the future, if I could still replace the license, what kind of template would be suitable for Commons, which then to take? I tried to copy from there to such a page, but it did not work? Vitaliy2005 (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Commons:Choosing a license has some useful information. Your transfer didn't work because the image page on Wikipedia had a non-free template. Changing it to the information template resolved the issue. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Very thanks) Vitaliy2005 (talk) 13:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:ACDC Back in Black Single Cover.jpg edit

 
File:ACDC Back in Black Single Cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

NetNewsWire icon edit

Hi! why do you intend to rename it "pre-2020"? it seems https://netnewswire.com/ is still using this logo? RZuo (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

@RZou: I was going by the GutHub repository. The latest version on GitHub looks a bit different than the one on Commons. It looks like the files were updated "to use the Big Sur style icon for the 6.0 release" in October 2020. [1] Ixfd64 (talk) 17:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
thx! it seems this logo was adopted in may 2019. is it ok if i rename it to 2019-2020? RZuo (talk) 18:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
@RZuo: Sure, feel free to use whatever name you feel is the most appropriate. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:24, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


File:Rites of Passage cover.jpg edit

Johnj1995 (talk) 21:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Chinese surveillance balloon over Billings, MT.jpg edit

Thanks for putting the Instagram link, but I have a concern. The link is inaccessible without an Instagram account and the page can't even be archived via archive.org or archive.is. I'm thinking that the uploader will have to send a VTR ticket just to confirm. This is just in case the uploader decides to change the license or something. FunnyMath (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't think a VRT ticket is needed in this case. If evidence of permission is accessible on the web, then a trusted user can review the license and verify a work is free. I'll add a {{LicenseReview}} tag to the file. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I'm trying to get other people's opinion on this just to confirm. See Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Permission_given_via_Instagram_link FunnyMath (talk) 20:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Plus, even license reviewers can make mistakes. For example, today a license reviewer mistakenly confirmed the license for a video as CC-BY-SA 4.0 instead of CC-BY 4.0. See [2] and File:Chinese balloon fall.webm FunnyMath (talk) 20:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Brasão Diocese Meridional IEAB.gif edit

Hello sir, Today a Bot user nominated a file that I uploaded for deletion. Since the user was a bot, I figured it was best to ask another user for help. The file that I mentioned is an insignia, which is correctly reference by the license tag {insignia}. Thanks for your help. Przelijpdahl (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Przelijpdahl: That's because {{Insignia}} does not indicate the work's copyright status. It only states that there are non-copyright restrictions. You need to include a standard license tag as well. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Zarya of the Dawn cover.webp edit

Could you explain to me what's going on with this image? Trade (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Although the AI-generated images have been ruled non-copyrightable, the author has claimed copyright over them. We usually use the {{Copyright claims}} tag as an FYI for non-U.S. users. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
So. No legal action taken against Wikimedia? Trade (talk) 19:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm not aware of any such claims made specifically against Commons. "Copyfraud" would probably best describe what's going on here, but {{Copyfraud}} currently just redirects to {{Copyright claims}}. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Revisiting revisiting SOHO images edit

Hey, I just want to let you know that I revived the topic you started Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/04#Revisiting SOHO images in Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Revisiting revisiting SOHO images. I thought you might want to know. And thanks for starting the initial topic. CoronalMassAffection (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Lord Vinheteiro.jpg edit

 
File:Lord Vinheteiro.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Unofficial channel. See the official channel, with verification.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Edu! (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Edu!: The video had a Creative Commons license when I uploaded this. It is now gone, but Creative Commons licenses are irrecovable. Ixfd64 (talk) 15:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Edu!: Never mind, you are right as it is from an unofficial channel. Supporting deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Aalto University School of Art and Design.svg edit

 
File:Aalto University School of Art and Design.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mayiani10 (talk) 08:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:First Quantum Minerals logo.svg edit

 
File:First Quantum Minerals logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taichi (talk) 06:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply