Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DanielPenfield!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, DanielPenfield!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

CountiesEdit

[1]: Freeport is in Nassau, not Suffolk. - Jmabel ! talk 14:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50 and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. INeverCry 06:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear DanielPenfield,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 01:11, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United StatesEdit

Dear DanielPenfield,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.

User:Mono

Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear DanielPenfield,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear DanielPenfield,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

File:WXXIAMFMTVHeadquarters.JPGEdit

 
File:WXXIAMFMTVHeadquarters.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Levdr1lp / talk 07:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

File:BrowserToolbarsInInternetExplorer11.pngEdit

 
File:BrowserToolbarsInInternetExplorer11.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 20:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

File:StumbleBarInChrome.pngEdit

 
File:StumbleBarInChrome.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 20:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Please remain calm and collegialEdit

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Svenska | Українська | +/−


 
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

Using an asterisk in the middle of the vulgarity you are using to refer to other editors does not make it acceptable. Revent (talk) 17:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Using insults in the deletion log as User:Hedwig in Washington did in File:BrowserToolbarsInInternetExplorer11.png is not acceptable. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 06:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Even Hedwig (or someone) insulted you or your upload, just be calm and civil. Always assume good faith. You can report Hedwig at COM:AN/U. But don't forget to be civil at all times when reporting an user. Poké95 09:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

COM:OVERCATEdit

DanielPenfield, you don't seem to understand COM:OVERCAT as it pertains to the situation you posted about on my talk page. Category:Albany County, New York is a larger geographic area than Category:Albany, New York and it includes locations which are not part of Category:Albany, New York - thus, COM:OVERCAT does not apply to this situation. If, for example, you created a category that was Category:Road signs in Albany, New York which was a sub-cat of both Category:Albany, New York and Category:Road signs in Albany County, New York, then COM:OVERCAT would apply, but you have not done this. Famartin (talk) 10:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

@Famartin: Feel free to use the {{Reply to}} template on the talk page where the discussion originated instead of feeling obligated to duplicate the discussion here. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Is Audra Pinkerton on the U of Rochester faculty?Edit

Regarding this change, I thought she was a marketing person for the U of R, but this information is several years old, so you might be right if you have more recent info.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Good catch! -- DanielPenfield (talk) 01:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States – Results!Edit

 This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2017}} to your userpage!

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States during the month of October! The United States contest saw over 1,400 people (the most of any nation this year) contribute over 8,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. Hundreds of these photos are already being used to illustrate pages on various Wikimedia projects.

We're excited to announce that our national judging process has concluded, and that we have selected the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States! These photos are recognized for their photographic quality, artistic merit, and their encyclopedic value as illustrations of unique historical sites. We were amazed by all of the uploads, and regret only being able to formally recognize the top 10. That being said – congratulations to our national winners and their amazing shots! Our 10 winners will be sent to the international Wiki Loves Monuments jury, who will then select the winners of the international contest. If you're interested in seeing the winners of the other national contests, you may do so at Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 winners.

If you would like to view all the photos submitted for the U.S. this year, you may do so here.

Finally, we have also created a feedback form for all U.S. participants to fill out. The survey is optional and anonymous, and only takes a minute or two – we hope to use the feedback to organize better events in the future!

A quick thank you to our national jury, as well as Commons editors who have helped categorize and place photos for the event. And finally, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments and helping to preserve our history through photography - we hope to see you again for future Commons photography events!

~Kevin Payravi & Nikikana, from Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States (16:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC))

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Rockefeller Center ice rinkEdit

There are two reasons for not including the rink in Category:Winter in New York City. (It's the winter part, not the NYC part, that's the issue: it's already in another NYC category.)

  • The rink exists year-round, not just in winter, and not just when it has ice. There are images in the category such as this one, which shows the rink in April (which is in spring, not winter), when the ice had melted.
  • Even if you want to look only at the time when the rink has ice, that's not just winter, either. According to its official website, this year it opens in October, which is in autumn, not winter. In fact, we have non-winter images of the rink with ice, including this one that was taken in October.

For these reasons, I don't think the rink category as a whole belongs in a winter category. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:30, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2018!Edit

 This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2018}} to your userpage!

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,400 people contributing over 8,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. The event runs similar to last year with some small but exciting changes: improved state guides, an interactive map, and a larger prize pool! Like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 11:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Paolo Monti photographs of ManhattanEdit

Dear DanielPenfield, thank you for your fixes in the Paolo Monti collection; please take a look to File:Paolo Monti - Serie fotografica (New York, 1965) - BEIC 6361487.jpg because it similar to File:Paolo Monti - Serie fotografica (New York, 1965) - BEIC 6361487.jpg. You may confirm or not the buildings. Thank you. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 09:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

@Marco Chemello (BEIC): As you probably have noticed by now, User talk:Jim.henderson quickly made a positive identification. Thanks for the encouragement. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 12:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Irfanview Image categoryEdit

Can you please explain why you removed the Category tag? — Ineuw talk 02:54, 23 November 2018 (UTC) - Sorry, it was my mistake. I understand why. — Ineuw talk 02:58, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Schools_in_Bronx_County,_New_YorkEdit

Auntof6 (talk) 07:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Categorising images - Sydney ShowgroundsEdit

Hi there. Thanks for all your great work on categorising images. I'm looking at a few dated from November 2018 where a number of images photographed by Sam Hood during the 1930s were categorised at occurring at Sydney Showground (Olympic Park). However, the showground during the 1930s were located at Paddington and only moved to the Olympic Park in the early 2000s after the Sydney Olympic Games in 2000. I have added a new category for the Paddington site and there is no work for you to do; however I thought you should know. Many thanks and keep up the great work. Rangasyd (talk) 06:30, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Nowruz and CommonsEdit

Hi. I know Nowruz very well; I'm from Turkey and lived in other places where Nowruz is celebrated. I also know very well our "box in box" categorization system. Therefore I recommend you not to revert my edits until you also learn the system. Having written about my person I am expecting not to see edit summaries like "celebrated in many countries--see ..." about a festivity thay I also celebrate. I will add Nevruz eggs and semeni pictures here soon." Best. --E4024 (talk) 12:23, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

@E4024: Exactly what this "box in box" categorization system that you claim exists? Is that your baby-talk name for COM:OVERCAT? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Could be. I try to be as simple as possible when trying to make people undertand things that otherwise may seem complicated. Good-bye. --E4024 (talk) 12:38, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
@E4024: Could you use your adult voice, then, and state which of these "Big Boxes" your so-called little boxes (namely Category:Holidays in Iran, Category:Festivals of Iran, and Category:Iranian ceremonies) already belong in?:

TemplateEdit

Hello, just out of curiosity, what issue was this this template (which name was highly ambiguous btw) born to fix? I find the utility of a template of the states of the U.S., or of the countries of a single U.S. state, but don't see what need this one is aiming to satisfy. Thank you and best regards, -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 22:56, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

@Blackcat: It sounds like you should have looked around to answer your own question:
Regarding your "highly ambiguous" complaint: In what way is it ambiguous? Is it because you believe that New York City contains cities as New York State does? Is there some other "New York" entity that you believe contains cities? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 23:42, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
As for the last point, the main category is Cities in New York (state). The other templates, in order to keep consistency with the naming style, should be named "cities in the United States by month", etc. etc. That apart my question was aimed to know what issue that template solved as I don't see a feasible use of it. It's not a matter of sensitivity, is that I don't see the point in using navboxes beyond a certain level of detail. Regards, -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
@Blackcat:
Your claim My response
As for the last point, the main category is Cities in New York (state). No it isn't. It's Category:Cities in New York and it's been named that way since 2004 presumably because there are enough reasonable editors who know that (state) is a completely unnecessary disambiguation for "Cities in New York". That's right, there will in fact never be a "Category:Cities in New York City". Also, you can pretend that a) There exists a navbox (or even template) naming MOS for WikiCommons and b) This fictional navbox (or template) naming MOS for WikiCommons contains a requirement that all navigation templates for a category be named exactly the same as the category (beyond namespace), but as of this writing no such navbox/template MOS exists and no such navbox/template naming requirement exists.
The other templates, in order to keep consistency with the naming style, should be named "cities in the United States by month", etc. You can pretend all you want that there is a "naming style" for navboxes/templates on WikiCommons, but there is none as of this writing. Note that instead of continuing to browbeat me into naming things according to your vague whims, you could do something constructive like make a proposal that describes your tastes and preferences in detail at COM:CD.
I don't see the point in using navboxes beyond a certain level of detail I like how you use vagueness effectively here. Exactly what level of detail? Did you even bother to search the Template namespace for "cities" to see how many templates attempt to provide navigation for cities-related categories? Or is it emotionally safer for you to blame a single editor over a single template instead of making a detailed proposal at COM:CD?
-- DanielPenfield (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "DanielPenfield".