Digigalos~commonswiki

Narcissus 2

¡Oye! Gracias por decirme lo del enlace. Y además en español: un lujo. Yo no soy nada internáutico, más bien un poco vejancón; de milagro sé usar el ordenador. Con gusto te pasaré bibliografía y responderé a tus preguntas sobre Narcissus.
1. Todos los híbridos, géneros y especies, deben llevar el signo x delante del nombre, no importa si son naturales o de cultivo. Si con posterioridad se descubre que se han naturalizado y viven autónomamente, se les quita el signo. P.e., N. x perezlarae fué descrito como híbrido de N. cavanillesii y N. serotinus, cosa fácil de saber porque vivía entre sus padres y tenía caracteres intermedios entre los de estos. Hace unos años se descubrieron varias poblaciones de un narciso igual que vivía en solitario en la zona de Denia, Alicante; N. serotinus también vive por allí, aunque no estaba en las mismas localidades, pero la población más cercana de N. cavanillesii está a cientos de kms. Había que concluir que se trataba de N. x perezlarae naturalizado, o sea que se le ha quitado el x. Esta es la publicación de Soler [1]
2. Cultivares son las plantas a las que se ha dado nombre de cultivar; algunos no valen nada. Según el Código de Nomenclatura de Plantas Cultivadas han de cumplir unos requisitos, como ser registrados, pero me parece que hay poca seriedad en su cumplimiento. Pueden originarse por cruces (deliberados o accidentales), selección o mutaciones. Muchos se descubren en los viveros sin saber de donde han salido. En algunos géneros cuya fecundación es difícil de controlar, se hacen siembras abundantes y luego se ve lo que ha salido. Lo que gusta se guarda y lo que no se tira.
En el caso de Narcissus 'Actaea', mi opinión es que sólo ha intervenido N. poeticus, ya que no se aprecia ninguna característica que le sea ajena. En las poblaciones silvestres hay mucha variabilidad y es fácil seleccionar una planta y crear una línea homogénea.
3. No sé cuantos son, pero una barbaridad, aunque no todos se hayan descrito como híbridos. Con decirte que nombres de no híbridos tengo yo registrados mas de cuatrocientos te harás una idea. Hay un registro de Kew [2], que yo he conocido por el danés del que hablamos Meneerke bloem, que tiene muchos nombres, híbridos incluidos. Para el danés es como la Biblia, pero, por lo que yo he podido ver, es muy inexacto. Tambien está el International Plant Names Index [3] . Hace unos años, en 2002 o así, yo hice un trabajo de recopilación de los híbridos de Narcissus silvestres españoles que te podría servir como punto de partida. El problema es que aquí cada año se publican cosas nuevas sobre el género y hay que estar actualizando continuamente.
Creo que es todo. La próxima, si no te importa, por e-mail. Un saludo. Alfredo

Narcissus

Hola, José Luis: Supongo que te estaré dejando desconcertado con eso de escribirte cada vez a un sitio, pero es que no me aclaro con esto. Antes me han borrado un mensaje y casi calificado de vandálico por escribirte en la User discussion en vez de la User talk.
Bueno, a lo que voy. Efectivamente, el usuario que tu dices es un tal Reginald, un médico danés aficionado a los narcisos y que utiliza lo mismo que tú, lo que hay. Así que desde que detecté los cambios en mis fotos no paro de cartearme contigo y con él. Con él es trabajoso porque en inglés me cuesta mucho. Si quieres puedes leer los correos que nos hemos cruzado.
Yo si me tengo por experto en narcisos silvestres españoles. Le he dedicado bastante trabajo hasta hace unos años. Hay otra persona en España que también ha trabajado intensamente, J. Fernández Casas, aunque sus criterios y los míos son distintos. En los narcisos del norte trabajó un botánico vasco, Uribe-Echevarría. Actualmente Carlos Aedo está haciendo el género para Flora Ibérica. Lo que creo que está claro es que cualquiera de nosotros conoce los narcisos españoles mejor que los de Kew, así que no deberíamos seguirles en lo que se refiere a lo que hay o no en España.
Si quieres saber algo sobre el género o necesitas bibliografía o referencias, me lo pides, que sirva para algo el trabajo de estos años. Alguien creó una entrada con mi nombre en Wikipedia y yo aproveché para añadir mis publicaciones con enlaces, pero no sé si te servirá al estar en lenguaje botánico. Casi mejor me preguntas las dudas y yo encantado de ser útil. Un saludo. Alfredo, --Cillas (talk) 11:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

PS. Quizá sería bueno que pusieras en tu página User un enlace a tu User talk. Para gente como yo.

Narcissus muñozii-garmendiae

Lo siento, pero Narcissus muñozii-garmendiae no es híbrido ni tiene nada que ver con N. x litigiosus; ni con sus padres, ya que pertenece a la seccion Pseudonarcissi, como se puede ver en la foto. Hay dos autores de habla inglesa, Wells y Blanchard, que en sendos libros afirmaron que era un híbrido, y el error parece que se ha extendido. Ya lo dijo D. Manuel Laínz: los errores son estoloníferos. Un cordial saludo.--Cillas (talk) 12:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Imagen:Garganta del Villar arroyos.svg

Por favor, ¿podrías modificar en la imagen el nombre del río ya que hay un error?; en lugar de Río Astillero se trata del curso alto del Río Alberche. Muchas gracias y Saludos. C3PQ.

Image:Iron Maiden - Brave New World.jpg

Please do not upload copyrighted images such as album covers (under fair use). Please read Commons:Copyright tags for more information. This image will be deleted. --EugeneZelenko 17:27, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Please note that fiar use images are not allowed on the commons (see Commons:Licensing#Material_under_the_Fair_Use_Clause_is_not_allowed_on_the_Commons for details). The english wikipedia and some others do allow fair use images (though this is deprecated). Please do not upload book coervers, press photos, screenshots etc to the commons unless they have been explicitely releasd under a free license. -- Duesentrieb 21:48, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

If you want this album cover on Spanish Wikipedia just upload it there (if such kind of images allowed). --EugeneZelenko 03:49, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Baltasar del Alcázar.jpg

¿Podrías indicar la fuente? Para verificar que está en el dominio público, vamos. Gracias. --Dodo 17:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Así está perfecto. ¡Muchas gracias! --Dodo 16:58, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:AmelieNothomb.png

Thanks for providing this photograph. However, Catherine Cabrol states specifically on her site that none of her photographs are freely usable. It will thus be deleted, unless you provide us with a proof that you are Catherine Cabrol, or you obtained explicit permission from her. David.Monniaux 19:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

I've perused your list of uploads. You seem to download copyrighted, unfree photos from a variety of sites and upload them under various bogus licenses. I thus block you until you give a meaningful explanation. David.Monniaux 20:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Pour la photo d'Amélie Nothomb: je viens d'écrire à la photographe, et elle m'a répondu qu'elle n'avait pas donné d'autorisation de diffusion. En matière de photographie, le droit d'auteur n'appartient pas au sujet, mais au photographe. Je serais donc très curieux de voir ce courrier électronique de Mlle Nothomb.

D'une façon générale, si vous obtenez des permissions particulières pour des contenus a priori protégés, vous devez l'indiquer sur la page, et faire suivre copie des permissions à permissions@wikimedia.org.

Par ailleurs, je vous rappelle que les ayant-droit doivent non seulement accepter que nous mettions leurs photos sur notre site, mais aussi que ces photos soient placées sous une licence libre autorisant la redistribution, les travaux dérivés et les usages commerciaux.

Je vais donc vous débloquer, mais je vous serai gré de bien vouloir fournir des précisions sur les autorisations que vous auriez obtenues. :Merci !David.Monniaux 11:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

File:Bucardo2.jpg

Hola, gracias por contribuir, pero la imagen que subiste tiene copyright por la Guardia Civil de España [4], por lo tanto no es apta para subir a commons. La imagen ha sido borrada... te recomiendo leer Commons:Marcas de derechos de autor.. veo que no es la primera vez que te lo advierten... tené cuidado por favor. --Ernesto Graf (discusión) 20:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:CircuitosDivisores.png

Hi, Please add {{Pd-self}} to clearify copyright status if you mean to release rights. --Tomia 23:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion warning

Image:Albert Schweitzer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.

Fred Chess 20:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC) .

Image Tagging Image:Aguarunas.jpg

Listo: retiré el aviso. Muchas gracias y un saludo. --Dodo 10:16, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Volar a latitudes más cálidas

Pues así están las cosas. Escríbeme un correo si quieres saber más (no validaste el tuyo de es:, fistro). --Dodo 15:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Banco de imágenes del MEC

Vamos a ver: NO se aceptan. Las plantillas existen para que nadie tenga la tentación de crearlas (igual que existe la plantilla {{Fairuse}}), pero en Commons se exige alguna (por eso la dual sí) licencia que no restrinja los usos comerciales. Como dice en Commons:Sobre las licencias, "El uso comercial de la obra debe estar permitido."

Un saludo. --Dodo 10:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Oncifelis guigna

Dear Digigalos! We are wondering why you classified this image as a Kodkod. Apparently it is a common Domestic Cat. Did anyone play a joke on you, or what has happened there? --Baldhur 21:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I now added deletion requests for that image and Image:Oncifelis guigna 1.jpg. --Baldhur 19:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Huerta_de_Valdecarábanos.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Huerta_de_Valdecarábanos.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 23:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Iglesia_2_-_Cabañas_de_Yepes.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Iglesia_2_-_Cabañas_de_Yepes.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Valladolid_-_Mapa_municipal.png

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 22:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Villacañas.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Villacañas.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Deadstar 12:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:San Saturnino de Noya 10.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:San Saturnino de Noya 10.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 21:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Alberto_Magno.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alberto_Magno.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:56, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Antonio_Alcalá_Galiano.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antonio_Alcalá_Galiano.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 10:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Piranesi-Portrait.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Piranesi-Portrait.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Escudo_Valdemoro_1969.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Escudo_Valdemoro_1969.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

ALE! ¿…? 11:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Escudo de Mohedas de la Jara.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Escudo de Mohedas de la Jara.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--ALE! ¿…? 11:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cat Chartreux.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cat Chartreux.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wikipeder (talk) 23:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Imagen: Garganta del Villar arroyos.svg. Por favor, puedes modificar el nombre del río Astillero por el de río Alberche, ya que es un error que aparezca el primer nombre. Muchas gracias y saludos. C3PQ.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Digigalos~commonswiki!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Guadalajara Guadalajara - Mapa municipal.svg was uncategorized on 13 August 2009.
• Image:Condemios de Abajo Guadalajara - Mapa municipal.svg was uncategorized on 13 August 2009.
• Image:Somolinos Guadalajara - Mapa municipal.svg was uncategorized on 22 August 2009.

File tagging File:Madonna.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Madonna.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

—LX (talk, contribs) 16:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

RIP. --Túrelio (talk) 22:11, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:QtopiaPhone.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:QtopiaPhone.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:QtopiaPhone.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 23:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Hi! My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy). I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting some photos in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use them in my book. Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the pictures will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication. The 3 photos which I would use are: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ajania_pacifica_01.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sedum_dasyphyllum_01.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arbutus_unedo_04.jpg Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request… My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com Bye, Edoardo Edoardo.bit (talk) 09:35, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Escudo de San Quirico del Vallés.png

File:Escudo de San Quirico del Vallés.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Cameta (talk) 22:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Digigalos. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Digigalos~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

20:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

02:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Digigalos.PNG

Yours sincerely Fæ (talk) 11:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Three photographs of a misidentified plant

• 
  your image #1
• 
  your image #2
• 
  your image #3
• 
  Coronilla valentina from Sicily
  (my photograph)
• 
  C. valentina subsp. glauca
• 
  Medicago arborea fruits
• 
  Medicago arborea flowers (and fruits)

Dear user Digigalos~commonswiki,
Though I am not an expert of mediterranean flora, I just changed the ID of your three photographs from the gallery above to Medicago arborea, because the shape of the fruits in one of the photographs (#3) clearly shows that this must be Medicago and the shape of the small flowers would nicely match Medicago arborea, but not Coronilla valentina or any of its subspecies. So if you have not got any other shrubby Medicago species in your area, my ID should be correct. Of course, your three photographs still need to be renamed and their use in other wikis might require correction or replacement. With best regards, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 09:25, 1 July 2018 (UTC)