Edward Zigma

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Edward Zigma!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tabrez Ansari.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tabrez Ansari.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Source is me. The image is in public source and was somewhat cruel as a man was getting beaten so edited it somewhat and cropped it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward Zigma (talk • contribs) 04:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

@Patrick Rogel: the original image is in public domain and used by various media houses. The original image is take from the video which got viral when tabreZ was lynched. Edward Zigma (talk) 06:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Source is not you since you claimed it comes from a video. You should upload this video first or link to it so we can verify if it's public domain or not. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Link to the particular video. This video is in public domain. Various media houses used it for reporting.. So the original image already in the domain,Edited for the purpose to make it good. And less gory. Next I want to point out that the userHarshil169 who put my image under deletion did it with bad intention. Already a dispute is going on between him and me On Adminstrators noticeboard.. He is already blocked from main wikipedia for 1 week. Here. But I have provided the links to the video first so as to prove its in public domain with no copyright claim coz that's what that matters at the end. But the intention of putting my imahe under deletion is not with good intention and definately not in good faith with wikipedia editorship. Thank you.Edward Zigma (talk) 10:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

No this video is not under a Creative Commons license. Besides it's far too recent (2019) to be public domain: copyright lasts 70 years in India. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

No wait. That video was edit. Let me give link to another one. The one which is public domain.See this video. This was viral video and shared on public platform. I can give you many links to tweet where this video was viral. There is no particular to this video and this video(which I has shared now) used by many media houses ,about which I have already provided the link.@Patrick Rogel: . There is no copyright claim to the video so to the image. And rest is your decision. Thank you. Edward Zigma (talk) 11:36, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image is a derivative work of a copyrighted video, not a free one. The fact that it's available on the Internet and that there's no copyright claim to the video doesn't mean it's free. Please re-read "First steps tutorial" at the top of this page before uploading more files. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Did you checked the second message that I had sent you.@Patrick Rogel: .Edward Zigma (talk) 15:59, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

No matter how you’ll attack me and allege me for this. I’m not going to loose my cool in anyway. You are attacking me, no problem, but just read COPYRIGHT policy of commons. I never nominated your second image for deletion because it was your work. Your first image was someone’s work and that’s why admin has deleted it. You have to prove to admin that how this was your work. Please do that. Read en:WP:AGF and en:WP:NPA fully, you’re not making your case stronger. Regards,Harshil169 (talk) 11:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Tabrez Ansari.jpg

File:Tabrez Ansari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Harshil169 (talk) 05:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Tabrez Ansari.jpg

File:Tabrez Ansari.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsclick.in%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2019-06%2FTabrez_Ansari_Jharkhand_Lynching_0.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsclick.in%2Farticles%2FTabrez%2520Ansari%3Fpage%3D1&docid=APozU3uB7fmk0M&tbnid=vCRalKjbN7l40M%3A&vet=10ahUKEwjx2YTkjPjlAhWvyzgGHftJDJIQMwgsKAAwAA..i&w=1280&h=720&bih=625&biw=1366&q=tabrez%20alam%20mob%20lynching&ved=0ahUKEwjx2YTkjPjlAhWvyzgGHftJDJIQMwgsKAAwAA&iact=mrc&uact=8 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Harshil169 (talk) 05:59, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Goalpur Detention Center, Assam.jpg

File:Goalpur Detention Center, Assam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Edward Zigma (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Goalpur Detention Center, Assam.jpg

File:Goalpur Detention Center, Assam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Edward Zigma (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)