ElRaki

Image:MET00506.jpg

Das Bild war absichtlich verkleinert. --Saperaud 22:08, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Servus, wusste ich nicht. Allerdings sollte die Originaldatei trotzdem auch dabei sein, damit alles den rechten WEg nimmt, beovr sich ein Benutzer beschwert, dass „seine“ Version nirgends mehr zu finden ist. Grüße, ElRaki 23:51, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:HveraroendWinter.jpg

Hallo,

Du hast ein "originally uploaded ..." zu diesem Bild hinzugefügt. Ich hab zwar nichts dagegen, aber wozu soll das gut sein? Ich habe ca. 100 Bilder von de nach commons verschoben - oder besser - hochauflösende Versionen der Bilder aus de nach commons hochgeladen. Willst Du denen allen eine History hinzufügen? Das Aufwand / Nutzen Verhältnis strebt hier IMHO nach unendlich ... Andreas Tille 06:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Aus dem NowCommons-Baustein der de.wikiepdia:

Der löschende Administrator ist verpflichtet, vor dem Löschen zu prüfen, ob es tatsächlich eine exakte Kopie der Abbildung auf Commons gibt.

Falls das Bild auf Commons anders heißt, müssen die entsprechenden Bild-Verweise angepasst werden.

Alle Bildinformationen (einschließlich Versionsgeschichte und Benutzerseitenlink) müssen komplett auf die Commons übertragen sein.

Also ja, ich werde das überall ergänzen, bevor ich auf de lösche, das Ganze ist ja notwendig um die GNU-FDL nicht zu verletzen. Wenn du dir hier meine Bearbeitungen ansiehst, habe ich da schon einige History ergänzt :).

Hmmm, ich sehe nicht in wie weit die GNU-FDL verletzt wird. Die Situation ist folgende: Auf de hatte ich eine ganze Reihe Bilder in einer Auflösung von <= 640x480, in die ich keine Unmengen von Arbeit gesteckt habe. Im wesentlichen stammen Sie direkt von meinen Webseiten (wo die Bilder auch unter GNU-FDL stehen) und sind per Skript von meinen Photo-CDs generiert. Seit Commons gegründet wurde habe ich dann begonnen, die "guten" Bilder manuell unter viel Aufwand per Hand optimal aufzubereiten. Wenn man so will, ist durch die Bearbeitung teilweise sogar "ein neues Werk" entstanden. Das darauf das gleiche wie auf einem deutlich schlechteren Bild in de abgebildet ist, macht das Bild in de lediglich redundant und daher löschenswert, da es auch sonst nirgends mehr gebraucht wird, denn sämtliche Verweise habe ich schon umgehängt. Unter diesen Bedingungen sehe ich werde eine Lizensverletzung noch irgendein anderes Problem, die Bilder aus de einfach zu vergessen. Darüber hinaus hat jedes meiner Bilder auch noch einen Link auf meine Webseiten, wo das kleinere Bild noch mal zu finden ist. Andreas Tille 13:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Du würdest mir - bzw. den jeweils löschenden Admin - einige Arbeit ersparen, wenn du die History gleich beim Übertragen deiner Bilder eintragen könntest. Grüße, ElRaki 10:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Es sind nun nur noch 6 übrig. Nachtragen werde ich das ganze aus oben genannten Gründen definitiv nicht. Andreas Tille 13:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Nachtragen geht bei gelöschten Bildern sowieso nicht mehr, da ist die History des Bildes auch gelöscht. Aber es stimmt schon, bei eigenen Bildern ist die Sachlage ein wenig anders, bevor ich aber schaue, ob der Benutzer, der in Commons ein Bild hochladet der gleiche ist, wie der in der WP, kopiere ich die History immer. Grüße, ElRaki 01:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

German OGGs

I restored them (from user talk:essjay). Bizarrely, the original uploader picked "unknown" in the license selector -- and then left them that way!!! I don't know why people don't watch what they're doing sometimes... If you could fix up the formatting, that would be good, they look a bit weird. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the restoring. "Unknown"-license and GFDL at the same time is really confusing, but I'm sure that was a mistake. I fixed the format, I hope it's okay now? --13:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

File tagging File:Teamgeist Ball World Cup 2006.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Teamgeist Ball World Cup 2006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Captain-tucker (talk) 16:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Renee Pornero.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Renee Pornero.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Renee Pornero.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wappen at bad vigaun.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wappen at bad vigaun.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Wappen at dorfgastein.png

File:Wappen at dorfgastein.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Teamgeist Ball World Cup 2006.jpg

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

crop

20131031 AT01 Manuela Zinsberger Portrait

Hallo ElRaki, bitte schick mir eine kurze Mitteilung, bevor Du solche üblen Crops von meinen Bildern machst. Unscharfe schlecht aufgelöste Bilder habe ich sicher noch mehr auf der Platte. Gruppenbilder werde ich jedenfalls künftig nicht mehr in voller Auflösung hochladen. --Ailura (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)