Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fmeditree!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Enver Necdet Egeran.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Enver Necdet Egeran.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Enver Necdet Egeran.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

KAPour les intimes 15:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Copyright status: File:Mustapha al Shihabi.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mustapha al Shihabi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 07:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Freemasonry in Syria

edit

Thank you for your contributions. Please use more precise categories than "Archives" or "Syria". It seems that you are downloading mainly files regarding Category:Freemasonry in Syria, so please use this category. Learn about categories by looking at files you uploaded, Special:ListFiles/Fmeditree, and the categories they have now (they have been changed). --MHM (talk) 07:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Les sources, auteurs, licences

edit

Merci pour les nouvelles contributions. Maintenant, il faudrait être plus précis concernant les sources, auteurs et licences. Veuillez consulter la page Commons:À propos des licences.

Sources

edit

Vous écrivez "Travail personnel", ce qui je pense est proposé par défaut pour les contributions du genre une photographie faite personnellement, actuelle, mais ne convient pas pour des documents anciens. Concernant vos contributions sur Commons, ces documents doivent bien se trouver quelque part et ne font sans doute pas partie de votre collection privée ?! Si vous avez fait ces photos dans les archives d'une institution, il faut alors indiquer pour la source le nom de cette institution, le fonds d'archives consulté et si possible aussi la cote du document. S'ils se trouvent sur Internet, il faut alors indiquer le lien url de la page, éventuellement le nom de l'institution. Category:Archives in France devrait être remplacé par quelque chose de plus précis, au besoin créer une nouvelle catégorie (qui sera une sous-catégorie de Category:Archives in France, si j'ai bien compris).

Licences

edit

Vous avez utilisé la licence par défaut {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}. C'est incorrect, vous ne détenez pas les droits concernant ces documents anciens. Voir Informations de licence et Travaux dans le domaine public sur la page Commons:À propos des licences. C'est assez compliqué. Dans votre cas, il me semble que Template:PD-old-70-expired pourrait s'appliquer aux documents d'avant 1925, si on considère que les documents que vous avez photographiés ont été "publiés" avant 1925 ; veuillez remplacer alors {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} par {{PD-old-70-expired}}. Pour les autres documents, peut-être Template:PD-old-70, mais cela s'applique pas aux Etats-Unis, {{PD-old-70}}. À voir avec des spécialistes !

Auteurs

edit

Vous n'êtes pas l'auteur de ces documents, seulement des photographies... (Mais si vous faites aujourd'hui une photo de votre maison, alors c'est vous l'auteur).

  • Pour les photographies, ce sera "Auteur inconnu", mettre le modèle : {{Unknown photographer}}, sauf dans le cas où le photographe est connu.
  • Pour les documents, les auteurs sont les personnes qui les ont signés, non ?! Alors ce sont ces noms-là qu'il faudrait indiquer, si possible avec leur année de décès (important pour la licence).

Wikipedia et Commons... un long apprentissage... mais au final très valorisant :-) Si vous avez des questions, vous pouvez les ajouter sur cette page. --MHM (talk) 06:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Husni barazi small.png

edit
 
File:Husni barazi small.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aladdin (talk) 06:37, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply