Galahad1822

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Galahad1822!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:57, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Polisth underogund ak sthooting.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Polisth underogund ak sthooting.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

~Cybularny ^Speak? 12:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Luis prince imperial 1909 Brazil2.png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Luis prince imperial 1909 Brazil2.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 21:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Sobre este ficheiro

Olá. Esse ficheiro que já havia sido corrigido para o padrão do livro oficial do governo do Brasil teve a correção revertida. Favor tem como você corrigir ou reverter a modificação? Acho que quem reverteu desconhece o livro oficial que tem o padrão mais brasileiro.--Almanaque Lusofonista (talk) 21:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

"Bandeira do príncipe regente"?

Olá. Essa questão de uma tal "Bandeira do Príncipe Regente do Brasil" num sei de onde o wikipedista achou tal nome quando carregou aquela imagem. Já que a ata do Conselho de Estado aprovou foi uma bandeira e um Escudo de Armas do Reino do Brasil e não do príncipe-Regente. Eis a referida ata: . E nem o decreto que oficializou a decisão do Conselho de Estado fala em bandeira do regente. Após estudar alguns trabalhos sobre nossos símbolos nacionais o certo é que teve uma Bandeira do Reino do Brasil e a mesma pode nem ter valido até o dia 1º de dezembro (quando um decreto mudou para a coroa imperial) já que no dia 10 de outubro na cerimônia de entrega da bandeira para o corpo militar, na pessoa do então jovem Luís Alves de Lima e Silva Dom Pedro já a mencionou como bandeira imperial e também na ata de Coroação dele ( em 12 d outubro de 1822) o documento se refere como bandeira do império. Essa é a ata de coroação: .

Também no livro Os símbolos nacionais na independência, de autoria do general Jonas de Moraes Correia Filho num há nada sobre bandeira do regente do Brasil. A num ser que tem algum livro antigo publicado em outro país, já que muitos documentos da monarquia foram deixados se destruir após a derrubada da monarquia brasileira. Assim, salvo documento comprobatório, penso até que a mesma deveria ser redirecionada para Bandeira do Reino do Brasil.

Pode essa confusão toda ter se gerado pelo fato de já no Reino do Brasil ele, Pedro I, continuou assinando como "Príncipe Regente" e na época que o voluntário vetorizou e postou a bandeira ainda num havia disponível documento de sua criação, o famoso Decreto Real de 18 de setembro de 1882 --Almanaque Lusofonista (talk) 22:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

O editor continua revertendo a bandeira padrão com base em gosto pessoal dele

Olá, Galahad1822.

O editor JorgeMonarch1974 novamente reverteu o trabalho hoje.

Ele diz que reverteu porque, a: "Bandeira revertida por ser mais histórica que as demais. Além disso, todos os videogames e todos os vídeos do YouTube sempre usaram esta bandeira, então não vejo razão para refazer a bandeira, que se tornou horrível, ao invés desta clássica. Então, vamos ficar com esta, pois é a bandeira mais histórica do Império do Brasil". Pelo jeito de ele num é brasileiro e o verdadeiro motivo do referida padrão ser o mais usado no que ele chama de: todos os videogames e todos os vídeos do YouTube sempre usaram esta bandeira foi pelo fato de ter ficado muito tempo no ar( de 2006 a 2021) e nesses 15 anos o pessoal dos games, do youtube e todos mais[até mesmo os monarquistas kkk] apenas fizeram o tal do "Copia e cola". E quem vai copiar e colar num se liga na história correta ou em padrões heráldicos definidos em publicação oficial.

Penso que seria bom alguém criar uma página de discussão no Wikimedia Commons sobre essa bandeira e marcar ele para trocar ideias com mais gente e assim ele ficar menos radical e ficar mais atento à história do Brasil como também ver que o que a Wikipédia visa é a informação correta e não as convicções pessoas de certos editores--Almanaque Lusofonista (talk) 20:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Penso que seja preciso informar para um administrador sobre essas guerras de edição

Olá, nesses casos assim de guerras de edição deve-se informar a um administrtador que ele vai ponderar o caso e pode até bloquer as edições e também o editor teimoso.

Contate esse Yanguas administrador que ele resolve esses casos--Almanaque Lusofonista (talk) 21:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Please sign your postings

---

Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions

As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 22:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Please sign your postings

---

Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions

As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 22:10, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Arlindoveiga.png

File:Arlindoveiga.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)