Hello, Jonassoeby. You have new messages at Heb's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jonassoeby!

-- 12:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Jonassoeby!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:37, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Permission: (Use Google to translate is from dansih to english) Kære Jonas Logo og lejrtegn må gerne bruges til diverse formål, når det giver god omtale af lejren. Og det gør en artikel på Wikipedia vist. Med spejderhilsen Pernille M

CallCentret Spejdernes Lejr 2012

Besøg også lejrens hjemmeside www.spejderneslejr2012.dk for mere information!

The Call Center Jamboree Denmark 2012

Visit us at http://www.jamboreedenmark2012.dk

File tagging File:Spejdernes Lejr 2012 Spejdere fra de 5 spejderkorps.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Spejdernes Lejr 2012 Spejdere fra de 5 spejderkorps.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Spejdernes Lejr 2012 Spejdere fra de 5 spejderkorps.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

heb [T C E] 10:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hej,
I tillæg til ovenstående er baggrunden, at kildesiden kun tillader fri brug pressemæssigt og ikke eksplicit har frigivet billederne under en licensform, der ikke kan trækkes tilbage og tillader alle former for anvendelse. Se mere om problemstillingen (på engelsk) på Commons:Problematic sources. MVH heb [T C E] 11:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hej
Jeg søgte tilladelse for begge dele - altså logo og billeder. Tilladelse kan ses nedenunder.
... derpå synes jeg der mangler en licens, som kun giver tilladelse til brug i pågældende artikel. Jeg kan hvert fald ikke finde den?.
Mvh --Jonassoeby (talk) 14:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Kære Jonas
Logo og lejrtegn må gerne bruges til diverse formål, når det giver god omtale af lejren. Og det gør en artikel på Wikipedia vist.
Med spejderhilsen Pernille M
CallCentret
Spejdernes Lejr 2012
Besøg også lejrens hjemmeside www.spejderneslejr2012.dk for mere information!
The Call Center
Jamboree Denmark 2012
Visit us at http://www.jamboreedenmark2012.dk
Hej Jonas,
Du finder ikke en licens der "kun giver tilladelse til brug i pågældende artikel", da det er et grundlæggende princip, at alle medier på Wikimedia Commons er fuldstændigt frie for alle til alle formål for al tid (du kan finde den lidt mere tekniske beskrivelse på Commons:Licensing). En licens der kun giver tilladelse til en specifik artikel - eller kun brug på Wikipedia for eksempel - vil således ikke være acceptabel og filen vil blive slettet. Som jeg læser den tilladelse du har fået, er den for indskrænket til brug på Wikipedia/Wikimedia, hvorfor jeg vil anbefale dig, at få en mere åben tilladelse f.eks. gennem brug af en mail-skabelon. MVH heb [T C E] 16:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:NederHadsten1800.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:NederHadsten1800.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

heb [T C E] 12:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hej Jonassoeby,
Du har for File:NederHadsten1800.jpg angivet at det er Eget arbejde. Idet der er tale om et kort over et område per 1804, finder jeg det nærliggende at tro, at du enten baserer tegningen på andet kortmateriale, eller f.eks. har scannet det ind fra en bog. Du bør således uddybe kildepunktet, med mindre du selv har lavet kortet på baggrund af egen forskning. Såfremt der er tale om en scanning/affotografering fra et værk der er 70 år eller ældre, bør du bruge {{PD-scan}} sammen med {{PD-Denmark}}. MVH Henrik/heb [T C E] 12:40, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hej Henrik
Jeg forstår din formodning, men dette er ganske vidst Eget arbejde, idet der ikke findes kortmateriale af god nok kvalitet fra før udskiftningen i 1804. Mine kilder er matrikelmateriale fra Frijsenborg Gods fra 1791, der beskriver placeringen af gårdene i landsbyen. Dog har jeg benyttet de Frie Data hos Geodatastyrelsen som et udgangspunkt, for at placere de gårde, som stadig findes. Mener du at jeg bør angive dem som kilde? --Jonassoeby (talk) 13:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hej Jonas,
Hvis du har brugt materiale fra dem, så bør de i udgangspunktet angives som (del-) kilde. Så specifikt som overhovedet muligt :). Mange hilsner, Henrik/heb [T C E] 15:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Dette er nu angivet :-)
--Jonassoeby (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Smukt. Det samme gør sig i øvrigt gældende for File:Kort hadsten.jpg og andet kortmateriale du måtte have lavet. Dette gælder generelt bearbejdninger af alle nuværende eller tidligere ophavsretsbeskyttede værker. Endeligt har jeg svaret på dit spørgsmål på User talk:Heb#Kort_fjernet_fra_Hadsten-artikel :) MVH Henrik/heb [T C E] 10:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Frie geografiske data fra Geodatastyrelsen / Open public geographic data from the Danish Geodata Agency edit

Dansk: Hej Søren1997Jonassoeby, Du har lagt en eller flere filer op, hvor det er indikeret at der er brugt frie geografiske data fra Geodatastyrelsen. I henhold til vilkår for brug af frie geografiske data, skal der angives hvilken dato, data er hentet fra Geodatastyrelsen. Du anbefales derfor at opdatere licensmærket {{DGA map}} med en datoangivelse. MVH Henrik/heb [T C E] 13:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

English: Hi Søren1997Jonassoeby, You have uploaded one or more files, which have indications of being based on open public geographic data from the Danish Geodata Agency. Conditions for use of open public geographic data stipulates that the date when the data were retrieved from the Danish Geodata Agency must be stated. You are therefore recommended to update the license tag {{DGA map}} with a date. In kind regards, Henrik/heb [T C E] 13:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Kort25-Hadsten.tif edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kort25-Hadsten.tif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

heb [T C E] 11:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:NederHadsten1800.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:NederHadsten1800.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

heb [T C E] 11:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hej Henrik Jeg troede vi havde diskuteret dette kort tidligere? Det er mit eget værk, hvor kun beliggenheds oplysninger er hentet fra Hadsten Lokalarkiv via KMS. Ovenstående fil: Hvad kom I frem til, i forbindelse med Geodatastyrelsen? --Jonassoeby (talk) 17:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Som det fremgår af GST vilkår for brug af frie data, skal der angives både datasæt og dato for udtræk for at der er tale om lovlig anvendelse. Det fremgår også af den licensskabelon der er påført filerne og jeg har endda også skrevet en notits om det ovenfor. Da du ikke har angivet datasæt og dato inden for en uge efter notitsen påførte jeg sletningsskabelonen. MVH Henrik/heb [T C E] 08:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Jeg undskylder, hvis jeg virker lidt dum. Men jeg synes da at det hele er opgivet i filerne? Dog kan jeg måske se lidt i http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NederHadsten1800.jpg, hvor jeg kun har angivet at det er fra matrikelkort. Men disse findes der ikke et overordnet datasæt for. --Jonassoeby (talk) 14:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
File:Kort25-Hadsten.tif kan jeg finde to datoer: 1 January 2013 og 10 February 2012. Den sidste er tidspunktet for hvornår filen er gemt (jf. EXIF-informationerne i billedet) og den sidste er givetvis oplægningstidspunktet. Altså intet om hvornår data er udtrukket fra GST/KMS. Jeg kan heller ikke se en angivelse datasæt her ([1] er ikke et datasæt). På File:NederHadsten1800.jpg er der to datoer - begge i 2012 og dermed ikke omfattet af frie kort (data skal være udtrukket efter nytåret 2012/2013, da der ikke er frigivet data med tilbagevirkende kraft)! Det er et ret præcist defineret vilkår, at den dato for hvornår data er udtrukket skal være oplyst og hvilket datasæt der er anvendt. GST har oplyst at dette er fordi, de løbende vil ændre licensvilkårne så derfor er det et spørgsmål om, at de skal kunne se hvornår data er udtrukket for at vurdere en given anvendelse ud fra de på det angivne tidspunkt gældende licensvilkår. MVH heb [T C E] 14:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
For måske at gøre det hele en smule mere tydeligt, har jeg lavet et eksempel på Frie data for englebørn: File:Fælledparken_1957-1976.png. Bemærk dato-angivelsen og kilde-sættets navngivning. Jeg antager at formatet for kildesættet vil være det samme uanset hvilket datasæt der er tale om. MVH 15:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
I File:NederHadsten1800.jpg har der ikke været brugt materiale fra Geodatastyrelsen, andet end at jeg via Kort på Nettet har fundet adresserne. File:Kort25-Hadsten.tif vil inden for få minutter blive opdateret ligesom englebørn-filen. --Jonas Søby 16:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Det ser godt ud. Jeg har fjernet sletningsskablonerne fra de to filer :) MVH heb [T C E] 17:52, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Hammel Sygehus 1960.jpg edit

 
File:Hammel Sygehus 1960.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 14:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:US Navy 101010-N-5549O-153 Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) the Honorable Ray Mabus, right, Prime Minister of Greenland Jakob Edvard Kuupik Kleist sp cropped.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Hadsten-Kommunekontor-1962.jpg edit

 
File:Hadsten-Kommunekontor-1962.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

heb [T C E] 13:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Vinterslev-skole-1937.jpg edit

 
File:Vinterslev-skole-1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

heb [T C E] 13:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Vinterslev-skole-avisudklip.png edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vinterslev-skole-avisudklip.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vinterslev-skole-avisudklip.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

heb [T C E] 13:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Det er et fotografi, som det også fremgår af metadata, er taget af undertegnede. --Jonas Søby 13:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Men det er et fotografi af noget der (i udgangspunktet) er ophavsbeskyttet. Citat-retten gælder desværre ikke på Commons. MVH heb [T C E] 14:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Map of the Port of Sisimiut.svg edit

Hej Jonas,

Har du selv været ude og måle Sisimiut op, eller har du brugt et reference kortmateriale? Med mindre det første er tilfældet, skal du (som altid) angive kilden til det sidste :) MVH heb [T C E] 17:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Grundmaterialet er openstreetmap — kan jeg lokke dig til at tilføje den rigtige licens? mvh Jonas Søby
Jeg vil meget hellere fortælle dig hvad du skal gøre, så du kan huske det til næste gang ;o)
Hvis du bruger {{OpenStreetMap}} i stedet for den nuværende {{Information}} får du meget foræret - herunder licensen :o)
{{OpenStreetMap}} sikrer endvidere at du angiver de korrekte oplysninger for brug i henhold til Open Street Maps retningslinjer. Når du så har gjort det, fjerner du bare linjerne =={{int:license-header}}== og {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} og så er du kørende :) MVH heb [T C E] 10:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Thierry Gueorgiou, WOC 2012.JPG edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Thierry Gueorgiou, WOC 2012.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 07:34, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Hnie21092010.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hnie21092010.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 23:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply