Mar11

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mar11!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Photographs of Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 CommentThe scope is to broad, as we have also statues of him. Could you add something please and be more precise ? Is it a photograph ? Looks like a photographed design... after a photograph. Thanks--Jebulon (talk) 16:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Please change this category to Photographs of Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay will be looks good. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 22:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Done Category chnaged from Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay to Photographs of Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)  Support Not a very good image, but the best in scope, indeed.--Jebulon (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epidermodysplasia verruciformis (tree man illness).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sunitikumar Chatterjee.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope ~ Moheen ^(talk) 16:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Khudiram Bose.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
People of the University of Calcutta; Meghnad Saha, Jagadish Chandra Bose, Satyendranath Bose.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope should be refined (Who are they? Why are they famous?) and include a link to a Commons category or a Wikipedia page (read COM:VISC). --Mathieu MD (talk) 18:43, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

 Done - Linked to commons category. - Mar11 (talk) 04:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

 Request I don't know what other users think about it, but I don't feel a scope consisting of a list of persons' names is appropriate. Is it? I believe that the name of the group, or company name, or whatever is the reason they are posing together on this photo, would be much prefered. --Mathieu MD (talk) 07:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

I think Category:People of the University of Calcutta is perfect. - Mar11 (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

No, unfortunately, the scope must be specific to the object described. At worst you can list the names. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:16, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Mathieu MD (talk) 08:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peary Chand Mitra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 01:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ziaur Rahman.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 01:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sukumar Ray.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chittaranjan Das.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jibanananda Das.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Bayazid Bostami mazar 1960 02.jpg

File:Bayazid Bostami mazar 1960 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:All India Management Association logo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:All India Management Association logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)