Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mathieu Kappler!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - Gymnase Georges-Lang - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 19:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - lost grey shoe at roundabout of RN 66, Rue des Vieux-Moulins Prolongée, Rue de Choisy and Chemin du Canal - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Comparaison Grand-Bourg Google OpenStreetMap (34063071850).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Google Street map content is copyrighted
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Lord Belbury (talk) 11:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promoted edit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac Besson - Northern part.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Le Jour ni l'Heure Eric Zemmour à Plieux, Gers, mardi 29 mars 2020, 19 31 15 (51971005595).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted posters.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Thibaut (talk) 09:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - lost grey shoe at roundabout of RN 66, Rue des Vieux-Moulins Prolongée, Rue de Choisy and Chemin du Canal - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - lost grey shoe at roundabout of RN 66, Rue des Vieux-Moulins Prolongée, Rue de Choisy and Chemin du Canal - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittenheim - parc du Rabbargala - 20220418 - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The subject is the tree in the park. Please add the id of the tree in the Summary/Description and Category. --Tagooty 01:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC).Reply
@Tagooty:   Done. I don't know anything about the tree, so I added 'unidentified' category. --Mathieu Kappler 20:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittenheim - parc du Rabbargala - 20220418 - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
All these 5 images need a more precise Summary/Description and Category to make them useful. --Tagooty 01:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Tagooty:   Done. --Mathieu Kappler 20:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - boulevard Thiers - vue en direction de l'ouest - 2022-05-03 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - boulevard Thiers - vue en direction de l'ouest - 2022-05-03 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doosan DX85R-3 excavator in Remiremont, France - 2022-05-03 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:17, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - pylône électrique au bord de la Moselle et de la RN 66 - 2022-05-01 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - rue de la Courtine - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittenheim - rue de Ruelisheim - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittenheim - rue des Mines - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TER train in Gare de Remiremont - 2022-04-10 10 h 21 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittenheim - rue de l'Espérance - 20220419 - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittenheim - rue de l'Espérance - 20220419 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittenheim - chemin dans les champs - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - RN 66 vue depuis le pont de la rue des 5e-et-15e-BCP - 2022-05-03 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TER train in Gare de Remiremont - 2022-04-10 10 h 21 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promoted edit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doosan DX85R-3 – left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - parc Monseigneur-Rodhain - 2022-05-03 - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare de Remiremont avec TER à quai - 2022-03-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare de Remiremont 2022-04-10 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs perspective correction. --Mike Peel 06:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Mike Peel:   Done See now. --Mathieu Kappler 19:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TER train in Gare de Remiremont - 2022-04-10 10 h 21 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wittenheim - parc du Rabbargala - 20220418 - 221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:12, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - RN 66 vue depuis le pont de la rue des 5e-et-15e-BCP - 2022-05-03 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - fort du Parmont - 2022-06-21 - 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - fort du Parmont - 2022-06-21 - 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - fort du Parmont - 2022-06-21 - 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:19, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - fort du Parmont - 2022-06-21 - 277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remiremont - fort du Parmont - 2022-06-21 - 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Emmanuel Macron election poster with graffiti, Paris (33676803123).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Macron President, Emmanuel Macron campaign poster, Paris (34342273491).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:French Election campaign posters with a graffitied Le Pen poster at a polling station in the 5th arrondissement, Paris (34550365055).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Macron & Benin election posters (34356009501).jpg edit

 
File:Macron & Benin election posters (34356009501).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Le Pen & Macron, French election posters 2017 (34356062021).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Remiremont - élection présidentielle 2022 1er tour - bureau de vote Médiathèque de Maxonrupt - 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Marine Le Pen, torn campaign poster, Paris (33662941083).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Mathieu Kappler avril 2017.jpg edit

Lymantria (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Mathieu Kappler à Mulhouse mai 2017 (1).jpg edit

Lymantria (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Mathieu Kappler à Mulhouse mai 2017 (2).jpg edit

Lymantria (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Phnom Penh (6234335966).jpg edit

 
File:Phnom Penh (6234335966).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Ensemble la France! Emmanuel Macron campaign poster, Paris (34472525615).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Votez PHB, Campaign poster by Philippe Bonan (33674533493).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Ensemble la France! Emmanuel Macron campaign poster, Paris (34342318481).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 23:12, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:L'express, Il a Gagne son Pari, headline Saturday, Paris (34484277315).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:French Election l'express Le Kid, headline (34531006725).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:French Election Le Point (34531016445).jpg edit

 
File:French Election Le Point (34531016445).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:A happy cactus, Invader street art in Paris (33706511374).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply