Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alpha Monarch!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Contents

File:David Villa Lined up for Spain.jpgEdit

 
File:David Villa Lined up for Spain.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

4ing (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

File:David Villa Euro2008.jpgEdit

 
File:David Villa Euro2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

4ing (talk) 18:19, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

File:David Villa Line Up Portugal.jpgEdit

 
File:David Villa Line Up Portugal.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

4ing (talk) 04:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

File:David Villa Euro2008.jpgEdit

 
File:David Villa Euro2008.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

4ing (talk) 06:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blockedEdit

Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Paul Walker01.jpgEdit

 
File:Paul Walker01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stemoc (talk) 14:49, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

I don't really own the image, It was credited under Flickr user's who is rightful owner (author) of the image. The licence was verified under CC 2.0 which is shareable --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 15:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Angelo Campos Peruvian.jpgEdit

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Angelo Campos Peruvian.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch | English | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | norsk | português | português do Brasil | slovenščina | svenska | русский | українська | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 15:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

The following image File:Angelo Campos Peruvian.jpg the licence is expired, The Flickr user claims that the original holder no longer holds it as copyright owner. I believe its shareable now
— Preceding unsigned comment added by PrinceSulaiman (talk • contribs) 16:03, 11 July 2014‎ (UTC)
No, it's a non-free photo grabbed from the Internet. It's not the Flickr user's own work. Therefore, they cannot issue a valid license.
Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here. LX (talk, contribs) 16:07, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Are you sure? The Flickr user claims it that the licence under CC Sa 2.0 --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Yep. Copyright violations are pretty common on Flickr. Please read the template above and the information it links to. LX (talk, contribs) 16:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Ah, I thought it was their actual licence, Thanks for letting me know :) --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Isaac Cuenca Lineup(Cropped).pngEdit

 
File:Isaac Cuenca Lineup(Cropped).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 16:01, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


You have been blocked for a duration of 1 monthEdit

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 month for the following reason: Uploading unfree files after warnings.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I realised that Flickr users are self-claiming the license of the image they upload, I apologise for posting them here. Could you kindly consider to unblock my account?""
Decline reason: "Thank you for acknowledging that you made a mistake. Please wait out the 1 month block then return to uploading legally licensed files. Thank you, Tiptoety talk 21:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

  Oppose. I think you still need some additional time away from uploading to do some more reading, for example to learn the differences between different Creative Commons licenses, which ones are compatible with Commons' licensing requirements and which ones are not. A good place to start would be Commons:Flickr files. LX (talk, contribs) 16:22, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
I already knew the licence requirements but the Flickr users are misleading the licences the images which they uploads --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
No, I don't think you do know the licensing requirements. On File:Isaac Cuenca Lineup(Cropped).png, you specified a different license than the one on Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/gerardreyes/6028295473 is clearly marked {{Cc-by-nc-nd-2.0}}. That license is not compatible with Commons' licensing requirements. LX (talk, contribs) 17:01, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Oops! I realised that licence was under CC SA 2.0 my bad! Since the licence version numbers bit confuse to me --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 17:06, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kabir Hashim.jpgEdit

 
File:Kabir Hashim.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Obi2canibe (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Maithri.jpgEdit

 
File:Maithri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Obi2canibe (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Obi2canibe, I have responded to the article in Maithri.jpg, Please kindly check and let me know and make sure to remove the tag if you didn't find it suspicious. --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 10:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


File tagging File:Maithri.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Maithri.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Maithri.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

MediaJet talk 09:51, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion requestsEdit

Deutsch | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Svenska | Українська | +/−


 
Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:34, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Parliament of Sri Lanka – Current.svgEdit

Please change two sides in this image.
Thanks
Above unsigned comment made by 112.134.100.143

Hello PrinceSulaiman, thanks for uploading Parliament of Sri Lanka – Current.svg. In en:WP it is stated that six members of the DNA group supported the Wickremesinghe governement and one was in the opposition, but in your graphics all seven MPs are on the government's side. Do you have any sources (there aren't any in the en:WP article either ...)? Greetings --Furfur (talk) 07:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
@Furfur: Due to crossovers the law permits MPs to join whomever he/she desires. You're free to modify the file if you see anything wrong in the image. As there are some ministers already had resigned from position due to their patronage to former President Rajapaksa as well the current cabinet ministers acting as caretaker minister. --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 08:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello PrinceSulaiman, I am not enough an expert on Sri Lanka domestic politics. So, I am not really competent to make changes (at least since I do not know reliable sources). You think it is difficult to give exact numbers, e.g., for the UPFA how many parliament members are actually supporting the Wickremesinghe government? Greetings --Furfur (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
@Furfur: There is no “UPFA” supporting the Wickremesinghe government, They're part of National Government program introduced by Maithri-Wickremesinghe at the presidential election. My exact numbers are 30 members of UPFA are backing the Wickremesinghe Govt as part of National Govt. Recently few of ministers resigned, So i cannot give you exact number, Only we can see after the General Election who is going to become the Prime Minister and who are becoming the ministers of government, therefore we still got time until Aug 17 as this article doesn't provide exact numbers of ministers from UPFA because some of them already crossed over to UNP recently due to granting nomination to Mahinda Rajapaksa. Hopefully on Aug 17 I will have the article and graphic updated!--PrinceSulaiman (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello PrinceSulaiman, ok, thanks for your answer. I am following Sri Lankan politics with interest but I always had difficulties to understand how Maithripala Sirisena could be expelled from the UPFA before the election of 8 January and then afterwards re-elected as their leader. So the UPFA seems to be quite heterogeneous, on the one side supporters of Maithripala Sirisena, on the other those still adhering to Rajapaksa? I am curious about the results on Aug 17. --Furfur (talk) 23:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
@Furfur:He was expelled from UPFA because he became the common candidate led by Ranil Wickremesinghe's United National Party before 8th January, After winning the election in the Presidential Election there were some of 25-30 MPs attempted to crossover to Maithripala Sirisena's party, as result of that Mahinda Rajapaksa the leader of the party, He had to reinstate Sirisena's membership because of the pressures of crossover to United National Party-led coalition. The constitution of UPFA states that if the member of UPFA becomes the President of Sri Lanka he/she is entitled to become the leader of the party, The constitution of UPFA had backfired on Mahinda Rajapaksa as he had amended the constitution to remove the former President Chandrika Kumaratunga who was the leader back in 2004. Thus, Sirisena got the leadership of party but the majority of UPFA members are still loyal to Rajapaksa which he still has the control of the party through his loyalties (not Sirisena's factor that represents 25-30 MPs).--PrinceSulaiman (talk) 16:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello PrinceSulaiman, thank you for your explanations. Of course I knew about the circumstances when Sirisena was expelled from the SLFP/UPFA when he announced his candidature against Rajapaksa but I did not know that the constitution of the UPFA states that the President automatically becomes leader of the UPFA if he is party member of the UPFA. I also did not know that Rajapaksa himself introduced this regulation to replace Kamaratunga. That's interesting to hear and now I understand the position of Sirisena better. I am really curious about the outcome of the coming election. --Furfur (talk) 17:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
@Furfur: God knows who will win this election, But in my prediction Wickremesinghe should win this election in order to protect the democracy principle in Sri Lanka. So i hope the United National Party wins this election. Actually he did introduce that amendment to remove her that's why there is feud between her and Rajapaksa, Kumaratunga is very supportive of Sirisena and Wickremesinghe during last election despite of political difference of Wickremesinghe she still supports Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government presently to safeguard the democracy. --PrinceSulaiman (talk) 17:22, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
I agree. Wickremesinghe as prime minister under Sirisena would be the better choice. The authoritarian political Rajapaksa style should belong to the past. I also expect the UNFGG & allies to win the election. --Furfur (talk) 17:50, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Alpha Monarch".