Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, AshFox!

-- 11:08, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Krasnyi Luch

edit

Do you think you could mark krasnyi luch as red? The NDSC said that they had besieged the city, but not taken it. Surrounding areas in krasny luch are under Ukrainian control.

Source:http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/11/russia-humanitarian-convoy-ukraine

Pervomais'k

edit

Terrorists regained control over Pervomais'k, - the NSDC.Inforesist--46.200.244.188 10:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Zimogorye

edit

Militants took Zimogorye in Luhansk region. Also according to local residents convoy of vehicles militants drive in the direction of the city Rodakovo.sourceUNIAN--46.200.244.188 10:12, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Map of East Ukraine conflict

edit

Also, insurgents control the village KodemaManuilivka and Petrivske in the city Miusynsk insurgents were able to take the center of the city under their control, and continue to fight against the forces of ATO on the southern outskirts. Also insurgents try regained control the strategic hill Savur-Mogila.UA Press so if you are not hard to update the map!--46.200.244.188 10:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Why did you edit the map on the basis of a dubious source and rejected data from official Ukrainian sources? But data that they publish the provided from sources in the Ukrainian army.--46.200.244.188 10:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also Council of National Security and Defense confirmed that the city Svitlodarsk and nearby villages Luhans'ke and Myronivs'kyi still not captured by government troops.[ http://mediarnbo.org/?p=3828 CNSD]--46.200.244.188 11:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Орден для вас!

edit
  Орден графического дизайнера
Спасибо вам за ваш труд! Alex1961 (talk) 10:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
File:East Ukraine conflict (English language version).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vitez Kojo (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:East Ukraine conflict.png

edit
 
File:East Ukraine conflict.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vitez Kojo (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ilovajsk

edit

But army only taken most part lovaysk and clashes still continued. Fix it. Pravda UALiga net--Hanibal911 (talk) 10:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yasinovataya

edit

Correct another mistake on the map because today in the city Yasinovataya fighting also continue.Segodnya UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 11:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Animation

edit

Hi!

I've made an animation (gif) of the changes of the rebels territories. It's here.

The animation is far from perfect, feel free to edit it if you want.

In the animation one can see some interesting dynamics. For example, the gradual growth of a "gulf" between Donetsk and Gorlovka. --Alex1961 (talk) 13:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Отличная работа, очень наглядно и старые наши карты не пропадут после удаление PNG карты. --ZomBear 2:35 PM, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Davydo-Mykilske

edit

The village Davydo-Mykilske under rebel control.Inforesist--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Situation in East Ukraine on 22 August of NSDC

edit

Please correct the map! Ukrainian sources said tiday that Ukrainian army is fighting for the retention of cities Novosvetlovka, Khriaschuvate, кургана Saur Мogyla. Алсо fighting against rebels continues in the towns Donetsk, Lugansk, Ilovaisk, Yasinovataya, Shahtersk, Thorez, Snižne, Zuhres, Gorlovka, Krasny Luch, Stanytsia Luhanska.UNNRNBO--Hanibal911 (talk) 10:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Amvrosiyivka

edit

Amvrosiyivka --- taken by Russian troops and rebels or contested --- IpressICTVNV UAPravda UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Novoazovsk

edit

Novoazovsk --- city taken by rebels and Ukrainian army retreated to Mariupol --- UNIANUNN--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Also soldiers officially deny that the Ukrainian army took control Novoazovskiy they said that now city Novoazovsk under the control of Russian troops. There are Russian tanks. But they said that now we have nothing that to recapture the city. Our forces are absolutely unequal "
Ukrainian troops entrenched near the village Bezimenne and set up roadblocks in all directions to Mariupol.TSN--Hanibal911 (talk) 19:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Russian Invasion?

edit

If this map is true we are watching a full-scale Russian Invasion at the moment! http://militarymaps.info/?lat=47.0751595&lng=37.1890987&z=12&t=0 It changes quickly - and there were lots of changes this evening. Any comments on that? And @Zombear: your edits of this evening are as good or bad as anything else at the moment if that map is true... --Metrancya (talk) 22:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Situation in East Ukraine

edit

Saur-Mohyla --- taken pro Russian rebels --- Of course now we can no trust the data from the source Komsomolskaya Pravda but the video proof clear showed that Saur-Mohyla captured by rebels.Komsomolskaya PravdaUNIAN

Also here confirmation from Ukrainian activists that Saur-Mohyla was taken pro Russian rebels.here--Hanibal911 (talk) 08:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Lutuhyne --- now under blockade by rebels --- source--Hanibal911 (talk) 10:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Verhulivka --- under control pro-Russian rebels --- NVUA--Hanibal911 (talk) 15:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Krasna Talivka --- unclear situation in the village --- Dialog UaFinanso Netsource--Hanibal911 (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Bezimenne --- takeb be Russian troops and rebels --- and now Russian troops and rebels located in 20 kilometers from the city Mariupol.UNIAN

Ilovajsk --- Soldiers Battalion "Donbass" were ambushed by militants near Ilovaiskaya --- Soldiers Battalion "Donbass" try to retreat from city Ilovajsk but they have been blocked by rebel forces. Maybe we need noted this area how fully under besieged by rebels.TVI UARacursSTR--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:27, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The rebels blocked road from city Mangush to Osipenko and now go violent clashes in the city UrzufPodrobnostiMariupol News
Amvrosiivka, VolodarskeStarchenkove, Volnovakha now under rebel control.source--Hanibal911 (talk) 08:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Now near of the city Mariupol located enemys armed group which comprises of 140 Russian tanks which now masked that they were similar to the rebel tanks.source--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Khriaschuvate and Novosvitlivka --- captured by rebels with the support of Russian troops --- UNIAN--Hanibal911 (talk) 13:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Novosvetlovka --- Army retreated from the city --- LB UAIBRA UANardep ORGkorrespondent--Hanibal911 (talk) 17:27, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Road from the city Debaltseve to the city Vuhlehirsk --- uncleat situation --- because in the press service of the National Guard reported that were Ukrainian troops moving along the Road from the city Debaltseve to the city Vuhlehirsk were ambushed by rebels.Pravda UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 20:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ilovajsk --- Ukrainian military leave Illovaysk --- UNIAN--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ilovajsk --- today near city of Ilovajsk nearly 200 Ukrainian soldiers surrendered --- LB UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Zhdanivka --- not under control by Army --- sourcesource--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Bezimenne --- under control by Russian troops --- sourcesource--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:17, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I as well as you against various of terrorist organizations and associations (DNR of LNR and other). But we must do everything that the map showed the real situation.--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:23, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Minor barnstar
For timely and quality work on updating the maps. Hanibal911 (talk) 13:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The situation on the Eastern Front

edit

From Donetsk to Mariupol --- Almost the entire southern flank of the front defeated remained only fragments forces ATO ---

Ilovajsk --- Troops which were surrounded near Ilovajsk ceased to exist as an organized force. Coupling to the environment is not. Trying to create a corridor for the withdrawal of troops failed. Most of the survivors were taken prisoner. On the number of killed and wounded can only guess. Most of the volunteer battalions ceased to exist in a meat grinder under Ilovaisk. A small strike forces sent to break through to Ilovaiskaya destroyed ---
Donetsk --- From the south and east of Donetsk unblocked, furthermore, the rebels now has a direct link with Russia on the whole stretch of the border that runs through the Donetsk region. There is information that the enemy occupied the district center Volnovakha. In the case of confirmation of this will mean that the formation of the separatists came to the operating room and can choose the direction of further strikes in the west of Donetsk region. Also there is a danger that rebels can besiege city Debalcevo. ---
Lugansk --- Under Lugansk, near Lutugino continued systematic destruction of another "pocket" in which there were Ukrainian troops. In other sectors of the front were positional battles.
Other area --- Enemy fully seized the initiative in all areas. Under Mariupol offensive formations separatists terminated for taking such a big city forces them is not enough. Information about the complete environment Mariupol not yet been confirmed, but it does not mean that the enemy abandon the plan to create a new "pot" --- Inforesist UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

So that you can fix the map in accordance with the data obtained from this reliable source.--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Вы хотите что бы я изобразил на карте блокаду Мариуполя и захват террористами "организации Новороссия", территории до Волновахи и дороги H20 (Донецк-Мариуполь)? Нет это я делать не буду, это дезинформация которую распространяют в интернете. Ваш источник скорее всего основывался на вот таких картах вроде: http://cassad.net/?do=warmarker или http://militarymaps.info/ которые которые не показывают действительную информацию о ситуации на Донбассе. Извините за русский язык, видя что вы из Эстонии я предположил что в его возможно знаете. -- ZomBear 9:25 AM, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Да не много русский и украинский!--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:40, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also now based on data from many sources, it is clear that Mariupol not in blockade by rebels. But on south front Russian troops located in 20 kilometers from Mariupol this confirm BBC. And now in the village Bezimenne located Russian troops.BBC
Also some sources said that Ukrainian army left Lutugino.UNNLugradar--Hanibal911 (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Sviatohirsk --- City controlled by government troops but in the city is still a large concentration of separatists --- TSN--Hanibal911 (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Avdiivka --- Despite the fact that city Avdiivka released almost a month ago, battle for the city is still going on. Heard explosions, gunshots. In the houses do not have water and light. People live in basements.--- source--Hanibal911 (talk) 11:17, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Correct the map because the BBC correspondents confirmed that militants which entered from Russia now located 20 kilometers from Mariupol. This means that the village Bezimenne is under the control of a militants.BBC and here another confirmation.LB UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 13:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Heorgievka and Lutugino --- government forces leave area near the cities of Heorgievka and Lutugino --- sourcesource--Hanibal911 (talk) 16:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Makiivka --- under control by pro-Russian rebels --- Golos Ukraine
Starobesheve --- city taken by Russian troops --- sourcesourceUkrinform--Hanibal911 (talk) 20:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ukrainian army left the Lugansk airport and villages in Starobeshevskiy area source--Hanibal911 (talk) 21:45, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ukrainian army also left the Komsomolske in Starobeshevskiy area so now Starobeshevskiy area under control by insurgents.source--Hanibal911 (talk) 21:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
То что украинская армия покинула Комсомольское, Старабешевского района основано на рассказе местного жителя: "В ночь с субботы на воскресенье, ровно в 01.00, колонна украинских военных капитулировала из города Комсомольское", - рассказал "Вестям" местный житель.. Подождём, может завтра еще появятся новости об этом. ПС: Спасибо за постоянную информацию! -- ZomBear 9:58 PM, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Maybe all this information is true because today, the military re-entered the city of Komsomolske this means that early army left this town.24TV And according this data towns Amvrosiivka, Styla, Rozdolne and village Kolosky under control by rebel.source--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Kurakhovo --- taken by insurgents --- ZN UALB UAThe InsiderIPress--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
I revert your updates about city Kurakhovo but I did not notice that you also update map near the town Rozdolne. I'm realy sorry I really did not want to harm and you can fix the map. Regards!--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Krasnogorovka --- clashes in the city --- Korrespondent--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry but other editors have agreed not use NSDC map since it has a lot of inaccuracies and now not clashes in the city of Yenakievo and map from NSDC also not said that clashes in this city. But mostly you have made the right updates just need fix city Yenakievo.--Hanibal911 (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
It is also maybe violent clashes took place yesterday near city Yelenovka.62 UAMig News--Hanibal911 (talk) 10:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
I also think that we need to add on the map the city Yalta near city Mariupol which under control of the government troops.--Hanibal911 (talk) 11:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
I revert your updates about city Kurakhovo because not only eyewitnesses reported about troops withdrawal fron Kurakhovo thid also confirmed soldier from battalion Donbass which said the army leave Kurakhovo.Ipresssourcesource And later this information is confirmed by other sources. LB UAProfi-Forex--Hanibal911 (talk) 17:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Volnovakha and Komsomolske --- unclear situation --- Volnovakha -Podrobnosti UA Komsomolske -Finanso UALB UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Спасибо еще раз за множественные источники, по возможности всегда бросайте сюда мне все что найдёте. Я всегда читаю что вы пишите мне даже если я не ответил вам. По поводу Волновахи, ТСН сообщает, что она пока что еще украинская, сегодян там были их кориспонденты и говорят что фронт за 10 км от города http://tsn.ua/video/video-novini/volnovaha-zalishayetsya-ukrayinskoyu.html -- ZomBear 6:18 PM, 2 September (UTC)

Krasnogorovka, Debalcevo --- still unclear situation --- Krasnogorovkasource also city Debalcevo where there are fights surrounded on three sides by the rebels.source--Hanibal911 (talk) 08:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also clashes in area cities of Svitlodarsk and Debalcevo for control of the crossroads of motorways M04 linking Lugansk and Donetsk, and M03 leading in Artemivs'k.[1]--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
The militants took control of the all south of Luhansk region.Mariupol NewsLiga NetGazeta UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Kamianka --- under control by pro-Russaian insurgents.Dialog UAsource--Hanibal911 (talk) 11:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Just after government troops began receiving the order to retreat north of Lugansk region.UA Press Government forces leave all the checkpoints along the route Donetsk-Mariupol, they were strengthening only at the entrance to Mariupol. Earlier rebels captured city Yelenovka and same day taken city Volnovakha. Troops also left Marinka and Kurakhovo in the south-west of Donetsk.112 UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 11:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Volnovakha --- unclear situation --- because according to the headquarters of TAU, the Ukrainian army this morning left Volnovakha. But on the office buildings in the city still raised the Ukrainian flags.Segodnya but at the same time, the rebels say they control the city.source--Hanibal911 (talk) 20:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Debalcevo --- Violent clashes in area city and soldiers are afraid that they are can get in new boiler --- Also after the Ukrainian troops retreat from city Lutugino government troops located only north of Lugansk. source--Hanibal911 (talk) 05:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Dokuchaevsk --- maybe under control by rebels --- Dialog UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 05:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
The village Hrushove is also now under the control of the militants because official sources confirmed that the southern portion of the Lugansk region entirely under the control of insurgents.--Hanibal911 (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Rodakove and Kurakhovo --- under rebel control --- city Rodakovo and railway station of the same name is already in full control of the rebels and the Russian army also army retreated from the settlement Kurakhovo in Maryinsky district of Donetsk region , which was previously released.Ipress--Hanibal911 (talk) 06:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Да, Родаково на карте уже давно не украинское. По поводу Курахово, в ссылке на ipress.ua опять не указывается источник информации, что из Курахово ушла украинская армия. Скорее всего опять же эти выводы основаны на сообщениях двухдневной давности от неизвестного солдата и какого-то гражданского под ником @Donetskiy. Везде где я размещаю эту карту все отмечают её достоверность и высокую точность по сравнению с другими картами, но при этом все отмечали только одну ошибку, это именно Курахово. Факт: Даже на картах сепаратистов они показывают, что не контролируют города западнее Марьянки, хотя при этом они так любят преувеличивать свои достижения и рисуют чуть ли не окружение Мариуполя и что они дошли почти до Бердянска, Запорожской области. -- ZomBear 7:06 AM, 4 September (UTC)
Maryinsky region --- unclear situation in some settlements --- Dialog UA Yes, the situation is not quite clear but I'll try to find more information about situation in the city Kurakhovo. Hanibal911 (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Debaltseve --- military withdrew from the city --- This morning the Ukrainian military withdrew from the city Debaltseve to outskirts where they were surrounded by several thousand troops of the Russian Federation.TSN Hanibal911 (talk) 09:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Vuhledar and Kostiantynivka --- clashes Ukrainian army against by rebels --- Dialog UA Hanibal911 (talk) 09:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Bezimenne --- under rebel control --- now rebel forces advance on the city Mariupol from the side village of Kominternove. 10 tanks tanks, 4 BMP-1, 2 APCs, 5 "Kamaz" with military equipment. Also from other side from the village Bezimenne towards the city Mariupol put forward 10 rebel tanks and self-propelled machines. Also with reference to the border guards Donetsk region reported that the military equipment of the enemy in the 15 -20 km from Mariupol. Offensive, he said, now the part rebel forces move from the village of Rosa Luxemburg and city Novoazovsk.source And some activists said that now violent clashes in the village Shyrokyne.herehere Hanibal911 (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Krasna Talivka --- unclear situation near Krasna Talivka border crossing --- NV UA112 Hanibal911 (talk) 13:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Debaltseve --- government troops were forced to retreat from the city --- Segodnya The bad news because official source confirmed that the army had left the city.UNIAN--Hanibal911 (talk) 19:30, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Avdiivka --- unclear situation --- Obozrevatel
Bezimenne --- under rebel control --- rebels attack the army position from this village.source Hanibal911 (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Komsomolske --- under rebel control --- But 18 soldiers from the Bashkirovskoy brigade still surrounded near the city.Mediaport Hanibal911 (talk) 12:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Krasnoarmiisk --- Ukrainian army left the city --- PodrobnostiIBRA UAMelitopol NewsDialog Inform--Hanibal911 (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Debaltseve --- clashes in the city --- Glavred--Hanibal911 (talk) 19:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Vesela Gora --- soldiers were ambushed by insurgents --- UNNNardep Hanibal911 (talk) 11:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Krasnoarmiiske --- village Krasnoarmiiske in Noaovzovskom area under control by rebel --- Vesti UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Kominternove and Telmanove--- clashes near the villages --- 112--Hanibal911 (talk) 14:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
And also army not confirmed that they captured city Telmanovo but oficial source only said about clashes on checkpoint near city. And Ukrainian activists reported that rebels shelled army convoy from artillery "Grad" in seven kilometers from the city Telmanovo.here--Hanibal911 (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Zhdanivka --- army withdrew from the city --- also rebels and Russian army controled the village Sofiivka In area of the city Lugansk, the Ukrainian troops almost left the city and its surroundings, moving away from his main forces to the north. In fact today they hold only a small bridgehead on the right bank of the Seversky Donets (Vesela Hora - Shyshkove - Dovhe).
town Hlybokyi --- under control by rebels --- Also near Vesela Hora - Shchastia were intense battles, as well as near the Stanytsia Luhanska. Thus the rebels, with the support of the Russian army, acting in the direction of Krasnodon - Lugansk still managed to push the Ukrainian troops across the river Seversky Donets (except as noted above springboard). So that now both banks of the river are under control by Ukrainian troops only in area Katerinovka - Nyzhnie UA PressOdessa Daily--Hanibal911 (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Talakivka, Shyrokyne, Sakhanka, Zemliane --- taken by rebels --- Mig NewsMig News112 UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Schastia --- The Russian military now are very close to the city of Schastia the front line between the Ukrainian army and the armed forces of Russia lies in area of ​​the bridge over the river of Seversky Donets --- Source--Hanibal911 (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Telmanovo --- city under control by pro Russian insurgents --- Mig News--Hanibal911 (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
city Sartana and village Kominternove--- under control by pro Russian rebels --- UNIAN--Hanibal911 (talk) 06:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Debaltseve --- The Russian troops or the rebels now start surround the Ukrainian troops in city Debaltseve now they are 300 meters away from position the Ukrainian army --- UNIAN--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Question: are there any other sources, than the militarymaps.info, about the multiple "cauldrons" of ATO forces, still deep inside the separatist area of control? [21:51 (UTC), 8th September 2014]

Ukraine's armed forces left the settlements Pryvitne, Pankovo​​, Stukalova Balka, Svitle, Obozne and Khrystove. Army also withdraw its troops from the liberated settlements Markivka, Novopskov, Belovodsk, Novojdar, Severodonetsk Starobilsk and Svatovo This is due to a truce, which was signed in Minsk between militants and Ukraine. source--Hanibal911 (talk) 21:28, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Debalcevo --- Half of the city Debalcevo controlled by insurgents --- Ukrainian military are now located under Debalcevo on a narrow strip of land on both sides surrounded by gunmen. Them all the time shell terrorists.Gordon UALB UAsource--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:26, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Army today left the several cities including Zhdanivka, Yunokomunarivsk, Rozivka, Vuhlehirsk.24TV UALB UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Dokuchaevsk --- under control by pro Russian rebels --- Dialog UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Vuhlehirsk --- under control by rebels ---24TV UALB UA
  • Dokuchaevsk --- under control by pro Russian rebels --- Dialog UA
  • The area around the city Debalcevo under the control of militants and in this area Ukrainian troops in besiege with the four side inside the cities Debalcevo and Chornukhyne. So that we need left in orange color the city of Debalcevo and the city Chornukhyne but the other cities and villages in this area need put in red color.Dialog UA
  • pro-Russian rebels launched offensive in toward the city Mariupol. Violent clashes in the area of ​​the 13 and 14 checkpoints.InfoResist
  • Avdiivka --- under control by insurgents --- Ukrainian troops retreated from the city.source
  • Marinka and Krasnogorovka --- Ukrainian military began to retreat from the cities --- source--Hanibal911 (talk) 11:58, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Thank you very much for your work. Regards! Hanibal911 (talk) 18:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Agreed! Outstanding work! --Metrancya (talk) 02:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

War in Donbass map

edit

Hi, you're doing a great job with the map of the War in Donbass I just wanted to ask you to please hold back your opinion on Novorosiyya as terrorists as many other people do have different views so please call them something else to keep an NPOV environment. Other than that you're doing a great job and thank you so much! --Leftcry (talk) 00:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
За значительный вклад в Википедию Alex1961 (talk) 21:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yellow circle south of Petrovske, west of Ivanivka and east of Hrushove

edit

There are only 2 villages there - Urozhaine (Урожайне in Ukrainian, Урожайное in Russian) and Tamara (Тамара in Ukrainian and in Russian). [2] displays that circle in pink (controlled by the insurgents). They are circled on all sides by rebel-held territories. Do you have any information that there is anything going on on those 2 villages? Are they being sieged or something like that? - see map [3] (Ukrainian) / [4] (Russian) / [5] (English) Mondolkiri1 (talk) 05:08, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Autograph-VolodymyrZelensky.png

edit
 
File:Autograph-VolodymyrZelensky.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Коронавірус

edit

Вітаю. Прошу Вас оновити зображення щодо поширення коронавірусу в Україні. Дякую--Dimon2712 (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Вітаю, схоже ви вирішили використати нову кольорову схему для мапи поширення вірусу в Україні. Але, як на мене, "молочний" колір для зон найменьшого поширення дуже погано читається на білому фоні. На мою думку, дійсно схема застосована на світовій мапі поширення є кращою на даний момент, і в ній також використано 5 різних градацій.--VileGecko (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • VileGecko сам про це думав, ну раз і ви того ж думки, зараз зміню кольори.--ZomBear (talk) 08:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • Дякую, так у нас вдасться припинити "війну редагувань" та долучитись разом до оновлення мапи в залежності від зручності для кожного у певний день. Також можу порадити лише підправляти стилі (class="st0" або інший) у текстовому редакторі замість використання Inkscape - так розмір файлу скоротиться на 10 КБ. --VileGecko (talk) 08:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Карта — File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Ukraine.svg

edit

Чому, власне, прибрано Крим з цієї карти [6]? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 10:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Blast furnace chip worker, Кольори на карті основані на офіційних даних МОЗ України, а вони не дають інформацію по Криму та ОРДЛО. Тому я і прибрав окуповані території - Крим і частини Луганської і Донецької області. --ZomBear (talk) 13:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Тоді треба або позначити іншим кольором бо інакше виглядає начебто там немає випадків. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 15:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Варіант з показом окремо Донбабве і Луганди мабуть був так само інформативним. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 12:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Теж маю прохання щодо карти. Можете при оновленні вказувати хворих у Донецькій та Луганській областях у форматі 6+1 (де 6 - випадки на вільній частині Донецької області, а 1 - на окупованій). Так буде менше плутанини. --ivasykus (talk) 07:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Доброго дня @ivasykus. Чесно кажучи я вже сам не знаю, що з цією картою робити. З початок думав взагалі без Криму і ОРДЛО показувати, так як карта заснована на даних МОЗ України ... але виглядало це не дуже. Після, знайшов офіційне джерело даних з Росії яке оновлюється і вирішив все ж Крим повернути. Одна людина взагалі пропонує цифри прибрати з карти і зробити 2 версії мапи (без, тільки колір і з цифрами), пан @Blast furnace chip worker каже що був взагалі окрему карту для окупованих територій. Тепер ви запропонували писати на мапі як «10 + 1» (де 10 - Україна, а 1 - ДНР). Не знаю, думаю це буде не дуже виглядати, та й може заплутати когось... Напевно найкраще я буду просто об'єднувати дані МОЗ України з тими, що відомі по ОРДЛО. --ZomBear (talk) 09:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Припустимо як на мене на тій самій карті позначати й згадані території і це буде краще описувати ситуацію. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 16:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
У Донбабве вже 2 випадок визнали, а на цій карті це ніяк не показано. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 09:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Blast furnace chip worker, Знаю, зараз працюю над виправленням всієї статистики і всіх карт. Бо виявлена критична помилка зі здвигом на 1 день. До вечора оновлю і актуальну карту, і анімацію і карти за попередні дні. --ZomBear (talk) 10:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Доречі, на карті на 2 квітня було 9 по Донецькій області, а ось тут https://www.62.ua/news/2716975/v-doneckoj-oblasti-podtverzden-vosmoj-slucaj-zabolevania-koronavirusom говориться лише про 8. Звідки інформація варто показати в описі файла. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 10:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Blast furnace chip worker Так все вірно. На 2 квітня в Донецькій області згідно МОЗ України було - 8 осіб, плюс на окупованій частині ("ДНР)" 1-го квітня стало 2 людини (https://ria.ru/20200401/1569466226.html). Ось і вийшло в загальному на карті на 02.04 - 10 осіб. --ZomBear (talk) 11:17, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Можливо згадані території можна показати окремо щоб було зрозуміліше. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 12:39, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Blast furnace chip worker Я не буду рисовать "ДНР" и "ЛНР" отдельно на карте. Это не административные единицы Украины. Я неделю назад пробовал их вообще не рисовать, выглядело это херово. Потом пробовал также помечать их отдельным цветом, выглядело ещё хуже, как дерьмо, на вид было – как будто в Украины ещё области добавились, даже не стал ту версию карты загружать на Вики. После нескольких дней экспериментов, пришел к тому, что лучше пусть будет количестве в общем, что бы не уродовать карту. Паралельно с картой обновляю и этот шаблон из статистикой. --ZomBear (talk) 07:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Тоді карта виглядає неправдивою. Крім того за 3 квітня було 11 по Донецькій області але звідки якщо за даними Міністерства охорони здоров'я було 8 і ще 2 на території окупованій. Території можна виділити штрихами як це робиться на інших картах. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 07:59, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Blast furnace chip worker почему 3.04 было 11 человек, потому что в Донбасяу стало 3 больных - https://ria.ru/20200403/1569557495.html Вот и вышло 8+3=11. --ZomBear (talk) 08:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Стало 3 хворих вже після завантаження файлу. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ні! Ви помиляєтесь. Карту с 11 на Донецкой области (8+3=11) я загрузил 08:22, 4 апреля 2020. А о том что в ДыНэРэ больных уже 3 человек стало 19:59, 3 апреля 2020. То-есть вечером предыдущего дня. Так что о каком "преждевременной отметке больных на карте" вы говорите я не пойму. --ZomBear (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Blast furnace chip worker ну вот, сделал. И що добре виглядає? — File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Ukraine.svg --ZomBear (talk) 09:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Це пів справи. Зафарбувати території відповідно до кількості хворих, заштрихувати і поставити цифри. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 15:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Відповідно до https://moz.gov.ua/article/news/operativna-informacija-pro-poshirennja-koronavirusnoi-infekcii-2019-ncov- 1319 випадків було зафіксовано станом на 6 квітня, а на карті показано що це станом на 5 квітня. Що там з Донбабве і Лугандою та Кримом? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 12:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Blast furnace chip worker Вітаю. Вибачте що вчора не відповів. Після невеликого обговорення ТУТ, вирішив що ОРДЛО та Криму взагалі не буде на карті. Нехай мапа буде чисто на даних МОЗ України. З приводу дати. Звіт МОЗ України який вона дає на ранок, це положення на попередній день. Звіт 9:00 години 6 квітня — це дані за 5 квітня. --ZomBear (talk) 13:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Це буде невірна карта. Показувати треба обов'язково з поясненням в описі файлу. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 13:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Треба Крим ось тут File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Russia (Density).svg виділити штрихуванням. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blast furnace chip worker Де там штрихування? Я не бачу. Чи не переплутали карту? --ZomBear (talk) 08:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Крим на цій карті треба заштрихувати бо він не є частиною території Росії. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 23:26, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Blast furnace chip worker Та не треба нічого штрихувати смугами. Зараз на мапі і все так зрозуміло, що в темно сірих зонах - немає інформації від МОЗ України. Якби Крим на карті був би нібито Російським, його було взагалі типу не було б на карті, прозорим був би. --ZomBear (talk) 07:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Мова про карту Росії вище згадану а не про карту України. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
А про їх карту. Ну на своїх картах вони що завгодно можуть малювати, та нехай хоч Аляску своєї малюють... На нашій карті, Крим просто буде - темно сірим - що означає що даних МОЗ України за регіоном - немає. --ZomBear (talk) 15:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Тут немає свої і не свої. Ця карта використовується в українській Вікіпедії. Отож требе виправити. І обов'язково треба починати показувати дані по окупованим територіям на карті України. Якійсь ти підозрілий. Треба тебе перевіряти. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Blast furnace chip worker Під словами "наша карта" я мав на увазі що "наша українська карта, яка використовується нашою українкою Вікіпедією", хоча і у всіх інших, але це другорядне. Уже обговорив це ТУТ, вказувати дані по окупованим територіям, я не буду, так як немає офіційних даних звідти. Гаразд ще по Криму та Севастополю можна брати данні що публікує РФ, але по ОРДЛО - там взагалі, фіг зрозумій що. А по-поводу того, что я какой-то подозрительный? ))) С чего вы это взяли? Ничего поверять не нужно, не накручивайте себя, всё морально. --ZomBear (talk) 18:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Detailed Map of Liberty City (GTA IV).png

edit
 
File:Detailed Map of Liberty City (GTA IV).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discostu (talk) 12:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Millerovo

edit

Stay safe friend

edit

I see that you are in Konotop, stay safe. Viewsridge (talk) 16:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk76IpAeigk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYK7wLOWfSQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXEMG4kOclw
Nice videos. Viewsridge (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Are you sure Konotop has fallen? I have not seen it on the news yet. Viewsridge (talk) 14:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sad news, thanks for the ref. Viewsridge (talk) 15:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

North East Chernihiv

edit

Do you know who controls Shostka, Mena, Novhorod-Siverskyi and other towns in that region? Viewsridge (talk) 17:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pics Battle of Konotop

edit

Hello ZomBear, is the infantry fighting vehicle Russian or Ukrainian? This should be written to the pictures! All the best for Ukraine! From Germany--Falkmart (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Vive l'Ukraine Libre

Vive Volodymyr Zelensky

РоCCія (RuSSia) go home

William Jexpire (talk) 20:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Photographer's Barnstar
Дякую за вашу роботу. Те, що ти робиш, має значення для всього світу! LutzBruno (talk) 17:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Adding photos

edit

I added one of your pictures to Eastern Ukraine offensive and will likely add others to more articles o the English wiki. Keep up the good work and stay safe. Glory to Ukraine! ErieSwiftByrd (talk) 05:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Battle of Konotop 28.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Konotop 28.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Battle of Konotop 28.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kharkivian (talk) 13:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Battle of Konotop 12.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Konotop 12.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Battle of Konotop 12.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kharkivian (talk) 13:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Battle of Konotop 06.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Konotop 06.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Battle of Konotop 06.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kharkivian (talk) 13:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Private Brian Peters with Huot.png

edit
 
File:Private Brian Peters with Huot.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo was published on 15 March 1973 to The Province Newspaper by an attributed author. Photos published in Canada remain in copyright for 50 years after death of author. This photo was not published in 1918 as suggested.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Bungle (talkcontribs) 20:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Battle of Konotop 05.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Konotop 05.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Battle of Konotop 05.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kharkivian (talk) 22:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Battle of Konotop 27.jpg

edit
 
File:Battle of Konotop 27.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

白猫shiro nekoОбг. 09:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Battle of Konotop Baturyn bridge.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Konotop Baturyn bridge.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Battle of Konotop Baturyn bridge.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kharkivian (talk) 21:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Indo-European_steppe_homeland_map.svg

edit

Hey there. I noticed this map you last edited has a mistake. It includes Greenland in Eurasia. Greenland is part of North America. I'd edit it myself, but the coding is a little past my abilities in Inkscape. Could you do it? Lexicon (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I edited it myself, although if you wanted to take a look at it, that would be cool, as I deleted some kind of coding to get at Greenland's shading, even though it didn't have any noticeable effect on the image. Lexicon (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Wagner Revolt map.svg

edit
 
File:Wagner Revolt map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MBH 05:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Oblivion Lost.png

edit
 
File:Oblivion Lost.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Оранге (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply