User:Kippi70/Archive01

Image Tagging Image:Koch_Ilse.png edit

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Koch_Ilse.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Finn Rindahl 15:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The image can be deleted, as the same one exists on commons already Kippi70 22:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, deleted. Finn Rindahl 10:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Eisner-kurt.jpg edit

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be deleted and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot_{(My Operator|My Contribs)} 21:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Punane torn @Pärnu edit

Punane torn - red tower, web: www.punanetorn.ee, location: Hommiku street 11, Pärnu @ google Maps, photo suwa (talk) 17:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

I have one foto of Red tower, but it is old foto (september 1998).

Geonarva (talk) 17:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!!! --Kippi70 (talk) 10:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

more red-tower-in-Pärnu -> Category:Punane torn -- Suwa (talk) 09:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Image:Raanana COA.jpg edit

Image deletion warning

Image:Raanana COA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 23:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I added my remark on the special discussion page concerning this file. I just wanted to note that although the design falls under "freedom of panorama", the file itself maybe copyright protected. If you downloaded the file from a copyright protected site (most IL sites are copyright protected, even those belonging to official authorities), then reusing the file may be a copyright violation. You can copy the design with a graphic application, i.e. producing your own file, and upload it to the Commons. Drork (talk) 11:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Dror! i still have a question - which license applies? is using

The reproduction of this architectural work, work of sculpture or work of applied art, is covered under the Israeli copyright statute (2007), which states that "Broadcasting, or copying by way of photography, drawing, sketch or similar visual description, of an architectural work, a work of sculpture or work of applied art, are permitted where the aforesaid work is permanently situated in a public place." (paragraph 23)
See COM:CRT/Israel#Freedom of panorama and COM:CRT/Israel#De minimis for more information.

as Permission and

This image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia. The use of such symbols is restricted in many countries. These restrictions are independent of the copyright status.

as License OK?

--Kippi70 (talk) 12:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Raanana COA.jpg edit

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Raanana COA.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ViperSnake151 (talk) 12:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kippi70!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Image:Meir Max Bineth.jpg is uncategorized since 31 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:Yosef Nachmias.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Pernau 1554.jpg was uncategorized on 14 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

The Pikiwiki Project official festive inauguration edit

שלום, אני רוצה להזמין אותך להשקה החגיגית של פרויקט "פיקיוויקי" - פרויקט איסוף תמונות ברישיון חופשי שיוזמים ויקימדיה-ישראל, איגוד האינטרנט הישראלי ומט"ח. הטקס יתקיים במהלך הכינוס השנתי של איגוד האינטרנט, ביום שני הקרוב בערב, בקריית נתב"ג. אנא צור איתי קשר אם אתה מעוניין להגיע. תודה. Drork (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi Dror, sorry for the late response and many thanks for the invitation. Unfortunately i cannot jois as i don't live in Israel, but

i noticed your activity in the PikiWiki and i think it's a great idea to have such a free repository of photos. All the best. Regards --kippi70 (talk) 21:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Ness Ziona and Rehovot edit

Hello, I answered your question in my user talk page. --Yoavd (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token e9d9cbe5c68a7aea0cede72bb8998c8e edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

בולים וכיוצא באלה edit

הידרו הביא לידיעתי את הבולים שהעלית, ומאחר שההליך הביורוקרטי הסתיים בהצלחה, שיחזרתי אותם וסימנתי כל אחד מהם תחת {{PD-IL-exempt}}. אם ישנם בולים נוספים, אתה מוזמן לרשום לי.

Yuval Y § Chat § 22:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

יש כבר תבנית כזאת, היא נקראת FoP-Israel.

אין צורך בשתי תבניות. תראו, בדקתי את העניין וספק רב אם בולים נכללים בסעיף הזה של החוק. גם ככה יושבים לנו על הווריד עם הנושא של חוק זכויות היוצרים בארץ, אז אנא אל תעלו תמונות שיש ספק לגביהן.

אגב, אני אשמח אם תוכלו להביע את דעתכם בעניין הצבעת המחיקה שנפתחה על הקריקטורה של לטוף על אלן דרשוביץ. היכנסו לקטגוריה "אלן דרשוביץ" (באנגלית), לקריקטורה, ושם תמצאו לינק להצבעת המחיקה. תודה. Drork (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

שלום יובל - אתה אומר "ההליך הביורוקרטי הסתיים בהצלחה" למה אתה מתכוון? פניתי לדרור אבי בעניין, כדי שיסביר לי על מה נשענת הקביעה בויקי העברית שבולים הם ברשות הכלל\ מותרים לשימוש ללא הגבלה ולא קיבלתי ממנו שום הסבר. השקעתי שעות בהעלאת הבולים, קטלוגם וכתיבת תיאור הולם ופתאום בא אדמין שלא דובר עברית ולא מתמצא בתחום ומחק הכל. עכשיו צריך בעצם לשחזר את כל הקישורים לערכים המתאימים בויקי העברית. אני לא מתכוון לעשות זאת לפני שאדע בוודאות שיש בסיס משפטי להשאיר את הבולים כאן. אשמח אם אם תוכל להוסיף מידע בנושא או להפנות אותי בהתאם. בכל מקרה, אני מאוד שמח ששחזרת ומודה לך על הטרחה. בברכה --kippi70 (talk) 08:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

אני מקווה שזה בסדר שאני מתערב. האדמינים כאן מוחקים קצת יותר מדי בהתלהבות, אבל במקרה הזה יש ספק גדול אם הבולים הם באמת ברשות הציבור. חוק הדואר התשמ"ו 1986 קובע: "הקנין הרוחני בבולים, וכן כל הזכויות בתרשימי בולים, ביצירות ששימשו לצורך הנפקת בולים, ובבולים, שבידי השירות הבולאי, הם קנין המדינה." (סעיף 51(ב))[1]. מדובר בסעיף שתוקן בשנת 2004, ואני לא יודע מה היה הנוסח הקודם, ואם התיקון הוא רטרואקטיבי, אבל ככל הנראה, יש חוק מפורש שאומר שזכויות היוצרים על בולים שייכים למדינה. זכויות היוצרים של המדינה פגות כעבור חמישים שנה (למדינה יש זכויות לתקופה קצרה יותר מזו של אנשים פרטיים), לכן נראה לי שרק בולים שהונפקו עד 31 בדצמבר 1958 הם ברשות הציבור. Drork (talk) 09:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

שלום דרור. אין בעיה, אני דווקא שמח שכתבת. אני מודע לחוק שאתה מזכיר והוא סותר את הנאמר בויקי העברית לגבי בולים, לכן פניתי לדרור אבי שנחשב שם למומחה בעניני ז"י ולא קיבלתי הסבר. הוא רק אמר שאני יכול להעלות את הבולים לויקי העברית. חבל לי מאוד שעזבת ואני מצטער שלא יצא לי לתמוך בך בדיון על הקריקטורות כי הייתי בטיול. לדעתי, הקריקטורה המאוד דוחה על דרשוביץ מעידה יותר על יוצרה ופוגעת בו מאשר בדרשוביץ. אני מקווה שעוד תחזור ואם לא אל תקח ללב ותשמור על הבריאות! בברכה --kippi70 (talk) 22:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Chizbatron 1949.jpg edit

למה סימנת גם בgfdl? האם יש שינוי בתמונה שהעלת מהמקור? Hidro (talk) 15:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Hidro, sorry ofr that, this is a beginner's mistake. As i have learned in time as there is no change to the oroginal image, PD premission is enough. I can only tell you there are quite a few images i uploaded this way, i'm not sure i feel like going over all of them correcting the license. Best Regards --kippi70 (talk) 21:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Israeli CoA's edit

Hi,

I am not sure Pieter Kuiper's suggestion is good. The Israeli legal system does not refer to copyrights on insignia. Since insignia are protected with special statutes and regulations, it probably seemed redundant to define the copyright status of these designs. Nevertheless, it is highly unlikely that any of the State's emblems or flags are copyright protected. Pieter Kuiper suggests that a designed copied to רשומות becomes copyright exempted. I am not sure this is true. We are not talking here about a new text added to רשומות but a design copied there. Drork (talk) 15:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

In User:Nilfanion/Israel#Image summmary also Deror avi seems to be of the opinion that the exemption of "Official Publications" is a good reason for considering these CoA designs to be free. If article 6 would not be valid for these designs, one would need to establish two things: that local municipalities have State copyright and that the design is older than 50 years. If State copyright does not apply to local authorities, practically all of the CoA's must be deleted, because few if any can be older than 70 years. Alternatively, one finds a photo of a 3D representation permanently situated in a public place. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Pieter Kuiper, the fact that you suggest that state-copyrights are different on the local and nationwide level show how poor your knowledge is in what concerns the Israeli legal and governmental system. I am tired of providing you lessons about the issue. Deror is a distinguished lawyer with a lot of experience in Israel. As you can see he never offers his opinion about the situation in the Netherlands or Sweden, because his experience relates to Israel. I would appreciate if you take a similar non-arrogant approach. I don't trust your quotes, so I'll ask him personally if he think the above-mentioned idea is workable. In the meantime, try to treat issues about which you possess some knowledge. Drork (talk) 12:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Abba Ahimeir.jpg edit

File:Abba Ahimeir.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Pieter, i'm not sure yet regarding the copyright status of stamps in Israel. As far as i can tell now stamps issued 50 years ago and older are PD and ALL the others might be still copyrighted. I'm trying to clarify this issue for two weeks (as currently the Hebrew Wiki states that stamps are PD) and i believe we will reach a decision quite soon. Your statement regarding the ministry of post is not correct as currently the company that issues all stamps in Israel ("Doar Israel") is a fully state owned company and this company is a part of the Ministry of Communications. Best Regards --kippi70 (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Could you give me a pointer to where this is discussed on hewp? I am not certain about the protection term of current stamps. It might very well be 70 years after death, even if the company is state owned. It is not so relevant for commons right now. But what I wrote was that the old ones would have had State copyright, now expired. Regards, /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:57, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

One thing i AM sure of , the protection term is NOT "70 years after death" as i have got a mail from "Doar Israel" which clearly says that all rights on design of stamps belong to the state. According to this i said that Israeli stamps enjoy a protection term of 50 years after their issue date as they are considered to be "a work made by the state". I need to check which paragraph in the Copyright Law handles this - Paragraph 36 (State Ownership Works) and paragraph 42 (Duration of Copyright in State Works).(i will add late a link to this issue in the Hebrew Wiki). A similar opinion you can find in Image Summary in here User:Nilfanion/Israel. Best regards --kippi70 (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token c33c4ff64dd4f615d405adf173f28ba6 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Mordechai Ish-Shalom.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

COA of Yeruham edit

Done. It's here. Юкатан (talk) 13:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Paul Keres monument Tallinn.jpg edit

File:Paul Keres monument Tallinn.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

No COM:FOP in Estonia. --Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Kovno_Judenrat_1943.jpg edit

File:Kovno_Judenrat_1943.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

sугсго 08:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token c1e19b04823a61ae9c5e3c49e48a6c2e edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Kruckenkreuzflagge_Ständestaat.jpg edit

File:Kruckenkreuzflagge_Ständestaat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 18:21, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kruckenkreuzflagge_Ständestaat.jpg edit

File:Kruckenkreuzflagge_Ständestaat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania edit

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Zikhron Yaaqov Municipal Emblem New.png edit

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zikhron Yaaqov Municipal Emblem New.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 22:12, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Julis COA.png edit

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Julis COA.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:Yirka COA.png

Yours sincerely, Scoopfinder^(d) 10:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Amos Ben Gurion 1948.jpg edit

File:Amos Ben Gurion 1948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ldorfman (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gideon Patt 1980 crop.jpg edit

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gideon Patt 1980 crop.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)