Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Andciao!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:45, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Thomas Aquino Manyo Maeda cardinal.png edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Aquino Manyo Maeda cardinal.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Thomas Aquino Manyo Maeda cardinal.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

4nn1l2 (talk) 03:18, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Antonio Augusto dos Santos Marto.png edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Antonio Augusto dos Santos Marto.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Antonio Augusto dos Santos Marto.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:03, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Soane Patita Paini Mafi.png edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Soane Patita Paini Mafi.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Soane Patita Paini Mafi.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nazaria March Mesa.png edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nazaria March Mesa.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Nazaria March Mesa.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Konrad Krajewski.jpg.png edit

 
File:Konrad Krajewski.jpg.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obviously bogus licensing claims. Getty Images content is not published under Creative Commons licenses.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 09:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Saint Mariam Thresia Chiramel.jpg.png edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Saint Mariam Thresia Chiramel.jpg.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Saint Mariam Thresia Chiramel.jpg.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

XenonX3 (talk) 20:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Nazaria March Mesa.png edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nazaria March Mesa.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nazaria March Mesa.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

XenonX3 (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:San Francesco Spinelli.png edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:San Francesco Spinelli.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:San Francesco Spinelli.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

XenonX3 (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Santa Giuseppina Vannini.png edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Santa Giuseppina Vannini.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Santa Giuseppina Vannini.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

XenonX3 (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:San Gerlando.png edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:San Gerlando.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:San Gerlando.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

XenonX3 (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Re Pagina Arcidiocesi metropolitane edit

Ciao. Stavo aspettando qualche altra risposta prima di procedere e poi magari vederla proposta alla cancellazione. Lu pasci (talk) 21:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Lu pasci: Perché devi vederla proposta alla cancellazione??----Andciao (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Aspetta, ma a cosa ti riferisci? Alla proposta o alla voce?----Andciao (talk) 13:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Alla voce Lu pasci (talk) 13:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Lu pasci: Non capisco il senso. Prima proponi e poi vuoi che venga cancellata. Ci hai ripensato e non lo vuoi fare più o forse ho frainteso qualcosa?----

Non vorrei fare il lavoro e poi vedermelo cancellato in quanto non enciclopedico. Tutto qui Lu pasci (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Lu pasci: D'accordo, comunque credo che la tua proposta vada bene. Hai avuto una buona idea, spero che anche gli altri siano d'accordo.----22:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


Re SajoR Stemma del cardinale... edit

-idioma español- Hola Andciao, espero estés bien...

Me di cuenta que le pediste a SajoR unos escudos, por lo que me di cuenta te ayudo a saber que:

  • Mons. Muñoz Cárdaba [1]
  • Mons. Angelo Accattino [2] aunque no es versión parecida a SajoR

Saludos... Marium Alberto (talk) 02:47, 02 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Marium Alberto: ¡Hola! Desculpame, te repondo después unos días, pero tengo que decirte que:
  • el escudo de monseñor A. Accattino es en formado PNG, por lo tanto no és un formado adecuado por un escudo;
  • yo sabía que existía un escudo de monseñor L.M. Muñoz Cárdaba en wiki, pero prefiero que también SajoR puedas hacerlo con su estilo, porque por ejemplo las esferas de platino parecen lunas y eso no me gusta mucho (y no creo de ser el sólo).
Todavía te agradezco por tu atención y observación. ¡Gracias!----Andciao (talk) 15:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Re:Escudo cardenal Ramazzini Imeri edit

Hola: Lo siento Andciao, con la información disponible, no estoy capacitado para realizar el escudo del cardenal Ramazzini Imeri. Cordial saludo, Macucal (talk) 23:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

¡Hola! Si tu quieras, te puedo ayudar con algunas indicaciones que yo te doy. No se, dime tú.----Andciao (talk) 15:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hola Andciao: lo siento, pero ni aún dándome instrucciones podría dibujar el escudo del cardenal Ramazzini.
Aprovecho para comunicarte que las «esferas de platino» en el escudo de monseñor Muñoz, que dibujé en julio del año pasado, parecen lunas porque son lunas, como indica el blasón en el que basé mi dibujo.
Cordial saludo, Macucal (talk) 00:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Te endiendo. Pero el escudo del cardenal Ramazzini se podría hacer parcialmente, como por ejemplo el libro, el Jesús Buen Pastor y también el río. Las otras partes si están difíciles se mantienen así. ¿Que piensas?----Andciao (talk) 14:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
No merece la pena dase el trabajo. Cordial saludo, Macucal (talk) 06:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Re:Escudo cardenal Mario Aurelio Poli edit

Hola SAnciao:

Veré qué puedo hacer con el escudo de monseñor Poli. Hay dos versiones en Commons ([3] y [4]) y utilizaré la segunda para hacer la que me pides, pero ¿por qué la pides sin ornamentos exteriores? La versión que hay en la iglesia de "San Roberto Bellarmino" lleva los cordones y borlas de cardenal. ¿Podrías enviarme una foto donde se vea bien esa versión?

Cordial saludo, Macucal (talk) 06:12, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

¿Es esto (File:Escudo de Mario Aurelio Poli.svg) lo que querías?. Saludos,Macucal (talk) 11:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Macucal: ¡Exactamente! Pero el dibujo me parece un poquito oscuro, no sé si el escudo tiene este color o sea de un negro más claro. ¡Todavía en general va bien!----12:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hola Andciao: yo no tengo medios para saber el tono de gris que han utilizado en el escudo de monseñor Poli en la iglesia de "San Roberto Bellarmino" de Roma. Si tú lo sabes, dímelo o envíame una imagen donde se vea. También puedes decirme el grado de gris que te gustaría y cambio el dibujo sin problema. Cordial salud, Macucal (talk) 00:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Stemma cardinale Stefan Wyszyński edit

Ciao Andacio,

Perché vuoi che SajoR sostituisca lo stemma Wyszynski esistente? Wikipedia è il lavoro di migliaia di persone che mettono in comune le loro conoscenze e abilità. Non è il luogo dove una singola persona presenta i propri talenti. Apprezzo molto l'enorme lavoro di SajoR sul tema dell'araldica cattolica, ma devo sottolineare che ci sono ancora altre persone che disegnano gli stemmi qui, e le loro opere non dovrebbero essere semplicemente espulse da lui. Lo stemma di Wyszynski è corretto e molto simile alla versione reale usata dal cardinale. In nessun modo dovresti cambiarlo!

Saluti

¡Hola Andciao!

¿Por qué quieres que SajoR reemplace el escudo de armas existente del Wyszynski? Wikipedia es un trabajo de miles de personas que reúnen sus conocimientos y habilidades. No es el lugar a dónde una sola persona presente su talento. Realmente aprecio el enorme trabajo de SajoR para el tema de la heráldica católica, pero debo enfatizar que todavía hay otras personas dibujando los escudos de armas aquí, y sus obras no deben ser simplemente expulsadas por él. El escudo de Wyszynski es correcto y muy similar a la versión real utilizada por el Cardenal. ¡De ninguna manera deberías cambiarlo!

¡Saludos!

Namedrszy — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.132.214.201 (talk) 13:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Escudo cardenal Luis Pascual Dri edit

Hola Andciao! como estas?

Un destacado heraldista profesional italiano, quien ha realizado escudos a varios prelados, me pregunta que si tengo la fuente del escudo del cardenal Dri, le dije que no tengo la fuente, le expliqué que fue una petición y que me basé en la imagen que un usuario había subido, quedó la duda si realmente es el escudo del cardenal Dri. Por ejemplo el escudo de armas del cardenal Ángel Sixto Rossi, que se ve en wikipedia no esta confirmado, un usuario se apresuró hacer el emblema basándose en el escudo de arzobispo, justo días después de ser nombrado cardenal. Te pregunto, ¿tienes la fuente de escudo del cardenal Dri? SajoR (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

@SajoR ¡Hola! Antes de todo te agredezco mucho por haber realizado diferentes escudos.
Entonces, ahora contesto tú pregunta.

Prácticamente hace unos días envié un correo electrónico a los frailes capuchinos del Santuario de Pompeya en Buenos Aires y me confirmaron que el escudo del Cardenal era precisamente ese. Por lo tanto, no hay duda que el escudo sea correcto. Puedes comunicarlo sin problemas al heraldista italiano. Hablando del escudo del cardenal Ángel Sixto Rossi, hace unos días pregunté a la Arquidiócesis de Córdoba si el Cardenal Rossi había cambiado su propio escudo. Todavía ellos me dijeron que Sua Eminencia mantuvo el mismo escudo que tenía cómo Arzobispo. Por lo tanto, lo que se ve en Wikipedia es casi correcto. De hecho, lo único error consiste en la presencia de la cruz patriarcal detrás del escudo, mientras, en realidad, en el escudo original hay un báculo. En conclusión, te había preguntado también los escudos de los cardenales Stephen Chow Sau-yan y Ángel Fernández Artime, ¿puedes realizarlos?----Andciao (talk) 05:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply