Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Baresi franco!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:52, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Contents

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mandarin Pair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Eristalis tenax and flowers.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eristalis tenax and flowers.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue tit three-quarter close-up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egretta garzetta oman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, though I think that this photo deserves a higher resolution.. --Cccefalon 20:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done High res version uploaded--Baresi franco 21:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Franco, I saw your nomination - bird. I also use E-pl5. I suggest you to always extract RAW to jpeg with Olympus Studio, because it gave much better results than Adobe. Than in the end eventually use Adobe to crop or something, but colors are perfect done in Olympus software. --Mile (talk) 19:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Al fursan display 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aegithalos caudatus side-on.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
missing species and category --A.Savin 15:56, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  Done--Baresi franco 21:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  Support good --A.Savin 12:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aegithalos caudatus front-on.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice square and good quality. --JLPC 18:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduelis carduelis in sunshine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meerkat stare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Shallow DoF, but focus is on the eyes thus OK for me. --Tuxyso 15:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue tit front and back-lit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Iifar 18:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blackbird in sunlight.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 21:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Egretta garzetta oman.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Egretta garzetta oman.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ichthyaetus hemprichii juveniles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I saw the note but QI imo.--ArildV 23:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Al fursan display 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aegithalos caudatus cocked head.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good quality. But please make sure to mention the taxa name in the image description, not only in the file name! --Uoaei1 15:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Sorry - now done :) --Baresi franco 17:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduelis carduelis facing sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  CommentThe taxa name is given in the file name only - please also mention it in the image description! --Uoaei1 15:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Yep, I should have thought of that - done! --Baresi franco 17:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erithacus rubecula with cocked head.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Iifar 18:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque Muscat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
That's better. --Mattbuck 23:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aegithalos caudatus front-on 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality Sharpness is good. --Yndesai 08:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Erithacus rubecula with cocked head.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Erithacus rubecula with cocked head.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduelis spinus - male.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment - needs location information - MPF
  Info Added location --Baresi franco 11:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
  Support Good I find. --Hockei 17:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduelis carduelis in sunshine 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 04:00, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chloris chloris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Aegithalos caudatus front-on 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aegithalos caudatus front-on 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduelis carduelis in the gloom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Bit dark but ok --Poco a poco 20:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduelis carduelis close up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good! --High Contrast 22:32, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poecile montanus kleinschmidti 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Very good! --Iifar 18:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Carduelis carduelis close up.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carduelis carduelis close up.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Poecile montanus kleinschmidti 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poecile montanus kleinschmidti 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highland Cattle on Pennine Way above Malham Cove 2014-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highland cattle above Malham Cove.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 18:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poecile montanus kleinschmidti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
(Very) good quality. --JLPC 21:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
... you were some seconds faster ... but I second that. --Cccefalon 22:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malham Cove Rock Climbing.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
CA (see annotation), too much magenta, too much #FFFFFF. --Cccefalon 10:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for taking time to review. Colours aren't my strong point, but I've tried to fix the CA (yep, looks like there were loads of fringes round the shadow edges), and I've made it less bright overall --Baresi franco 20:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Congrats - it's considerably better and can pass as QI. --Cccefalon 21:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malham Cove 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Mandarin Pair.jpgEdit

Hi Baresi, I nominated your Mandarin Duck pair picture for VI. However there are some issues that need to be addressed. Further details are found on the page. Cheers. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 11:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Arctic K - I'll have a look --Baresi franco (talk) 15:36, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Photo Challenge WinnerEdit

  Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Mandarin Pair.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Two of something, in February 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balearica regulorum stare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The top crop is not optimal, but still QI to me --Poco a poco 20:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balearica regulorum portrait 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bucephala clangula female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
No doubt, it's a QI. However, have you considered a tighter crop or a square crop? IMO the bird portrait would benefit from that. --Cccefalon 05:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I'd thought about it, and wasn't sure, but your second opinion has convinced me - crop uploaded. --Baresi franco 17:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
It's great with the new crop! --Cccefalon 20:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bullfinch side-on.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anas falcata male portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grey crowned crane at Martin Mere.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good quality. Have you considered a tighter crop at the right side to get the bird balanced in the middle? Well, thats just a question of personal taste; perhaps as second version of the photo. --Cccefalon 05:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC). Thanks for the review and interesting suggestion. I like having a bit of lead room, but I'll have a go and see how it looks. --Baresi F 22:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bucephala clangula female.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bucephala clangula female.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mandarin Pair.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mandarin Pair.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Male Aix sponsa portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

FP promotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Balearica regulorum portrait 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Balearica regulorum portrait 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/Jee 08:32, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrrhula pyrrhula female 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:09, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrrhula pyrrhula female 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:09, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta ruficollis portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmaronetta angustirostris portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Malchen53 06:41, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aythya nyroca at Martin Mere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Aathavan jaffna 01:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmaronetta angustirostris at Martin Mere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jee 06:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmaronetta angustirostris 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
ok --Cccefalon 06:36, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pyrrhula pyrrhula female 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyrrhula pyrrhula female 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chloris chloris female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 09:02, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Erithacus rubecula with cocked head.jpgEdit

I see you added this to Wikipedia in the box describing it as "The British subspecies, Erithacus rubecula melophilus". If this is the case, you could move it into Category:Erithacus rubecula melophilus. I'm no bird expert. It might also be useful to say where the bird was photographed. -- Colin (talk) 13:00, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Sure thing Colin - done. Spotted a couple of others that need location, too, so I'll do them while I'm at it --Baresi F (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chloris chloris female.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chloris chloris female.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aix galericulata male portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chloephaga melanoptera sat in daisies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 18:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baby Meerkats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for QI --NorbertNagel 20:42, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyme Park House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Could be even better with the "Defringe amount" set to a higher level, but anyway QI. --Cccefalon 05:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the review and good advice - I've removed some more of the fringing that I had missed --Baresi franco 18:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Humboldt penguin during moult.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Small magenta fringe around the beak. The feathers are showing too much magenta, the magenta saturation should be reduced --Cccefalon 05:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC) Thanks for reviewing - is it any better now?--Baresi franco 11:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Oh yes! Well done! --Cccefalon 20:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
Nice job! XD Webysther (talk) 20:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erithacus rubecula juvenile.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 21:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilac-breasted Roller 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:54, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring tailed lemur portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! European Brown Bear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-tailed lemur portrait 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Brilliant eyes beat unsharp nose - QI for me. --Cccefalon 03:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhinoceros unicornis 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Franco, may I request your support?Edit

Hi Baresi franco I have a FP candidate of a Nile Croc eating a wildebeest in the Masai Mara that ends tomorrow, and has got just 7 support votes... just borderline. If you could check if you like the image, and support it, I would be grateful. But please, only support it if you really think it has enough quality or dama to become FP. Thanks a lot. --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk)

Hi Arturo, I didn't get chance to review that candidate, but it looks like you got enough support :). Your Manta Ray photo is wonderful, btw --Baresi F (talk) 22:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:European Brown Bear.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:European Brown Bear.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

What lenses do you use?Edit

Hello Baresi Franco, I enjoyed your stunning images. I have a Panasonic G5 with the 14-42 kit and 45-150 lenses but I am unsure which lenses I should get afterwards. Could you tell the lenses you use? Thanks. Fah112778 (talk)

Hi Fah112778 - glad you like my uploads :). I'm sure you could get some fantastic photos with your setup already, but if you're interested in bird/wildlife photography then IMO the Lumix 100-300mm is very good. I also use the Oly 60mm Macro lens for some wildlife shots, but hardy ever at macro distances - mostly just as a short telephoto. For people shots I use the Lumix 20mm f1.7 and the Olympus 45mm f1.8.--Baresi F (talk) 22:28, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Falcated duck 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please remove the moiré ... Kidding ... Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great tit side-on.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good quality. Love the background. I think the composition can be optimized by cropping slightly on the left hand side. I propose FPC nomination. --Slaunger 20:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  Done Thanks - it looks more balanced now --Baresi franco 22:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Baresi franco Thanks for the new crop, and wow! -- Slaunger 21:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue tit three-quarter close-up 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Male Aix sponsa portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Male Aix sponsa portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Preston cenotaph 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI for me --Halavar 17:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Preston cenotaph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 08:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Great tit side-on.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Great tit side-on.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avenham charity shop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 10:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boer War Memorial Wigan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:27, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little Moreton Hall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spire of St Walburge Preston.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Perhaps 1000px too high at the top but good quality. --DXR 18:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Photo Challenge SilverEdit

  Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Moorhen feeding chick.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Big and small, in September-October 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spire of St John's Minster, Preston.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Standish st wilfrids.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, nice detail. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 02 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurasian blue tit Lancashire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. no doubt, its even FP for me! --Hubertl 20:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aix galericulata male calling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Preston Cenotaph with wreaths.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Yes, its better, I just want it to be prepared for FP. I will vote with Pro! --Hubertl 12:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midland Hotel Manchester.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Great work! --Steindy 00:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bullfinch male.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Excellent! Please don't decline. -- Spurzem 00:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
A good photo, indeed. What about FP, Baresi franco? --Brateevsky 15:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll give it a try! --Baresi franco 22:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  Comment Very good, but there are black parts that need brightening. For example between eye and beak. --Hockei 10:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Hockei, I'll see what I can do.--Baresi franco 22:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willow Tit Lancashire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 08 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bass Rock from south east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Yes, better. Great view! --DXR 22:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bullfinch male.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bullfinch male.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rufford Old Hall Great Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 03:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Eurasian blue tit Lancashire.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eurasian blue tit Lancashire.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurasian blue tit Lancashire 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 21:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue tit three-quarter close-up 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:50, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great tit - Parus major.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Watling Street Road Workhouse entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 17:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winter Hill Main Mast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A bit noisy in the sky. Jakec 15:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing. I've reduced the noise - is it any better now? --Baresi franco 12:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Better now. Nice work. Jakec 17:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goldcrest 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ. --Palauenc05 17:04, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Goldcrest 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Goldcrest 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/KTC (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations!Edit

You are, like Uwe und XRay - in my opinion, one of the three "Wikimedians", which spent more then just Highlights to this common project. Therefore, your success is more important for me. I wish you good light for this and the contest in the next year! --Hubertl (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks Hubertl, that is very generous of you, and much appreciated. The foundations of Commons are its enthusiastic amateur contributors and, as you say, it is good that a few of us are represented in the top 12. Good light to you, too, sir!

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aythya nyroca at Martin Mere 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 23:21, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Granada Mk I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haigh Windmill 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI for me --Halavar 22:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Visit Brazil someday!Edit

Hello, Baresi franco! I recommend you visit Brazil. This vast country is home to unique natural life. It is abundant in splendid landscapes. Visit Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília and many other cities! Visit Brazil someday! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the recommendation, 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk). The allure of Brazil is easy to see in these photos: lots of WOW!

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parus major poised.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Nice--Lmbuga 21:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduelis carduelis close up 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black Swan at Martin Mere.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Gorgeous! --Crisco 1492 01:48, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Aythya nyroca at Martin Mere 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aythya nyroca at Martin Mere 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Walburge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
What is it? (see note) --Christian Ferrer 15:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Christian - ghosts now removed. --Baresi franco 20:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 21:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Black Swan at Martin Mere.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black Swan at Martin Mere.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miller Arcade Preston.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Touzrimounir 18:23, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quarry Bank Mill Styal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 22:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunham Massey stables and carriage hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muscovy duck portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 21:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muscovy duck portrait 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Muscovy duck portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Muscovy duck portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UK Ironman 2015 competitor - cycling.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Impressive and good quality -- Spurzem 21:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brant goose portrait.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiloé wigeon portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 22:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ring tailed lemur portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ring tailed lemur portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

EmailEdit

Hi Francis, I've sent you an email! Best, Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 18:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moorhen feeding chick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

I think that you need to crop a portion of the bottom, that blury area is pretty disturbing Poco a poco Thu, 03 May 2018 18:45:56 GMT
  Support Good quality. Not so visually disturbing IMO --Christian Ferrer 18:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Baresi franco".