User talk:Benoît Prieur/Archives 2013

Archives

Archive

• May 2023-January 2024
• 2022-May 2023
• 2021
• 2020 (part 2)
• 2019
• 2017-2018
• 2016
• 2015
• 2014
• 2013
• 2012
• 2011
• 2010

Re : OpenData Gahetna

Salut ! Dans le mille, je suis aussi actif sur fr.WP ! Pour faire simple, les photographies importables sont celles dont le "Collectie / Archief" est "Fotocollectie Anefo" et le "Nummer toegang" est "2.24.01.05". Très important ce dernier point, tu peux voir sur ma PdD commons les nombreux imports supprimés car ils étaient sous licence "2.24.01.01" qui n'est pas CC-BY-SA. Les deux photos qui t'intéressent ne sont donc pas utilisables sur fr.WP. Le mieux est de faire une recherche directe comme cela, qui hélas ne donne aucun résultat pour Pingeon. Cordialement. Efilguht (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour et merci beaucoup pour la réponse rapide et précise.

J'ai tout compris .

Cordialement, --Agamitsudo (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of église Saint Romain de Miribel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of église Saint-Martin de Miribel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of église Saint-Didier de Neyron.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Geocodage needed--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:15, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

 Done (sorry for that). --Agamitsudo (talk) 15:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of town hall of Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment For buildings that can be visited, do not forget to add "exterior" to the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:42, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of église Saint-Maurice de Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment For buildings that can be visited, do not forget to add "exterior" to the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

File:L'église de Brocas bis.jpg

Bonsoir,
Mais, comment as-tu fait ? (magie ?).
--Agamitsudo (talk) 23:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour Aga,

Oui c'est de la magie, tu regarde bien l’image sur ton écran et tu dis : Supercalifragili…

Plus sérieusement, j’ai redressé les perspectives avec GIMP, un logiciel libre de traitement d’image. C’est en fait assez simple à réaliser.

Pierre Selim le fait systématiquement sur ses images d’architecture et ça évite aux clochers de se casser la figure et de laisser penser que les architectes et maître d’œuvre ont trop forcé sur la bouteille !.

--Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 07:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Salut,

du coup ta magie m'intéresse : c'est quelle fonction/commande sous GIMP, qu'il faut utiliser ?

En te remerciant, --Agamitsudo (talk) 11:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Dans la boîte à outils, il faut sélectionner l’outil perspective (MacOS => Maj+P) --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 11:14, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok merci. Je vais tester cela. --Agamitsudo (talk) 14:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Carré_Frais

Carré Frais has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Rah l'autre eh, c'est pas copyrighté ça ? Un flicaillon d'un pré carré dont tout le monde se fout (sisi) 09:01, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Ce serait plutôt un pré carré frais, ici. --Agamitsudo (talk) 07:41, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

TUSC token 898f69e0312a859948bd75ea9f8ad4c8

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Mairie-Saint-MauriceDeBeynost.JPG

File:Mairie-Saint-MauriceDeBeynost.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Sathonette 2 saint-maurice-de-beynost.JPG

File:Sathonette 2 saint-maurice-de-beynost.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 15:13, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

File:La Sereine à La Boisse.JPG

File:La Sereine à La Boisse.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Lycée de la Côtière à La Boisse.JPG

File:Lycée de la Côtière à La Boisse.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 15:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Marce(l) Rufo

Merci beaucoup pour ce renommage, je n’avais même pas vu la bourde ! Très cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Salut,

Ce n'est rien. Au passage merci à toi, pour l'explication relatives au "redressage de clochers qui tombent" (ALT+P sous Gimp) : j'utilise abondamment la fonctionnalité à présent.

Bonne continuation et bravo pour tes magnifiques photos. --Agamitsudo (talk) 07:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Theatre-Croix-Rousse-Lyon-France.jpg

File:Theatre-Croix-Rousse-Lyon-France.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

file movements - tagging redirect for deletion

Please stop tagging file redirects for deletion after file movements - these should always be kept except for very recently uploaded images. We are not alon in the Wikiworld and some re-users now link to a dead file. Thank you. --Denniss (talk) 09:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Zylbermann

Ils ont dû se gourer dans le programme, c'est écrit avec 2 N sur son dos ! JeanBono (talk) 10:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done catégorie corrigée. --Agamitsudo (talk) 10:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

J'ai ajouté les numéros/noms de chaque joueur (+ les entraîneurs et les arbitres) dans cette Category:Finale du championnat de France masculin de hockey sur gazon 2013 : ça devrait aider à la catégorisation. --Agamitsudo (talk) 12:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Joli travail, quel contributeur passionné ! JeanBono (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

J'avais une photo de l'entraîneur de Saint-Germain mais je l'ai supprimé, je peux la retrouver. Je l'avais pris en fourbe sans lui demander. JeanBono (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Si tu en as une de celui de Lille : il a un article sur WP... --Agamitsudo (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Scott Sunderland

Bonjour, concernant l'image "Scott Sunderland -Tour de France 2013 - Montpellier", je suis bluffé... De bonne foi, j'étais persuadé qu'il s'agissait de Claude Eymard (consultant France 2) qui est un quasi-sosie mais en consultant des photos de S.Sunderland, effectivement, pas de doute, c'est bien lui... Il faut dire que j'avais demandé à des personnes présentes et ceux-ci pensaient que c'était le journaliste français; par contre, il y avait bien une discussion en anglais entre les deux personnes... En tout cas, bravo pour ta perspicacité... --34 super héros (talk) 13:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Cela arrive, pas de souci .

Pour être parfaitement honnête, ce n'est pas moi qui est reconnu Scott Sunderland (j'avais juste un doute au sujet de Claude Eymard), comme tu peux le lire ici.

Au passage, bravo pour tes photos de sports !

À bientôt, --Agamitsudo (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Catégories

Bonjour Agamitsudo. Merci d'avoir corrigé et merci pour l'explication. Je m'aperçois de la chose après coup. Comme par exemple je constate que cette page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Parc_de_la_T%C3%AAte_d%27Or contient 80 fichiers et sur la même page un lien http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Parc_de_la_T%C3%AAte_d%27Or qui contient 42 fichiers dont certains ne sont pas sur la page précédente. Je pense qu'il est possible de corriger cela mais je ne la fais pas car je ne veux pas tout abimer. Pourriez-vous le faire et si vous avez le temps m'expliquer le problème ? Merci. Cordialement. Tusco (talk) 17:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Dans ce cas c'est un peu différent : ce n'est plus un "problème" de catégories successivement incluses. En effet, Parc de la Tête d'Or est une page de présentation, une "vitrine" du thème qui est incluse dans la Category:Parc de la Tête d'Or. Le travail de caractérisation de l'image est réellement fait par les catégories (et non par les pages). À mon sens, pas de problème.

Bonne continuation, --Aga (d) 17:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Category redirects

Hello, I am busy renaming a number of French municipality cat's. Category redirects for the old cat's have a function for wikipedias-to-commons links. Deleting Category:Joyeux is excellent. But I propose to keep Category:Douvres and similar cat's as redirect for a month or so. --Havang(nl) (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok. Regards. --Aga (d) 21:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. See Commons:Rename a category#Should the old category be deleted?. But it's a limit case. Greetings. --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of chapelle Saint-Georges de Pugieu, Ain, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment it is necessary to have a caption in English. It is desirable to say, in the caption where it is the monument. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romain Bardet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Vue de Gerland côté virage Sud - 2.JPG

File:Vue de Gerland côté virage Sud - 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Vue de Gerland côté virage Sud.JPG

File:Vue de Gerland côté virage Sud.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Avant match - vue de Gerland depuis le virage sud.jpg

File:Avant match - vue de Gerland depuis le virage sud.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Entrée tribune Jean-Jaurès du stade Gerland.JPG

File:Entrée tribune Jean-Jaurès du stade Gerland.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Reproduction du stade Gerland (musée du train miniature de Châtillon-sur-Chalaronne).JPG

File:Reproduction du stade Gerland (musée du train miniature de Châtillon-sur-Chalaronne).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Mais pourquoi diable ?

Salut,
Pourquoi proposes-tu cette image à la suppression File:Avant match - vue de Gerland depuis le virage sud.jpg pour le motif discutable que l'architecte n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans (alors même que le bâtiment lui-même et son architecture sont peu identifiables) et pas celle-ci qui dévoile autant (ou aussi peu) du bâtiment File:Stade-Gerland-RWC2007.JPG. On se demande ... --Aga (d) 09:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Parce qu'à mon avis (mais ce n'est que mon avis) cette photo est avant tout destinée à montrer les installations rugby mises en place pour la coupe du monde à Gerland. Mais libre à toi de la proposer aussi à la suppression, (j'y défendrais mon point de vue mais je comprendrais si elle était supprimée). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Mouais. Comment dit-on WP:POINT sur Commons ? Il est vrai que les anciens fumeurs sont souvent les plus zélés à dénoncer les clopeurs. --Aga (d) 09:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Conflit d'édition - j'étais en train de compléter/modifier mon message précédent, le voici donc complet : Parce qu'à mon avis (mais ce n'est que mon avis) cette photo est avant tout destinée à montrer les installations rugby mises en place pour la coupe du monde à Gerland (l'architecture elle-même ne couvre qu'à peine 1/4 de la photo). Mais libre à toi de la proposer aussi à la suppression (j'y défendrais mon point de vue mais je comprendrais si elle était supprimée), sachant quand même qu'elle a déjà été conservée une fois. Au contraire, sur File:Avant match - vue de Gerland depuis le virage sud.jpg, il y a une bonne moitié de la photo qui concerne l'architecture elle-même (amorce + arrière-plan). Mais j'avoue avoir hésité pour celle-ci car on peut toujours considérer que le sujet de la photo est la préparation de la pelouse avant-match et plus secondairement aussi le public. C'est à débattre (c'est à ça que servent les propositions de suppression !) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Mon point de vue : les photos extérieures dévoilent l'architecture du bâtiment : rien à dire donc sur leurs suppressions. Par contre, les photos intérieures ne dévoilent rien ou quasiment rien de l'architecture. --Aga (d) 09:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Ta référence aux accusations de Kirtap est pour le moins malhonnête et non constructive. Kirtap ayant déjà été en partie malhonnête sur ces accusations, y revenir dessus ne montre pas une attitude constructive de ta part (Kirtap a détourné ma façon d'argumenter et les nuances que j'apportais à l'époque sur un sujet très précis. Si j'agissais aussi malhonnêtement que Kirtap à l'époque, je clamerais que tu es pour le copyvio en m'appuyant sur ton point de vue précédent concernant les intérieurs/extérieurs des stades ! Mais heureusement je ne suis pas Kirtap...). Je ne vois aucunement en quoi ta remarque fait avancer les choses. D'autre part, ça semble signifier que, comme/si j'ai fait des erreurs par le passé, je n'ai pas le droit de signaler les erreurs des autres ? C'est quoi cette mentalité ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Tout le monde s'est fait ou se fera accusé un jour de copyvio par Kirtap (sans doute une forme de bizutage wikipédien).

Sur l'allusion plus haut, ce n'était pas classe, je l'admets.

--Aga (d) 09:32, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

C'est bon alors, je te pardonne... surtout en tant qu'autre victime de Kirtap ! Continuons donc à débattre sainement, nous ne sommes pas lui... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:34, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Bien d'accord. Je trouve plutôt qu'il y a bien dichotomie extérieur/intérieur quant au droit d'auteur, pas forcément pour tous les stades, mais assurément pour celui-ci. Typiquement les travées sont ce qui "marquent" l'architecture de Garnier : or on les voit assez peu de l'intérieur (tout dépend du cadrage bien sûr) et en tout cas sur les clichés concernés par les IàS.

Bonne continuation, --Aga (d) 09:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Tiens, ça fait du bien d'être soutenu par Kirtap ! Comme quoi, malgré la petite rancune que j'ai, ce n'est pas un mauvais bougre... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Prudhomme et Pescheux

Bonjour. Je passe rapidement ce matin sur la page VI et je constate que tes deux photos sont toujours sans promotion alors que tu as fait ce qui t'était demandé par Archaeo. Peux-tu, s'il te plaît, dans la partie "review", ajouter un petit mot, ou plus rapidement un  Done pour que tes fichiers puissent être promus par celui qui t'a demandé la modification?. -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 07:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour JLPC,

Tu as raison : j'avais oublié de le faire.

Merci, --Aga (d) 08:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hubert Dupont.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of chapelle Saint-Georges de Pugieu, Ain, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment it is necessary to have a caption in English. It is desirable to say, in the caption where it is the monument. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christian Prudhomme.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There must have a description of the character in the caption, we do not know who he is, what he does ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. --Aga (d) 08:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Al criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean-François Pescheux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There must have a description of the character in the caption, we do not know who he is, what he does ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. --Aga (d) 08:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steele Von Hoff.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Gianni Meersman (Cropping).jpg

Bonsoir, aurais-je enfreint une des lois de protection sur le droit à l’image en recadrant vos photo? Car je me posais la question suite à votre Méta bandeau d'avertissement sur le droit à l’image. cordialement Matt777

20:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Absolument pas . En fait, il est conseillé de placer ce bandeau sur les portraits de personnalités.

Concernant votre travail, bravo et bonne continuation.

--Aga (d) 19:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Suppression de catégorie

Salut,

C'était ma toute première fois. Merci d'être passé derrière moi. Petro (talk) 18:25, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

No problemo. C'est un plaisir de t'aider (pour une fois que c'est dans ce sens là).

À bientôt, --Aga (d) 18:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

J'ai vu qu'une de tes photos avait eu les honneurs de la presse : [1]. Bravo ! Petro (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Photos de bâtiments récents

Bonjour,

J'ai lu que les photos de bâtiments récents peuvent être supprimées au motif que l'architecte est vivant ou n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans. Pourrais-tu m'éclairer à ce sujet. Merci. Petro (talk) 14:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Salut,

En fait WikiCommons n'héberge que des documents sous (certaines) licences libres. Pour qu'une photographie d'un bâtiment puisse être déposée il faut donc qu'elle soit conforme au droit du pays dans lequel se trouve le bâtiment. Dans certains pays (Suisse par exemple), toute photographie de bâtiment peut être potentiellement téléversée sur WikiCommons car il y a la liberté de panorama. En France, ce n'est pas le cas et la législation sur le droit d'auteur s'exerce : pour toute oeuvre de l'esprit, le droit d'auteur est applicable jusqu'à 70 ans après la mort du créateur (peintre, auteur et architecte également). Donc hormis si l'architecte donne son accord, il n'est pas autorisé de téléverser une photo d'un bâtiment français dont l'architecte ne serait pas mort depuis au moins 70 ans. Comme c'est très limitatif, il existe sur Wikipédia francophone, une exception au droit d'auteur relative au bâtiment récent qui te permet sous certaines conditions, d'héberger des photos de ce type sous Wikipédia elle même (une autre exception en vigueur est celle sur les logos/marques déposées).

N'hésite pas si tu as d'autres question ou si je n'ai pas été suffisamment clair.

--Aga (d) 14:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Karabala statue (Yerevan).JPG and File:Bull statue (Yerevan).JPG

Hi Agamitsudo, please add the name of the sculptor to the image desription. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

 Done

I take into opportunity to thank you for your deletion actions when I'm wrong in naming categories.

Regards, --Aga (d) 19:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buste de Louis Thollon à Ambronay.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness is borderline, but OK from my side. --NorbertNagel 18:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Youpi. --Aga (d) 00

30, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Photo de François Faber

Bonjour,

Je ne sais pas si cela peut t'intéresser : il y a sur Gallica une photo de Faber avec une meilleure résolution que celle que tu as téléchargée. Petro (talk) 12:41, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done Je me suis permis de faire la manipulation. Très cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:34, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Woauh merci à tous les deux !

Bien sûr que ça m'intéresse : merci à Claude pour la manip'.

À bientôt à tous les deux, --Aga (d) 04:36, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Du coup, j'ai ajouté cette (belle) photo à l'article en cours de labellisation. --Aga (d) 04:43, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Monument de la Renaissance africaine, vue arrière.JPG

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Modifier les métadonnées de photos

Bonsoir,

Je viens de m'apercevoir que j'ai mal paramétré l'heure de mon appareil photo. Donc toutes les photos que j'ai prises dernièrement ont une heure erronnée. Connais tu un logiciel compatible Mac permettant de modifier les métadonnées d'une photo ? Petro (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Salut,

En fait j'ai quelques périphériques Apple mais je n'ai pas de mac et pour les modifications des Exifs je passe directement par les propriétés (que ce soit sous Linux ou Windows). Après avoir regardé un peu ce soft pour mac semble être très bien (et en téléchargement gratuit ; par contre payant via l'appstore).

En espérant que cela t'aidera. Peut-être demander sur le Commons:Bistro sinon ? (il y a à coup sûr d'autres wiki-photographes utilisant un mac).

Tiens-moi au courant, --Aga (d) 08:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Merci. Je n'ai pas pris le temps de m'en occuper. Je reporte ça à plus tard (ou jamais...). Petro (talk) 17:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Benoît Prieur, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Frankfurt stadium from plane.JPG

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 07:00, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 06:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Benoît Prieur, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Bonne année et joyeux Noël!

--Beko (talk) 23:21, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:HerriotEinstein.jpg

Author died in 1936, so copyright has expired, whatever some library may claim. Jcb (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

That's true. I did not take care about this information (dead in 1936). Thank you for your awareness.

I was only disturbing by the NC mention with a possible too recent picture.

Bye, --Aga (d) 23:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)