Bulka UA
- Administrator User:Ahonc, that being with me in a state of conflict because of Ukrainian Wikipedia article Bazaliya [1] after blocking Ukrainian administrators resorted to targeted trolling, harassment, including threats statement[2]; [3]. In addition the administrator has not reported since the end of the block. I ask you unlock my account and take to User:Ahonc appropriate sanctions (Sorry, I'm using a translator for English).--Bulka UA (talk) 09:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- I explained my position on my talk page, and other sysop Killiondude agreed that this block was correct. And the links, provided by Bulka UA (2, 3) was the warnings in Ukrainian, but not the threats. The phrases 'do not do this next time, because you'll be blocked' and 'this is the last warning' are not threats. They are warnings.--Anatoliy (talk) 09:40, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- 1. You depart from the main. Namely, after the conflict in the Ukrainian wikipedia you continued it here with the use of office administrator. Why have you applied for a license to the images on the theme Bazaliya immediately after blocking an article in Ukrainian Wikipedia? Unfortunately, your actions in Ukrainian Wikipedia are destructive and have not found a decent reaction by administrators (comparable article Bazalii before and after my intervention, as well as your "contribution" during this time as everything will fall into place). 2. Loading your floor one of the reasons my pursuit of you. Since you have loaded the image was PD license which it did not meet I uploaded a similar image that correspond to this license File:Bazaliya.gif. You canceled my step. Still can not prove a license. In the Ukrainian wikipedia you know a user who makes the kickbacks without explanation. Not inclined to seek understanding (see the page requests to administrators). 3. Also I never called you "троль паршивий". And he threatened not "give" you administrators and warned that just as in the Ukrainian wikipedia actions you wait for response according to the rules. Usage "small" (not "baby") is not offensive. You knowingly enter into deceit. In addition it is your words: a conversation of two grown men, it can be a bit harsh. Do's and Don'ts of a resentful. (Sorry, I'm using a translator for English)--Bulka UA (talk) 10:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Our conflict in Ukrainian Wikipedia (where you is also blocked now) do not make influence for this blocking. You say that I persecute you, I tag your images because of conflict, and images are correct. But I tagged not only your images (see my contribs). Many users do not love me because I deleted his images. But I am sysop, and it is my duty to delete wrong licensed images. And when I delete image I do not see, who is the uploader if the image (that's why sometimes I may delete my own image. C'est la vie.)--Anatoliy (talk) 10:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Again deceit: "While I was writing this comment, the participant also received Bulka UA lock in Wikipedia ukrainsoky the threat to other participants". The official reason for blocking "persecution" there are unexplained and before you make a block from the Wikimedia Commons is no relation. --Bulka UA (talk) 10:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- persecution, threat, harassment - what is big difference? all are violations.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- I sent a request to unlock because its cause is not known to me [4]. But again it's no lock on the Wikimedia Commons. --Bulka UA (talk) 10:45, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- User:Ahonc commented on my assumption of a conspiracy between him and the Ukrainian Wikipedia administrator who resorted to arbitrary blocking of my account: And even if there is a <conspiracy>, then what? --Bulka UA (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ha-ha, conspiration? You have paranoia.--Anatoliy (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- It can be said agreement. Rather. --Bulka UA (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, shit. You did expose us. We are secret agents of Wikimedia. We watch for you every day and night.--Anatoliy (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Your malevolence is offensive and passed all limits. I demand an apology. --Bulka UA (talk) 19:32, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, shit. You did expose us. We are secret agents of Wikimedia. We watch for you every day and night.--Anatoliy (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- It can be said agreement. Rather. --Bulka UA (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ha-ha, conspiration? You have paranoia.--Anatoliy (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- User:Ahonc commented on my assumption of a conspiracy between him and the Ukrainian Wikipedia administrator who resorted to arbitrary blocking of my account: And even if there is a <conspiracy>, then what? --Bulka UA (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- I sent a request to unlock because its cause is not known to me [4]. But again it's no lock on the Wikimedia Commons. --Bulka UA (talk) 10:45, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- persecution, threat, harassment - what is big difference? all are violations.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:36, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- 1. You depart from the main. Namely, after the conflict in the Ukrainian wikipedia you continued it here with the use of office administrator. Why have you applied for a license to the images on the theme Bazaliya immediately after blocking an article in Ukrainian Wikipedia? Unfortunately, your actions in Ukrainian Wikipedia are destructive and have not found a decent reaction by administrators (comparable article Bazalii before and after my intervention, as well as your "contribution" during this time as everything will fall into place). 2. Loading your floor one of the reasons my pursuit of you. Since you have loaded the image was PD license which it did not meet I uploaded a similar image that correspond to this license File:Bazaliya.gif. You canceled my step. Still can not prove a license. In the Ukrainian wikipedia you know a user who makes the kickbacks without explanation. Not inclined to seek understanding (see the page requests to administrators). 3. Also I never called you "троль паршивий". And he threatened not "give" you administrators and warned that just as in the Ukrainian wikipedia actions you wait for response according to the rules. Usage "small" (not "baby") is not offensive. You knowingly enter into deceit. In addition it is your words: a conversation of two grown men, it can be a bit harsh. Do's and Don'ts of a resentful. (Sorry, I'm using a translator for English)--Bulka UA (talk) 10:15, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Українофобія.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Українофобія.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Українофобія.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Українофобія.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Попередження
editНе завантажуйте зображень гіршої якості поверх зображень кращої якості. У разі повторення порушень до вас буде застосоване блокування.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Григорій Гладинюк.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Григорій Гладинюк.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Anatoliy (talk) 20:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- помер у 1911 році. отож світлина не могла бути зроблена після смерті. сто років достатній термін щоб відповідати заявленій ліцензії. --Bulka UA (talk) 07:52, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Костел Св. Трійці. Базалія.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Костел Св. Трійці. Базалія.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Костел Св. Трійці Базалія.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Костел Св. Трійці Базалія.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Anatoliy (talk) 15:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Потрібно ще автора вказати. Він міг померти після 1930 року, а таке зображення вже не в PD.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:21, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ти бачиш там автора? То вкажи. --Bulka UA (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Де ж я його можу бачити? Книжка у вас, а не у мене.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ти бачиш там автора? То вкажи. --Bulka UA (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Попередження №2
editПрохання утримуватися від особистих образ та нападок на користувачів. Це попередження останнє.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:21, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Будеш за мною бігати тутешні адміни не наші і швидко з таким тролем упораються. --Bulka UA (talk) 15:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Я за вами не бігаю. Я інших користувачв (напр. Ed1984, Sidik iz PTU) так само попереджаю про проблеми з ліцензіями зображень, однак вони не огризаються. Ви просто не правильно зробили опис зображень (з нього не видно, що вони в PD). А коли вам написали попередження, то у відповідь написали образу.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Блокування
editНа жаль, ви не зрозуміли після першого разу і в наступній репліці вдалися до погроз. Тож ваш обліковий запис заблоковано.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. I see that Ahonc can speak a little English. If Bulka could speak English that would make things easier, but I'll use a translation as well. Ahonc, where is the "особисті образи, погрози" that needed a 3 day block?
- Привіт. Я бачу, що Ahonc можна говорити трохи по-англійськи. Якщо Булка говорить по-англійськи, що буде робити речі простіше, але я буду використовувати переклад, а також. Ahonc, де "особісті образи, погрозивши", які необхідно 3 дня блок? Killiondude (talk) 20:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Будь ласка, ведуть себе на Commons. Блок здається допустимим. Якщо ви хочете просити розблокувати потім використовувати {{unblock}}.(Вибачте, я використовую перекладача для української мови) --> (Sorry, I'm using a translator for Ukrainian) Killiondude (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Both users have a conflict with respect to the Ukrainian Wikipedia article, which placed these photos. Users Bulka UA and Ahonc committed multiple violations of the rules in this case. This may be harassment. --Yakudza (talk) 22:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, harassment from Bulka UA to me. I didn't make harassment to him, I only reverted his edits (restore my edits), it is different case, and does not make influense to this block.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:19, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Пошуки_утопленика._ізяслав._горинь_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Пошуки_утопленика._ізяслав._горинь.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Please, discuss your actions when moving categories. To move a category, you should write a request and discuss it with other users. Your move was reverted, since it contradicts the article name in Wikipedia, fle names, other categories' names and most of the sources. Also, you should not remove all Russia-related categories only because of your national sentiment.--Beaumain (talk) 19:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Если ви хотите доказать вашу правоту, зачем тогда удалили категории? Кроме того мои взгляди к вам никоим образом не относятся. Иван Федорович имеет историческое написание имени латиницей. Может вам ето и не нравится. Может если ви мне покажете его подпись в том варианте на котором ви настаиваете я сменю свое мнение. --Bulka UA (talk) 09:19, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- В Commons принято именовать категории, как в английской Википедии (поэтому здесь категории называются Kiev, Kharkiv и Odessa, а не Kyiv, Kharkov (как предалагли переименовать русские википедисты) и Odesa), поэтому категория должна называться Ivan Fyodorov. При этом названия файлов можно давать на любом языке, так как Commons — проект многоязычный. И если файл имеет внятное название не на английском, то это не может быть причиной его переименования.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Вас як завжди ніхто не питав. І ви як завжди не робите посилання на офіційні правила. Крім того якщо у вас стільки часу щоб випасати розмови на сторінках користувачів які до вас не зверталися то ви мабуть знайдете іще трохи часу щоб потурбуватися про гармонійну назву для цієї категорії Category:St. Vododymyr's Cathedral, Chersones. --Bulka UA (talk) 10:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- навіщо «випасати»? список спостережння для того і придумали, щоб було видно зміни на сторінках, за якими спостерігаєте. А щодо посилань на правила: читайте підсумок тут: Regardless of all above arguments, category names will be in English. Gallery names can be in the native language. You can create a soft redirect from categories local names to th English names.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- І що це доводить? Росіяни вчергове перейменували категорію в обхід обговорення. Адже "англійською" також буде Ioannes Fedorowicz (цьому написанню слід віддавати перевагу) та Ivan Fedorovych. --Bulka UA (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- У такому разі спочатку перейменуйте статтю в англійській Вікіпедії, а потім уже категорію тут.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:33, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Не розказуйте що мені робити. --Bulka UA (talk) 11:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- У такому разі спочатку перейменуйте статтю в англійській Вікіпедії, а потім уже категорію тут.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:33, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- І що це доводить? Росіяни вчергове перейменували категорію в обхід обговорення. Адже "англійською" також буде Ioannes Fedorowicz (цьому написанню слід віддавати перевагу) та Ivan Fedorovych. --Bulka UA (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- навіщо «випасати»? список спостережння для того і придумали, щоб було видно зміни на сторінках, за якими спостерігаєте. А щодо посилань на правила: читайте підсумок тут: Regardless of all above arguments, category names will be in English. Gallery names can be in the native language. You can create a soft redirect from categories local names to th English names.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Вас як завжди ніхто не питав. І ви як завжди не робите посилання на офіційні правила. Крім того якщо у вас стільки часу щоб випасати розмови на сторінках користувачів які до вас не зверталися то ви мабуть знайдете іще трохи часу щоб потурбуватися про гармонійну назву для цієї категорії Category:St. Vododymyr's Cathedral, Chersones. --Bulka UA (talk) 10:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- В Commons принято именовать категории, как в английской Википедии (поэтому здесь категории называются Kiev, Kharkiv и Odessa, а не Kyiv, Kharkov (как предалагли переименовать русские википедисты) и Odesa), поэтому категория должна называться Ivan Fyodorov. При этом названия файлов можно давать на любом языке, так как Commons — проект многоязычный. И если файл имеет внятное название не на английском, то это не может быть причиной его переименования.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Петро Власенко. Замок князів Острозьких у Старокостянтинові зі Случі.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Петро Власенко. Замок князів Острозьких у Старокостянтинові зі Случі.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File:Церква_Пресвятої_Трійці._Інтер`єр_в_керунку_вівтаря._Замок_Острозьких_в_Костянтинові.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Edit wars
editПрохання не влаштовувати війн відкотів, а читати, що пишуть у шаблонах. Шаблон номінації на вилучення нема сенсу відкочувати, бо бот його все одно поверне. Для зображень треба вказувати пряме джерело, тобто на сторінку з самим зображенням, а не на головну сторінку сайту. Тоді можна буде перевірити, що зображення знаходиться саме на тому сайті і підпадає під зазначений дозвіл. У разі повторення відкотів до вас можуть бути застосовані санкції у вигляді обмеження можливості редагування.--Anatoliy (talk) 16:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- proszę o kontakt w języku polskim. poszedł na wojnę to ty. usunięcie podstawowych informacji. dlaczego? następnie złożyć skargę? --Bulka UA (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I do not know Polish. But I know that you know ukrainian (you write articles in uk.wikipedia).--Anatoliy (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- a ty z Ukrainą? słyszałem o takiej. nie mówią po ukraińsku? --Bulka UA (talk) 17:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sprechen Sie Deutsch?--Anatoliy (talk) 17:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- I not live in Germany. Why do you think? --Bulka UA (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sprechen Sie Deutsch?--Anatoliy (talk) 17:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- a ty z Ukrainą? słyszałem o takiej. nie mówią po ukraińsku? --Bulka UA (talk) 17:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I do not know Polish. But I know that you know ukrainian (you write articles in uk.wikipedia).--Anatoliy (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
|
File:Lina Kostenko 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
I don't know any of the facts concerning whether red or blue is correct. However, in general if there is an image which has been used in multiple Wikipedia articles for a length of time, and there are objections to changing that image, then you should probably upload the new version as a separate image (i.e. under a new name). AnonMoos (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Notice
editI've make a notice on your blind-reverts [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&diff=prev&oldid=62991878}. Please self revert and use a talk page first to express your arguments. For your convenience you can use language which more comfortable for you. Thank youJo0doe (talk) 17:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week
editYou have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: Corrupting descriptions without reason (vandalism) Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Massive_categories_and_images_decription_removal, e.g. [5]..
If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.
|
File source is not properly indicated: File:Костел Св. Трійці. Базалія.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Костел Св. Трійці. Базалія.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File tagging File:Судять.jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Судять.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
File tagging File:SHAPKA.GIF
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:SHAPKA.GIF. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SHAPKA.GIF]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Holova zaslav.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Holova zaslav.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Holova zaslav.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Warning! Please stop edit war, personal conflict and using sockpuppets in conflict
edit1) Прошу вас прекратить войну правок в описании файла Bazaliya.gif. Если двумерное изображение находится в общественном достоянии (PD-old), то любое его последующее воспроизведение не создает объект авторского права.
2) Использование виртуалов в конфликтой ситуации недопустимо.
В случае повторных нарушений Вы будете заблокированы.
Надеюсь на Ваше благоразумие и буду рад видеть Ваш конструктивный вклад. С уважением, -- George Chernilevsky talk 23:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- зображення є краденим і потребує письмового дозволу на використання згідно застереження вказаного на сайті. крім того вже один адміністратор висловився зцього приводу натякнувши Агонку що зображення мусить бути видалене. отож саме він продовжив конфлікт. --Bulka UA (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- У ВікіСховищі сотні зображень із цього самого сайту, але чомусь їх ніхто не вилучає.--Anatoliy (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.
|
File:Леонід Перфецький Бій під Крутами акварель.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Golubky.jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Golubky.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Doff (talk) 17:24, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File source is not properly indicated: File:A. Hors`ka. Shevchenko. Maty.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:A. Hors`ka. Shevchenko. Maty.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:A. Hors`ka. Shevchenko. Maty.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File tagging File:Shukhevych monument.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Shukhevych monument.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Shukhevych monument.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
|
File:Dobkin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
File:Оксана Пахльовська.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Конференція про Голодомор в Італії. 2007 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Armenian Cathedral, Kamyanets Podilsky.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Armenian Cathedral, Kamyanets Podilsky.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Armenian Cathedral, Kamyanets Podilsky.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Володимир. Єпископський замочок.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Holodomor. Stamp NZ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, BaseSat (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014
editВітаємо!
З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!
Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Роман Шухевич Roman Shukhevych.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Роман Шухевич Roman Shukhevych.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Роман Шухевич Roman Shukhevych.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, INeverCry 05:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки», 7 березня — 5 квітня 2015
editВітаємо!
З 7 березня по 5 квітня 2015 року буде проходити конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки» в україномовному розділі Вікіпедії. Приєднуйтеся!
Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на сайті «Вікімедіа Україна»
Конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки», 7 березня — 5 квітня 2015
editВітаємо!
З 7 березня по 5 квітня 2015 року буде проходити конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки» в україномовному розділі Вікіпедії. Приєднуйтеся!
Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на сайті «Вікімедіа Україна»
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey
editВітаємо!
8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.
Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Birthplace of Juliusz Słowacki has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Lemyk.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Zaslav map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Арсен річинський.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Арсен річинський.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Арсен річинський.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Арсен Річинський. Казалінськ. 1949.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Арсен Річинський. Казалінськ. 1949.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Арсен Річинський. Казалінськ. 1949.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Арсен Річинський. Казалінськ. 1949.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mitte27 (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Roman Shukhevych 1926.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Меморіальна таблиця Арсенові Річинському. Кременець.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Меморіальна таблиця Арсенові Річинському. Кременець.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Шухевич і Дяків.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Жертвам тоталітаризму. Ізяслав.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |