Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cdfi!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your account has been blocked

edit

see:

Although the ownership of the two accounts was declared at User:Clevermercury, it is still a serious violation of WMF rules to make comments in any discussion from more than one account, thereby falsely distorting the support for one side of the issue. It is ridiculous to expect that Commons users will read the User page of every person making comments to discover that two accounts are actually the same person..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Reasoning below on talk page under "Wrongfully and Maliciously Blocked""
Decline reason: "You edited two deletion requests without disclosing, that you have two accounts. You claimed, that you disclosed it, but this was not true. Cdfi has no userpage at all and Clevermercury had no userpage, when you commented the DRs (on 14th and 15th of March, but userpage of Clevermercury was created on 19th of March). It's bad, that you abused multiple accounts, but it's even worse, that you lied, that you disclosed your two accounts, when you actually didn't disclose it. Taivo (talk) 14:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)"Reply
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Wrongfully and Maliciously Blocked

edit
"I have been blocked for alleged harassment / intimidation, when the exact opposite has taken place. Jameslwoodward and his friends have gang stalked me with the intention to force my two accounts into closure. As for my two accounts: one was registered on wikipedia "Cdfi" and one registered on Wikimedia commons "Clevermercury", being brand new to wiki sites, I didn't realize wikipedia accounts could access wikimedia and vice versa - so I registered two. Regardless, I own and operate two accounts and, as per the official wikipedia sock puppet policy, I declared and linked both accounts to each other through their user pages and was not in violation of any terms of service. I was wrongly accused of "ballot stuffing" by User:Jameslwoodward who was called in by User:Ellin Bettz. Ellin Bettz and I have a short history of friction over edits relating to two versions of a wikimedia commons media file depicting the Ottoman Admiral Dragut. The file which I uploaded was recommended for deletion by Ellin Bettz for supposedly being "copyrighted" however the other file (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragut#/media/File:Turgut_Reis_Admiral.JPG) which is also supposedly copyrighted... has still not been deleted, why? Ellin even posted on my Cdfi talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cdfi  that "it's likely that the one you don't like will be the one which remains." - who said anything about liking or not liking? And why is this person the one to decide that ahead of time? Why has this editor made it a personal matter? My revert on the wikipedia article for Dragut was to maintain the status quo when the underlying commons image had been reverted to a qualitatively different version. It's already documented for anybody with the time to read it through. As I have explained previously, in the thread I was accused of ballot stuffing on, I voted only once and declared that both accounts are mine in that very same thread - which can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Portrait_of_Dragut_-_The_Drawn_Sword_of_Islam.jpg . Others have agreed that I have been falsely accused ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pok%C3%A9fan95 on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Clevermercury). Jameslwoodward then accused me of having an undisclosed history on wikipedia on my talk page (complete fabrication with no evidence other than "I use the jargon and tools well") and despite being given all reasonable explanation as to how and why I had two accounts, and how I was PROTECTED by the sock puppet policy, he pushed ahead anyway and banned my account. Moreover, my other account has also been banned by User:Yann who was terse and attempted to intimidate me away from posting on the administrator notice board for incidents here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Clevermercury - here is the post that angered him enough to ban me: (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=237869384#Haranguing_Newcomers:_Welcome_to_Wikimedia). After I had posted on the administrator notice board for incidents asking for help, I found my account blocked for "harassment / intimidation", simply for calling administrator attention to my talk page, which was the scene of a grisly and unwarranted gang-attack against me. I don't know or care how long any of you have been administrators / bureaucrats / etc, what I know is that this is an open platform and not your own personal bullypen. All I have done since I signed up earlier this year was to improve the wikipedia pages I have edited.. please take a look at my edits. Everything I have done was in good faith and it is NOT wrong of me to interpret this coordinated attack as tag-teaming, because that is what it is. I would like an administrator/bureaucrat who does not know Yann / Jameslwoodward / Ellin Bettz to please look at the entire history of interactions between myself and these three individuals, you will see my treatment has not been inline with administrator code of conduct and deserves an inquiry into abuse of authority and how you treat people new to this site. Thank you, Cdfi/Clevermercury"

Talk page blocked.

edit

This user doesn't understand. Yann (talk) 17:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply