Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Christ-schmitt!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
File:La couverture du livre sur les vitraux de Cocteau.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I am the owner of the copyright in this photo--89.159.107.195 08:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Autres-vitraux-de-labside.jpg

edit
 
File:Autres-vitraux-de-labside.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I am the owner of the copyright in this photo--89.159.107.195 08:40, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Les trois baies de la face sud.jpg

edit
 
File:Les trois baies de la face sud.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 15:44, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour je ne comprends pas le problèmes posé par mes photos qui sont ma propriété et que j'offre gracieusement à la communauté pour mieux apprécier l'oeuvre de Cocteau ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christ-schmitt (talk • contribs)

Please don't comment here, but in the above linked deletion-discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I am the owner of the copyright in this photo--89.159.107.195 08:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Photo de Zoo Project

edit

Bonjour,

Vous avez téléchargé Bilal Berrini dit Zoo Project.jpg en indiquant être l'auteur de la photo et en la plaçant sous licence cc-by-sa 4.0.

Cette photos a déjà été publiée de nombreuses fois sans que vous soyez mentionné comme auteur et sans qu'il soit précisé que cette photo était placée sous licence cc-by-sa.

Aussi cette photo ne peut pas être publiée sur Wikimedia commons (donc sous licence libre) sans qu'il soit prouvé que son auteur (ou ses ayant-droit) a décidé de la publier sous licence libre.

C'est pourquoi j'ai proposé la suppression de cette photo.

O.Taris (talk) 14:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply


File:Bilal Berrini dit Zoo Project.jpg

edit
 
File:Bilal Berrini dit Zoo Project.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Vitraux du coeur .jpg

edit
 
File:Vitraux du coeur .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am the owner of the copyright in this photo--89.159.107.195 08:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Le poète Orphée.jpg

edit
 
File:Le poète Orphée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)I am the owner of the copyright in this photo--89.159.107.195 08:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:La triple baie du transept sud détail .jpg

edit
 
File:La triple baie du transept sud détail .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am the owner of the copyright in this photo--89.159.107.195 08:42, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:L'orant.jpg

edit
 
File:L'orant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)I am the owner of the copyright in this photo--89.159.107.195 08:42, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:La triple baie de la face est détail.jpg

edit
 
File:La triple baie de la face est détail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am the owner of the copyright in this photo--89.159.107.195 08:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Vitrail central (détail).jpg

edit
 
File:Vitrail central (détail).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am the owner of the copyright in this photo--89.159.107.195 08:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image:Le tympan nord.jpg

edit

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  português  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  മലയാളം  +/−


Hello! Thank you for uploading Image:Le tympan nord.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I have noticed that the version you uploaded is a thumbnail, while a larger version is available. Please upload the full version of the image. Thank you,

Jotzet (talk) 07:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Orphée.jpg

edit
 
File:Orphée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:36, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Triple baie de la face est (détail ).jpg

edit
 
File:Triple baie de la face est (détail ).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:La triple baie de la face est.jpg

edit
 
File:La triple baie de la face est.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:La triple baie du transept sud .jpg

edit
 
File:La triple baie du transept sud .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC)I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Les trois fenêtres de l'abside.jpg

edit
 
File:Les trois fenêtres de l'abside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Vitrail central de l'abside .jpg

edit
 
File:Vitrail central de l'abside .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:La triple baie du transept sud (détail) .jpg

edit
 
File:La triple baie du transept sud (détail) .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:39, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:La lance .jpg

edit
 
File:La lance .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:39, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

== File:Tympan nord .jpg ==

 
File:Tympan nord .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 9 March 2018 (UTC)I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Roger Bissière tympan sud.jpg

edit
 
File:Roger Bissière tympan sud.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 9 March 2018 (UTC)I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Les cinq baies vitrées de la cathédrale de Metz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:03, 9 March 2018 (UTC)I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Couverture-1bis.jpg

edit
 
File:Couverture-1bis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:09 autoportrait.jpg

edit
 
File:09 autoportrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)I do not understand the request to delete photos. I am the sole author of these photos and therefore there is no need to delete them--89.159.107.195 04:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Vos téléversements

edit

Bonjour. Comme l'on vous l'a déjà écrit, la liberté de panorama n'est reconnue en France que pour les usages non commerciaux faits par des particuliers et est donc incompatible avec une licence Creative Commons qui autorise l'exploitation commerciale de vos photographies. Par ailleurs, la loi considère que les auteurs de ces oeuvres sont Roger Bissière, Jean Cocteau, Marc Chagall et autres et ne tomberont dans le domaine public que 70 ans après leur mort. En attendant, vous devez obtenir l'autorisation de leurs ayant-droits pour toute reproduction. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Les photos que j'utilise proviennent de mes différents ouvrages pour lesquels j'avais obtenu l'autorisation. Sous quelle forme faut-il que j'atteste à nouveau de l'obtention des droits ?--89.159.107.195 04:50, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour. Déjà il faudrait que vous vous connectiez avec votre compte Christ-schmitt. Ensuite, merci de lire fr:COM:OTRS où vous trouverez comment procéder. Attention cependant à la différence entre une autorisation de publication pour un ouvrage et un renoncement irrévocable à des droits d'auteur comme demandé ici. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Le tympan nord.jpg

edit
 
File:Le tympan nord.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Univers de JL Trévisse.jpg

edit
 
File:Univers de JL Trévisse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.204.177.15 22:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:La perspective de la lance.jpg

edit
 
File:La perspective de la lance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.43.34.36 21:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply