Distelfinck

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Distelfinck!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

 

Steinsplitter (talk) 17:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Please don't abuse commons for dewiki darama and don't play the system, if you don't stop i need to take administrative actions against you. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

You wrote "if you don't stop i need to take administrative actions against you". Could you be more specific? If I don't stop what? --Distelfinck (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

As this comment by me seems to have been misunderstood as trolling by you, I'll word it more carefully: What do you mean by abusing commons for dewiki drama and playing the system exactly? All I did was uploading an image weeks ago, it got deleted a couple days ago, I requested an undeletion of that image, and took part in the discussion of that deletion request. I also wrote a post on the talk page of the person who closed the deletion discussion, and you deleted that post. Why? --Distelfinck (talk) 19:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

I didn't import dewiki drama or try to play the system. --Distelfinck (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

There is no drama on dewiki regarding the file I uploaded. If there was any drama anywhere, it was on Commons, and it started with the deletion of the file. It is circular logic to support the deletion of a file, because it supposedly creates drama, but the only drama that was created by it was created by its deletion. --Distelfinck (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

You wrote this comment here two minutes after you reverted a comment of mine on another users talk page. This makes me think of course that your "if you don't stop" is referring to, amongst other things, my comment that you reverted. That's why I asked you to be more specific, what is OK and what is not OK for me to do. What is wrong about that comment of mine? --Distelfinck (talk) 10:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Steinsplitter (talk) 17:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Unblock request

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "I don't understand why I was blocked. There's absolutely no reason to. And certainly not "trolling", as the person who blocked me gave as reason. Distelfinck (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)" Decline reason: "User does not seem to understand that their behavior is inappropriate. -FASTILY 06:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

38 edits on commons. Most of this contribs are trolling (drama imported from dewiki). Here on commons we don't tolerate such a inappropriate behavior. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

None of my edits are trolling. I would confess if some were trolling, but there's nothing to confess. --Distelfinck (talk) 17:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

If it were true what you're saying, then you could provide examples of my alleged trolling. Go ahead. --Distelfinck (talk) 22:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Distelfinck, das Hochladen von File:Von Wahldresdner gelöschter Adminproblemfall.png wurde als problematisch angesehen, weil dies als missbräuchlicher Versuch angesehen werden kann, einen Konfliktfall aus de:wp hier nach Commons zu importieren, indem auf de:wp gelöschte Inhalte zu einem Konfliktfall hier hochgeladen werden. Auf de:wp stehen die ganz normalen Wege, hierunter insbesondere die Löschprüfung, frei, die Löschung überprüfen zu lassen. (Hier ist ein Beispiel dafür.) Ganz generell werden Versuche, Konflikte von einem WMF-Projekt zu einem anderen zu übertragen, nicht gerne gesehen und gelegentlich mit dem Begriff „Trolling“ verbunden. Ich würde den Begriff hierzu nicht verwenden, sondern eher von dem Ansatz einer Projektstörung sprechen, zumal Du durch das volle Programm einschließlich COM:UDEL und Ansprache des zuletzt entscheidenden Admins durch bist. Es wäre hilfreich, wenn Du akzeptieren könntest, wozu Commons dient und wozu nicht. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 17:41, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Fastily: I'm keen to stop behaviour that is not appropriate. I of course intend not to upload the deleted image again, and never said so or had the intention to, I don't want to break any rules here. And I'm not trolling, and I'd like to know specifically what behaviour is not appropriate. What makes my comment on another user's wall, that Steinsplitter reverted, not appropriate? In that comment, I was only pointing out some inaccuracies I had spotted in that user's closing comments of the undeletion discussion I had started. --Distelfinck (talk) 10:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Fastily: Do you think I did troll? If not, then please change my block message to something else. --Distelfinck (talk) 10:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

You abused commons for uploading a screenshot of a deleted adminproblem-case on dewiki. This is clearly out of scope (confirmed at COM:UDEL). After your unneeded comment at natuur's talkpage i warned you to stop importing dewiki darama to commons. You refused to do so. This is playing the system / trolling. And please stop using your talkpage access for moore drama or the block parameter needs a change. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Ted Cruz, official portrait, 113th Congress.jpg

File:Ted Cruz, official portrait, 113th Congress.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)