Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Ebrahim

(Redirected from User talk:Ebraminio)


lua modulesEdit

Hello my friend,
You showed me something very important: how to retrieve in a lua module all the parameters passed to the calling template.
Do you remember how that works ?
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 10:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Liné1: Hi! Module:Arguments is what you want :) −ebraminiotalk 11:12, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Excellent. thks. Cheers Liné1 (talk) 12:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for emojis!Edit

Thank you for uploading all these free emoji sets on Commons, and for making the table with all of them!   ~ nicolas (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

That's so nice of you  ebraminiotalk 18:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Global botEdit

Hi Ebraminio, your Global bot Ebrambot was inactive for over a year. As interwiki links are no longer maintained via global bots, there is a consensus to remove Global bot flags from inactive accounts, and those active only on few projects (local bot flags to be requested instead of global). If you intend to run your bot globally with new functionality in near future please let us know here. Otherwise global bot flag will be removed, but you can re-request it later if needed. You can also request removal of global bot flag yourself if you wish so.----Shanmugamp7 (talk) 09:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

help meEdit

I have been attacked by user:Herby in [1] --Sonia Sevilla (talk) 12:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

File:RuoosALgebal.18.jpgEdit

 
File:RuoosALgebal.18.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 08:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Google Chrome icon (2011).svgEdit

  File:Google Chrome icon (2011).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2620:0:1000:447C:5B9:3F4E:56FF:23F4 18:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

ابزارEdit

سلام. با توجه به اینکه تسنیم مجوزش رو کریتیو کامنز4 کرده، امکان بارگذاری تصاویرش هست ولی مشکلی که هست اینه که باید تصاویر رو تک تک دانلود و آپلود کرد. امکانش هست که با ابزاری(یا هر روش دیگر) این فرایند کوتاه تر بشه؟ مثلا تصویر رو انتخاب کنیم و خودش بارگذاری کنه؟--Freshman404Talk 13:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

سلام. ابزاری نوشته شده ولی یه دلیل کمبود وقت فعلا برنامه برای عمومی کردن آن وجود ندارد هرچند می‌توانید از اینجا از آن استفاده کنید، به دلیل آزمایشی بودن بهتر آن را جایی معرفی نکنید و به خروجی آن تکیه نکنید و البته نمی‌دانم آیا هنوز کار می‌کند یا نه ولی امکانات خیلی خوبی از جمله بارگذاری همزمان و حذف خودکار واترمارک داشت که امیدوارم مفید باشد. −ebrahimtalk 17:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
متاسفانه کار نمی کند. تشکر از شما--Freshman404Talk 10:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
امکانش هست که تغییر نام کلی و اضافه کردن توضیح هم اضافه کنید(اگه تغییر نام تکی و توضیح چندزبانه هم باشه که دیگه خیلی بهتر)--Freshman404Talk 09:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
فکر می‌کنم اونچیزی که مورد نظرتون هست شد، بررسی کنید −ebrahimtalk 15:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Admin's Barnstar
For You! Omid.koli (talk) 11:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you :) −ebrahimtalk 13:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

درخواست حذفEdit

سلام. ممکن است لطفاً این تصویر را حذف کنید؟ می‌خواستم در خود ویکی‌پدیا بارگذاری کنم، هدایتم کرد اینجا و من بی‌توجه ادامه دادم. سپاس. Saeidpourbabak (talk) 16:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

  Doneebrahimtalk 19:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
سلام مجدد و سپاس بابت اقدام. Saeidpourbabak (talk) 07:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Favour to ask — faWP tasksEdit

Hi. We have Masroor bayati (a new user) who has converted a table from an English article to be an image here for use at faWP. The image of the table in that format would be considered out of scope by many, and the table itself is actually a template. So could you please organise the import of the template w:en:Template:Codon table to faWP, then we can look to remove the image. Thanks if you can help.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, no problem, done and replaced fa:الگو:جدول ژنتیکی :) −ebrahimtalk 06:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Ebrahim!Edit

Happy new year :) −ebrahimtalk 08:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata tool for the speedy creation of a Creator templateEdit

Hallo Ebrahim, please, can you linked this wikidata tool in the top of the creator template? greatings --Ekenaes (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Ekenaes: Hi. Honestly I don't have enough confidence to do so, can you please raise this on the discussion page of that template and/or ping User:Jarekt? Thank you −ebrahimtalk 13:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

File:PEO-octocat-1.svgEdit

  File:PEO-octocat-1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Qzekrom (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Questions about 3D models on CommonsEdit

Ebrahim,

In 2015 you submitted one of the most popular ideas for the Community Wishlist Survey about enabling the sharing of 3D models on Commons. There's technical work underway to make this happen with the STL file format.

We'd like to get your input on how the Commons community might respond to concerns over the uploading of 3D files, given that it might now involve new patent and copyright issues that weren't as relevant before for 2D files. For instance, if someone uploaded the 3D model of a potentially patented work how would the community respond? What can the community do in advance to discuss and prepare for the possibility of these things happening?

Additionally, we'd like to know where it would be best to make contributors aware of the policy around items of this nature. For example, the community may wish to ensure there's a reminder of policy during the upload process and again on the file page itself. Where else might the community want to look to be prepared before the feature is enabled? Should we perhaps update commons guidance linked from the Editors' index, such as the Commons:Licensing, the Commons:How_to_detect_copyright_violations, and the Commons: non-copyright restrictions?

If you have a few minutes to think about this and provide feedback it would be greatly appreciated. If you aware of other Commons contributors that might have some thoughts, please include them in this conversation as well. Thank you for everything and I appreciate your time.

Yours, CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 15:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

User:CKoerner (WMF): I am very happy on seeing this Is progressed, I think the best way forward would be to collaborate with OpenSCAD and other already established 3d models FOSS communities (and/or, I don't know, maybe thepiratebay(!!) physibiles uploaders?). You can possibly find some common people with OpenSCAD community here. I hope you would allow formats that people from that community could interoperate with Commons. About copyrights, some can imagine and build this system in order to keep Commons admins able to deal with copyright issue but as that would be beyond wmf capabilities and destiny I guess you should convince Google or Tineye itself to go for such system which doesn't seem to be very feasible but perhaps worth trying. Thanks −ebrahimtalk 16:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you ebrahim for the feedback. I'd love to reach out to some of the existing communities to let them know what we're up to and encourage them to participate. I'd like to take these same questions to the larger Commons community so look for a familiar-sounding Vilage pump post soon! :) CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecatedEdit

Hello Ebrahim, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

EmojioneEdit

Bonjour,

Pourquoi supprimer les émojiones ? --Raphaelb49 (talk) 19:50, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Raphaelb49: Hi there, there is no removal, just moving and normalizing names in order to avoid having a file in two names (one with uppercase letters and one with lowercase letters), if you found an instance of removal without uppercase naming replacement please let me known. Thanks −ebrahimtalk 19:57, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Concerning File:Feedbin-Favicon-search.svgEdit

The page containing the file c:File:Feedbin-Favicon-search.svg says positioning error. What is meant by that? Wereldburger758 (talk) 11:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

You can ask from the person who put that tag but basically it means librsvg (or the author) is failed to detect/put correct bounding box for the work and should be fixed sometime. −ebrahimtalk 13:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Google emojisEdit

Will you be uploading the new Google emojis separate from the blob emojis (as discussed at Talk:Emoji#Noto_Color_Emoji_.28Android_O.29)? I saw that some (Category:Noto Color Emoji - Updated) were already uploaded atop previous releases rather than as separate files—are you reverting those too? czar 18:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi there. Yes if I do the uploading I'll do such. No I don't have a plan for that, have a look at "So our rule is something like [...]" of that page, that sounds like a good policy I believe but if anyone disagree that can be discussed there. −ebrahimtalk 08:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Now I see why you wanted an old version of File:Emoji u1f486.svg as you used it on your talk page on English Wikipedia :) I don't oppose with restoring their old versions however the problem is they didn't use semantic branch (or other git's mechanism like tag or branch) for noto emoji project versioning so distinguishing minor fixes from major style changes was hard. In other words with each change to their git repository I had one of these options:

  • Replacing all of them
  • Uploading all of them, even the not updated ones with to different names (which exact duplicate images probably would made Commons unhappy)
  • Skipping the not updated ones (which would have made linking the images hard)
  • Not uploading any update (even new Emojis additions)

Which I had to with the first option. Now that they've promised to tag a release before bulb style emojis complete revamp, putting them to a different naming just can make sense but I have no solution in mind (and enough motivation to be honest) for putting older ones on a separate places but maybe that can be handled with manual upload or something (cc: User:Czar, User:Nclm) −ebrahimtalk 13:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

 :) Yes, that one, but I'd also like to save the set for posterity. To clarify, all of the "blobs" are overwritten on Commons as of now? I don't know whether Google's "blob" removal applied to the non-face emojis, but what if only the old versions of the face emojis (the blobs) were uploaded separately? I don't know the face emojis' file name range or how to pull the git repo from a paste date to automate their upload. Would you know how? czar 16:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
User:Czar: Current version that we have on Commons which is the most recent public available version still have some of blobs design but the new design which can be found here is a complete redesign, it is like Google gradually came to an understating that blobs are not the way to go but just now decided to replace all of the Emojis with a new design. Also no problem about IPBE, I tried to avoid bureaucracy, I don't have much activity there after all :) −ebrahimtalk 20:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Me too. Okay, I'll add this to my list of things to pursue myself someday. Thanks! czar 20:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Ebrahim".