Haendelfan

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Haendelfan!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 13:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Haendelfan!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image:Giuseppe belli olimpiade 01.jpg was uncategorized on 4 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Giuseppe belli olimpiade 02.jpg was uncategorized on 4 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Giuseppe belli olimpiade 02.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Giuseppe belli olimpiade 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

AtelierMonpli (talk) 00:15, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Giuseppe Aprile - Buch.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Giuseppe Aprile - Buch.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Scoopfinder^(d) 12:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Giuseppe Aprile - Buch.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Giuseppe Aprile - Buch.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Hasse by karl traugott riedel.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Hasse by karl traugott riedel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rettinghaus (talk) 15:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Category:Botanischer Garten (Leipzig) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, ich muss dich darauf hinweisen, dass parallel dazu eine ältere englischsprachige Kat. namens Category:Botanical garden of Leipzig University existriert. Es wäre wüschenswert, die beiden aufeinander abzustimmen. Die neue deutsche Kat. sollte mMg nach als Unterkategorie der älteren erscheinen. Sonst wären das Paralleluniversen. --Mfgsu (talk) 23:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Vielen Dank, da war ich mal wieder unaufmerksam bzw. habe nur nach Botanisches Institut geschaut, nicht Botanischer Garten.--Haendelfan (talk) 00:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Karl-Tauchnitz-Straße edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, ich wieder mal mit Bemerkungen. Also ich schaue ab jetzt öfter hier nach. Neulich paar Bilder aus der Galerie von K.-T.-Str. nur vorläufig der Kat. zugeordnet. Mir war klar, dass du die Einordnung in die Unterkategorien richtig vornimmst. Nun zur Sache: Mir sind schon einige Fehler bei der Beschreibung in den Kat. oder bei den Files aufgefallen. Ich will dir ja nicht ins Handwerk pfuschen, aber Einiges muss wohl berichtigt werden. Ich scheue nur den großen Arbeitsaufwand bei der Menge an Daten. Daher kann ich dich nur minimal mit Textkorrekturen unterstützen. Das freilich nur, wenn's dir genehm wäre. Ich möchte dir erstmal Anerkennung zollen für die Heidenarbeit, die du dir aufgebürdet hast. Solong --Mfgsu (talk) 23:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hallo zurück und vielen Dank, sowohl für die Anerkennung, als auch für das Angebot, mich zu unterstützen. Das nehme ich gern an. Beziehst du dich bei den Fehlern auf die Hausnummern in der Wächterstraße? Da muss ich wirklich noch mal ran. Ich hatte da eine falsche Vorstellung, scheint mir, als ich davon ausging, dass es wie in der K-T nummeriert ist. Du könntest das gern schon verbessern, sonst mache ich das, wenn ich die neu eingestellten alten Ansichtskarten auch noch in die Kategorie der einzelnen abgebildeten Villen einbinde. Dazu muss ich aber erst noch die Einzelheiten finden. Ich bin leider jetzt auch im Urlaub fernab Leipzigs und habe also noch keine Möglichkeit, mir dein empfohlenes Buch zugänglich zu machen, in dem diese Einzelheiten sicher drin stehen, sondern sortiere erstmal das, was ich finde, so gut wie möglich ein. Die Aufarbeitung folgt dann noch. Ich habe auch Neuigkeiten von der ZLB Berlin: nachdem ich angefragt hatte, ob die Info in der ZDB richtig ist, dass sie die Blätter für Architekäutur gescannt vorliegen haben, bekam ich zunächst die Info, dass sie zwar gescannt seien, aber aufgrund von personellen Engpässen zeitnah nicht eingestellt werden können. Wenn ich aber einen Band bräuchte, würde man mir diesen gern zur Verfügung stellen. Nachdem ich nun wieder Band 1 anforderte und bekam und bei der Anfrage danach auf meine Zusammenstellung der schon verfügbaren Bände bei wikisource aufmerksam machte, wurde ich gebeten, Band 1 dort nicht zu veröffentlichen, man würde nun die Blätter für Architektur vorziehen und in Bälde einarbeiten. Das Gute an den ZLB-Scans ist: die Texterkennung scheint super zu funktionieren, wenn nicht sogar gegengelesen worden zu sein, man kann dann also gut im gesamten Bestand nach Leipzig scannen... Also: vielen Dank für deine Hilfe, ich werde dann auch regelmäßig auf deine Bearbeitungen schauen und lernen! Und das meine ich wirklich so, ich fange ja gerade an, die architektonischen Highlights des Leipzigs der Gründerjahre richtig kennenzulernen. --Haendelfan (talk) 15:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ja wahrlich Lpz. ist voller architektonischer Highlights, speziell bei den historistischen Villen der Vergangenheit! Man muss im Hinterkopf haben, dass die Stadt um 1900 als die reichste (die meisten Millionäre - umgerechnet auf heute Milliardäre) und viertgrößte (nach Berlin, Hamburg und Breslau) Stadt des Deutschen Reiches galt. Daher die Bauwut und der oft zitierte "Leipziger Größenwahn". Das zur Einordnung nur am Rande. Ich will's langsam angehen lassen und deine Texte stückweise korrigieren. Ein Problem bei den Beschreibungen - am Bildmaterial habe ich nix auszusetzen - sind hin und wieder Ungenauigkeiten, die offenbar von den unterschiedlichen Quellen herrühren. Um Ordnung in die Sache bringen, führt der Weg über das genannte Buch übers Musikviertel. Wobei da auch noch Lücken zu erkennen sind. Immerhin bringt es einen weiter in der eindeutigen Zuordnung und Lage der Bauten mit Adresse und Hausnummer. Ferner sind da Angaben zu den Wohngebäuden mit Bauherren und Architekten (soweit bekannt) zu finden. Wie ich an anderer Stelle schon sagte, sind die Eckbauten in der Zuordnung problematisch. Das gilt insbesondere für die K.-T.-Str. Dazu hätte ich auch Korrekturbedarf anzumelden - neben anderen und kleineren Dingen in der Beschreibung. Also packen wir's an. Aber gemach und keine Hektik! Wünsche schönen Urlaub noch. Solong --Mfgsu (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

PS: Zur Villa Meyer in der WP hatte ich in der Disk. formale Fehler beanstandet. Wenn du kannst, würde ich gern deinen Standpunkt dazu erfahren. --Mfgsu (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, ich habe das nicht vergessen. Derzeit bin ich aber mit den Einzelheiten der Bauten in der K-T-Str. befasst. Vielleicht hast du die Sachen ja verfolgt. Ich denke, dass man von Einzelnen zum Allgemeinen kommen muss. Kann noch eine Weile dauern, da eine Änderung in Art. einen ganzen Rattenschwanz von Edits in WP oder bei Commons zur Folge hat. Ich hoffe, dass du mir nicht übel nimmst, wenn ich meine Meinung auf WP-Diskussionseiten klar äußere. Solong --Mfgsu (talk) 03:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Architects of Leipzig edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Haendelfan, mir fiel auf, dass du die o. g. Kategorie direkt in die Hauptkat. Leipzig einsortiert hast. Besser wäre sie wohl in den beiden Unterkategorien "Architecture of Leipzig" und "People of Leipzig" (hier vor dem A). In die Oberkat. sollten nicht so spezielle Cat. eingeordnet werden. Ich hätte es ja ändern können ;-), wollte es dir aber erst mal hier sagen. Viele Grüße --Catatine (talk) 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

das ist ein sehr guter vorschlag. bin ich sehr einverstanden damit. ich kenne mich mit den ganzen unterkategorien noch nicht so richtig aus und bin für sinnstiftende hinweise sehr offen!--Haendelfan (talk) 13:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Okay, dann habe ich es mal gemacht ;-) Gruß --Catatine (talk) 22:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Irrenanstalten_in_Deutschland edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Irrenanstalten in Deutschland has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 23:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Joseph Schuster (composer).jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Joseph Schuster (composer).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 04:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Farinelli in reisekleidung edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Könntest du bitte das von dir spiegelverkehrt hochgeladene Bild c:File:Farinelli in reisekleidung - ortkemper 1998.jpg korrigieren? --Goesseln (talk) 10:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte das auch schon gesehen, aber wie du sicher siehst, ist das Bild spiegelverkehrt gedruckt worden (siehe die Version mit Bildunterschrift). Ich habe es nur gescannt - und ich habe leider keine Ahnung im Bereich Bildbearbeitung, wie man ein Bild entspiegelt. Wenn du das machen könntest, würde ich mich natürlich freuen.--Haendelfan (talk) 13:38, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

bei Ortkemper hatte ich nicht nachgesehen.

"man" "könnte" das Bild wahrscheinlich auch selbst herunterladen und dann mit Paint oder so spiegeln und dann wieder zurück

ich bin aber sowieso nur drauf gekommen, weil ich noch ein paar Bilder aus Vivian zu Ricci ua. scannen und hochladen wollte, da bin ich den einfachen Weg gegangen. Bei Vivian steht auch ein anderes Datum. Nächste Baustelle... oder auch nicht... gruß --Goesseln (talk) 16:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]