Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Hic et nunc/Archive 1

< User talk:Hic et nunc
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Hic et nunc in topic File:John Williams missionary2.jpg

Fruchtwasserembolie.png

Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Hic et nunc, kannst du bitte mal durch einen Edit bei File:Fruchtwasserembolie.png mit Zusammenfassung "license is okay for me" bestätigen, dass du mit {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} für das ganze Bild einverstanden bist? Du hattest es als {{Cc-by-2.5}} hochgeladen. Es ist aber bei den Quellbildern dreimal CC by 2.5 und einmal cc-by-sa 3.0 enthalten. Die by-Lizenzen erlauben bei Bearbeitungen eine abweichende Lizenzierung, aber die cc-by-sa nicht. Daher ist mE die cc-by-sa 3.0 korrekter, wenn auch vielleicht nicht 100% korrekt. Die Originalautoren habe ich aufgeführt (die darfst du nicht einfach so unterschlagen - das ist eine Lizenz- und damit Urheberrechtsverletzung). Hattest du Probleme beim Benutzen von derivativeFX? Weil eigentich werden die ja automatisch aufgeführt. Nur bei der Lizenz muss man derivativeFX manchmal korrigieren - alles macht das Tool auch nicht richtig. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 21:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Korrektur. Ich hab es beim englischen Pendent auch gleich korrigiert. Möglicherweise lag es daran, dass ich mal wieder mit dem falschen Browser unterwegs war, dass dervativeFX gepasst hat.--Hic et nunc (talk) 15:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Ah - noch eine Version davon. Sehr gut, danke. Ich verwende derivativeFX immer nur mit Firefox - wie es mit anderen Browsern funktioniert, weiß ich nicht. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 18:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Auf meinen Rechnern werkelt auch Firefox. Aber manchmal muss man eben auch zur Verfügung gestellte Maschinen nutzen... ;-) --Hic et nunc (talk) 07:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Protest einlegen! ;) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:14, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Man soll keine schlafenden Hunde wecken... Vor allem, wenn man dann begründet, dass viele Sachen hier und da nicht funktionieren, die man so macht, könnte ich mir vorstellen, dass man sich überlegt, dass die Leute alle zuviel Zeit mit solchen Sachen verbringen. ;-) Grüße --Hic et nunc (talk) 06:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Wohl wahr. :-D Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Das Quellbild musste ich zur Löschung vorschlagen

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:European_Parliament_Buildings_(2008)-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 06:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Zellerfeld Salvatoris Orgel MiRo cropped.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Zellerfeld Salvatoris Orgel MiRo cropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Denniss (talk) 17:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Hic et nunc,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
  
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Albert Doederlein.png

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Albert Doederlein.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 22:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Quelle ist jetzt exakt nachgetragen.--Hic et nunc (talk) 13:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Neues Palais und Communs von Norden pano 1.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Done.--Hic et nunc (talk) 13:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

File:HGS6.jpeg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Done.--Hic et nunc (talk) 13:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Rathaus entzerrt.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rathaus entzerrt.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Rd232 (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Dietrichfischerdieskau.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Dietrichfischerdieskau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Polarlys (talk) 22:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Uterine fibroids.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:18, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Done--Hic et nunc (talk) 08:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Solagna.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Hic et nunc. Spricht etwas dagegen, dort auf die (grössere und Wasserzeichen-freie) Erstversion zurückzusetzen? --Leyo 10:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh, das hatte ich glatt übersehen. Nein, dann sollten wir das einfach revertieren. Es ist einfach das Foto in der besten Auflösung.--Hic et nunc (talk) 13:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Das hatte ich mir gedacht. ;-) --Leyo 15:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flowers in marble, Taj Mahal, Agra, India 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 19:34, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

The merit should go to you. Yann (talk) 06:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!--Hic et nunc (talk) 06:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Accra - New bungalows on the ridge 1915.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Accra - New bungalows on the ridge 1915.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 11:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Quelle war da, jetzt eine weitere ergänzt.--Hic et nunc (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:SchützenschnurSilber.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:SchützenschnurSilber.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Flor!an (talk) 09:44, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Heimachine, Zwolle.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks! Much better! Kleuske (talk) 09:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Gern geschehen.--Hic et nunc (talk) 06:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected: 

Eleassar (t/p) 13:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Grossherzogtum Baden 1.png

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Grossherzogtum Baden 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ 17:30, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Koyuk.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Koyuk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rapsar (talk) 15:06, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Pomare images

Latest comment: 11 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Could you rotate, straighten and crop (not an inch of the image should be cropped including extra black spaces, just crop away the book is what I am asking for) these images? Just upload the square crops first and save them into the file history. If you don't follow my specific request, I will revert it as I have done with User:Viscontino who didn't straighten or rotate them and cropped away more of File:Maheanuu.jpg than I requested. And after and only after that, if you can make them like File:Prince Punuarii Teriitapunui.jpg with an oval, please do, if not just ignore this last step.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 12:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

PS: I would still like the 1906 version of each head I requested at the lab at a later point.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 12:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I will try to do. But first the 1906 versions.--Hic et nunc (talk) 13:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Now I tried to do what you requested. But I'm not sure if it's okay so. In my opinion the square crops are the better ones.--Hic et nunc (talk) 13:07, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, same here. I think you actually need to rotate, crop and recreate areas for the ovals to look right. Do you mind if I refer all the photo version to the square crops you did? As for the 1906 and the Belle of Tahiti images, are you using a white background or grey? I am guessing they are grey because it looks nothing like this File:Valdemar Knudsen, c. 1875.jpg which is the color of background that I want. Thanks. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:03, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Yes, the background is light grey like the background in galleries and image boxes in WP. So it seems that there is only the pic without any frame. But it's no problem to make it pure white.
Because you wanted no cropping of parts of the images I only rotated the images as they were. It's poosibel to do more but I don't know when I will have the time.--Hic et nunc (talk) 08:02, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Could you please make them pure white like Valdemar Knudsen's image? Just Belle of Tahiti and the 1906 versions; you don't need to bother with the photographs anymore. I will just revert them to the square crops you made.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 17:34, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Now they are white.--Hic et nunc (talk) 02:06, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Type-III Genital Cutting.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Type-III Genital Cutting.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Die Sengerin (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Celje center 2006.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Celje center 2006.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Celje center 2006.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eleassar (t/p) 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Megatherium Estanzuela.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Megatherium Estanzuela.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 18:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Mammoth Estanzuela.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Mammoth Estanzuela.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 18:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Castillo de San Felipe.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Castillo de San Felipe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 18:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Sir Richard Levett, Lord Mayor of London (1699).jpeg

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. Which version are you reverting to here? I uploaded the original file, which the administrator Yann was kind enough to make some changes to. Then you tried a version, and suggested that if I preferred the prior version, that I revert your work. I did prefer the prior version -- the one done by the Commons administrator Yann. Please clarify the changes you're making. MarmadukePercy (talk) 07:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Yanns version is the actual one.--Hic et nunc (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Okay, thank you. MarmadukePercy (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Incidentally, this is nice work. It retains the original, but with better definition, and without the greenish hue. File:Sir_Richard_Levett,_Lord_Mayor_of_London_(1699)-2.jpeg. MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Seeleinsee-00093442 w.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

Hallo Hicetnunc, das hier ist eine saubere Arbeit, danke. Gruß,--Ratzer (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Gern geschehen. --Hic et nunc (talk) 07:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Hummels.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Hummels.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Friechtle (talk) 12:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Willi-Schwab-Schutzhütte.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, Du hast mir schon mehrfach Bilder gerettet! Vielen Dank nochmals dafür! Leider ist mir wieder mal eines missglückt. Könntest Du vielleicht mal irgendwann nachsehen ob Du was retten kannst? Das wäre sehr lieb von Dir! Ich wäre Dir sehr dankbar! Viele Grüße!--Tara2 (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe mal dran gedreht.--Hic et nunc (talk) 10:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Vielen Dank nochmals jetzt finde ich es sehr gut!--Tara2 (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Lille gilles de la boe.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you for the job on the file. It does look better now. --Velvet (talk) 08:33, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome.--Hic et nunc (talk) 09:13, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Naked pubic hair.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. This image was included in your vulva diversity picture, but it may be a copyvio. Could you find a replacement for it? -mattbuck (Talk) 01:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bc76 Kulisse Videodreh BlackCold.jpg

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bc76 Kulisse Videodreh BlackCold.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Balloons over Goreme.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you for the help! I'm hopeless with this photo tools. José Luiz disc 10:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome.--Hic et nunc (talk) 11:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for help me to improve the pictures. You are a excellent photo editor. Contratulations!. A Hug >:) --The Photographer (talk) 14:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Humpta, Humpta, TäTäRä

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Vielen Dank für die Bearbeitung des Tübinger Musikkorps. Über den externen Zuggriff über Wikipedia zeigt es der Server schon richtig an. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

ElisabethWeichmann.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, Hit et nunc. Sehr herzlichen Dank für Deine Mühe. Aber ich komme zu dem Schluß, daß man das Bild von Elsbeth Weichmann doch nicht in den Artikel einbauen sollte, es wird ihr nicht gerecht -was natürlich nicht an Eurer Bearbeitung liegt. Es sollte gelöscht werden. Ich werde wenigstens versuchen, ein besseres von ihr zu organisieren. Vielleicht kennt ja auch jemand von Euch eine Quelle. Nochmals Dank für die Mühe--MoSchle (talk) 14:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)ich hoffe, dies ist die richtige Seite.--MoSchle (talk) 14:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Hallo MoSchle, es gibt jetzt noch den restaurierten Ausschnitt unter File:ElsbethWeichmann (cropped).jpg. Und ein neues Bild kann man ja immer noch einbauen.--Hic et nunc (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

File:André Haschker.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:André Haschker.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Yellowcard (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

File:John Williams missionary2.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago29 comments2 people in discussion

Could you crop and clean File:John Williams missionary2.jpg and File:Rev. John Williams.jpg and File:Group of Rarotonga (1898).jpg? Just upload over it.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)   Done --Hic et nunc (talk) 06:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you crop and straighten these images?

--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC)   Done--Hic et nunc (talk) 13:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you best to straighten and crop these images? I couldn't scan them perfectly from the books without having the edges curving up.

--KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done --Hic et nunc (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you redo File:Eleanor Kekoaohiwaikalani Wright Prendergast.jpg and oval crop File:S. M. Kamakau, Hawaiian Historian.jpg? Thank you. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done--Hic et nunc (talk) 12:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you use either [] or [] and upload a crop version of the image over File:Queen Emma of Hawaii, engraving by H. Adlard.jpg like File:Kalakaua4.jpg and upload a higher res version of the signature over File:Kaleleokalani signature.jpg? Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

  Done--Hic et nunc (talk) 06:45, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

For File:Victoria Kamamalu, daguerreotype, 1858 noframe.jpg, do you know how to edit the frame corners into backgrounds without cropping it further? If not just leave it alone. Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you crop away the dotted border and white out the name on File:Caesar Celso Moreno.jpg? And can you crop away the caption on File:Celso Cesare Moreno.jpg and then create a derivative file by cropping a profile pic on the line of ones already on w:Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Hawaii) that is the head, shoulder, som chest and good ratio of background behind their shoulders. Sorry about the specificity. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

  Done--Hic et nunc (talk) 07:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Could you crop/extract an image of T. F. Lansing from File:Annexation Club, Honolulu.jpg? I would like the crop to include every bit of the photograph of Lansing in the first upload and then a second upload, over this on the same image, cropping away the unnecessary extra background on top. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

  Done --Hic et nunc (talk) 09:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Could you upload over File:Elizabeth Keawepo‘o‘ole Sumner.png and File:Elizabeth Keawepo‘o‘ole Sumner.jpg a tighter crop more like this File:Prince Punuarii Teriitapunui.jpg? And also change it to black and white since the redness doesn't seem original and it makes a reader think that she had red hair. No need for any new version just upload over original. Also, could you change File:Victoria Kuali‘i Sumner Ellis Bufandeau.jpg and File:Victoria Kamamalu and Nancy Wahinekapu Sumner.jpg to black and white? Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Also can you crop File:Kahoʻohanohano.jpg? Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

  Done--Hic et nunc (talk) 07:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Could you change File:Poomaikelani2.jpg, File:Madame Namakeha.jpg, File:Liliuokalani and John Aimoku Dominis.jpg, File:Funeral procession of Jonah Kuhio Kalanianaole.jpg, File:Lowering Kuhio's Casket.jpg, File:Members of the Chiefs of Hawaii, ca. 1922.jpg, File:Josephjfern.jpg, File:Young Hawaiian ladies in western clothing.jpg, File:Kaiulani and sister on ukulele.jpg, File:Richard Seddon and the King of Niue with flag.jpg, File:Queen Emma of Hawaii06.jpg, File:Kapiolani1863.jpg, File:Dominis1.jpg, File:Liliuokalani in London (c. 1887).jpg and File:YoungArchie.jpg to black and white ? And just crop borders from File:Duke Paoa Kahanamoku, photograph by A. R. Gurrey Jr.jpg and File:Duke Kahanamoku, Waikiki, 1910.jpg without changing its color or quality? Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

  Done --Hic et nunc (talk) 11:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Could you crop and clean these images and make them the ones already cropped black and white? Thank you very much.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

  Done --Hic et nunc (talk) 13:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Could you please help me clean and crop File:Hiram Bingham II, facing left.jpg, File:William Drake Westervelt.jpg, File:Home of William Drake Westervelt at Waikiki, c. 1915.jpg, File:Robert Louis Stevenson and King Kalakaua and his Singing Boys.jpg, File:Mary Patton Chamberlain, 1865.jpg, File:Levi Chamberlain, 1845.jpg, File:Chiefs in Feather Cloaks by Paradise of the Pacific, 1923.jpg, File:Chamberlain House, 1910.jpg, File:A Native Grass House of the Humbler Class (Henshaw).jpg, File:Levi Chamberlain, 1847.jpg, File:Edward G. Beckwith.jpg, File:Making Ready the Feast, Hawaiian Folk Tales.jpg and File:Nathaniel Bright Emerson.jpg. For File:William C. Parke.jpg could you help create a restored derivative file that doesn't have the signature and a signature file that has white background? And could you help desaturate these images listed here and File:Liliuokalani in Boston, 1897.jpg. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

  Done Not all changes are already shown by the server.--Hic et nunc (talk) 07:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Can you crop (some already crop) and clean these images here Passing of Liliuokalani?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

  Done --Hic et nunc (talk) 09:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Could you restore their original colors on all of them to just the crop form? It doesn't look good restored. I don't think the original tones and lightings were suited to be black and white. And you didn't need to create black and white versions of ones that were colored.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 09:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I restored the coloured pics even though they look like too much saturated. The b/w pics are originally b/w. The impression of different tone is a result of scanning in colur mode. If one had chosen grayscale there were no difference to restored pics. And I did't believe that you want to preserve yellowed paper tone.
Contrast and brightness have been much too less, already in the originals - a common problem of old photographs. The shown scenes happened outside at sunny weather what can be seen by the hard shadows.
So I decided not to revert all these files. But feel free to do it if you don't like it. I thought to do yo a favour. Sorry if it was not as successful as I intended. --Hic et nunc (talk) 11:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Could you clean, denoise (if needed) and turn black and white these images [1], [2], [3], [4], File:General View of Nouméa, by Peace.jpg, and File:Gilbert C. Wiltse.jpg? Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

I will do this but at the moment (this and next wek) I have very less time. Sorry. --Hic et nunc (talk) 06:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

regarding Ed Snowden retouch

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Heya Hic et nunc, I was taking a gander at File:Edward Snowden.jpg and File:Edward Snowden-2.jpg today and noticed the mole on Edward's neck is missing in your retouched version, would you mind adding that back in since that's part of his body? Kind regards, Dainomite (talk) 02:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

A user OliverBel removed it as his first and single edit and I didn't realise it. Now the mole is back again. It's definitely part of his body.--Hic et nunc (talk) 07:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Ohhhh I gotcha, I probably should've looked at the revision history, doh! >.< Thank you for restoring the file though! Cheers, Dainomite (talk) 05:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


File:Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hallo Hic et nunc, dies betrifft Deine Bearbeitungen eines Fotos, das inzwischen gelöscht worden ist, da wir keinen Beleg dafür haben, dass es gemeinfrei ist. AFBorchert (talk) 11:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Das ist dann halt so.... --Hic et nunc (talk) 12:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hic_et_nunc/Archive_1&oldid=575990767"
Return to the user page of "Hic et nunc/Archive 1".