Notice

Archives: 1 2 (last archive partly transcluded on this page)

De-adminship warning edit

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Ilmari Karonen. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnsteltalk 23:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the notice. Given that this is my second warning, and that I really haven't been active on Commons in the mean time, I've decided to resign my adminship. If I ever decide to become more active here again, I'll just re-apply. --Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

MIMEStatBot improvements edit

I'd like to stop pseudo-manually updating my report User:Dispenser/Wrong Extension and you're bot has an overlapping report. These changes needed for assimilation

  • The runtime can be shorten by using a temporary table and reusing it for both reports
  • .oga and .ogv should only dedicated to img_media_type AUDIO and VIDEO respectively
  • .xcf is a supported format on Common
  • Related discussion at Commons:Bots/Work requests/Archive 7#Fix file extensions

Dispenser (talk) 17:19, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

We could perhaps combine these tools in a multi-maintainer project; I actually applied for one for MIMEStatBot some time ago, but never got around to moving the code over. (Not sure if that would make sense given the current status of the Toolserver, though; I haven't been really following that stuff very closely, but I know there at least used to be a lot of talk about transitioning to the WMF Tool Labs in the future.)
I deliberately wrote MIMEStatBot to be fairly policy-agnostic: it doesn't really know or care which MIME types are allowed on Commons, it just counts them all and then compiles a list of any files with unusual types, where "unusual" is defined by an arbitrary cutoff of 500 files or fewer. It also doesn't currently care about file extensions at all, although that could indeed be changed fairly easily.
I suppose it would be possible to add a simple configuration file that defines any "expected" MIME type / media type / extension combinations, and have the bot report anything not found in it. That file would need to be update whenever Commons policy (or technical restrictions) on file formats changes, but that's not really too frequent. (I think that major changes over the lifetime of MIMEStatBot have been the introduction of the .djvu and .webm formats.)
Anyway, a big problem with MIMEStatBot is that it's already pushing the Toolserver query runtime limits pretty hard; yesterday's run got killed before it managed to complete. In theory, it should be possible to rewrite the code to maintain running statistics and update them based on upload and deletion logs, but in practice that would likely get out of sync with reality pretty quickly. (For example, purging a file can change its MIME type if the detection code has changed in the mean time, and leaves no trace in the logs; also, MediaWiki's logging works on a best effort basis, and while it's rare, it's quite possible for a file to get uploaded or deleted without leaving a log entry.) Any plans to add functionality would need to take into account the fact that even the existing functionality barely works any more. :(
--Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply



End of last archive; please add new topics below this note.


De-adminship edit

Hi Ilmari,
it is with a regret that I inform you that, following our de-adminship policy, you had your administrator rights on Wikimedia Commons removed today by a Wikimedia steward.

I would like to use this opportunity to thank you for your efforts and contributions in making Wikimedia Commons what it is today (no big words intended!). If you'll feel like doing so at some point, please feel free to re-apply for adminship at COM:RFA. Again, thanks for all the help you gave us, and (hopefully) see you back soon! odder (talk) 19:48, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ilmari, thanks for your great, persevering work, especiall in the scripting area. I hope, one day, I could support a you in your re-application for adminship. Best -- Rillke(q?) 23:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Location Spain EU Europe 1.svg edit

 
File:Location Spain EU Europe 1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 08:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Richard Stegmann.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Richard Stegmann.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Richard Stegmann.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 20:49, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

User:MIMEStatBot edit

Just a heads up, User:MIMEStatBot hasn't run since November 24. Bawolff (talk) 18:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If you don't want to host the bot anymore, I would be willing to take it over. Bawolff (talk) 17:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Bawolff: That would be great, it's very sad that e.g. Commons:MIME type statistics isn't updated anymore. --user.js (talk) 01:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC) PS. TMg has set up the toollabs:tmg/mimestat.php, perhaps you can use that? --user.js (talk) 19:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Gale Ann Hurd and James Cameron.jpg edit

 
File:Gale Ann Hurd and James Cameron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dream out loud (talk) 03:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:MIMEStatBot edit

Why is the bot needed? It would be better, when the Mediawiki software would do that type of statistics generating?! 87.79.116.206 09:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Armoiries du Baron Matthieu CHATELIN,Lord de Redwoods.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lemmens, Tom (talk) 21:02, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Arboles binarios.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arboles binarios.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Arboles binarios.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki talk:InterProject.js#Cookie edit

Could you take a look at it? --Andyrom75 (talk) 08:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Ykua Bolaños1.jpg edit

 
File:Ykua Bolaños1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Gunnex (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Artist impression of Pluto and Charon.jpg edit

 
File:Artist impression of Pluto and Charon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hektor (talk) 18:32, 17 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Flamurijin.jpg edit

 
File:Flamurijin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Keφr (keep talk here) 09:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Sexy dancer 04.jpg edit

 
File:Sexy dancer 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Hogarth Marriage-a-la-mode reproduction 1.png edit

 
File:Hogarth Marriage-a-la-mode reproduction 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gestumblindi (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Warning.jpg edit

 
File:Warning.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

This, that and the other (talk) 07:44, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Mares.svg edit

 
File:Mares.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

151.50.249.197 20:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Rajeevmassji.jpg edit

 
File:Rajeevmassji.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 19:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Skl.jpg edit

 
File:Skl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roberto94 (talk) 00:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Parralellampor.jpg edit

 
File:Parralellampor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roberto94 (talk) 00:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Geometrie TD 03 2.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Geometrie TD 03 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Geometrie TD 03 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:LaurahostsSR.JPG edit

 
File:LaurahostsSR.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FredWalsh (talk) 03:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Warning.jpg edit

 
File:Warning.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Infant Krishna.jpg edit

 
File:Infant Krishna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


Category:Text images that should use vector graphics edit

 

Text images that should use vector graphics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Apocheir (talk) 18:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Sediment in the Gulf of Mexico (2) edit.jpg edit

 
File:Sediment in the Gulf of Mexico (2) edit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 02:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Lebanon.svg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Lebanon.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:A.png edit

 
File:A.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  20:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:MissingDotX.svg edit

 
File:MissingDotX.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

大诺史 (talk) 08:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:GrayDotX.svg edit

 
File:GrayDotX.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

大诺史 (talk) 08:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:WhiteDotX.svg edit

 
File:WhiteDotX.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

大诺史 (talk) 08:45, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:RedDotX.svg edit

 
File:RedDotX.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

大诺史 (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:BlackDotX.svg edit

 
File:BlackDotX.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

大诺史 (talk) 08:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Struktura zatrudnienia Jews of Szydłowiec in 1787.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thoji (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:21divss.gif edit

 
File:21divss.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kj1595 (talk) 06:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

New Sport records icons edit

Hi Ilmari, I've recently used some of your sport records icons and I wonder if you could add a few missing ones based on   and   and the World Athletics abbreviations:

  • U20 record icons: WU20R - World U20 record, EU20R - European U20 record, NU20R - National U20 record etc.
  • U18: YOR - Youth Olympic Games record
  • MR - Meeting record
  • WB - World Best Performance; WU20B and WU18B
  • WDB/WHB - World Decathlon/Heptathlon Best Performance (also with N for National, E for Europe, C for Championship and O for Olympic)
  • NB - National Best Performance; NU20B; NU18B
  • EB - European Best Performance; EU20B; EU18B
  • WU20L - World U20 Leading; WU18L

Would be great if you can manage this or could forward it to someone who can do it. Best regards 185.209.238.238 10:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I could, but it might be even better if I taught you how to do it yourself.
First, download the original SVG version of one of the icons (say, File:Sport records icon WR.svg) and open it in a text editor. (Depending on which editor you're using, you might first need to rename the file to change the suffix from ".svg" to ".txt".) You'll see that it's just a couple of lines of XML code, like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.0" width="180" height="128">
<path style="fill: #254061; stroke: #376092; stroke-width: 6; stroke-linejoin: round;" d="M 177,85 C 177,62.84 177,3 177,3 L 43,3 C 20.84,3 3,20.84 3,43 C 3,65.16 3,125 3,125 L 137,125 C 159.16,125 177,107.16 177,85 z" />
<text x="89.979248" y="97.940353" style="fill: #ffffff; stroke: none; font-family: Bitstream Vera Sans; font-size: 85px; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; text-anchor: middle;">WR</text>
</svg>
Now, if you do the same with one of the other icons (say, File:Sport records icon ER.svg), you'll see that it's almost identical except for a couple of parts that I've highlighted in bold:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.0" width="180" height="128">
<path style="fill: #ffffff; stroke: #000000; stroke-width: 6; stroke-linejoin: round;" d="M 177,85 C 177,62.84 177,3 177,3 L 43,3 C 20.84,3 3,20.84 3,43 C 3,65.16 3,125 3,125 L 137,125 C 159.16,125 177,107.16 177,85 z" />
<text x="89.979248" y="97.940353" style="fill: #000000; stroke: none; font-family: Bitstream Vera Sans; font-size: 85px; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; text-anchor: middle;">ER</text>
</svg>
You can edit those parts of the code, save the file with a new name (make sure it has an ".svg" suffix) and open it in a web browser, and you should see a brand new icon that you can then upload to Commons!
Specifically, the fill: #xxxxxx and stroke: #xxxxxx codes on the third line (the one that starts with "<path") set the background color and the border color of the icon respectively. The #xxxxxx parts are HTML color codes; SVG uses the same syntax. There are plenty of online color pickers that can generate those codes; most browsers even have one built into their developer tools, and most paint programs can also generate them.
On the fourth line (the one that begins with "<text"), the fill: #xxxxxx part sets the text color, and the actual text of the icon is at the end. Note that if you make the text longer than two letters, you'll also probably need to reduce the font-size: 85px value earlier on the same line to make it fit.
I'd suggest at least giving it a try! If you get stuck at some point, let me know and I'll try to help you. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Toyslove sybian in action kobe lee.ogv edit

 
File:Toyslove sybian in action kobe lee.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hérisson grognon (talk) 15:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:21divss.gif edit

 
File:21divss.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 21:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 22:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Bennylin (yes?) 20:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Recycle001.svg edit

 
File:Recycle001.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Moneyhumor.png edit

 
File:Moneyhumor.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dronebogus (talk) 20:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Wappen Andermatt.svg edit

 
File:Wappen Andermatt.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 12:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:peaje chile edit

Señal de peaje en chile Nico12456 (talk) 02:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply