Open main menu
Willkommen auf Commons, Johannes Robalotoff!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png Erste Schritte

Unser Ratgeber Erste Schritte und unsere FAQ können Dir nach Deiner Anmeldung hilfreich sein. Sie erklären, wie Du die Benutzeroberfläche anpassen und zum Beispiel auf Deine Muttersprache umstellen kannst. Auch erklären sie, wie Du Dateien hochladen kannst. Daneben erläutern sie unsere grundlegende Lizenzpolitik. Du benötigst keine besonderen technischen Kenntnisse, um hier mitzumachen. Sei mutig hier beizutragen und gehe von gutem Willen aus bei den Absichten anderer. Dies ist ein Wiki - es ist wirklich einfach.

Icon apps query.svg Hilfe bekommen

Mehr Informationen bekommst Du im Gemeinschaftsportal. Du kannst Fragen im Forum oder im IRC-Chat #wikimedia-commons stellen. Du kannst auch einen Administrator auf seiner Diskussionsseite ansprechen. Sofern Du eine spezielle Frage zum Urheberrecht hast, frage auf der Seite Diskussionsseite:Lizenzen.

Transmission icon.png Tips, Tricks und Spielzeuge
  • Setze Babelvorlagen auf Deine Benutzerseite, so dass andere sehen können, in welcher Sprache sie Dich ansprechen können, und zeige deine grafischen Fähigkeiten.
  • Alle Deine hochgeladenen Dateien sind in Deiner persönlichen Benutzergalerie einsehbar. Trage dazu im Feld User Deinen Benutzernamen ein und bestätige mit ENTER.
  • Bitte unterschreibe auf Diskussionsseiten, indem Du ~~~~ tippst.
  • Verwende das CommonSense-Werkzeug, um geeignete Kategorien für Deine Dateien zu finden (damit andere Leute sie ebenfalls auffinden können!).
  • Um auf eine Bildbeschreibungsseite zu verlinken, schreibe dies:[[:Image:Foo.jpg]], so dass dies angezeigt wird: Image:Foo.jpg
  • Sofern Du Dateien aus einem anderen Projekt überträgst, verwende bitte immer das Werkzeug CommonsHelper.
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Hast Du einen Fehler gemacht?
  • Wolltest Du eine Datei umbenennen oder sie verschieben? Lade sie einfach erneut hoch und markiere die alte Datei mit {{bad name|Richtiger Name}}
  • Ausführliche Informationen findest Du auf der Seite Löschrichtlinien.
(P.S. Möchtest Du diese Nachricht kommentieren?)

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Johannes, schön das Du bei uns hier auf den Commons mitmachst (und das ja schon länger!). Hast Du nicht Lust, mal eine Benutzerseite anzulegen, so mit ein paar Babelbausteinen und einem Link auf Deine deutsche Benutzerseite? Dann hätten alle anderen Commoner ja auch mal ein paar Informationen. Ich habe schon daran gedacht, Dir vielleicht den Willkommensbaustein mit den Links hier zu verbauen, aber da Du ja schon länger und gut mitarbeitest, ist das ja wahrscheinlich nicht nötig. Vielen Dank für Deine Fotos übrigens, ich habe eben mal eins gesehen. Schöne Grüße, Longbow4u 20:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Deprecated lang templatesEdit

Hi,
Thank you for using language templates. However, I wanted to let you know that templates like {{English}}, {{Deutsch}}, etc. are now deprecated and should not be used any more.
Instead, you are encouraged to use {{en|Your English text}}, {{de|your German text}}, etc.
Thanks agains and best regards from France, have fun uploading and editing here :)
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your hint. I will use the new templates with my future pictures and gradually replace templates for older ones. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome!
Happy editing and uploading then :)
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 12:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Fotos von Burgen in Hessen für BuchprojektEdit

Hallo, Herr Robalotoff! Für ein wissenschaftliches Buchprojekt über eine mittelalterliche Handschrift suche ich gute Fotos von bestimmten hessischen Burgen. Bei Ihnen fand ich folgende Fotos, die mich interessieren: Burg Falkenstein (10a-JR-16.8.2001), Burgruine Hattstein (28.3.2004), Burg Eppstein von Nordwesten (2.6.2002), Burg Münzenberg von Südosten (15.9.2003), Burg Reifenberg (26.5.2002). Könnten Sie mit mir Kontakt aufnehmen unter k.deissner(at)universitaetsdruckerei.de ? Dann könnten wir klären, wie ich an die Originaldaten in möglichst guter Auflösung kommen kann - und Ihre Bilder bekämen einen schönen Platz in einem tollen Buch! Freue mich auf Ihre Antwort... Gruß, K.D.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss-Bad-Homburg-Oberes-Tor-JR-G6-1807-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruine-Landstein-JR-G6-1367-2006-10-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weisser-Turm-Bad-Homburg-JR-G6-1766-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Glaskopf-JR-G6-3147-3153-2009-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirche-Habenscheid-JR-G6-3792-2009-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Oberneisen-JR-G6-3652-2009-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Elisabethenbrunnen-Bad-Homburg-JR-G6-1793-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schoenburg-Hoher-Mantel-JR-G6-4185-2009-09-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Ardeck-Holzheim-JR-G6-3692-2009-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Ardeck-Holzheim-JR-G6-3717-2009-08-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kaiser-Wilhelms-Bad-JR-G6-1796-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss-Bad-Homburg-Libanon-Zeder-JR-G6-1752-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schlosspark-Bad-Homburg-JR-G6-1773-2007-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sankt-Goarshausen-JR-G6-4201-2009-09-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 25-Pfennig-Coin-Deutsches-Reich-1912-F-JR-4403-4406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 25-Pfennig-Coin-Deutsches-Reich-1912-F-JR-4403-4406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Kronberg-JR-E-65-2010-04-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Koenigstein-JR-E-106-2010-04-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

perspective correctionEdit

Many thanks for your perspective correction of my CoA of Paris, now promoted as QI ! Ok, I have to download the tool, but I'm not sure that I could understand how using it...I'll try ! Friendly from Paris,---Jebulon (talk) 19:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

You' re welcome! It was somewhat pedantic by me anyway to ask for a correction of this picture, because the original geometry was already almost OK :-) So I felt obliged to show what I meant... Many people won't see the difference. It is only obvious on the monitor at full resolution. --JRff (talk) 21:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Same subject, a month later...
first, many thanks for your kind reviews, it's very interesting to me
Perspective distortion is (was ?) a great problem to me, because I work on Mac, and there are not many freewares except Hugin. I've downloaded it, but I'm absolutely unable to use it, I don't understand anything. Today, I've downloaded the Gimp, and it seems to be good now.

My next problem is the noise in difficult light (obelisk...), but the solution is in to buy another camera, i'm afraid.
OK, I've uploaded a corrected version of the street sign, and a new version of another close-up of the streetlamp. Thoughts about ?
Thank you very much for your help.
Have a nice sunday (...bad weather over Paris :( ...) --Jebulon (talk) 10:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jebulon, for simple perspective corrections on two-dimensional objects, Gimp is sufficient, so there is no need to use something as complicated as hugin. But if you once know how to use hugin, using Gimp might be even more cumbersome. This is because you have to tell Gimp how it should correct the image, while hugin wants to know from you only what it should optimize, not how it should do it. Also hugin can work with 16 bits per channel, and it gives better results because its methods are specially designed for photography. Did you look at this turorial and also this one? --JRff (talk) 12:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Relief-Sankt-Johann-Kronberg-JR-A40-1828-2010-04-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Katz-JR-G6-4716-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kurhaus-Bad-Ems-JR-G6-4646-4648-2010-05-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Rheinfels-JR-E-239-241-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hexenturm-Idstein-JR-G6-4546-2010-05-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Nassau-JR-G6-4572-2010-05-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Reichenberg-JR-E-296-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Reichenberg-JR-E-292-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Katz-JR-E-519-2010-08-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Maus-JR-E-541-2010-08-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Rheinfels-JR-E-527-529-2010-08-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Nave of Granada CathedralEdit

Hello. Many thanks for your review of my picture. I don't absolutely know nothing about photo post processing, and you made me discover the tool "curve" in the GIMP I use. I' ve tried to follow your advice about "S" curve correction, it is really new for me. I do not understand all here, but It is very interesting ! I'm not sure if my pic is a QI now, but I think it is better. May I have your opinion now, please ? However, a lot of vielen Dank for the tip ! --Jebulon (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. I supported the new version of your image meanwhile on the QI nomination page. --JRff (talk) 20:47, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rhine-near-Sankt-Goarshausen-JR-G6-4692-2010-06-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wellmich-JR-G6-4797-2010-08-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Marksburg-Braubach : True or not true?Edit

I asked the question but it was answered me it was normal.

  • Confirmes-tu qu'il est aussi mal fichu que sur la photo ou y a-t-il une erreur de perspective? --Archaeodontosaurus (Diskussion) 10:23, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
  • En fait, la tour est aussi mal fichue que sur ma photo. Donc, ce n'est pas d'erreur de perspective;) --Tobi 87 (d) 16:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

True or not true? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

I think that the tower is actually a bit leaning, but not as much as it appears from the image in discussion. You can see that from other pictures on the internet. On the nominated image the wall of the building right behind the tower and the flagpoles on the right are also leaning. However they do not lean on other pictures, and it is very unlikely that the flagpoles were consistently not mounted upright as they are new and not hundreds of years old. Moreover I took some pictures there by myself in this summer, although I stood closer to the hill. I did not notice this extreme Pisa tower effect. --JRff (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Understood I withdraw my vote --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

SculptureEdit

Good evening!. If this photo overed on two degrees to left?) --Vizu (talk) 17:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Good evening. Just rotating by two degrees will not work.
I did outline the most important problem already on the QI nomination page: If you rotate, you will get the lamp and the people upright. But you have to crop the image afterwards in order to get a normal rectangular frame again. As there is not enough room at the right side this will cut the man's elbow.
The second problem is that the image is not just tilted. If you just rotate so that the lamp is upright, the basement of the sculpture will be still sloped to the right. To correct for this, one would have to make a complex perspective correction, e.g. with the free tool "hugin". And this is not worthwile because of the elbow problem described above.
I hope that I answered your question. I wish I could answer in Russian in order to make it easier for you. But I never had the opportunity to learn that language.
--JRff (talk) 18:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Thank you! --Vizu (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg Katz HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stadtmauer-Oberwesel-JR-E-797-2011-05-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Washington D.C. Temple At Dusk.jpgEdit

Hello, I have uploaded a corrected version of the image. (Do purge the cache of your web browser) --Jovian Eye storm 02:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, I supported the new version on the featured image candidate page now. --JRff (talk) 18:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Sooneck-JR-E-852-2011-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!Edit

 
Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an info wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch!Edit

 

Hiermit überreichen wir

die Urkunde für die erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Wettbewerb

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-G6-6231-2018-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Argynnis-paphia-JR-E-2295-2018-07-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hohes-Schloss-Fuessen-JR-G6-6224-2018-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alopochen-aegyptiaca-JR-T20-2095-2018-07-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018Edit

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

im Namen von Organisationsteam und Jury danke ich Dir für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland.

Im Jahr 2018 wurden ebenso wie im Vorjahr etwa 24.000 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen viele die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia illustrieren werden. Die Teilnehmerzahl lag diesmal bei 683, im Vorjahr waren es 1063.

Unsere Jury hat die Top100 der Bilder aus Deutschland ausgewählt. Die zehn bestplatzierten Fotos nehmen an der internationalen Ausscheidung teil.

Falls Du Lust auf einen weiteren Fotowettbewerb hast: Im September läuft Wiki Loves Monuments, wo Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden eingereicht werden können.

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-E-2757-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-G6-6310-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haus-zur-Flechte-JR-T20-2148-2018-08-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiherwiese-26-Idstein-JR-E-2659-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiherwiese-23-Idstein-JR-E-2662-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiherwiese-28-Idstein-JR-E-2660-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiherwiese-2-Idstein-JR-E-2648-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiherwiese-27-Idstein-JR-E-2663-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiherwiese-17-Idstein-JR-E-2658-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kreuzgasse-13-Idstein-JR-E-2667-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Himmelsgasse-2-Idstein-JR-E-2725-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

My sensorEdit

Re this: I have found a shop some distance from me that does this; after the New Year I will be making an appointment and taking the camera there. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Obergasse-7-Idstein-JR-E-2690-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rodergasse-1-3-Idstein-JR-E-2720-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marktplatz-4-Idstein-JR-E-2724-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kaffeegasse-2a-Idstein-JR-E-2684-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Borngasse-5-Idstein-JR-E-2674-2677-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Koenig-Adolf-Platz-Idstein-JR-E-2699-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Obergasse-19-Idstein-JR-E-2680-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Reaching out to youEdit

Hi, I just want to say that I may well be wrong, but I mean no harm, and I just call it the way I see it. I certainly don't wish to discourage you and will be looking to see whether I think any of the photos you nominate at QIC might be good FP candidates.

Happy New Year, and I'll see you on the boards.

Best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ikan,

thank you for your message. I do not mean any harm to anyone either. It is just that I was very, very surprised about your judgement. This is the reason why I wrote a longer answer to your post today on the QI discussion page. I have seen many softer images being promoted, not only macro shots, for which "crispness" is obviously much more difficult to achieve. And I have seen people prefer halos from over-sharpening over the residual, but natural softness of a lens, thus spoiling images with artifacts. That's why I felt I had to react.

The problem with noise reduction, as seen on the mobile phone image just discussed, is also not only the absolute loss of detail on fine structures. A painted wood has a consistent "grain" from brush strokes. However inappropriate noise reduction as from a mobile phone or a cheap compact camera creates an inconsistent look of details, because it smears out structures with lower contrast but preserves high-contrast structures of the same size with distinct edges . This inconsistency looks much more irritating and artificial at full resolution than moderate, but consistent lens softness, which softens everything on the same scale.

But apart from that - I don't think that my particular images currently under discussion really suffer from lens softness. As I wrote before, what disturbs you is most likely a matter of edge contrast, not sharpness. The chateau is very bright compared with the foreground. Thus highlights have to be compressed into a relatively small tone range. If I would try to compensate this with even more sharpening, this would not make the image better.

Regards and happy new year, --JRff (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I appreciate your detailed replies and will think about them. I wonder if there would be a good talk page for more people to have a fuller discussion about these things, not focusing mainly on one or two of your photos and E3's photos but more generally. I may learn something. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Idstein-JR-E-2642-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Killingerhaus-Idstein-JR-T20-2101-2018-07-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiherwiese-1-Idstein-JR-E-2649-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiherwiese-13-Idstein-JR-E-2656-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-E-2764-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-G6-6319-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-G6-6316-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Cape Town picturesEdit

 
How does this one look now?

Colors are more saturated and there seems to be a purple/red component on the mountains that was not there before. May be white balance is a bit different? Highlights on the houses are slightly brighter. But most important: There is uncompensated CA that was not visible at all in the old version! Detail on the mountains and plants is not better, perhaps even worse. And I see sharpening halos on the left an right side of the mountain chain. In short, it is not what I expected. What software do you use for raw conversion? --JRff (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Adobe. Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
For Adobe I cannot give recommendations about parameters. But you should at least try RawTherapee. It is free and open source community software, so a test will not cost you any money. The advantage of this program is that it does very little on your image per default. It does Demosaicing and then applies a tone curve similar to that which was applied by the camera to the JPEG file which is embedded in the RAW file. If your lens is in the program's database it will also correct for distortion and chromatic aberration. That's all, so far as I remember. I.e., per default there will be no noise reduction and no sharpening at all. Of course this is not acceptable for the final result. But it is a starting point where you can see what detail is actually in the raw file in absence of any processing artifacts. You can then gradually add sharpening and noise reduction as well as adjust luminance, contrast, white balance etc., and you can see step for step if this improves or rather degrades your image. It may be a bit more difficult to use than some commercial converters. But you have full control (which is not the case, e.g., for Canon's converters which I have used for some time).
Regards, --JRff (talk) 20:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiherwiese-15-Idstein-JR-E-2655-2018-08-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marktplatz-2-4-Bad-Camberg-JR-E-2778-2018-09-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Linde-Reinborn-JR-E-2495-2018-08-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Reifenberg-JR-E-2829-2019-02-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberreifenberg-Sankt-Georg-JR-E-2813-2019-02-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bassenheimer-Palais-JR-E-2818-2019-02-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberreifenberg-Burg-JR-E-2832-2019-02-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2019Edit

Hallo Johannes Robalotoff,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2019 kannst Du wieder beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland (WLE 2019) teilnehmen. Gesucht sind selbst aufgenommene Landschafts- und Naturfotos aus Schutzgebieten in Deutschland.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg kann diese Übersichtsseite dienen.

WLE 2019 kann nur durchgeführt werden, wenn weitere Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen unser Team verstärken. Es geht unter anderem um die Organisation in der Wikipedia und das Sortieren der Bilder auf Commons. Über Art und Umfang der Beteiligung entscheidest Du selbst.

Wie in den Vorjahren übernimmt eine Vorjury ab Anfang Mai die Vorauswahl der Bilder. Auch daran kannst Du Dich gern beteiligen. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Besonders engagierte Freiwillige werden für die Jury benötigt. Wenn Du vom 12. bis 14. Juli in Fulda die besten Bilder küren willst, melde Dich auf der Jury-Seite.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--GPSLeo (talk) (im Auftrag des Organisationsteams) 17:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eppstein-JR-E-3039-2019-04-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg-Eppstein-JR-T20-2513-2019-04-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Johannes Robalotoff".