Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lepetitlord!
 
File:Miquel Barceló.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Classement

edit

Bonjour Lepetitlord, Ce lien Commons:Premiers pas/Classement peut aider.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Luis_Mazzantini2++.JPG

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Luis_Mazzantini2++.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • If it is from a newspaper: What newspaper. Name, Year, Issue, date, page.
  • The author is not "author=Lepetitlord". Scanning something does not make you the author. See COM:L#Spain (?, I assume its spanish). Something is public domain 70/80 years after the author died. Scanning something does not make you the author of give you any copyrights. So who is the phohotgrapher, what year did he die?

--Martin H. (talk) 12:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Newspaper's name =les Annales politiques et littéraires, weekly.
Year = 1902
Issue= 27 june 1902
Page = 31
Author = photograph unknown, certainly not spanish, the issue is about Mazzantini visiting Paris, buying clothes. The caption says that he put his matador's costume to explain what it is composed off.
Photographer= unkown, not even mentionned.
Picture : domaine publique

What else can I say now ?--[[Lepetitlord]] ([[Discussion utilisateur|d]]) (talk) 22:15, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Tieanm1989.4 bis.JPG

edit
 
File:Tieanm1989.4 bis.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

What this, a joke? The photographer is well known and it is not your uncle. --Martin H. (talk) 13:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

P.s.: That throws some doubt on your "family archive" claims. I always thought that this claims are wrong, now you provided a prove that they are wrong. So who is realy the photographer of your uploads. --Martin H. (talk) 13:08, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Youe certainsly shoot too fast. Be careful with your deletions when you cannot PROOVE that a rcopyright has been violated Look Martin, my grand father va born in Vietnam, part of my family lived in China, part lived in Laos, part comes from Cambodia. They came back most of them in 1975. Only my uncle stayed beacause he was supposed to be inoffensif by the régime. He was expelled two monthes later. I cannot send you his passeport with the mention "non grata" person. If your are doubting of my family archives, them there is nothing I can do. I do not care to discuss anylonger these matters of doubt. Do you REALLY believe only ONE photographer took images of this event ? Their were a lot of peoplewho have donne the same thing, not under the same angle, not exactly at the same second. But you very well can see it is different from the copyrighted photograph. Do as you like. See you--[[Lepetitlord]] ([[Discussion utilisateur|d]]) (talk) 19:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you think there is only the version en:File:Tianasquare.jpg then you are mistaken, there is also a video footage. http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/1374461/3rd-Party-Misc. I cant believe what you try here. --Martin H. (talk) 22:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am not trying anything at all. It is not the same photograph. Just compare exactly the light, the surroundings etc. You proove just that . But there is an obsession about the ONLY person that could have taken that photo when there are dozens who did, not exactly a the same second. My uncle's was from much far away. I had to arrange it with photoshop. Anyway, now, you can drop the matter. We do not give the copyright. My mother said so. She keeps it for herself. I believe she is perfectly entitled to after all that jazz and the way we are bullied. No hard feeling anyway. We just learned how to make money instead of giving away family things.--[[Lepetitlord]] ([[Discussion utilisateur|d]]) (talk) 22:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tienan'men2.JPG

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tienan'men2.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tienan'men2.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 22:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tienn'men_1.JPG

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tienn'men_1.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tienn'men_1.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 22:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

User talk:Martin H.

edit

What exactly are you trying? You made a bad upload and I deleted it. I asked you if you joke and you went into defense claiming this someone else work. I prooved that this is untrue and tagged you other files as {{subst:nsd}} as I have serious doubt in the reliability of your uploads. What do you try now? To make me feel bad that I tagged your uploads and that I removed a blatant copyright violation from Commons?? You can use my talkpage if you want to provide an opposite prove against my explanation, do not abuse it for such stupid "I have a photo and I revoke copyright because you deleted my upload" bullshit. I validly deleted your upload! Stop this nonsense, adress the problem but stop vandalizing. Thank you. --Martin H. (talk) 00:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I do not want this photograhs to be published

edit

What you removed on your page, I will put here :

You even cut that :

I am not talking about Tank man now. The matter is over since I do not care about your appreciation eather. You are talking a lot for no reason at all. I am talking NOW about the two files I have been stupid enough to import in this place . So I retrieve the two files File:Tienn'men 1.JPG‎, File:Tienan'men2.JPG. And YOU will be responsible for that. Because you accused me of giving no source which is not true. You called me a liar several times, you insulted and despised my work. You do not deserve these files. You must delete them immediatly. You have no longer a license to publish them freely, I cancelled the description and the licence--Lepetitlord (d) (d) 00:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

and you also cut that of : As Owner of the copyright, I hereby retrieve the copyright I gave. There is no longer free license for the two last photographs I imported. I ask they be deleted immediatly. Thank you.--[[Lepetitlord]] ([[Discussion utilisateur|d]]) (talk) 23:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I retrieved the licencse because you called me a liar, which is an insult. I retrieved the licence because I AM THE OWNER OF THE COPYRIGHT, SO IS MY MOTHER. WE SHALL SELL IT INSTEAD OF GIVING IT FOR FREE TO A STUBBORN GUY.--[[Lepetitlord]] ([[Discussion utilisateur|d]]) (talk) 23:18, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I do not care about your appreciation which is false and biased. I want these photographes deleted because:

  1. because you are accusing me falsely on all sort of pretences
  2. because you dont know what really happened on the 5 june
  3. because you have deleted a photgraph that is in the family since 20 years.
  4. because you ask for sources that are very clearly explained
  5. and because I am fed up to give freely somethhing I can sell. Please yourself.--[[Lepetitlord]] ([[Discussion utilisateur|d]]) (talk) 01:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

à propos de l'homme de Tian'anmen

edit

La photo attribuée au seul Charlie Cole a en réalité plusieurs auteurs, connus ou anonymes, américain, chinois, anglais, français, belges. Voici par exemple

Merci de se renseigner à l'avenir. --[[Lepetitlord]] ([[Discussion utilisateur|d]]) (talk) 11:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Boris Vian - WIKI.jpg

edit
català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  magyar  português do Brasil  Nederlands  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  русский  suomi  日本語  +/−
 
File:Boris Vian - WIKI.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("File:Boris Vian - WIKI.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

JuTa 10:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, JeanBono (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Boris Vian - WIKI.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Boris Vian - WIKI.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Pan Tau (talk) 08:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 09:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply