User talk:Obsuser/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Edhem Mulabdic.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Edhem Mulabdic.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Edhem Mulabdic.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 08:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Behar br. 1..jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Behar br. 1..jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Behar br. 1..jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 08:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Osman aziz.png

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Osman aziz.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Osman aziz.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 08:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bošnjaci (slika).png

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bošnjaci (slika).png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bošnjaci (slika).png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 08:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bosnjaci slika zaj.png

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bosnjaci slika zaj.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bosnjaci slika zaj.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 08:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Enver c.png

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Enver c.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Enver c.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 08:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 08:03, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Bos institute.png

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bos institute.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Bartolomeo cristofori.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bartolomeo cristofori.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

C3r4 (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bosnia and Herzegovina anthem.ogg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bosnia and Herzegovina anthem.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Horizontal.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Horizontal.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Horizontal.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Vertical.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Vertical.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Vertical.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello. This is a reminder for you that it is important to address the identified issues instead of simply removing legitimate warnings and notices from your talk page. Removing messages does not remove them from the talk page's history. You are encouraged instead to archive past discussions according to our community guidelines. You can have this done automatically for you -- simply place {{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.

Yann (talk) 22:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not recreate deleted content

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Your image or other content, File:Bosnia and Herzegovina anthem.ogg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

Yann (talk) 22:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Obsuser.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yann (talk) 22:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Vertical.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Vertical.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 08:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Horizontal.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Horizontal.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 08:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Bone tumor skull.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bone tumor skull.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Milićević (talk) 12:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Karposh 2.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Karposh 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Milićević (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Le Corbusier moderen grad.gif

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Le Corbusier moderen grad.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Milićević (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Ohrid - Samuel's Fortress.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ohrid - Samuel's Fortress.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Milićević (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Burj Khalifa under sunrise.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Burj Khalifa under sunrise.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 06:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Emina Jahović 2013 (3).jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Emina Jahović 2013 (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sealle (talk) 03:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: uploading unfree files after warnings.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Sealle (talk) 04:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Karposh 2.jpg

And also:

File:Le Corbusier moderen grad.gif

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 04:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

@Sealle: These files are not over the threshold of originality, and are historical; per Commons:Threshold of originality (w:en:Threshold of originality#Typefaces and geometry) and per Commons:Derivative_works#Maps (Geographic or topographic features) they should not be deleted. --Obsuser (talk) 19:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

I don't think so. Sealle (talk) 19:47, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Why? What is over the threshold of originality? --Obsuser (talk) 19:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Karposh 2.jpg is not present in https://it.pinterest.com/source/designcity.3dontwerpen.nl/.
Also, you have found https://it.pinterest.com/source/designcity.3dontwerpen.nl/ but not http://www.dzsm.rs/istorijat.html for Batut (link should probably go to http://www.batut.org.rs/index.php?category_id=43, not to the file itself [at least on Wikipedias it's like this])... --Obsuser (talk) 19:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Stoja.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

File:Stoja.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sealle (talk) 04:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

@Sealle: It is not any Flickr washing; I had conversation via e-mail (stoja.info@gmail.com) given on official Stoja FB profile that is verified on FB (https://www.facebook.com/pg/stoja/about/?ref=page_internal) and also linked from official website (http://stoja.rs/).

I asked for permission to use one photo and waited for two month to get this photo; it was uploaded to Flickr. I have that e-mail conversation in my G-Mail account.

Please don't delete the file because I can use OTRS verification. Could you help me on how to do this? Conversation is in Serbian language, and links to Flickr URL of uploaded file. Is this enough to pass OTRS or I need to ask for explicit permission inside e-mail conversation itself (for example, by using one of the templates present on Commons for such purposes or something else)? --Obsuser (talk) 19:16, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

We need permission, issued by a proper copyright holder (usually a photographer, not a person depicted). Sealle (talk) 19:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Copyright holder is Stoja, because it is her image used as official cover for her website (you can see "© Stoja - Sva prava zadržana" on the website).

I can continue e-mail conversation to ask who is the photographer and then contact him/her, but why is that needed if there is a proper Flickr account, photo published there and reviewed successfully? This is how it's done for many photos, e.g. File:Nattha Thenews.jpg. Author is name of the Flickr account, in our case Stojanka Novaković (stoja72). You concern was "'single image' flickr account", but I can prove that is the official account created after I asked for one free image via e-mailing stoja.info@gmail.com (inside the conversation, URL to the filck file and thus the account in question is present, just don't know how to use OTRS to confirm this). --Obsuser (talk) 19:47, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:M j batut.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:M j batut.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

@Sealle: Source: http://www.dzsm.rs/istorijat.html. --Obsuser (talk) 19:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion requests

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

Sealle (talk) 04:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

World religions map en.svg

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi there,

Thanks for your message. Unfortunately most of my knowledge relating to vector graphics is confined to Inkscape, with only a limited knowledge of editing SVG files by text.

Is there any chance you could shade the island of Bali and a circle in central Kalimantan in the orange colour for Hinduism? (basically as seen in this map) And add shading for Hinduism in Sri Lanka?

Many thanks

--RaviC (talk) 00:49, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

@RaviC: I will try to do it for all translated maps. Thing is that other maps would need to be translated all over again if SVG code is not comparable; it is much easier when this is not the case, so that one can add only updated parts for other-language maps. --Obsuser (talk) 01:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

No worries, I completely understand. When I have some free time I'll try and pick up SVG syntax and fire up Vim for future editing. --RaviC (talk) 01:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Burj Khalifa floors-sr.svg

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Bird song development timeline-sr.svg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Obsuser,

if you translate diagrams to Serbian, please put them into Category:Diagrams in Serbian.

Thanks!--Kidira (talk) 14:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Gammaknife-sr.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gammaknife-sr.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gammaknife-sr.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Wdwd (talk) 13:40, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Update request

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, Obsuser.

Can you put South Sudan which is missing in File:Religije sveta.PNG, File:World religions map sr.svg, File:World religions map en.svg, File:World religions map ru.svg, File:World religions map sr-lat.svg, File:World religions map uk.svg? Source for South Sudan: http://www.globalreligiousfutures.org/countries

Yours sincerely, Artoxx (talk) 20:39, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@Artoxx: When I find time for that, I will. --Obsuser (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180621 090931.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180621 090931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Прашнице Зеница 20180625 183632.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Прашнице Зеница 20180625 183632.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Прашнице Зеница 20180625 183841.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Прашнице Зеница 20180625 183841.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180620 053052.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180620 053052.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Прашнице Зеница 20180625 183950.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Прашнице Зеница 20180625 183950.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Зеница 20180620 045212.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Зеница 20180620 045212.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Зеница 20180620 045212.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180620 045912.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180620 045912.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180621 052737.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180621 052737.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180620 050510.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180620 050510.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Krusovice20001.png

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Krusovice20001.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted poster

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth O (talk) 11:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Krusovice20002.png

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Krusovice20002.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted poster

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth O (talk) 11:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Desktop screenshot Windows 7 stolen.png

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Desktop screenshot Windows 7 stolen.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted screenshot

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth O (talk) 11:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180710 100837.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180710 100837.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 10:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180710 100822.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180710 100822.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 10:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180627 004626.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180627 004626.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 13:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180627 003902.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180627 003902.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 13:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Зеница 20180729 220725.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 10:37, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница мени 20180703 141856.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница мени 20180703 141856.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted menu, no permission

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth O (talk) 07:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Прашнице Зеница 20180625 183657.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Прашнице Зеница 20180625 183657.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Smooth O (talk) 07:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180730 052127.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180730 052127.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighte poster

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Smooth O (talk) 07:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180809 210513.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180809 210513.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180810 133505.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180810 133505.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180827 193052.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180827 193052.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180827 193621.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180827 193621.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180827 224544.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180827 224544.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180827 230856.png

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Зеница 20180827 230856.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180828 003607.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate j.budissin^+/- 18:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180828 003646.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate j.budissin^+/- 18:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20180729 210054.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate j.budissin^+/- 18:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:53, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Same for other files in Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Obsuser. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20190121 181241.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate j.budissin^+/- 16:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20190427 132151.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:19, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Бањалука 20190605 135052.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Ej, pozz. Pošto vidim da fotkaš po BL, jel možeš pliz da isfotkaš što detaljnije budeš mogao banjalučke džamije, ako budeš imao vremena. Pošto nameravam da napišem članke o njima i skupio sam krš literature. I vidi ako možeš fotkaj Halil-pašino turbe. Ukucaj na guglu, sve će ti ovo izaći. Ovde imaš spisak džamija.

BTw, nadam se da će ti isteći taj blok uskoro. --Ivan VA ([[User talk:Ivan VA|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Pozdrav. Islikao sam u Zenici sve gradske i nekoliko prigradskih vani i unutra, a u BL sam bio samo jedan dan u posjeti i uslikao one tri u centru i onu što se gradi kod crkve. Nemam namjeru ići uskoro, a i termin busa je nezgodan, kreće u 6.15, dođe u 10.30, a nazad u 17.00. Isteće, a i svakako nisam imao tada vremena da uređujem tako da me nije toliko pogodilo. Hvala na komentaru. Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Napiši samo ako znaš na svakoj njenoj slici u opisu kako se zove ova ispod Ferhadije što se jedna slika koristi za turbe neko, nema na njoj natpisa ili nisam vidio, ali mislim da nema jer bih uslikao inače kao i kod Dolačke... Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Oke, popuniću opise gde izostaju. Deo tvojih fotki sam već iskoristio u jednom drugom članku (1 , 2). Inače hvala i za ovoliko fotki. Mnogo je frustrirajuće kad živiš u BG kao ja, tako da mi nije mačiji kašalj da odem do BL da fotkam, a pišem o toj temi :/ Tako da kad svako nov nešto dodaje odatle, ja mu se penjem na glavu xD Odlično i za Zenicu :) (samo to dosta manje poznajem). Poz --Ivan VA ([[User talk:Ivan VA|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Kategorije

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

FYI. Pozdrav, j.budissin^+/- 19:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Zenica

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Ako budeš dalje fotkao po Zenici, vidi pliz fotkaj zgradu Industrijske škole, da je metnem u ovaj članak, u galeriju. Jer su on i Neidhart autori te zgrade. --Ivan VA ([[User talk:Ivan VA|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:39, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Template:Done. Mislim da sam i davno uslikao tu zgradu sprijeda, potraži u kategoriji Zenica i potkategorijama ili mojim otpremanjima, ali evo i jutros sam bio dole pa sam islikao sprijeda i odnazad gdje je bio bazen za obuku i centar za rekreaciju (stoni tenis i sl.); vidim jutros da je to sve propalo, a ja sam tu učio plivati; bilo je relativno dobro, ali voda prehladna... --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:40, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Svaka čast, evo ubacio sam u članak. Tnx :) Hehehe..i ja sam imao iskustva sa učenjem plivanja u hladnoj vodi :P Inače, stvarno zgrada izgleda pomalo otužno. Koliko sam čitao, arhitektonski, tog Najdharta (ko autora) arhitektu uzdižu u nebesa (posebno u Sarajevu), al ovo mu i nije neko delo. Na stranu što, na žalost, propada. --Ivan VA ([[User talk:Ivan VA|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20190725 221120.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20190819 100533.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Kawiki7 ([[User talk:Kawiki7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Зеница 20190821 175555.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

File copyright status

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. --Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Цвијет Сребренице (извезени, фотографисан).jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Behar

Latest comment: 4 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Imaš li pojma gde mogu da nađem ove stare brojeve Behara koje si ti linkovao ovde pre par godina u diskusiji o tom članku na hr.wiki. Pošto je izgleda stranica izbrisana. Have any idea? Treba mi za članak. Poy --Ivan VA ([[User talk:Ivan VA|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Imaju svi ili neki na arhivi: primjer. --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Da al to nisu ovi stari brojevi. Ovi ih 1900-e i to. Koliko sam ja skapirao to je pre bilo na toj stranici. --Ivan VA ([[User talk:Ivan VA|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Ne znam, možda su "intervenirali" pa ih obrisali sa neta. Ali te datoteke obrisane na :hr: se mogu ja mislim povratiti jer nijedan doprinos se ne može nepovratno obrisati na Wikipediji.

Evo našao sam broj 1 na svom kompjuteru u starim downloads-ima: evo ti link za direktno preuzimanje (link fajla, Expires on Mon Dec 2 03:09:46 2019), biće otpremljen 30 dana na tim serverima a onda oni brišu, pa preuzmi dotle. U slučaju da zip verzija nije OK ili nije prvi broj, nisam otpakivao da vidim koji je broj unutra, evo drugi link za direktno preuzimanje (link fajla, Expires on Mon Dec 2 03:13:53 2019) za broj 1 sigurno u .pdf-u. Evo i alternativno ovdje, ne bi trebalo isteći osim ako ugase sajt... Ne znam ima li drugih brojeva, npr. broj 2 ili 3, niti znam gdje sam tada iskopao taj broj 1. --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Bilo bi ekstra kad bi to moglo da se povrati. Ako možeš pitaj tamo, jer su mene blokirali na neodređeno zbog prepucavanja sa Kuburom na Kafiću, pa ne mogu sam. Inače puno hvala na trudu. Meni treba broj 5, tako piše u drugom radu koji čitam da je to referenca (piše rimskim Behar V). Inače ovaj prvi broj sam i ja našao, ima digitalizovano na sajtu Biblioteke grada Sarajeva ili Bibilioteke BiH (ne mogu da se setim koja od te dve). Al samo taj broj, i on čak nije potpun kao što vidiš (inače i danas stoji tamo). Inače ni sam ne znam što su bezveze brisali sve to. To je časopis koji je prestao da izlazi pre 100-ak godina, odavno je ušao u javno vlasništvo. Baš bezveze. --Ivan VA ([[User talk:Ivan VA|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Ali to su slike broja 104 i tog broja 1. Nema broja 5/V. Mogu ja narednih dana provjeriti ima li slučajno zenička biblioteka taj ili ijedan broj u nekom formatu... A ako navodiš kao referencu Behar ne mora biti dostupno onlajn, mislim da to već znaš. Manje/teže je provjerljivo, ali referenca je i dalje validna. Ima gomila referenci samo sa naslovom knjige, čak i bez broja stranice. I mislim da nije prestao da izlazi tako davno, sad sam naletio na izdanje iz 2013. (možda neko novo ali sa istim naslovom, a ta stara izdanja originalnog formata časopisa svakako da nisu smetala i slažem se da ih nije trebalo brisati). --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Ali to su slike broja 104 i tog broja 1. Nema broja 5/V.. Zato sam te i cimao. Mislio sam da je na ovom ukinutom sajtu bila ahriva svih brojeva. I da se, pošto je sajt ukinut, nekako sačuvala, negde (na netu). Pa sam mislio da znaš gde. Ako je negde arhivirano...Inače puno ti hvala što si se ponudio da mi učiniš uslugu, ovo za zeničku biblioteku :)))) Imaš pivu xD il kontrauslugu ;)..Pa sam zato pogledao u COBISS.BIH da li ima Behar u zeničkoj biblioteci, al nema :/ Zato sam našao digitalizovani, taj sam prevideo, u Gazi-Husrevbegovoj biblioteci, al samo prvih 5 listova tog petog izdanja (možeš da vidiš ako se prijaviš kao gost). Nisu papci digitalizovali ceo časopis, al dovoljno sam video na tih 5 stranica, jer je to sadržaj časopisa, da tu ima ova pesma koja mi treba :) Inače sam video da ceo Behar, sve brojeve, imaju u Narodnoj biblioteci ovde u Beogradu, pa ću tamo otići da uzmem. Inače, da znaš, izlazila su do danas 3 lista naziva Behar. Ovaj originalni kojeg tražimo (od 1900 do 1911. godine), jedan drugi od 1927 do 1945 godine i ovaj treći kojeg si linkovao. On je glasilo bošnjačke zajednice u Hrvatskoj i izlazi tek od 90ih ili 2000ih. Nema on veze sa ovim originalnim, al eto možda je na njihovom sajtu bila cela arhiva ako su skenirali (inače taj imaš ceo arhiviran na skribdu, može da se čita, svi brojevi). --Ivan VA ([[User talk:Ivan VA|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:39, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20191121 145019.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate j.budissin^+/- 08:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

BMW: blue and white

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You may not have noticed, but in the middle of the new (like naturally of the old) BMW.svg, also in en: BMW logo 2020.svg, should not be blue and transparent, but blue and white. Furthermore, what is going on the Wikimedia Commons with BMW.svg (look at the file history)? Sincerely, --2001:999:42:19B1:11F8:14EE:A4C5:7516 22:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

There are versions with white too. Check roundels category (on Commons; en.wiki took some file following UK BMW website, and I do not like it either).

That file will remain as is because change is radical if we would update it and that is not respecting Commons policy. --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Stoja.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Зеница ? 4139UoRmPFL. AC SY400.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Grb Zenice

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Zašto si vratio ove izmjene? Podkategorije se prave da se rasterete kategorije kada ima puno slika za istu podaktegoriju kao što je ovdje slučaj da slike grba Zenice idu u jednu kategoriju (Category:Coats of arms of Zenica). --Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Template:Ping Zato što Zenica i Grad Zenica nisu jednaki. Naseljeno mjesto Zenica (to je kada se napiše samo Zenica) ne može imati grb (ni zastavu, ni bilo kakav simbol ozvaničenosti). --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Razumijem šta kažeš, ali si mogao samo preimenovati kategoriju ili prebaciti u drugu, a ne vraćati sve izmjene pojedinačno. --Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

To što si predložio je pogrešno. --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 06:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

File:The Pirate Bay.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate Guy Macon (talk) 17:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate This is about this edit. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 22:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20190405 080040.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20190709 125637.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20190709 125656.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20200408 112911.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Зеница 20200408 113026.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Sahat-kula i razno

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dao sam ti odgovor ovde. Ako ne možeš na nekoj stranici na sr.wiki da mi odgovoriš, odgovori ovde. Mislim na izmene na članku o sahat-kuli. I ovo vezano za odblokiranje takođe. --Ivan VA ([[User talk:Ivan VA|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Ping

Ne mogu 'otvoriti drugu ip. adresu', ne znam šta misliš pod 'otvori' (blokirano je za rutersku i treba dan da se promijeni, a preko mobitela je dugo za pisati i plaća se). Evo odgovor ispod... Ne moraš, ima dovoljno pametnih urednika i bitno je da se prave članci (ja mogu na :sh:, još bolje).

Odgovori po stavkama za bl. sahat-kulu:

Zato što je nekome sporno banjolučki za Banja Luka, a ovako ostane sigurno banjalučki za Banjaluka.

Treba za svaki broj. Mogu se pisati neke jedinice, ove osnovnoupotrebne, uključujući metar, i ćirilicom (po P2010).
Ne treba to u uvodu jer je uvod sažetak i nije relevantno, a dole može kao neka dopuna. Neka novinari rade svoj posao zasebno od rada na Vikipediji jer principi nisu isti. Bolje skraćenica (i logično i prema Ž. Cvijanović); nije temeljni cilj Vikipedije informisanje, nego prikupljanje kajmaka od onih koji informišu.
Ne razumijem šta si htio reći, ali mislim da nije pleonazam nego detaljnost; korigovano je da nema nikakvih kanona u islamu jer valjda samo ima usvojeni ili neusvojeni dogovor ljudi radi organizacije života.
Nije enciklopedijski ni praktično navoditi da neko nepoznat daje nešto što bi trebalo biti istorijski fakt (lokacija, datum i sl.); ako se u izvorima tih referenci, prateći tok prenosa informacija, uspjelo zagubiti ime osobe a uspjelo sačuvati da je to jedan putopisac onda i nisu pouzdane.
Vakifi su radili nešto (vodili brigu, donirali ili nešto drugo), a vakufima se samo organizovali formalno (vakuf može postojati misaono i ne može raditi ništa, nego njegovi članovi). Ne može država uhapsiti, nego policajac imenom i prezimenom... Ako je vakuf set nečega većeg poput institucija, onda treba izbjegavati množinu te riječi jer bi to bilo pleonastično (jedno na drugo). Vakif mora biti osoba koja se primarno povezuje s vakufom; mutevelija je također vakif u ovom slučaju ali je na čelu, razabire (ne može biti izuzeto na čelu jer bi onda bio povlašten)...
Ako ne treba onda zašto je pisalo prije toga da je prelazio unutar porodice umjesto da je odmah ili prije porodice pisalo da je sa oca na sina ako je to primarno (kako sam stavio je tačno kako god, ne mora se precizirati; a kako je pisalo ono bi trebalo da je apozicija pa sam zato dodao npr., a ako nije apozicija nego neko obrnuto preciziranje onda samo promijeniti npr. u primarno); zapravo, popravi taj dio kako misliš da treba, ali ja sam stavio kako mislim da je bolje (ono prelazio je bilo previše uopšteno, a npr. sam objasnio). I danas valjda ide po muškoj liniji, tako je uvijek (argument: Bog)... Ne implicira. I piše prvo posao, a potom je izjednačeno posao sa dužnost i ne bi onda trebalo biti spora s time da se ponavlja opet da je posao (a čak i nije posao nego prije dužnost jer valjda svijet napreduje a ne nazaduje i danas je više poslovnih zgrada i valjda nezavisnih poslovnih ljudi ako firme posluju legalno a tada je bilo više neformalne saradnje i međudužnosti radi lične koristi u grupicama koje su se poznavale). Dužnost je neformalnog karaktera, a funkcija formalnog; oboje je posao.
▶To koja je moja greška, ukloniti jer nema smisla (nastala je nedovršenost rečenice). Mora posebno za muškarce, posebno za žene.
Ako nema vladao a samo godine onda se implicira kad je rođen do kad je umro (interval vremena života). Ako godine važe za nešto drugo a ne ovaj interval, onda se to mora i navesti; ne znam šta bi moglo drugo biti nego kada je vladao... Prethodno je pomenut Bosanski pašaluk i neće se valjda navoditi kada je vladao drugim pašalucima ili neke arbitrarne godine iz života (nepovezano). Mora se znati u članku šta godine znače (ako su samo godine poslije imena onda znače interval od rođenja do smrti). Ne treba slika ako ima kutijica za Vikizvornik s linkom do vakufname paše jer je to bitno za datum podizanja kule i samu kulu; on nije sam podigao kulu, u njegovoj vakufnami je samo pomenuto održavanje (i bilo bi neprikladno izdvojiti jednu osobu kao važnu za sahat-kulu, više ljudi je moralo podići, različiti održavati itd. a to je sve istorija te sahat-kule i niko nije bio važniji, u protivnom bi slike svih tih ljudi trebalo staviti u zaseban odjeljak, eventualno onog ko je podigao u uvod ako je sam to uspio uraditi a to nije)...
Kako god je blaža modifikacija i manje orig. istraživanje nego davanje negativnog konteksta stavljanjem riječi istina. Meni je kako god ono na engleskom however (bilo kako bilo, bilo kako, nebitno kako), a to ne može izražavati ništa eksplicitnije nego kad se stavi riječ istina jer ovo prvo je neutralnost i kad se iz nje izvede izraz za negativan kontekst narednog i dalje je neutralno i nije uvedeno orig. istraživanje a istina nešto za što se treba boriti ili barem stanje koje neko priželjkuje a to time nije neutralno i bilo šta implicirano time je onda neneutralno. Ili imamo različite definicije u mozgu pa je tebi manje važan pojam istine (da se njime iskaže negativan kontekst narednog za tu rečenicu u odnosu na prethodnu u tom pasusu) nego pojam neutralnosti, a pošto mislim da niko ne zna da li postoji Bog i/ili Đavo (ili Allah, ili Iblis, ili neki nadmoćan entitet, "jača karta") – meni je logično, bolje, sigurnije biti neutralan i djelovati po potrebi nego odabrati ijednu stranu (negativnu ili pozitivnu, lijevu ili desnu); umjesto toga, iskoristiti obje strane za ono što se mora a onda i želi za ugođaj zbog mogućeg postojanja prvog pomenutog entiteta. :)
Isto kao i za ono s godinama poslije imena paše, mora se znati na šta se misli; ovi prostori je prazna fraza i zaključiti se može da se ne može odnositi ni na šta drugo do na Balkan u ovom slučaju, jer je kula ovdje i autori djela u referenci domaći. Ne smiju urednici tumačiti izvor iz reference i stati na jednu stranu, jedino ga obrazložiti da bude eksplicitno šta se želi reći. Namjerno je neneutralno. Pod ovi prostori spada i obližnja livada i obližnja visoravan, i nizija, ili region cijeli sa približnim granicama, a u sh. rječniku neozbiljnih se pod frazom ovo i čestom upotrebom nevalidne množine (ili jednine) izbjegava imenovanje onoga o čemu se priča a čemu se pripada i/ili što se ne voli (ova [naša] država propala, ovaj narod [kojem pripadam] loš, ovo čudo me muči, ove izbjeglice problemi itd.); slična greška je kad se u člancima o Balkanu ili Srbiji nađe našim prostorima ili naši ljudi / naše stanovništvo. Postavlja se pitanje kojim prostorima ako su već relevantni, čemu opisivati same prostore (i to čak indirektno stavljati negativan kontekst), a još gore ne reći kojim da neko razmišlja jesu li to jugoslavenski, srbijanski, raški, od pašaluka ili je geografska odrednica... Balkan je oduvijek postojao kao najveća regija koja uključuje manje regione te političke organizovane teritorije; Balkan je geografska i iz prethodnog razloga koji sam naveo istorijska regija pa stoga ne bi trebalo da ima ni geopolitički a pogotovo ne politički kontekst (ne zna se jesu li politike svih država Balkana iste da bi to bio politički Balkan, a i istorijske i današnje države i uprave su sigurno bile na teritoriji koja je Balkansko poluostrvo i ne šire, Balkan je skraćeni izraz za Balkansko poluostrvo [prema enwiki čak primarni naziv, a Balkansko poluostrvo je naziv pod kojim je takođe poznat Balkan], pogrešno bi ga bilo koristiti politički pa to onda primjenjivati na cijelo Balkansko poluostrvo jer značenje termina Balkansko poluostrvo nije upitno, ostrvo mora biti geografska a ne može biti politička odrednica; samo zavisi dakle da li neko više voli Balkansko poluostrvo ili interese država koje su otprilike tu pa mu se ne spominje Balkan ni Balkansko poluostrvo [ni oboje, ni moguće poređenje itd.] nego izbjegava to nazivajući ovim prostorima). Ne mora se, može se izbjegavati vječno i time ići srednjim, najlakšim putem...
To griješiš da se danas BiH zove Bosnom. Hercegovina su prikačili 1878. godine a do tada je trojni naziv bio nepoznat/nekorišten, oduvijek je cijela srcolika teritorija bila i biće prosto Bosna (možda je i nekima čak Banjaluka u Hercegovini, a ne odgovara im da Mostar bude u Bosni). Zar ne bi bio 'Srbija i Kosovo' malo čudan termin za označavanje te teritorije (može biti ili cijela ta teritorija Srbija s Kosovom, ili cijela Kosovo sa Srbijom, ili zasebno Srbija i zasebno Kosovo; izdvajanje i imenovanje jednog dijela pa spajanje je besmisleno i to niko ne radi, samo se valjda nadograđuje na prethodnu uspostavu koja je bila najbolja na početku ili sredini a sad smo daleko i od početka i od sredine)...
Treba Ferhat-paša ili paša Ferhad ako mu je ime Ferhad jer ako se odlučilo na bilo koji način, u ovom primjeru crticom, spojiti dvije riječi (Ferhad i paša) nakon spoja se i prilagodi izgovoru (kao što se prilagodi i pri izvođenju, sufiksima itd.). Za obe strane isto.
▷Dodaj to, izgleda OK. 'bujan život' i dalje zahtijeva pojašnjenje jer ako ne znaš šta znači to čemu onda izdvajati kao relevantno od tog autora (zapravo, faktualno je pogrešno samo to: bujan život je npr. život biljaka i rastinja, a ne ljudi koji upravljaju sobom; možda staviti, ako je to tačno na šta se odnosi, 'ukazuje da je na prostoru tadašnje Banjaluke već dugo bila formirana zajednica ljudi' bez pominjana Ravlića, ali ja bih to skroz izbacio jer ako je bila zajednica ljudi nisu imali razloga nestati svi ili otići negdje, ako su bili prije Osmanlija onda su prosto nastavili biti tu). Uostalom, opis života Banjaluke nije relevantan za članak o sahat-kuli jer se ona napravi jednom i održava za potrebe svih bez obzira na nastavak istorije; korisna informacija tu je natpis 1501 i citiranje Ravlića da o zvonu, a ne i dalje izvođenje zaključaka radi opisivanja života u gradu (mada, to je relevantno za nastavak u kojem se pominje paljenje katoličke crkve, s tim da je svejedno nužno objasniti puki jednostavni navod da je tu 'bilo života ljudi' plus ako je to bila druga, crkvena npr. kula ovo nije članak o njoj nego o sahat-kuli i dovoljno je pomenuti postojanje mogućnosti da je na tom mjestu prije bila crkvena kula i zvono, a potom podignuta sahat-kula jer ako nije podignuta nego ona prerađena onda je i naslov članka pogrešan).
I centimetar se preslovljava a u izvorniku na ćirilici treba da je na latinici, isto važi kao i gore za metar.
▷Slažem se da treba staviti da je mišljenje tog autora radi drugog navoda, ali ne izbacivati ovo vjerovatno jer taj drugi, uslijedjeli navod to zahtijeva i bi bilo dobro da ima još jedna-dvije reference za prvi dio rečenice koje navode izvođenje istog zaključka iz drugog navoda jer taj drugi navod ima riječ često...
Već sam objasnio oboje, barem rekao šta mislim.
U P2010 na 401. str. ima odrednica -oro (-ero) a nema -ero (-oro) i tu i na 500. str. navode kao primarno oblike sa o; uz to, nema četverica nego samo četvorica. Uvijek je moguće na naizgled sve OK pronaći grešku nakon nekog vremena.
▶To staviti u mala slova, valjda ostalo uključeno na tastaturi greškom.
▷Treba preformulisati u 'Kako ističe arhitektkinja Husedžinovićeva, donje zone sahat-kule su vjerovatno tom prilikom' jer ne znam koje bih ostavio (prije prvo ali ne valja prekidati nakon je/su, a kad bi drugo ostalo onda po hrvatski).
Isto kao gore što sam naveo, tada nije bilo trojne konstrukcije naziva (a i ova sahat-kula nije istorijski u istoj kategoriji ili nivou onih modernih, iz nenezavisnih BiH i nezavisne BiH).
Pa ne može arhitektkinja navoditi išta (pokušaj pročitati sa smislom da neko drugi navodi to, ne može), mora biti neka arhitektinja ili neki arhitekta a nema druge u članku; što se mene tiče, dodaj ova radi neutralnosti i enc. stila i pravila ali nije neophodno jer se ista informacija prenese (u drugom pasusu odjeljka je spomenuta 'arhitektkinja Husedžinovićeva', a u ovom pasusu – u odnosu na taj dio rečenice gdje (ne) nedostaje ova – netom-prethodno je spomenuta Husedžinovićeva za koju se već, u drugom pasusu reklo da je arhitektkinja i sve je jasno i tok ostvaren). U ovoj rečenici je meni sporno ', bez korišćenja izvorne literature', jer nije baš najjasnije na šta se misli (valjda da je to lična izjava te arhitektinje i profesorice a ne informacija preuzeta iz drugog izvora, npr. istoričara; tada je ovaj zarez prije jer suvišan jer direktno opisuje tokom kako ona to ističe).
▶▷Onda staviti [[spolijum]]ima bez polunavodnika. Treba spolijum(i) a ne spolij(i) jer se zadržava lat. sufiks -um (u nazivima hem. elemenata – najrelevantniji dokaz da se zadržava).
U P2010 su „” navodnici pa bi polunavodnici trebali biti ,’ ali pošto bi prvo bilo isto kao standardni zarez onda su polunavodnici ’’ (oblik ’’ dat je u P2010 na 135. str.).
Isto kao gore što sam naveo, tada nije bilo trojne konstrukcije naziva.
Nazivi institucija se prevode (sudovi, vojske, vlade, muzeji); članak na ijekavici pa ostane naslijeđe. To im znači prosto da je objekt u evidenciji deveti, deveti po redu – kad se broji, prije ima osam nekih drugih; 'pod rednim brojem 9' = 'kao deveti po redu' ['redni broj 9' nije baš najbolja konstrukcija jer ako se napisalo 9 onda je to kardinalni broj sam po sebi i ne može ga uspješno modifikovati prethodna sintagma da sve zajedno znači da je to nešto deveto; 'redni broj devet' bi bilo prihvatljivo samo pri objašnjavanju šta su redni brojevi, kao primjer; takođe, brojevi 1—9 se pišu slovima]
▶Ne znam zaista kako, samo vrati zarez prije <... Ponekad mi se nešto desi što sam uradio a za što sumnjam da sam uradio nego da se nekako čudno samo od sebe izmijenilo...
▷Riječ zajedno se odnosi na ljude, ne mogu predmeti biti zajedno ili skupa; nešto se može ili moglo uraditi samo istovremeno ili odjednom, ali to nije baš često i nije ovdje slučaj (mislim kada se nešto baš tempira i nastoji da krene po jednom satu u istom momentu). Možda da staviš 'istog dana su srušeni i drugi objekti u kompleksu...'.
▶Šabloni refbegin i refend su za reference, a ovo je drugi odjeljak (Literatura) i tu ide standardni colbegin i colend za dijeljenje na kolone; to je zato što je Literatura inače za dodatnu, preporučenu literaturu uz možda nekoliko koje su sfn ili harvnb reference (jer tako i dalje mogu biti preporučena literatura, samo su npr. dva ili tri puta različito upotrebljene sfn-om ili harvnb-om sa različitim stranicama) a ako je baš citirana – treba izdvojiti ispis kao pododjeljak odjeljka Reference jer to su onda reference a ne literatura (samo su skraćene kao prave reference u <ref></ref> da se ne ponavlja dugi tekst). Očitava to nego je greška duplirano -lat-lat a treba samo -lat, pri zamjeni alatkom je nešto zeznuto pa je ostalo duplirano -lat-lat; zamijeni samo tih nekoliko primjera -lat-lat sa -lat.
Nisi nešto dobro vidio jer taj URL nije nijednom naveden igdje u članku (ref. 4 je .pdf, možda je sadržaj sličan ali nije isto, ovo stavljeno u SV je prikladno za SV jer je obična veb-stranica a ne .pdf i sl., izašla bi jednostavno pri Gugl pretrazi). I nije na hrvatskom, eto odmah na početku kao neki prednaslov piše ostaci a i ispod u samom gl. sadržaju ostaci a na hrvatskom bi bilo ostatci, piše Službenom glasniku a ne Službenome glasniku, provedbi a ne sprovedbi, kulturno-historijskog a ne kulturno-povijesnog i ima još puno dokaza da nije hrvatski standard (ali je činjenica da nije ni čisto bosanski jer ima kroatizama [Povjerenstvo može za bosanski; nije to što kažeš da je pisana na hrvatskom, oni nikad ne kažu Korišćena a rad mora u cjelini biti jednog standarda da bi se reklo da je tog standarda – ipak je mješavina odnosno 'BiH jezici' kako piše umjesto 'Bh. jezici' na izboru jezika na veb-sajtu old.kons.gov.ba, jer ima i bosanskog, i hrvatskog, i srpskog], tek nije srpski). Možda je rješenje da se stavi sh i tako obuhvati ili doda hr i sr da bude 'po zakonu', ali sam sajt old.kons.gov.ba je neka podvala (engleskojezičkog, eventualno njemačkojezičkog karaktera) jer gore piše 'Komisija/Povjerenstvo za Očuvanje Nacionalnih Spomenika' a samo engl. i njem. od poznatijih pišu većinu riječi u rečenicama i sintagmama sve velikim početnim slovima (sh. standard je normalni natpis 'Komisija/povjerenstvo za očuvanje nacionalnih spomenika', možda 'Komisija/Povjerenstvo za očuvanje nacionalnih spomenika', ali nikako Očuvanje, Nacionalnih i Spomenika ne mogu biti vlastite imenice, jedino nečije kodiranje).

Stavio sam ▶ na stavke (dijelove) primjedbi kod kojih ja mislim da treba reagovati (ili da reaguješ jer ja trenutno ne mogu) korekcijom mojih korekcija a gdje je nadogradnja potrebna dodatnom doradom bez da sam ja uveo greške ▷, da ih izdvojim ako će pomoći.

Izuzmi dijelove mog odgovora gdje možda ima nekog filozofiranja s logičkim greškama, razabrati činjenice i što vidiš da je tačno...

PS:

[urađeno] Ako možeš poveži sh:Crkva Gospe Ružarice u Vrlici na d:Q5116980 i sh:Crkva arkanđela Mihaela u Zadru na d:Q25110033. [urađeno]
[urađeno] I kad preimenuju sliku File:Saint Michael in Zadar.png u File:Church of Saint Michael in Zadar.png (ili drugi aplikabilan naslov) stavi je pod tim naslovom u parametar 'slika' infokutije članka sh:Crkva arkanđela Mihaela u Zadru. [urađeno]

I hvala za reakciju na članku Zenica. Ali na :sr: (i :hr:, u posljednje vrijeme i :en:) treba riješiti taj problem sa nalozima (ne napisah korisnicima jer za neke ne vjerujem više da su korisnici, osobe, nego neki botovi ili lažni nalozi; jedino ako imaju baš dobar provod pokazivanjem moći, ignorancijom ili igranjem s drugim korisnicima i Vikipedijom) u korijenu jer se samo nastavio.

Ima nekih kontradiktornih informacija u člancima o Indiri Radić – člancima o njenim albumima i člancima o pripadajućim pjesmama, kao i nav. šablonu za nju, a i grešaka što se tiče enc. stila.

Za prvo, za album Zmaj se navodi u članku o istom da je 2004. a u članku o pjesmi Zmaj da je izašla 2003. godine. *(valjda nisu prvo objavljivane neke pjesme a onda sklopljen album i izdat, to nema smisla; ako se izdaje album, sve se prvo pripremi tj. snimi i onda zajedno izda da bi bio album a ne kompilacija) Takođe, ima neka informacija ' снимљена тридесет шест година по рођењу Курта Кобејна (Абердин, 20. фебруар 1967 — Сијетл, 5. април 1994), фронтмена Нирване' za koju nije jasno kako je povezana sa albumom ili pjevačicom (u članku o njoj nije pomenut taj umjetnik, čemu navoditi mjesto i godine njegovog rođenja i smrti, opisivati ga dodatno kad ima članak o njemu itd. itd.). O drugoj pjesmi, u članku o njoj se navodi da je pjesma snimljena 2003. a izdata naredne godine a u infokutiji da je snimljena 2004. * /na Jutjubu za sve ove pjesme je godina u zagradi u onom audio dijelu naslova 2003. s tim da druga nije objavljena na njenom zvaničnom kanalu, nije je ona otpremila, nego je otpremljena na kanal produkcije Grand; sve to oko muzike i uopšteno i uključujući Jutjub je konfuzno, osim prisutnosti lažnog sadržaja koji nije snimljen kamerom; mnoge su u naslovu dobile prikačeno "HD", a prije je natpis za većinu bio u formatu Template:'Ime Prezime ili Umjetničko ime - Naslov pjesme - (Audio Godina)Template:' a (1) zvuk ne može biti HD nego je HD došao uvođenjem širokog formata slike na novim televizorima i odnosi se ujedno i na poboljšan prikaz u odnosu na stare 4:3 sa zakrivljenim ekranom, dakle vizuelni: v. en:High-definition television / HD / HDTV/HD-TV naspram en:Wideband audio / wideband voice / HD voice i (2) ionako se pri odabiru kvalitete uratka na 720p ili 1080p neće promijeniti kvalitet zvuka nego slike/videa jer se zvuk ne može pretvoriti nikako u HD ako nije snimljen digitalno u HD-u (a ako jeste onda bi u opcijama umjesto Kvalitet moralo pisati Kvalitet vizuelnog prikaza jer samo Kvalitet se odnosi i na vizuelni i zvučni izlaz a zvučni kako sam već naveo da mislim da ne može biti magično ikako pretvoren u HD: nemoguće je da kvalitet prikaza bude HD jer i ako se odabere 720p ili 1080p a pjesma iz npr. 1987, kao ova, sam omot albuma nije digitalni i tako ne može biti istinski HD, osim što kad se navede samo HD ne misli se primarno na zvuk nego sliku/video a naslov u pomenutom primjeru je 'Merima Njegomir - Da nije ljubavi tvoje - (Audio 1987) HD' a slika ova, fotografija papirnog omota ploče, sjetih se sada i da ti nekada pominješ 'fotka' a je li s pozitivnim ili negativnim ishodom ne znam..., i sam rad iz vremena kada nije bila dostupna HD tehnologija pa se može onda zaključiti da se to HD na kraju naslova odnosi ipak samo na zvuk jer se tu govori o širokom rasponu ali onda treba da je WB prema wideband a ne HD ili da je HD Audio GGGG ili Audio GGGG, HD jer samo HD znači high definition a velik raspon frekvencije ne čini to otpremljeno i digitalno da bude visoke u značenju kvalitetne definicije, snimljeno je kako je snimljeno, tada su ljudi više verbalno komunicirali pa im je glas bio manjeg raspona jer su ga puno trošili i time kvalitete a definicija kao princip se inače izvodi zaključivanjem a nije nešto već postojeće, neko stanje, pored već pomenutog da se naslov uratka odnosi na cijeli uradak uključujući sliku/video jer (Audio GGGG) HD poslije druge crtice kao treći element naslova tako formatiran primarno označava onda samo da je uradak HD po nekom aspektu datom u tom trećem elementu a važnija je godina za praktičnu upotrebu i po pravopisu se u zagrade stavlja dodatni opis a ovo HD je više dodatno nego godina; trenutno se oznakom HD implicira da je cijeli uradak HD, inače bi crtice bile nepotrebne; zagrade su nejasne, pristrasne ili pogrešne upotrebe i prije bi u njima trebalo biti samo ovo novododato HD kao manje važno od godine pjesme, sa godinom u malim a HD u srednjim zagradama, jer treći element poslije druge crtice je dovoljno da bude samo godina jer se ne odnosi direktno i na ime izvođača nego direktno samo na godinu kada je snimljena pjesma, primarno važi kao informacija o pjesmi pa tu treba da su zagrade da izdvoji opis od ostalog, pri čemu su crtice problematične, ili ako se hoće da je bez zagrada da je umjesto prve crtice duža crta ili dvije crtice i onda godina bez zagrada i nepotrebnog "Audio " a ako je poslije imena izvođača crtica a poslije naziva pjesme nema crtice onda tada zagrade ne bi bile nužne; ako je taj treći element opis cijelog uratka, onda je Audio netačno jer je plejer sa slikom, a HD je svejedno nevalidno iz tri ili više razloga ili najmanje tri razloga/
Ovo drugo, u članku, sr:Индира Радић#Дискографија, u hetnoutu stoji 'Детаљније: Дискографија Индире Радић' a to nije detaljnije nego glavni tj. poseban članak (to je jer je skoro sr:User:Aca nevalidno spojio te hetnout šablone u jedan imenovavši ga Детаљније (a druge nedosljedno za lat. verziju u Dodatne informacije-lat posebno a za ćir. kao preusmjerenje na Детаљније, plus su dokumentacije sada nedosljedne...) a bilo je više šablona posebno: za glavni članak ili poseban članak, takođe pogledajte ili za više informacija pogledajte, te onaj sa drugačijim ispisom i namjenom a natpis je bio jedinstven ali se ne sjećam šta je tačno pisalo (označavao je nešto kao proširene, dodatne informacije, možda Za više informacija pogledajte tj. further ali ne znam sigurno, mislim da je imao naslov na srpskom i tu poruku)... To sa hetnoutima treba vratiti na sređeno, dosljedno i upotrebno stanje jer je sada kako se vidi ispis u nekim slučajevima pogrešan a u nekim od tih slučajeva su neki korisnici već bili stavili tačan pa im je rad oštećen.
Dodatno, u članku o albumu treba ispraviti naopaki apostrof ‘ u ’.

--Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC) [u]

Hi Obsuser. Please do not revert a decision or closure of a discussion by an administrator. Doing so in the future will be considered disruptive and may result in administrative actions (including but not limited to the loss or restriction of editing privileges). Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

It must be done collectively. --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

You have chosen to ignore warnings. And as such, you have been blocked for 2 hours. Further disruptions on your part will result in a longer block. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I do not have actually to respect anyone's "warnings", especially when I know I'm right. You better have written 'And as such, I have blocked you for 2 hours.'... You made disruption, I know I made meaningful contributions and cannot give up on truth even if you are stronger. --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your actions are in contravention to practice and policy. "Being right" does not give you the right to reopen a closed discussion. If you disagreed with a decision to close the discussion as kept, the correct process is to open a new deletion request. Reopening a closed discussion is out-of-process and, in combination with reverting an admin action on multiple occasions, esp. after being warned not to, is disruptive. As a result, I have blocked you for a week. If you continue after the block ends, it will result in a longer block. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

It does actually. I opened new deletion request now... --Obsuser ([[User talk:Obsuser#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)