Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pjt56!

Contents

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Pjt56!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Your picture on AlcantaraEdit

Hi, your picture on Alcantara is now published on italian magazine FAME DI SUD (www.famedisud.it) Facebook Page

Edible fungi in basketEdit

Guten Tag!

Lesen Sie, bitte Commons:Kriterien für wertvolle Bilder.

Das Messer ist ein gewöhnliches Instrument für die Pilze. Es widerspricht den Kriterien auf jeden Fall nicht. VI ist nicht FI.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


> Wie kann ich mein Oppose zurücknehmen?

<s> {{oppose}} old info... </s>

new vote and some info...

Zum Beispiel:

  Oppose old info...

Ich bin kein Commons Administrator, nur der Benutzer.

Es ist treu, es ist hier sehr spannend. Es ist die gute Gesellschaft der Freunde und der Gleichgesinnten.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky talk 22:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

What are VIEdit

Hello, Thanks for your interest in Valued Images project. Be aware that Valued Images are not the same as Quality Images. In peculiar, technical quality isn't of such importance. VI rules say: For photographs, the quality achievable using the built-in camera in a modern mobile phone should normally be good enough. The image must look good on-screen at the review size. VI must meet these 6 criteria. A VI is the most valuable illustration of all images on Commons which fall within the scope of the nomination. Note that most valuable does not necessarily imply the best technical quality. Valued images are less about perfect technical quality and more about your ingenuity in finding good and valuable subjects which matter, and about the useability of the information on the image page, see Valued image value for further details. --Myrabella (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schiller edit1.jpgEdit

Would you reconsider your review in light of the response? Durova (talk) 06:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Episyrphus balteatus 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Episyrphus balteatus 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 00:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Rauma, Finland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! LightsVintageMBTruck 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lights on vintage Daimler-Benz truck 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Green BeetleEdit

Maybe Chrysolina herbacea but can you give the length (mm.) and place at lest the country Nce photo Notafly (talk) 21:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chrysolina herbacea-pjt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Episyrphus balteatus on Borago officinalis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Episyrphus balteatus on Borago officinalis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality imageEdit

Please check sky noise on pictures below my candidate, which are already promoted. Many of them got quiet higher noise, i dont find my noise high at all. I agree with distortion. Regards, Petar. --Mile (talk) 22:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Distortion fixed, thanx. --Mile (talk) 23:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

True, everything can be fixed with software, but in my case sky noise is low. Check other pictures which are already nominated. --Mile (talk) 09:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stuttgart Gasometer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stuttgart-Gaisburg Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica M1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Killesbergturm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Killesberg Tower 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Osmia cornuta copulation 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Osmia cornuta copulation 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 07:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Museum at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Mating beesEdit

Your image of the mating bees (and the voyeur ant) is superb. Congratulations! I was also pleased to realize I'm not alone rasing those questions about the women beggar. Cheers -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your support! The fact is I came to your page to comment on your assessment of the beggar picture. But then I saw the promotion template and realized that I haven't payed much attention to your picture when it passed through FPC. That was a serious flaw which I felt should be corrected immediately... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Osmia cornuta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aeshna affinis-pjt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Polistes dominula-pjt2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

File:Beetle-pjt1.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Dragonfly-pjt4.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Solitude.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tringa totanus in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kunstmuseum Stuttgart, exterior at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

TUSC token b6c3ce6cd2ab8c03e0a0019ad9be1994Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Grüne Spinne falsch bestimmt! ;-)Edit

Hallo Pjt56,

nachdem du mich auf meiner Disk bezüglich der grünen Spinne angeschrieben hattest habe ich bei Benutzer:Mhohner angefragt und der hat deine Annahme bestätigt! Meine Bestimmung war falsch und deine Vermutung war richtig! Ich habe jetzt auch gleich eine Umbennenung veranlasst und die Beschreibung sowie die Cat angepasst. Nochmals vielen Dank für den Hinweis und bis die Tage, besten Gruß mathias K 15:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

...und da isses auch schon passiert. ;-) Gruß mathias K 15:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Phoenicopterus roseus-pjt1.jpgEdit

Perfect I changed the caption of the image and the caption in French Wikipedia. (A month before I was in the Venice lagoon to make images of reconstrution of the ecosystem). Can you read the caption in German this picture? Uncarina ankaranensis MHNT.jpg. Because I do not speak any language of Goethe. Thank you for these linguistic exchanges internationals. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Fly-pjt16.jpgEdit

Hallo Pjt56, das abgebildete Tier würde ich als Platystoma seminiatonis (Familie Platystomatidae) einordnen. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Danke, Pristurus! Ich habe die Umbenennung der Datei veranlasst und die Beschreibung geändert. Falls du Zeit und Lust hast: ich habe in meiner Galerie noch eine ganze Reihe weiterer nicht bestimmter Insektenfotos ... Grüße, --Pjt56 (talk) 07:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50 and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. INeverCry 18:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameterEdit

Hallo Pjt56. Bitte passe deine Uploadvorlage an, damit dieser Parameterfehler nicht mehr vorkommt („Other“ ist in Template:Information nicht als Parameter enthalten). --Leyo 21:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Taormina-pjt1.jpgEdit

Hello Ptj56, I used part of your image Taormina-pjt1.jpg for a pagebanner on Wikivoyage, and gave it the name Taormina-pjt1_Pan.jpg. Because this is not on Wikipedia, I make this announcement on your discussion page. I hope I did it correct with the license. --FredTC (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CKLee Stuttgart 5.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CKLee Stuttgart 5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Cyclamen hederifolium in SardiniaEdit

Dear,

It is indeed a Cyclamen hederifolium or its var. confusum (Syn. C. confusum). It is not possible to differentiate them without looking at the leave.

Another possible cyclamen should be C. africanum, which however does not occur in Europe.

If you want, I can rename your file (I am a "filemover").

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Dear,
In the meantime I have renamed it accordingly.
FYI: I have 5 Cyclamen species in my garden (mid-Belgium): C. hederifolium, C. coum, C. cilicium, C. purpurascens and C. pseudibericum. The first two are strong growing and sowed by ants, so that these species are widespread in my garden. C. coum is now blooming with the first crocuses (C. imperati 'De Jager' and C. sieberi 'Bowles White').
Beste Grüße aus Belgien, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 10:55, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Gonocerus acuteangulatus-pjt.jpgEdit

I used a copy of your photo at http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/insects/WatchList.htm with a copyright statement - I hope this is in order.--Keith Edkins (talk) 11:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Fine with me. Thanks for notifying me! --Pjt56 (talk) 16:35, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Vespula - DolichovespulaEdit

Hi Pjt56, Vespula vulgaris-pjt6.jpg zeigt eine Langkopfwespe. Vermutlich Dolichovespula saxonica. Beachte den Abstand zwischen Augen und Kiefern. Der ist bei Vespula stets kürzer als bei Dolichovespula. Die dunkle Zeichnung auf dem Clypeus kann, trotz einiger variabilität, auch hilfreich bei der Bestimmung sein (V. vulgaris -> wie ein hängender Hammer; D. saxonica -> +- wie ein Dreizack). Gerade die Dolichovespula scheinen leider ziemlich variabel gezeichnet zu sein.

Gruß --Aiwok (talk) 13:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 23:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Fjadrárgljúfur-pjt - Used for ClassEdit

Hello, PJT56,

Just letting you know we are using your photo for a discussion about erosion in our geology class in Mongolia tomorrow.

Beautiful shot! Carrie Wallestad, lecturer, Mongolia International University

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bismarckturm-pjt2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

PanoramabilderEdit

Hinweis, da du ab und zu :-) Panoramabilder hochlädst:

1. Bau anstelle eines Hinweises in der Beschreibung das Template:Panorama ein. Das setzt einen vorformulierten Hinweis auf die Beschreibungsseite und erleichtert auch das automatische Auffinden von Panoramabildern. Format: {{Panorama|<Objekt>|<Anzahl der Einzelbilder>|<Stitching-Software>}} (z.B. unter „Sonstige Informationen“ in der Upload-Maske). Ich habe das bei File:AltbachPowerPlant-pjt2.jpg schonmal vorgenommen.

2. Ordne die Bilder auch in die passendste Unterkategorie von Category:Panoramics ein, z.B. Category:Panoramics_in_Stuttgart.

Danke! --Kreuzschnabel 07:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

GeocodingEdit

Noch praktischer wäre es, wenn du deine Bilder geographisch verortest (sie können dann auch über interaktive Karten gefunden werden). (Als ich noch bei QI mitgemischt habe, war es kaum möglich, ein nicht-geocodiertes Bild promotet zu bekommen, haben sich die Standards da seitdem so aufgeweicht?) Angegeben wird üblicherweise der Kamerastandort mit Template:Location, z.B. in der Form {{Location dec|B.reite|L.änge}}. Ist nur ein wichtiges Objekt im Bild, kannst du auch den Objektstandort mit Template:Object Location angeben. Genaue Koordinaten liefert dir Google Maps auf Klick in die Landschaft. --Kreuzschnabel 07:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

CanyonEdit

Hi!

I am using your beautiful image https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Fjadr%C3%A1rglj%C3%BAfur-pjt.jpg

as study matter for my digital photography photoshop assignment under the Creative Commons Attribution terms.

Thanks :)

  • Thanks for notifying me. I'd appreciate a link or pdf to the final result (and a signature ...). Best, --Pjt56 (talk) 15:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

==

Hallo

I just tweeted your lovely File:Coreus marginatus-pjt.jpg image at https://twitter.com/Javiermedia/status/739220927938973696 (after a couple of similar theme scenes). Regards --Javier ME (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Use of imageEdit

I used an image of yours of Seydisfjordur on http://sturnidae.com/cruises/ports/Sey.php. Thank you.

15:28, 12 July 2016

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgw321 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

JG.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgw321 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Isodontia mexicana-pjt2.jpgEdit

I used a copy of your photo at http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/insects/WatchList.htm with a copyright statement, to report that the wasp has now been found in Britain. Thank you for providing this image.--Keith Edkins (talk) 22:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Thanks for notifying me! It is interesting to observe that the species moves further and further north. --Pjt56 (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyvio by an Icelandic businessEdit

Hi Pjt56, as you were writing on File:Reykjavík-pjt1.jpg you appreciate a notice if someone finds your picture on a site other than Wikipedia. So look at http://taxipickup.is/iceland-tours/ on the bottom right. I find them using a number of CC-licensed files on their site with neither attribution nor mentioning the license, including a pic by me, which is why I was writing them 4 times (!) since 2015. One time they responded promising to have their "website manager" fix this, but nothing happened and I happen to get fed by them and willing to hire a lawyer. What do you think? Would you possibly join, also maybe helping to contact others whose copyrights apparently have been violated by that business to have them join? I have no experience yet with the Icelandic lawyer sector but there seem to be some lawyers in Reykjavik around who have specialized in copyright issues. Beschde Grüße aussem Remstal ;) --dealerofsalvation 17:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Remstäler, thanks for notifying me about those guys. Yes, if we find others to join I'd be willing to spend a moderate amount of money. In other cases companies who were for one reason or another not able or willing to publish copyright information offered to pay me a reasonable fee - which I usually accepted :-) Maybe we should try that first: send them an invoice ... Best regards from the Landeshauptstadt, --Pjt56 (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the idea, I'll think about it, but in my previous polite mails I was telling them I was not interested in money but in proper attribution so I'm not yet sure if I'll change my mind about that ... but if you want you can go ahead and send them an invoice on your behalf. BTW at User:Dealerofsalvation/taxipickup.is Copyvios I'm systematically investigating more copyvios by them. --dealerofsalvation 19:49, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


Hans Dijkema, ZC4Edit

Hi Pt56, I'm using your image Scilla Maritima, as an illustration for the Materia Medica in my Homeopathy Program. Just to let you know.

File:ViolinChinRest-pjt.JPGEdit

Hello, we are using your image at 'chinrest' on the English Wiktionary [1]. I hope that is OK. It's a very good image. Please let me know on my talkpage there if there is any problem. Thank you. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 18:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Metellina mengei-pjt.jpgEdit

Hi, I edited your picture File:Metellina mengei-pjt.jpg a bit, to reduce the over-exposure of the original. Just to let you know that I'm using the edited version in a talk on spiders. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Use of the File Dunguaire Castle outside WikipediaEdit

I will use the Image in the Shadowiki (a wiki / fanpage about Shadowrun, because the castle is mentioned there (in the Sourcebook "Tír na nÓg" from FASA).
--Käpt'n Karel (talk) 23:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Use of guillemot picEdit

Hi,

I used your picture of a flying guillemot https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cepphus_grylle-pjt.jpg in a ppt for a species identification course at the University of Helsinki. Thanks!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Altair75 (talk • contribs) 12:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Use of Hverarond imageEdit

I would gladly use your image of Hverarond geothermal area (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hverar%C3%B6nd-pjt.jpg) in website https://www.wondermondo.com, the short description of Hverarönd. Thanks! Daarznieks (talk) 07:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello Daarznieks, feel free to use the image! Nice site! Regards, --Pjt56 (talk) 13:33, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Pjt56".