Narodna GalerijaEdit

Imam problem če dam oznako da je slika iz Galerije, tole me moti. "This image is available from the National Gallery of Slovenia website..." Problem je da je slika moja, stvar pa je iz muzeja, ne pa slika. Tole bi se moralo popraviti. --Mile (talk) 09:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Pa res. Sem zamenjal predlogo za link do muzeja. Mislim, da se ne splača popravljati predloge. --Sporti (talk) 10:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Vidim da si dal zgoraj in da ime avtorja ostane, kar je bolje kot prej. Sem jo dal na glasovanje na Commonsu. --Mile (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Skrij besediloEdit

Živ, ali bi vedel kakšna je oznaka da spraviš en tekst v folder, imam preveč teksta na glasovanju o sliki, s tem folderjem pa umakneš tekst na eno mesto. Tam ostane samo oznaka da se nahaja še tekst. --Mile (talk) 08:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Misliš nekaj takega {{Read more}}?--Sporti (talk) 09:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Samo bi rabila bit kaka oznaka da se nekaj nahaja, za tole govorim link --Mile (talk) 09:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


Mislim da deluje, čeprav se spomnim da so imeli tudi drugačno. Včasih je boljše tole, ker če se začne spamat naj vsaj tole umakne od glasovanja. --Mile (talk) 09:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

@PetarM: : Kateri denar si fotografiral? Če si jugoslovanski, je v javni lasti kot npr. File:50000000-Dinara-1993.jpg?--Sporti (talk) 11:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

[1], tukaj gre za De minimis pravilo. Na Help desku je nekdo potrdil da gre za De minimis, poglej kdo bi rad brisal - Colin seveda. Več potrdil čakam na [2]. Tukaj je stran kjer odločajo o brisanju.

Tukaj je z Help deska: In my opinion Commons:De minimis applies and the image can be kept. Only a small part of the banknote is visible, and more importantly the subject of the image is the printing process pattern. MKFI (talk) 07:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC) --Mile (talk) 11:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Se pravi stvar kot komplet je Copyvio, ampak De minis ene stvari dovoli.

Mislim, da tu ne gre za De minimis in je bil prvi komentar napačen. De minimis je, ko neka zaščitena stvar zaseda manjši oz. nebistven del fotografije. Lahko bi bilo kvečjemu npr {{PD-shape}}, toda v tem primeru tudi to ni. --Sporti (talk) 11:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Ni problem umaknit, če tako potrdijo na Copyright forumu, imam še eno podobno fotko kjer je frej licenca. Forinti. --Mile (talk) 12:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

MorbegnaEdit

Sporti, bi lahko ti pogledal malo po netu, če obstaja kakšna prosta slika Morbegne (Google Slike -> Morbegna). Za v članek w:sl:Triglavska vojašnica Viktorja Emanuela III. bi bila. Cilj je čim starejša slika (magari črnobela), na kateri je še celotna zgradba. --Janezdrilc (talk) 13:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@Janezdrilc: Težko bi bila katerakoli slika prosta zaradi FOP glede na leto izgradnje 1934. --Sporti (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Ja, sem mislil, če bi bila kakšna slika "brez avtorja", da velja potem 70 let po zakoniti objavi. A drugače bi šlo na slwiki naložit katero pod pošteno uporabo? --Janezdrilc (talk) 13:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@Janezdrilc: : Problem so pravice arhitekta stavbe, ki bi moral umreti leta 1946 ali prej, da bi bila fotografija vojašnice lahko v javni lasti. Zaradi tega bi bila poštena uporaba po moje OK. --Sporti (talk) 13:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Ok, potem bom eno poljubno kar k nam naložil. Hvala. --Janezdrilc (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

BackheadsEdit

Hi Sporti, do you really think it is a good idea to add pictures to a person's category when the face is not visible, the person is completely in the background or seen from behind?--Ailura (talk) 09:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

@Ailura: : I don't see why not, photo from the rear or side can be used to illustrate player's technique and especially for people with no other photos (like Category:Igor Kokoškov). --Sporti (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't see Igor Kokoskov on that picture. And there is no way to use this picture for that person. This is a picture of two persons. --Ailura (talk) 09:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your uploads, but I don't understand why you have been adding Category:Media requiring renaming without the related template to them, Please use {{Rename}} with the appropriate parameters instead.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: It wasn't me - see [3]. --Sporti (talk) 06:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
I see, it was 1989. Do either of you have any info that might help with renaming?   — Jeff G. ツ 06:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I added the category so the main one would be less crowded. I placed the category there per rename criterion 2. -- 1989 06:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
@1989: Where is it written that you should add Category:Media requiring renaming without the related template to any file directly?   — Jeff G. ツ 10:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Where is it written that I shouldn't do it? -- 1989 16:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

New Creator templatesEdit

Sporti, when creating new creator templates, it would be great if you can add Commons Creator page (P1472) and Commons category (P373) properties to the Wikidata item. Commons Creator page (P1472) can be added by clicking  . Commons category (P373) can be added either manually or by adding "homecat" field to the creator template and then clicking   if it is there. I am planning to expand documentation about it and add warning boxes if those 2 fields are missing but at the moment I add them myself. --Jarekt (talk) 14:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

OK. --Sporti (talk) 17:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

File PremissionsEdit

Hello Sporti, I see that you have marked images of Adamir Jerkovic for deletion but all the images have been released. Owner of the images has sent and decleration of release to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with over 20+ images and i wrote the ticket number i file summary. Could you please help me by telling what else i need to do? Regards, Momanovic (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Joze PlecnikEdit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tivoli-Park,_Ljubljana.jpg You removed the Plecnik-Category from my picture. That structure is from Plecnik. Obviously. Why? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 09:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

I assumed Category:Jakopič Promenade is already in it, added it to Category:Structures by Jože Plečnik in Slovenia now. --Sporti (talk) 09:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
I guess it's ok now --Thomas Ledl (talk) 10:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Dear Sporti,

Do you know the Purger & Co number of this postcard?

Usually it is printed on the rear side of the postcard.

I would very much appreciate your information

Actia Nicopolis (talk) 07:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

@Actia Nicopolis: : No. Maybe it was on the ebay page, but it doesn't exsist any more. --Sporti (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
@Sporti: : OK. Fine. I will compine two files that are the same postcard, if you do not mind.

File:Bistrica Purger 12846.jpg and File:Krain Purger 12846.jpg

@Actia Nicopolis: : I think you can leave both in such cases. They are different versions even though it is the same postcard. --Sporti (talk) 08:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 14:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

My apologies, this was incorrectly marked for deletion, as the majority of the bulk-imported images in that category were mislabelled; this one wasn't, and I've updated the discussion to make clear it's no longer under nomination. Ubcule (talk) 14:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
No problem. --Sporti (talk) 13:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

PirnatEdit

Zdravo, Sporti.

Najprej, srečno in zdravo 2019!

Lahko prosim tole pogledaš: rdeči napis 'Pirnat' v kategoriji Category:Nikolaj Pirnat? To je očitno nekje v Wikidata ... --Eleassar (t/p) 12:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Enako. Očitno je nekaj z infopoljem in nagradami, Borštnar ima 3x. Sem prašal na Template_talk:Wikidata_Infobox#Awards_bug. --Sporti (talk) 12:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Imaš prav. Hvala! --Eleassar (t/p) 13:36, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Du hast die Kategorien von Joseph Heike und Joseph-Heike-Weg auf Joseph Heicke verschoben, das ist aber falsch. Der Maler Joseph Heike hat im 20. Jahrhundert gelebt und hat mit dem Joseph Heicke nicht zu tun. Könntest Du die entsprechenden Änderungen wieder rückgängig machen.--79.214er (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

OK. --Sporti (talk) 09:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Paintings from DorotheumEdit

Hi Sporti. You have made some very good uploads from the Dorotheum. When I go there, I only find paintings in 400px jpg, so is there a technique for getting better images from their site? In other sites one can see (behind) how they have scaled down photos, but not here. Hope you have time for this. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 06:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

@Rsteen: Unfortunately they remove the hires images after the auction takes place, before there is a link to fullsize picture (like here). --Sporti (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Okay. Well, it was worth a try. Thanks for your time. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 07:39, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
@Rsteen: With the new updated site that has changed at least for some [4]. --Sporti (talk) 09:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Sporti. This is super, because it gives a hint of the codes connecting the 400px and the full-size pictures. Thanks again for your help. --Rsteen (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

QuestionEdit

I have two questions. How do you crop an image to keep the previous/original version/file. While checking, I have noticed you have done so on an article. I would want to do similar with the article of Marjan Krnjić; as there are two persons on the image. Also, how do you connect multiple images, as I have noticed the article has several images. Many thanks.--Malojojo (talk) 00:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

@Malojojo: : For cropping I use a tool croptool, you can choose to overwrite or upload as a new file. I'm not sure what do you mean by connecting, maybe categorization as Category:Marjan Krnjić? --Sporti (talk) 06:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
@Sporti: Thank you for your reply. I have tried this tool, but it deleted the original version of the file/image. Could you please do the cropping? Portrait

--Malojojo (talk) 16:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

  Done. --Sporti (talk) 05:48, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Pozdravljen, zgornji posnetek bi moral ponovno naložiti brez zvoka, ker je v njem uporabljena skladba brez ustrezne licence (NC), glej tule. Tudi sicer na Zbirki glede glasbenih podlag in njihovega označevanja v opisu datotek ni enotne prakse, kar dostikrat zaplete preverjanje. Do koca meseca bom poskusil pregledati večino slovenskih posnetkov, ki čakajo na odobritev licence. Hvala za tvoj trud! MZaplotnik(talk) 07:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

@MZaplotnik: : OK bom naložil brez zvoka. Tiste, kjer so med tem umaknili video z Youtuba ali spremenili licenco, pa kar briši. --Sporti (talk) 08:31, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
@MZaplotnik: : Zbriši tudi prvo verzijo videa Marš za Muro - Marsch Für Die Mur.webm z zvokom. --Sporti (talk) 20:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Ne morem, ker na Zbirki nisem admin (od "naših" sta to samo Eleassar in KK). Bom predlagal za brisanje skupaj z ostalimi, ki niso več dostopni na YT in arhivskem Waybacku. MZaplotnik(talk) 20:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Da malo poročam o svojem napredku. Pri teh dveh je tudi treba utišati zvok: File:Trening varne vožnje. B & B.webm in File:Portorož • Slovenia • slovenska obala.webm, potem bom prvo različico datotek predlagal za izbris.
Kot si že sam namignil, starejših posnetkov S. Urbančiča ne moremo obdržati, ker so izbrisani, zabeleženi niso niti na Waybacku.
File:Podelitev ZLATIH PETIC na Ravnah na Koroškem - 2015.webm in File:Slavnostna podelitev bronastih in srebrnih priznanj.webm imata preveliko minutažo avtorsko zaščitenih skladb, da bi si ju upal potrditi, in ju verjetno čaka brisanje, podobno tudi File:Struggling on CRAZY roots in Kranjska Gora- Vlog 10- 2018.webm (predpostavljam, da glasba ni pod prosto licenco in je je preveč, da bi lahko bila de minimis, izrezovanje inštrumentala pa je gotovo preveč zamudno).
Video File:Protest proti napadu na Metelkovo.webm pa je bil umaknjem z Youtuba, a na srečo samo zato, ker so čez nekaj dni naložili razširjeno verzijo, kjer se v zadnji mituti videa soočijo z županom, predlagam, da na Zbirko preneseš to verzijo. MZaplotnik(talk) 20:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Ok sem pozabil, da tukaj nisi admin. Protest proti napadu na Metelkovo se nalaga, pri treh pa sem utišal zvok. --Sporti (talk) 06:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Prosim, da še pri teh posnetkih naložiš verzijo brez zvoka:

File:Vojna za Slovenijo-Rožnik 1991.webm, File:In Krvavec Heavens!.webm, File:S kolesom po Ljubljani 15 01 2019 Šiška - Center.webm, File:S kolesom po Ljubljani iz Centra v Fužine.webm, File:Bikepark Maribor Pohorje 2019 Sick Edit ●Goproedit -27.webm, File:Hyperlapse Nova Gorica 1.webm, File:Hyperlapse Nova Gorica 2.webm. Za nekaj dni končujem z delom, čez kakšen teden bom naredil skupni DR za tiste datoteke, kjer bo treba izbrisati samo prvo verzijo. MZaplotnik(talk) 12:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Ok sem jih naložil brez zvoka. --Sporti (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Sem prišel skoraj do konca, spet te prosim za utišanje zvoka pri teh posnetkih: File:TECAJ UREJANJA IZLOŽB NA LJUDSKI UNIVERZI KOPER.webm, File:Vaja GZ Cerknica – DS Smith Rakek.webm,File:Sestavljanje dvigala - Timelapse - TŠC Nova Gorica.webm.
File:Rog postaja mesto- Cikel javnih razprav II - O lastnini in njeni uporabi.webm je duplikat izvirnega File:O lastnini in njeni uporabi - cikel javnih razprav- Rog postaja mesto.webm - a ga kar predlagam za brisanje?
Še trije so problematični, me zanima tvoje mnenje:
File:Praznik Češenj Goriška Brda - Festa delle ciliege Dobrovo 2012.webm - preveč avtorsko zaščitene glasbe, brez zvoka pa posnetek skoraj nima smisla.. Predlagam brisanje.
File:Mag. Jože Kozina, vrhovni državni tožilec, o reviji Osvoboditev Živali.webm - veliko zaslonskih posnetkov iz revije, ki pa je avtorsko zaščitena. Predlagam brisanje.
File:สารคดี ถ้ำใต้พิภพแห่งสโลเวเนีย l The Cave Of Slovenia.webm - izgleda kot posnetek s televizije, uporabnik pa ni lastnik pravic. Predlagam brisanje.--MZaplotnik(talk) 09:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Omenjene tri in tudi Praznik češenj sem naložil brez zvoka, za Kozino bom naredil le screenshot. Za zadnjega pa se mi je zdelo kot Youtube kanal televizije, pa morda res ni. Jih je pa še nekaj povezanih s Slovenijo ([5]) --Sporti (talk) 09:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Čeprav revija v posnetku je Osvoboditev Živali, ki jo izdaja Društvo za osvoboditev živali, ki je tudi objavilo video. --Sporti (talk) 09:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

WLM 2019 SlovenijaEdit

Nisem še na široko razglašal, a ta september nameravam organizirati Wiki Loves Monuments pri nas. Problem FoP bom rešil s filtriranjem seznama spomenikov, da bodo gor gotovo dovolj stari. Lahko računam na tvojo pomoč pri kategorizaciji prispelih slik in ostalih tehnikalijah? Zaenkrat imamo Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Slovenia, landing page oz. vsaj njegov osnutek bom postavil danes, hkrati pa tudi sezname spomenikov po regijah. — Yerpo Eh? 07:07, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Seveda. Večina spomenikov je tako dovolj starih za FoP, razen kakšnih novejših npr. Plečnikovih zgradb in vojnih spomenikov. --Sporti (talk) 07:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Plus arheološka najdišča bi mogoče spustil, ker jih je ogromno in ker pri večini niti ni česa oprijemljivega za videt razen ambienta. Kaj misliš? — Yerpo Eh? 07:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Ne vem kako večina izgleda, ampak verjetno imajo vsaj kakšno oznako (File:Klenik Litija Slovenia - situla site.JPG)... --Sporti (talk) 07:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yerpo: : Za nekač občin je pred časom naredil seznam KocmutD, če kaj pomaga (sl:Kategorija:Seznami enot nepremične kulturne dediščine Slovenije). --Sporti (talk) 15:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Tisto poznam, ampak za mojo idejo ni dovolj uporabno, ker bi rad dal sezname kot pripomoček za iskanje "varnih" spomenikov brez skrbi glede avtorskih pravic. Pa zraven bo gumb za direkten upload z vnešenimi podatki o imenu in lokaciji, torej bolj za v projektni imenski prostor. — Yerpo Eh? 15:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yerpo: :Kategorijo lahko dodaš prek url, kot če v infopolju klikneš gumb Naloži datoteko (npr. Category:St. Anthony the Great Parish Church, Brezovica pri Ljubljani). --Sporti (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Najbrž bi se dalo sprogramirati skripto, ki bi prebrala, kateri spomeniki že imajo kategorije v Zbirki, in dodati ta podatek v gumb, ampak na žalost ne bom imel časa še za to. Če ti ni odveč, bi letos kategorizirali še na roke, potem bomo pa videli glede na udeležbo. — Yerpo Eh? 15:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Ja verjetno ne bo ravno neobvladljivega navala prvič. Mogoče edino lahko bolj izpostaviš tiste spomenike, ki še nimajo slik. --Sporti (talk) 15:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yerpo: Ali slike spomenikov naložene klasično, ne prek natečaja, tudi sodelujejo? --Sporti (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Hja, načeloma bi morale, ampak težko bo slediti, z vmesnikom za ocenjevanje bo mogoče problem in še statistika jih ne bo štela. Si opazil kakšen primer? — Yerpo Eh? 06:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
@Yerpo: File:Our Lady of the Rosary Church (Stopno) 16.jpg, File:Our Lady of the Rosary Church (Stopno) 17.jpg, File:Our Lady of the Rosary Church (Stopno) 18.jpg, File:Our Lady of the Rosary Church (Stopno) 19.jpg, File:Stara mestna elektrarna.jpg. Će štejejo jim je smiselno dodati predlogi {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2019|si}} in {{Cultural Heritage Slovenia}}? --Sporti (talk) 06:45, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Tiste, ki jih je posnel Janezdrilc, lahko za test. Če se ti ljubi, ga prosim še obvesti, da bi bilo bolje, če uporabi pravi vmesnik (če ne ga bom jaz). Slika elektrarne bo pa verjetno brisana in ne šteje, ker vem, da uploader ni avtor. — Yerpo Eh? 06:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
@Yerpo:   Done in tudi šteje jih v statistiko. --Sporti (talk) 07:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Ok, hvala. Kampanja jih sicer ne šteje, ampak orodje za ocenjevanje se mislim da nastavi na kategorijo, tako da ne bi smelo bit problema. — Yerpo Eh? 09:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Slike Uroša NovineEdit

Zgleda smo privabili avtorja, čigar slike si že pred časom prenašal s Flickrja (kar vidim, da si že opazil). Razmišljam, če ne bi bilo mogoče pustiti novejših, da ga ne odženemo po nepotrebnem in da bodo boljši rezultati natečaja. Lahko označevanje za podvojene slike počaka, dokler ne vprašam za mnenje? — Yerpo Eh? 15:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

@Yerpo: Seveda. V pravilih je tudi ta možnost omenjena kot izjema (Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#F8).--Sporti (talk) 16:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

ČrnovojnikEdit

Pomagaj prosim tole Smrekarjevo knjigo v Zbirki urediti tako, kot so drugi večstranski pdfji, npr. Knoblova pesmarica Štiri pare kratkočasnih novih pesmi. --Hladnikm (talk) 06:33, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Mislim, da gre za napako strežnika, ki se bo uredila v nekaj dneh. --Sporti (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your server side upload request on Wikimedia PhabricatorEdit

Hi, your server side upload request on phabricator to import a large file from YouTube has been completed. You can now find the file at File:Rally_Idrija_2019_Slovenija.webm. Just notifying you, in case you didn't notice. Please feel free to add relevant categories to the file page. Cheers, Masum Reza📞 10:26, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. --Sporti (talk) 14:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file moversEdit

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!Edit

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Collage postcardsEdit

Hello Sporti, you create the category:Collage postcards. Today I put this category under Category:Postcards by number of images. I do the same for my Category:Multiview postcards. I know the german word "Mehrbildkarte" it is simular to the english "Multiview postcards". I see this word for example here or here. If I check Collage postcards it is more an collage of postcards not more images at one postcard. What do you think? Can I move this category to "Multiview postcards"? Best regards -- sk (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Ok. Moved Category:Collage postcards of Slovenia to Category:Multiview postcards of Slovenia. Not sure if Category:Collage postcards should stay or not. --Sporti (talk) 14:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Now I found also Category:Montages of postcards. - Ok I will move this category. I try to sort/order/clean the Category:Postcards. Thanks. -- sk (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 

Fallow Peak has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Stare neobjavljene anononimne fotografijeEdit

Prosim presodi zadnje štiri predloge za izbris na User_talk:Hladnikm --Hladnikm (talk) 07:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

@Hladnikm: : Dosti se tu na žalost ne da storiti, razen če poznaš ime fotografa in je že minilo 70 let od njegove smrti ali se on oz. njegovi potomci strinajajo z objavo npr. prek OTRS. --Sporti (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
@Sporti: , za interpretacijo sem zaprosil Lenarta Šetinca, ki nam je pomagal že pred leti, in posebej za fotke med vojnim časom in fotke po vojni utemeljil, zakaj naj slike obstanejo: User_talk:Hladnikm. Mogoče vendarle lahko podpreš, kakor tudi @Yerpo: ? --Hladnikm (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
@Sporti: , uspelo! predlog za izbris je umaknjen, zdaj bom anonimne neobjavljene fotografije izpred 1950 in tudi povojne, če niso "izvirna avtorska stvaritev", lažje postavljal. --Hladnikm (talk) 08:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

helpEdit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iran_Turks_Iran_T%C3%BCrkleri.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Turkic_people_in_Iran.jpg

Nominate for deletion

two fake , unsourced and self made maps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiltwhip (talk • contribs) 13:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Sunrise atLake Bled.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Unidentified locationEdit

Hi, may I ask why you changed the category of File:Piran, Slovenia (41399653192).jpg from the correct location to 'unidentified locations'? In my opinion it's clear what location this picture is.

NeoMeesje (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

@NeoMeesje: Hi. Location data for this image is wrong. Flickr now says it's Zurich.[6] --Sporti (talk) 09:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
@NeoMeesje: I've changed category to Cityscapes of Zürich. Sporti, the file should be renamed. Best, MZaplotnik(talk) 10:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
@Sporti: Ah, I see! Thanks for clarifying and solving this :) NeoMeesje (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Moved it to File:Zürich, Switzerland (41399653192).jpg aswell to avoid confusion. --Sporti (talk) 13:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Edit slike MORSEdit

Zdravo. Imam vprašanje o sliki z dovoljenjem MORS. Ali lahko poeditiram (obrežem) sliko, ki je že v Zbirki (recimo File:Koncert_Orkestra_Slovenske_vojske_v_Gallusovi_dvorani_Cankarjevega_doma_(5).jpg), tako da bi prikazovala posameznika, in jo takšno potem uporabim na drugih Wiki straneh? Ali naj pri tem naložim novo (manjšo) različico z isto licenco in dodam ustrezna povezovalna parametra "Image extracted" in "Extracted from"? Hvala za pomoč. --Ben-Picc (talk) 10:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Ja lahko oz. z orodjem CropTool le označiš izrez in ti ostalo naredi sam, morda ga moraš le omogočiti v nastavitvah. --Sporti (talk) 10:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
CropTool deluje odlično, hvala. --Ben-Picc (talk) 11:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

File: Martin Krpan from Fran Levstik:Edit

Nomination for deletion: Thank you for the reminder; Illustrator Tone Kralj added. --Naturpuur (talk) 10:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

HelpEdit

Nominate for deletion

Map

fake , unsourced and self made map.--Rdhlww (talk) 19:23, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Sava Bohinjka 2018.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Ljubljana heating station from drone.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Simple photographsEdit

Sporti, do you remember how studio and other routine photographs that are ineligible for copyright should be tagged? I'd like to exclude File:01.Dedi Metod.jpg and File:03.V Vedrogu, 1967.jpg from the copyright discussion (we have permission for most of the others in the deletion request, but these two have unknown authorship and haven't been published before). — Yerpo Eh? 14:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Yerpo: : I don't remember using it in such cases, but according to COM:NOP Slovenia it would be {{PD-Slovenia-exempt}}, eventhough the template doesn't currently cover such cases. --Sporti (talk) 14:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

A request for your assistanceEdit

Hello Sporti! We haven't met yet but I just wanted to stop by and drop a greeting. I'm a casual editor of some tennis articles on Wikipedia and have noticed that you have expertise in uploading and categorizing Flickr images. I still feel like I am very much a novice and I attempted to try and categorize myself and create new wikidata and all that but I was concerned with eventually messing it all up, so I stepped away and decided to contact you instead. The album I'm referring to is here! Would you please be able to transfer the files from the Flickr album whenever you have the time? And if someone else has gotten to the task, then please just disregard the request. I would also welcome any and all guidance regarding learning the exact steps to successfully completing the transfer of images to Commons and organizing them for the next occasion. Sorry again for the inconvenience and I look forward to hearing from you soon! Thanks so much for your assistance! Tunestoons (talk) 07:23, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi. In order to transfer an entire album from Flickr you can try using flickr2commons tool (here are the instructions). --Sporti (talk) 08:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Cappuchin Bridge (30706076020).jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Market Mountain (Novo Mesto)Edit

Market Mountain (Novo Mesto)!? Od kod ta prevod Trške gore? --Andrejj (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Se strinjam, da bi bilo bolje pustiti slovensko, očitno se ne strinja @TadejM: , ki je prestavil kategorijo. --Sporti (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Za poimenovanje kategorij imamo Commons:Naming categories. Načeloma v Commons uporabljamo angleška imena kategorij. Nisem apriori proti poimenovanju s slovenskim imenom. Će se gre v preimenovanje, predlagam, da se prestavijo tudi druge podobne kategorije. npr. Category:Big Pasture Plateau in Category:Mount Saint Mary. (Mogoče še User:Doremo kaj pripomni.) --TadejM (t/p) 16:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Sicer se več ne spomnim točnega razloga za preimenovanje, mogoče je šlo poleg konsistentnosti z drugimi podobnimi geografskimi imeni tudi za razločitev med kategorijama naselja in hriba. --TadejM (t/p) 17:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

No, tole je (načeloma) povsem brezveze ... --Andrejj (talk) 19:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

It is certainly awkward for an oronym (Market Mountain makes me think of a grocery store). Given that it's identical to the settlement name, (Mount) Trška Gora creates good unity with that name, which is appropriate. In any case, like Mestni hrib near Kočevje, it's just a Hausberg or Stadtberg (as it was also called in German), which is a rather generic name, after all. Doremo (talk) 21:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Hvala za komentarje. Se strinjam s prestavitvijo na (Mount) Trška Gora. --TadejM (t/p) 09:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 01:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Odbojka na mivki - trening (52247049015).jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Odbojka na mivki - trening (52247049015).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

TadejM (t/p) 13:10, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

TadejM File in question is taken from official government Flick profile and was taken with exactly the same camera model as other photos (see File:Predsednik vlade Janez Janša na državni proslavi ob dnevu boja proti okupatorju na Mali gori pri Ribnici (52031012362).jpg and many others) where EXIF clearly states UKOM as an author. I believe no further checks are necessary.--MZaplotnik(talk) 13:46, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, MZaplotnik. What makes you think that these photos are PD? They don't meet the {{PD-Slovenia}} criteria, and the proper license tag is missing in any case. --TadejM (t/p) 21:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
I see, It's stated in the UKOM Flickr image description. Fine. Then not much has to be done except for sorting out the tag. --TadejM (t/p) 21:37, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
TadejM They are not PD, but they were marked as PDM by official copyright holder. There's a difference between {{Flickr-public domain mark}} and {{PDMark-owner}}. Commons community consensus has decided to accept files which are labeled as Public Domain Mark by their copyright holders. There is additional license review (Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review) to double check files were really marked with PDM by their copyright holders and were not flickr-washed. MZaplotnik(talk) 22:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Ok, thank you for explaining that. I will then remove the 'no license' tag. --TadejM (t/p) 23:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 
File:Le Jour ni l'Heure 3159 - autoportrait au petit carnet, Galerie nationale de Slovénie, Ljubljana (Laybach), mardi 23 août 2011, 14-53-18 (6075867754).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 01:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

 
File:Narodna galerija (20072394990).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 01:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 09:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

 
File:Obeležje na rojstni hiši Rudolfa Maistra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 04:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

 
File:Razglednica Marijinega trga 1905.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 08:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

 

1 man with 2 women in Slovenia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Beeblebrox (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 11:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 11:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 11:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 18:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

 
File:Križanke, arhitekt Jože Plečnik in Nace Šumi pri pogovoru s sodelavci 1952.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 20:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 21:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)