User talk:Tsui/Archive 1

Mandala

Can you provide a source for your description of the image in Mandala? If it really does feature Vairocana & co, then it's probably a Diamond Realm (Vajradhatu) mandala, not a Womb Realm (Garbhadhatu) mandala... User:Jpatokal

i guess it from Womb Ream. You can compare it with this one. ---Xiaowei (talk)

you may find the mandala of diamond realm here.---Xiaowei (talk)

I do not remember which images exactly I used to identify the mandala. The description comes from: Louis Frédéric: Buddhismus - Götter, Bilder und Skulpturen, Éditions Flammarion, Paris 2003, ISBN 2-08-021001-7

Now I found another image of a Taizo-kai/Garbhadhatu-mandala which seems to fit the image here at commons: [1].

To identify it without doubt, it would be interesting to know what exactly distinguishes the two mandalas. I will try to find descriptions to do so. --Tsui (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Untagged image

Hey there, Image:Koh Phangan Longtail1.jpg is currently untagged. All images need a licence else they may be deleted. Thanks, Joolz 19:06, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for reminding me. Usually I add the licence-tag immediately after loading up an image. I have tagged it now. --Tsui 21:32, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Sanchi2

No there is no reason for the sustitution except that frequently I have problems in incorporating images to the spanish articles and I am obliged to download the image from wikipedia and uploaded it in Commons so it can eb used in the spanish version. I don't why this happens, but it does. Please, feel free of replacing the original picture. Regards --18:13, 18 October 2005 (UTC)Jose Montalvo

Image:British Empire Anachronous 4a.PNG

I removed the Iran outline since the 1919 treaty was never ratified by the Iranian parliament and died on paper. Kaveh 22:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion warning

Image:Ww2-76.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.

Thuresson 14:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion warning

Image:San Francisco Chinatown Snoopy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.

Angr 18:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

"Permanent"

Perhaps the best way to think of what "permanent" means in the context of Panoramafreiheit is that it means unbefristet. Most buildings and statues are "permanent" because they're not up for a predetermined amount of time. An ad painted on the side of a building, on the other hand, is almost certainly subjected to a contract for a fixed amount of time only. I'm not a lawyer though -- I have no idea if this is how German courts actually interpret "permanent", but it seems like a plausible definition. Angr 15:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

When tagging copyvios, please use {{Copyvio}}; that way the images are categorized for speedy deletion. Thanks for your work on checking images. Cnyborg 23:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Invitation

Hi Tsui,

I saw your mammalia pix uploads and thought you may be interested in Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life and / or Commons:WikiProject Mammals

regards, and keep up the good work!

TeunSpaans 20:36, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Wien

hmm, ich fand den Artikel mit den Flaggen schöner..

wollt ich nur mal so anmerken ;)

lg --Werckmeister 09:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Tsui,

schon ok, mich haben die deutschen fahnen irgendwie nicht so gestört. ich glaub mit der deutschen fahne hätten noch mehr leute was anfangen können, als mit der österreichischen, aber naja.. hätte dir aber diese oder diese anbieten können. ;)

zu 2) also mir gefallen ehrlich gesagt diese Kürzel nicht. da fand ich die bilder schon besser, hat vor allem einen guten kontrast zur Bildbeschreibung gegeben.. Hab mir das ganze bei Warszawa abgeschaut. hab das dort ganz gut gelöst gefunden.

aber naja, werd wohl auch ohne meine klickibunti-bilder überleben können ;)

lg --Werckmeister 19:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Messier1.jpg

Please note that Image:Messier1.jpg, used in Image:Tsui01.jpg, is a copyrighted image. See copyright statement at http://geena.not.iac.es/general/photos/. --Vesta 19:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I will exchange the image tomorrow - after replacing the part with the planetary nebula. --Tsui 22:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 22:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Vietnam_Haiphong.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vietnam_Haiphong.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

lost Votes

I just wanted to check and maybe reconsider my vote, casted 19:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC) > diff. But I can not find it, neither on the current page nor in the archive. It seems mine and a couple of other votes got lost with this edit > diff. --Tsui 22:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your information. Apparently that was the result of a clumsy (or worse) edit by a new user (User:75.5.9.244 . Please be patient until we put everything as it was. Then, you'll be welcome to change your vote. Alvesgaspar 18:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

• It is fixed now. You can see and modify your vote in here - Alvesgaspar 23:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Buddha Naga Angkor.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Buddha Naga Angkor.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wikipeder 13:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Androidin Maria cropped.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Androidin Maria cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Phrood 01:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

THIS GUY DOES NOT WANT source of image listed!

DO NOT DELETE SOURCES! IMAGES SHOULD BE REMOVED IF NOT CREDITED TO ITS SOURCE! THESE PEOPLE ALLOW ME TO USE THEIR HIGH RES IMAGE LIBRARY BUT I MUST CREDIT THEM FOR THEIR MEDIA! —the preceding unsigned comment is by The art master (talk • contribs) Tsui 20:39, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

You added links to this shop to images that have been uploaded years ago by other users (and not been re-uploaded by you), to images where the true source was already given ... now you claime, they are from this shop? --Tsui 20:39, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:66066.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:66066.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 20:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Taj Mahal

Prima Foto. Ihr seid spitze.--84.56.127.221 08:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Danke!

:-)   Tsui 15:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

On de:user:W., &c.

(Zu Deiner Information; ich gedenke da nicht weiter nachzuhaken. Was mich der de:Verein "kann", ist nicht druckreif.)
Nachdem aus nahezu nichtigem Grund und _o.h.n.e_j.e.g.l.i.c.h.e.s_Verfahren de:Admin user:Jergen den account de:user:IP. und die dazugehörige IP unbefristet gesperrt hatte, gelang user:Seewolf die grandiose Leistung, den ursprünglichen Account, den ich nie in irreführender Weise benutzt hatte, unter Behauptung "Sockenpuppe" ebenfalls zu sperren. Gratulation. w. -- any IP 08:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Christina Stuermer Leopoldau.jpg

Hallo Manfred, ich musste leider gerade einen LA gegen das Bild stellen. Gruß, --Flominator 18:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Wenn Du meinst. Wo ist die Copyright-Verletzung? Meinst Du die Video-Walls auf die das Bühnengeschehen live und in Echtzeit (also keine Aufzeichnung) übertragen wurde? Wenn das als Copy-Vio. gilt, soll sein. --Tsui 07:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Christina Stuermer Leopoldau.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Christina Stuermer Leopoldau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 06:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ernst_Fuchs_HYPNOSIA_mit_Mitra.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Ernst_Fuchs_HYPNOSIA_mit_Mitra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lupo 09:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acryllium vulturinum Schönbrunn2008c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets QI requirements --LC-de 17:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Kategorisierung "BBuk&etc"

Dass es "BB" und nahezu unabhängig davon "BB+Band" zu geben scheint, kommt mir ungeschickt vor. Ist das eine von dir vorgesehens Zwischenlösung, oder sollte das Deiner Meinung nach bleiben? WeHaWoe 18:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Die Idee ist, die Bilder (meiner Ansicht nach zumindest) klarer zuzuordnen: die Personenkategorie Category:Boris Bukowski für ihn selbst - also für Porträts, frühere Aufnahmen und ähnliches - und die Category:Boris Bukowski & Band für die aktuelle Formation mit der er (unter diesem Namen) auf Tour ist. In die Band-Kategorie passen so auch die Fotos der Musiker (vom Gitarristen habe ich noch welche, muß erst das/die beste/n auswählen), die ansonsten in der Kategorie unter seinem Namen eher verwirrend bzw. deplatziert wären, anderseits ohne der Band-Kategorie kaum über Bukowski zu finden wären.

Die Einteilung ist vergleichbar mit der Category:Willi Resetarits und der dort zugeordneten Category:Stubnblues, oder mit Category:Stefan Weber und Category:Drahdiwaberl. --Tsui 18:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Versteh' schon, aber irgendwie müsste eine Querverbindung sichtbar sein für einen, der eine der Kategorien öffnet (wenn ich einem Bild aus Cat:BB nachgehe, erfahre ich bisher nicht, dass es noch eine Menge anderes Material gibt, auf dem er zu sehen ist. Meine Idee wäre, BB als Unterkategorie von BB&Band anzulegen. Was hältst Du davon? Die imo ungeschicktere Alternative wäre, entsprechende Bilder mehrmals zu kategorisieren WeHaWoe 07:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Habe jetzt die beiden bislang vorhandenen Kategorien zu Musikern der Band - eben Category:Boris Bukowski selbst und Category:Sandra Lawson - der Category:Boris Bukowski & Band zugeordnet. Das führt bei ihm zwar im Kreis, was aber nicht weiter störend sein sollte (ist auch bei Weber und Drahdiwaberl der Fall). Jedenfall sollten die Bilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien, egal woher man in eine davon kommt, problemlos zu finden sein. --Tsui 19:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Sieht gut aus. lgw. WeHaWoe 19:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Hahn+Schmied, +BIG TX

Hatte (gestern noch gegen 22:00) bei beiden nachgefragt; vom Büro Hahn kam heute gegen Mittag was zurück. Ist aber wohl insgesamt glimpflich abgelaufen. Danke, dass Du das Sinnlos-Nutzlos-Dämliche beizeiten aus der deWP rausgenommen hattest. Ist mir echt peinlich, soooo blind gewesen zu sein -- wär' aber auch allzu BILDLICH-schön gewesen, links den Hahn von der eher Rechten, etc., &so weiter ... -- lg, WeHaWoe 16:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Ging ja noch mal gut und war kein Drama. Ich bin auch froh, dass Du mir mein "Einschreiten" nicht übel nimmst. Da ich ja selber als Amateurfotograf in der Wikipedia unterwegs bin, kenne ich diesen gewissen Knipser-Stolz bzw. -Eifer beim Bebildern von Artikeln. Bildinhalte falsch zu identifizieren ist mir auch schon passiert - zum Glück nur vermeintliche Korallen, die sich als Korallenanemonen entpuppten, und einen Baum betreffend :-)

Gruß, Tsui 21:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Ja, klar. Aber eine Privatperson in die Öffentlichkeit zu zerren, wie's mir faktisch passierte, wäre für mich bei längerem WP-seits unbeeinspruchtem "Aufenthalt" ebendort doch äußerst unangenehm gewesen. Bin also heilfroh, dass 1. Du aktiv wurdest und 2. das Büro Dr. Hahn binnen weniger Stunden reagierte (dass die für derlei keine Nachtschichten am Sonntag einlegen, = eh' klar), und 3. ein COM-Admin dann binnen kaum 2h löschte.

Falls Du Dich ein wenig mit "Heuriger" auskennst: ich mach' da (deWP) gerade eine größere Überarbeitung (angeregt durch "Anton Karas") und würde mir wünschen, dass jemand anderer da d'rüberliest, ob das inzwischen "sichtungswürdig" ist. So ab 20080520-19:00 GZ. (=local time) Falls Du bis morgen nix tust, sprech' ich mal beim Ö-Portal vor -- DIE erinnern sich bestimmt noch an mich ;) WeHaWoe 12:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Wrong location?

Hatte ich da einen Bug, oder Du? (meines Wissens hatte ich bloß die location lt. tsui abgemalt ;) -- ich glaub' ich werd' die Ortsangaben in Zukunft lieber Berufeneren über- und bei mir sein lassen ;) -- hoffe nur, Du konntest die Korrekturen IRGENDWIE halbautomatisch machen.

Was hältst Du übrigens vor der Unter-Kategorie, die eine ip für dieses eine Konzert angelegt hat? Ich fand sie vorerst entbehrlich, habe aber keine Lust alles wieder umzuschreiben und habe zunächst mal bei einem hiesigen Oldie angefragt, ob man das lassen kann/soll (user:Rama). lg, --WeHaWoe 10:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Den Bug hat User:Responsible? produziert, Deine Angaben waren/sind schon in Ordnung. Er hat die Katgeorie Category:Concert at Krieau, 10 May 2008 angelegt und bei den Zuordnungen einiges durcheinandergebracht. Einerseits hat er etliche Bilder von den Konzerten am Praterstern/Kaiserwiese, darunter eben das von Russkaja, der Krieau zugeordnet - das hatte ich mit "wrong location" gemeint. Anderseits hat er die Krieau-Kategorie der Category:Supporters at UEFA Euro 2008 zugeordnet, womit die Konzerte nichts zu tun hatten (es wurde bloß eine Zugabe von Heinz aus Wien beim Praterstern-Konzert für diese Mockumantary über einen fiktiven Sieg der österr. Mannschaft bei der EM gefilmt).

Ob die beiden Kategorien Category:Concert at Krieau, 10 May 2008 und Category:Russkaja concert, 10 May 2008 überhaupt sinnvoll sind lasse ich mal dahingestellt. Erstere lässt sich immerhin der Category:U-Bahnhof Krieau (Wien) zuordnen. Von Russkaja gibt es bislang ausschließlich Bilder dieses einen Auftritts. Einzelne Konzert-Kategorien sind da vielleicht noch nicht notwendig, stören meiner Ansicht nach aber auch nicht. --Tsui 14:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Ja, ich bezweifle es auch. Betr. R.-Konzert hab' ich user:Rama#On Categories, Sub-Cat etc gefragt und er meint, lieber lassen. Auch könnte ich demnächst mit einem Schnorrbrief Bilder von einem R. Konzert in Dornbirn 2007 kriegen, die Zusage habe ich bereits, sollte jetzt nur noch um die Abwicklung gehen. Selber eingreifen möchte ich eigentlich nicht in ein Dutzend Bilder, und ganz sicher nicht, solange die Sache nicht eindeutig geklärt ist. Ich schau mal ber Responsible? vorbei. lg, WeHaWoe 15:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sabine_Gruber_Wien2008.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Sabine_Gruber_Wien2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 16:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

EURO'08

Hi Tsui, u[n]ser ; "Responsible?" schlägt wieder mal zu: {http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image%3AUEFA_European_Football_Championship_20080629_37_Spanish_couple.jpg&diff=12911439&oldid=12543519 dieses u. ähnliche]. Weiß nicht recht, wie damit umgehen. Hast Du ne Idee? ICH halte seine Ergänzungen für 100proSTUSS. --WeHaWoe (talk) 15:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Naja, inhaltlich sind die beiden Kategorien Category:Association football supporters of Spain und Category:Supporters at UEFA Euro 2008 zutreffend (im Unterschied zu dem früheren Problem, wo die Konzertbilder schlicht falsch zugeordnet waren). Mich stören sie nicht. Wenn es hilft, dass man die Bilder auf verschiedenen Wegen findet und dann vielleicht in Artikeln einbaut, warum nicht? --Tsui (talk) 16:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

ACK. "An sich" war+ist mir die EURO sowieso reichlich wurscht, abgesehen vom Happening. --WeHaWoe (talk) 10:02, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tech Gate Vienna 2008a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You must be using a good lens ! surprisingly noisy for a ISO 100 shot. Did you brighten dark parts ? Benh 21:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Donau Vienna International Center 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not very exciting but its ok --Simonizer 17:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augarten Flakturm Wien2008a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's OK. --Lestath 22:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Harri Stojka 30.08.2008c.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Harri Stojka 30.08.2008c.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Francine Jordi Wien 13-9-2008b.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Francine Jordi Wien 13-9-2008b.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh (talk) 18:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Buddha_Bamiyan_Riviere.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Buddha_Bamiyan_Riviere.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

ALE! ¿…? 11:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tibet Lhasa Jokhang Wheel of Dharma.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Tibet Lhasa Jokhang Wheel of Dharma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--shizhao (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hello.

You can add this fields :

{{Babel| |fr |en-1 |PH-3 |}}

on your user page. --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately I do not speak, nor can I write, French. The Babel-boxes for German and English are already on my userpage. If PH-3 is justified I am not sure, since I am not a professional photographer ... I am still learning by doing ;-) --Tsui (talk) 09:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tibet_Lhasa_Prayers.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Tibet_Lhasa_Prayers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Tsui (talk) 09:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Link between photographers page

Hello.

I have made a topic called "More good photographers" on my user page. You could create a similar topic on your user page and you could include me in it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Danke

fürs Foto von Danielle Spera! Hab grad letzte Woche den Artikel ergänzt, da ich an einem Interview mit ihr war, und hab noch ein bisschen bereut, dass ich keinen Fotoapparat mitgenommen hatte :) Schreib auch gerade an einem Bericht über das Interview für meinen Blog. Der is ganz neu und soll einfach nur eine Gesprächsreihe an der Uni dokumentieren, also nix professionelles. SG -- Otto Normalverbraucher (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Gerne geschehen. Ist zwar nicht herausragend, aber als Illustration im kleineren thumb-Format gut zu gebrauchen. Wirklich froh bin ich über das eine Foto Arik Brauers, auch wenn es nicht wirklich scharf ist. Ein leider noch unschärferes und schlechter belichtetes Bild habe ich von Rabbi Paul Chaim Eisenberg, auf dem er vor Brauers Abraham-Bild steht. Das werde ich ihm aber zuerst mailen und um seine Freigabe anfragen bevor ich es hier hochlade

Der Blog sieht hochinteressant aus. Ich habe ihn jetzt nur überflogen, werde ihn aber sicher noch intensiver lesen ... bin schon neugierig auf die weiteren Einträge. --Tsui (talk) 02:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Brauer und Eisenberg kommen ja auch! (Eisenberg war auch vor ein paar Monaten schon da und hat über "Prostitution im Judentum" aus der Sicht eines Rabbiners referiert - das war ja unterhaltsam!) Evtl. werd ich selber noch Fotos machen, hab aber bislang aus Zurückhaltung (ist ja eher Klassenzimmer-Atmosphäre) gelassen (umso froher bin ich, dass du Fotos gemacht hast); nächste Woche hab ich auch den Fotoapparat nicht hier und die Woche drauf überschneidet sich der Termin mit einem Treffen für eine andere Lehrveranstaltung - da kann ich aber vermutlich früher weg und dann vielleicht auch mal ein Foto machen (und Notizen machen, damit nix im Blog fehlt). Weiß noch gar nicht wer Ende März kommt. Werd schaun dass ich heute oder sonst wann dieses Wochenende noch den Gideon Singer-"Bericht" mache, damit ich endlich nicht mehr hinter her hinke; Außerdem überleg ich, ein "Exkurs"-Post über das de:socalled-Konzert in Wien zu machen. SG -- Otto Normalverbraucher (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Tsui!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Five Piece Band 27.10.2008 Vienna02.jpg is uncategorized since 25 March 2009.
• Image:Five Piece Band Chick Corea John McLaughlin 27.10.2008 Vienna.jpg is uncategorized since 25 March 2009.
• Image:Five Piece Band 27.10.2008 Vienna03.jpg is uncategorized since 25 March 2009.
• Image:Five Piece Band 27.10.2008 Vienna01.jpg is uncategorized since 25 March 2009.

File:Dulce Ponte, Wiener Festwochen 2009 c.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:55, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Dulce Ponte, Wiener Festwochen 2009 b.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Dulce Ponte, Wiener Festwochen 2009 d.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Dulce Ponte, Wiener Festwochen 2009 a.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Pagoda01.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pagoda01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pagoda01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

The Evil IP address (talk) 14:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Thomas D., Donauinselfest 2009 h.jpg

Hi. You really want File:Thomas D., Donauinselfest 2009 h.jpg deleted? It seems a bit clearer than the one you want to replace it with. Wknight94 ^talk 18:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi,

Thank you for asking! To be honest, I cannot decide which of the two is better. Both are noisy and a bit blurry. I edited the image several times in slightly different ways and accidentaly loaded up two versions. If you think version h is better than version i I have no objections if you delete the latter instead of the one I supposed. --Tsui (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Photographers Blackbelt

		THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
		I hereby award at you this Photographers Blackbelt for your outstanding and excellent pictures. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!
Nice to see, that the images are noticed and appreciated. --Tsui (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Deutschösterreich und Schweiz.jpg

Hallo Tsui! Weia, da hab ich grad eine Altlast gefunden ... mit einem drei Jahre alten Kommentar von Dir :-D Ich kenn mich mit den Commonsregeln nicht aus und stell deswegen keinen Löschantrag, hab aber mal die Kategorien rausgenommen (in der Hoffnung, daß sie niemand mehr findet) und vor allem diese seltsame Karte aus dem Artikel zur Geschichte Österreichs in der pt.wp. Beste Grüße --Magadan (talk) 10:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Das Bild scheint mir eine Altlast aus der Zeit vor der Sperre von Postmann Michael zu sein. Inhaltlich erinnert es an seinen Stil. Es zu löschen fände ich schon sehr sinnvoll. Bei einem Bild mit sehr ähnlicher Problematik wurde hier aber entschieden es zu behalten. Einige halten es für wichtiger möglichst jede Grafik zu behalten, egal wie falsch und irreführend sie ist. Bleibt also nur, solche Bilder immer wieder mal aus Artikeln herauszunehmen. Was leider der mühevollere Weg ist. lg, Tsui (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Lob

Hallo Tsui. Habe soeben ein bisschen in deinen vielen (Promi)fotos herumgestöbert. Einfach mal ein kleines Dankeschön für diese Bereicherung der Wikipedia, weiter so! Liebe Grüsse, Sandro (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Sandro!

Danke! So ein Feedback ist sehr willkommen und immer auch ein zusätzlicher Motivationsschub; gut zu wissen, dass die Bilder bemerkt und geschätzt werden. Die Sommersaison der Open-Air-Festivals, Freiluft-Sportveranstaltungen usw. neigt sich zwar gerade dem Ende zu, aber ein paar Bilder aus der letzten Zeit habe ich sozusagen noch in der Pipeline, die kommen bald. In nächster Zeit stehen auch wieder einzelne interessante Veranstaltungen in Wien an, wo es hoffentlich wieder gute Fotogelegenheiten geben wird. Es wird also so weiter gehen. lg, Tsui (talk) 10:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

ich bin vor allem auch bei dieser Kategorie hängengeblieben. Freut mich sehr, wenns so weiter geht ;-) Liebe Grüsse, Sandro (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Das war eine jener Veranstaltungen, zu denen ich (im Gegensatz zu z.B. Ars Electronica, Amadeus Awards, Nestroy-Theaterpreis, Sportler des Jahres ...) leider keine Akkreditierung bekam. So musste ich eben "draußen" bleiben, bei den Autogrammjägern, Ich-und-ein-Promi-Fotografen und Schaulustigen entlang des roten Teppichs, wobei die meisten geladenen Gäste da sehr zugänglich und gut gelaunt waren. --Tsui (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Die sind bestimmt auch launischer, die Promis. Kriegt man eine Akkreditierung normalerweise eigentlich "einfach so", nachdem man sich meldet, oder muss man da noch bestimmte Dinge vorweisen können? Sandro (talk) 19:57, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Auch Promis sind nur Menschen. Ich kann mir gut vorstellen, dass es ihnen mitunter auch zu viel und lästig wird von Kameras und Autogrammjägern "verfolgt" zu werden. Bei offiziellen Anlässen, eben z.B. Red Carpets, habe ich das aber noch nicht beobachtet. Sicher auch weil das dann einfach zum Job gehört. Als Paparazzo habe ich mich noch nicht betätigt, habe ich auch nicht vor.

Mit den Akkreditierungen habe ich unterschiedliche Erfahrungen gemacht. Ich frage in der Regel zuvor per E-Mail bei den jeweiligen Pressestellen od. Veranstaltern an und weise ausdrücklich darauf hin, dass ich kein professioneller Journalist bzw. Pressefotograf bin (also auch keinen Presseausweis habe) und die Bilder für Wikipedia mache, wobei ich immer auch ein Link auf meine Übersichtsseiten hier mitschicke, damit die Leute sich ein Bild davon machen können was ich so knippse. Bei manchen Veranstaltungen bzw. Veranstaltern klappt's, bei anderen nicht. Ohne Presseausweis hat man z.B. keine Chance im österr. Parlament eine Sitzung zu besuchen und zu fotografieren. Es mir auch schon passiert, dass eine Band die Bilder vor einer Veröffentlichung gerne per mail geschickt haben möchte, um zu sagen welche Fotos ok sind und welche sie lieber nicht im Web sehen würden. So etwas ist mir sehr recht. So sind alle zufrieden. Das Letzte was ich möchte, ist die Abgebildeten mit meinen Fotos zu verärgern. Ich habe auch schon auf Fotos einen Löschantrag gestellt, weil ich von den Fotografierten diesbezüglich kontaktiert wurde. Das waren Fotos aus meiner Anfangszeit der "Porträt"-Fotografie für Wikipedia, als ich einfach drauf los knippste ohne viel zu fragen. Inzwischen frage ich eigentlich fast immer nach, bevor ich fotografiere od. Bilder ins Netz stelle. --Tsui (talk) 21:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Also wenn man Glück hat, erhält man manchmal auch eine Akkreditierung ohne Presseausweis. Ich versuche es auf die andere Art, an Fotos von Prominenten ranzukommen - nämlich mit Freigaben. Ich habe einige, welche ich damals noch unter einem anderen Account hochgeladen habe und mit diesem sind es bisher leider nur drei, obwohl ich bestimmt schon gefühlte fünfzig Freigaben abgeschickt habe. Aber es ist halt so, manchmal hat man Glück, manchmal weniger. Und wie du geschrieben hast, ist es natürlich angenehmer, wenn die abgelichtete Person auch einverstanden damit ist. Liebe Grüsse, Sandro (talk) 22:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Um Freigaben anzufragen habe ich noch nicht probiert. Es erschien mir zu kompliziert, weil man dann ja sowohl beim Fotografierten, wie auch - rechtlich eigentlich noch wichtiger - beim Urheber, dem Fotografen, nachfragen muß (und Letztere vermutlich wenig begeistert von der freien Lizenzierung hier sind, sie leben ja davon ihre Fotos zu verkaufen). Anderseits ist das ein guter Weg, um auch mal an Porträts zu kommen, bei denen Licht, Setting, Make-Up usw. wirklich professionell sind; und an Bilder von Menschen, die einem eher nicht leibhaftig über den Weg, bzw. vor die Linse, laufen. --Tsui (talk) 06:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Ja, das ist so. Man muss schon sehr viel schreiben und dann gibt es natürlich viele, die der Veröffentlichung nicht zustimmen (aus dem dir genannten Grund). Zudem fände ich es auch viel spannender die Promis selbst vor der Linse zu haben. Leider tümmeln sich in meiner Region nicht sehr viele rum. Gruss, Sandro (talk) 11:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anna Kim Wien2008.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anna Kim Wien2008.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ti Amo, Metropol 2009 (26).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ti Amo, Metropol 2009 (26).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Arik_Brauer,_Vienna_2009_a.jpg

File:Arik_Brauer,_Vienna_2009_a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Christina Stürmer

Phantastisches Bild von Christina Stürmer. Gratuliere! Bernhard aus München

Vielen Dank!

Aber welches meinst Du? --Tsui (talk) 20:50, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Category:Norbert Darabos

Hello!

I accidently removed this link. Thanks for restoring. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for this message! I already suspected there could be a (new) regulation that prohibits interwiki links in categories or something similar. Glad that it was just an accident. Regards, Tsui (talk) 21:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Nein, da gibt es keine neue Richtlinie. Ich zudem die fehlende Interwikis der betreffenden Kategorie ergänzt. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 23:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for the lovely photo of Kelly Clarkson you contributed to the English Kelly Clarkson page. I've been desperate to get a decent photo of her on there for a long time.

Kindest regards - BalloonaticFanatic (talk) 23:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! Though the image has been added to the article by someone else. But I'm glad you like it :)

Tsui (talk) 22:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Tschernobyl und Fukushima Gedenkveranstaltung (Wien 2011-04-25)

Valuable photos. Could you write a short story in Wikinews about? Przykuta → [edit] 21:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! There are more images to come from this event, maybe tonight or tomorrow. As I am not familiar with wikinews at all I can not promise to write about it there. If you are interested, more information can be found at atomausstieg.at and on the website of global2000, the Austrian environmental NGO that organized the event. Unfortunately all the info is in German. Tsui (talk) 22:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Tschernobyl und Fukushima Gedenkveranstaltung (Wien 2011-04-25)

Hallo Tsui!

Was spricht gegen die Umbenennung von Category:Tschernobyl und Fukushima Gedenkveranstaltung (Wien 2011-04-25) in Category:Commemoration ceremony for Chernobyl and Fukushima (Vienna 2011-04-25). Nachdem die zwei Basiskategorien, z.B. Category:Fukushima I Accidents wohl hauptsächlich von nicht-deutschsprechenden Besuchern/Nutzern besucht wird, wäre eine engl. Kategorie von Vorteil. Zumal die Richtlinien auf Commons die Verwendung von englischen Kategorienamen verlangt. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 21:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Kein Problem von meiner Seite. Dass Kategorien generell englisch benannt werden sollen wusste ich noch nicht. --80.109.63.190 22:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Hallo! Ich habe gerade die Kategorie umbenannt bzw. neu erstellt: Category:Commemoration ceremony for Chernobyl and Fukushima (Vienna 2011-04-25). Vielleicht findest du noch ein paar Bilder auf deiner Kamera, um die Kategorie zu füllen. Gruß und Danke, High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Danke Dir - u. Bilder folgen auf jeden Fall noch ein paar.--Tsui (talk) 10:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Los_Angeles_Venice2.jpg

File:Los_Angeles_Venice2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Clara Luzia, WUK 20.04.2011 06.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Datei:Alice_Schwarzer,_ROMY_2009.jpg

Hier: 1, 2 mit der Angabe 'Bild: GNU FDL' --Martina talk 21:45, 27 July 2011 (UTC) PS: w:Wikipedia:Weiternutzung/Mängel/Mehrfachnutzungen#www.regenbogen.de

Climbers from Spain

Hi, obviously I accidentally clicked "-" with HotCat. thx anyway. --Rotpunkt (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Thank you for putting into use so many of the pictures of climbers I made at the world cup in Vienna last year. It is good to see them used in articles. --Tsui (talk) 19:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

You made an awesome work taking and uploading those pictures! Thanks so much :) --Rotpunkt (talk) 20:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Super Bilder! Bin hier über ein von dir geschossenes Foto gestolpert (yay, mit korrekter Weiternutzung!): http://wissen.dradio.de/lokalfernsehen-das-comeback-des-helmut-thoma.36.de.html?dram:article_id=12327 Church of emacs (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Schoko-Nuss mit Baiser oben drauf - sehr fein, danke! :)
Schön auch zu sehen, dass das mit der Attribution bei Weiternutzung doch immer öfter klappt. Nur ganz so eng hätten sie ihn nicht zuschneiden sollen. Aber offenbar wollten sie die Sponsorenwand wegbekommen. --Tsui (talk) 18:17, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Eva_LaRue,_ROMY_2009.jpg

File:Eva_LaRue,_ROMY_2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.254.231.37 20:25, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Vienna → Munich

You're welcome ;) I did sometimes some similar mistakes and it's always a pleasure tu put the correct description ;) Otourly (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Rock climbing

I don't know if you are interested in climbing, however you have taken amazing photos. If you are interested in this discussion, you are welcome, we need more opinions: Commons:Deletion_requests/Category:Rock_climbing. Cya. --Rotpunkt (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I am rather unfamiliar with climbing. I took the pictures of all the climbers when I had the chance to get an accreditation as a photographer for the Boulder Worldcup in Vienna. Apart from that I have no real relation to this sport. --Tsui (talk) 00:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Mario-Max zu Schaumburg-Lippe, dancer against cancer 2010.jpg

I just want to confirm - where did you get the file? Somebody has emailed us claiming copyright on the image. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

I took it at the charity event "Dancer against Cancer" ([2]) 2010 where I had an accreditation as a photographer (other images from that event: Category:Dancer Against Cancer 2010).

However, since it is not used anywhere and the biographical article about Mr. Schaumburg-Lippe on de.wikipedia was deleted I would not mind, if it gets deleted. During the discussion preceding the deletion of the biography ([3]) he himself or someone in his name or someone pretending to be him (Benutzer:PrinzzuSchaumburgLippe) alleged that the picture was meant to depict him as unsound or unprofessional. That was not my intention. On the contrary, taking part in a charity event is something quite honorable in my view. But anyway, it seems he doesn't like it (and the mail you recieved came from him or his office I assume), so I would say: delete it. It just seems to cause unnecessary troubles. --Tsui (talk) 00:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: File:Mungo Park portrait.jpg

Hm .. I've just removed the scanner artifacts, converted to grayscale, contrasted and centered a bit. The old version is always available in the file history. I guess you don't agree that my edit is an improvement. I am curious why? Materialscientist (talk) 10:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

The image is scanned from a book published in 1859. There it is the reproduction of some kind of etching or rather a drawing, so the dots and hatching etc. are inherent parts of the picture, just like the strokes of brushes in paintings, not artifacts or distortions. Also the texture (and color) of the paper is part of the image. That is how it looks like. Blurring it until all the details vanish distorts the picture. --Tsui (talk) 13:35, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Re:Categories ...

Hallo Tsui ! Meiner Meinung nach, war über-zu kategorisieren. Wenn Er ist auch sicher, Schlagzeug hinzu. Die "Kategorie: Musicians" ist zu allgemein. Tut mir leid, der arme Deutsche. "Kategorie: Ulli Baer" repariert. Mit freundlichen Grüßen:Tamba52 (talk) 17:31, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Verstehe. Danke für die Antwort. Ich habe begonnen Kategorien für die einzelnen Instrumente zu schaffen und Musiker dort einzuordnen -> Category:Musicians from Austria by instrument --Tsui (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Samuel Weiss (Schauspieler)

Hallo Tsui, vielen Dank für dein Bild File:Nestroy-Theaterpreis 2008a.jpg, mit dem ich ausnahmsweise nach einer Bearbeitung den oben von mir gestarteten Artikel bebildern (File:Nestroy-Theaterpreis 2008a Samuel Weiss cropped.jpg) konnte. In meiner Domäne Literatur u.ä.m. ist es immer schwer Bildmaterial zu bekommen. Und wie kam ich auf Weiss? Die übliche Artikellawine, die man selbst lostritt, wenn man beim WikiCup mitwirkt. ;-) Alles Gute --Laibwächter (talk) 19:38, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Laibwächter, sehr gerne. Und ich freue mich immer sehr, wenn meine Bilder Verwendung finden!

Die Protagonisten der Literatur- und Theaterwelt sind tatsächlich schwer zu "erwischen". Der Nestroy, andere Preisverleihungen und da und dort eine Lesung sind gute, aber leider rare Gelegenheiten. lg, Tsui (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Visa UK1993 US1994.jpg

File:Visa UK1993 US1994.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Spartaz (talk) 04:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Eva LaRue, ROMY 2009.jpg

File:Eva LaRue, ROMY 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.254.230.210 00:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Cat in Petra

Tank you very much for that ! It's great ! Antoinetav (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Tarifa Toros2004.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Tarifa Toros2004.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 10:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Eloui WAVES Vienna 2012 Odeon 14.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Tsui, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 11:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Please use sub-categories

---

When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––Apalsola ^{t • c} 12:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok. Usually I do so. Which image(s)/categorisation(s) made you write this hint? --Tsui (talk) 17:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Category:E75 (Finland) and Category:National road 4 (Finland). I will keep it in mind. --Tsui (talk) 17:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, and also Category:Lake Inari ⊆ Category:Nature of Inari ⊆ Category:Inari. BR, ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 22:43, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pharoah Sanders Quartet ft Dwight Trible and Howard Johnson - INNtöne Jazzfestival 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, although the shallow DoF is a pity --Poco a poco 10:42, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pharoah Sanders Quartet ft Dwight Trible and Howard Johnson - INNtöne Jazzfestival 2013 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 10:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pharoah Sanders Quartet ft Dwight Trible and Howard Johnson - INNtöne Jazzfestival 2013 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 10:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DelaDap - Amadeus Awards 2013 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Life Ball 2013 - opening show 121 Tonia Sotiropoulou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Appropriately Licensed

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SAEDI WUK 2011 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC) no good quality, its excellent! --Ralf Roletschek 18:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicholas Ofczarek, Sasa Schwarzjirg - Romy 2013 c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 20:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österreichischer Filmpreis 2013 B Ulrich Seidl 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 20:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österreichischer Filmpreis 2013 C Manuel Rubey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, and at ISO3200! --Mattbuck 20:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Life Ball 2013 - magenta carpet 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Life Ball 2013 - magenta carpet Celestial Tableau by Darrell Thorne and The Gods 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 23:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Life Ball 2009 (arrivals) Konstanze Breitebner.jpg

File:Life Ball 2009 (arrivals) Konstanze Breitebner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Life Ball 2009 The Blonds fashion show, Eva Padberg.jpg

File:Life Ball 2009 The Blonds fashion show, Eva Padberg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:36, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Tim Mälzer, dancer against cancer 2010.jpg

File:Tim Mälzer, dancer against cancer 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:40, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clara Luzia - Donauinselfest Vienna 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice--Lmbuga 23:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nina Hartmann Brasil Orpheum 2012 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 23:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Life Ball 2013 - magenta carpet Amanda Lepore, Dean and Dan Caten 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossstadtgeflüster - Donauinselfest Vienna 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österreichischer Filmpreis 2013 B Christoph Kuschnig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bottom of the image is perhaps a bit dark and with vignetting, but QI for me--Lmbuga 05:33, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DelaDap Tania Saedi Stani Vana - Amadeus Awards 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österreichischer Filmpreis 2013 B Eva Jantschitsch 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiener Festwochen 2013 Eröffnung 20 Fatima Spar Adam Rapa Flip Philipp Michael Bruckner Philipp Moosbrugger Jon Sass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:39, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österreich-Rundfahrt 2013 Wien 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 11:11, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

new Commons brochure draft

Thanks for your comments on the Commons brochure draft. We're getting close to a final version, and I've put up a new draft that includes a lot of the suggested changes from the previous version. Please look it over if you have a chance, and post any final suggestions or corrections.--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulivu-Donna Cumberbatch Quartet - INNtöne Jazzfestival 2013 09 Mark Johnson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulivu-Donna Cumberbatch Quartet - INNtöne Jazzfestival 2013 05 Rachiim Ausar Sahu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Fourth revision and I'm still not sure, but I think that it can be QI: Very good composition--Lmbuga 18:49, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

thanks!

		The Commons Barnstar
		Thanks so much for giving feedback on the Commons brochure! You can see the print version here. Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 15:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)