You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I made the Shakespeare arms mainly because I had stumbled across a good SVG depiction of a tilting spear. I've done various images of non-complex coats of arms, but I'm not an artist in the sense of drawing things, so if I did the Hall arms, I would probably have to take the dog's heads from File:Arms of Baroness Llanover.svg... AnonMoos (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Technically speaking those are couped (cut straight) rather than erased (jagged, as if ripped off), but I haven't found any erased dog's heads on Commons, so those will have to do. Zacwill16 (talk) 10:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Zacwill,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Trump arms.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hello, the armorial of the Emperor's arms with the collar of the Spanish Order, and shightly national elements and design (the arms over a Spanish Shield with the colors of his Standard in the way of Emperors Meiji and Taishō of Japan as knights of the Golden Fleece), so it is own but not just a complete invention because it is based on the armorial of the Spanish Golden Fleece and others of Royal European Orders like:
this and this one. The arms of the knights of the Golden Fleece from (c.1995) Insigne Orden del Toisón de Oro y su Armorial Ecuestre. Montalvo Eds.
Regards --Heralder (talk) 16:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Osage nation seal.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This emblem is from 2014, which means that it is not in the public domain
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have grantedautopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 00:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Apologies I’m on a mobile phone. You can use my talk page. You can tell me why you know better than me about the ILN. In detail there. Best. Broichmore (talk) 22:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply