Amica 2467

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Amica 2467!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:21, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bodenprofil.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bodenprofil.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Deleted content

---

Hello Amica 2467, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Bodenprofil.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 00:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, Green Giant, for your message. I already produced a soil profile, myself, which you can see in the unreviewd version of 'https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix-See'. But why is this jpg-file (and more photographs of the soil at the Phoenix-See area which I did, myself) not available in "Wikimedia Commons"?

Kind regards, Amica

Phoenix-See

Hallo Amica 2467, Du hast einige Bilder vom und um den Phoenix-See recht seltsam kategorisiert. So ist File:KomischeFenster.JPG mit Category:Phoenix-See versehen, obwohl hier Häuser zu sehen sind, nicht aber der See. Umgekehrt ist File:Landschaftsbauwerk.JPG, auf dem Phoenix-See und der "Kaiserberg‎" zu sehen sind mit Category:Boden versehen, obwohl das mit der schwedischen Stadt nun wirklich nichts zu tun hat. Bringst Du Deine Kategorisierung bitte in Ordung? Kategorisiere bitte, was wirklich auf den Bildern zu sehen ist. Die von Dir geknipsten Häuser (Category:Houses in Dortmund) stehen vermutlich in den Straßen Seehang, Seehöhe‎ oder Seeweg. Wo genau weißt Du sicher besser als ich. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 20:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Ies, tut mir leid, ich beteilige mich hier noch nicht so lange und kann das nicht besser. Wenn ich ein Foto hochlade, wird mir keine Auswahlliste angezeigt, so dass ich mir eine "Kategorie" ausdenke, die sicher nicht immer optimal ist. Eine schwedische Stadt wollte ich aber ganz sicher nicht kategorisieren :-) Wie ich das jetzt nachträglich ändere, weiß ich auch nicht. Sorry --Amica 2467 (talk) 09:27, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Kategorien (Friedrich Engles)

Hallo Amica 2467, nutze doch bitte die richtigen Kategorien. Wenn Du schon bei Category:Friedrich Engels bist, ist Category:Engels-Haus für das Engelshaus, Category:Gedenktafel Engels-Haus für die Gedenktafel am Engels-Haus und Category:Engels-Denkmal (Wuppertal) für das Engels-Denkmal ohne Mühe zu finden. -- Ies (talk) 11:57, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, IES, ich hab's wirklich nicht gefunden: Ich lade die Bilder hoch und dann gibt's dort ein Feld, in das ich eine Kategorie eintragen soll. Ich habe "Friedrich Engels" eingetragen, diese Kategorie gab's schon, aber weitere sinnvolle Möglichkeiten wurden mir nicht angeboten, nicht mal "Livingplaces", das ich zuvor in den Commons gesehen hab. Ich weiß nicht, wie das gehen soll?! --Amica 2467 (talk) 12:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Brache ohne Vegetation3.JPG

Hallo Amica 2467, auch diese Bild ist falsch kategorisiert: Der kategorisierte Phönixsee ist gar nicht zu sehen. Auch die Beschreibung "Auf dem Stahlwerksbodenmaterial wächst nichts" ist offensichtlich falsch. Wie am grünen Belag auf dem Boden sehr deutlich zu sehen ist, wachsen dort mehrere Moosarten. Ebenfalls sind Gräser, mehrere krautige Pflanzenarten und im Vordergrund sogar kleine Sträucher zu erkennen. Warum machst Du hier bewusst falsche Angaben? -- Ies (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

"Nichts" kann man nicht gut fotografieren

Hallo les, dort wo neuer Boden aufgebracht wurde, wächst etwas: ich wollte ja zeigen, dass es nicht an der Jahreszeit liegt. Auf den Brachflächen müssten also seit einigen Jahren Birken wachsen. Aber selbst die vereinzelten Löwenzahnpflänzchen kümmern vor sich hin. Außerdem wollte ich im Hintergrund anhand der Bebauung zeigen, dass es sich tatsächlich um das Phönixseegebiet handet und deshalb ist der Boden nicht im Detail zu sehen. Zeitgleich habe ich aber 2 weitere Fotos zu diesem Thema hochgeladen oder wenn Du selbst ein besseres des fast unbewachsenen Bodens hast, kannst Du es gern austauschen. Mir geht es um die Information: der Wind verweht den belasteten Boden und Kinder atmen die Schadstoffe ein bzw. bekommen sie auf die Haut. Das sollten die Anwohner wissen und erkennen dürfen. Ich hoffe, Du hast nichts dagegen. --Amica 2467 (talk) 06:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Schadstoffe.jpg

File:Schadstoffe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Motopark (talk) 14:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

@ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Motopark Hallo Motopark, warum hast Du meine Grafik gelöscht / why did you delete my picture 2 days after sending me a message? I created it myself with ppt and saved it as jpg / ich habe sie selbst erstellt mit ppt und als jpg gespeichert. Beim Hochladen habe ich angegeben, dass sie mein eigenes Werk ist. Wo ist das Problem? Sie enthält wertvolle Informationen. Soll ich sie abmalen und dann fotografieren?

Und warum so schnell? Am 01.10. erhalte ich Deine Mail und heute morgen, 03.10., ist sie schon weg. Wollt Ihr keine freiwilligen, ehrenamtlichen Mitarbeiter? Vielen Dank für Deine Antwort im voraus. --Amica 2467 (talk) 07:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Amika.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Amika.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Amika.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:54, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Die Quelle ist: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crystal_Clear_kdm_user_female.png --Amica 2467 (talk) 07:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Phoenixsee Bodenprofil.JPG

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Phoenixsee Bodenprofil.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:54, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Hedwig in Washington (mail?) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hedwig_in_Washington Hallo Hedwig, ich verstehe Deinen Wunsch, ich solle die Quelle zu der Grafik https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phoenixsee_Bodenprofil.JPG angeben nicht?!

Ich habe sie selbst erstellt. Die Informationen stammen aus der im Bild angegebenen Literatur. Auch weiss ich nicht, wo ich etwas eintragen soll? Html kann ich nicht. Aber wenn solch wertvolle Informationen in Wikipedia geloescht werden, wuerde das mein Bild von Wikipedia sehr erschuettern. Die Stadtvaeter haben diese Infos sehr gut versteckt, ich habe sie aufgrund meiner beruflichen Erfahrung herausgefiltert und in dieser Grafik auch für Laien zugaenglich gemacht, damit die Anwohner die Qualität des Bodens einschaetzen und sich entsprechend verhalten bzw. ihre Kinder schuetzen koennen. Wenn so etwas verloren ginge, nur weil ich mich im Dickicht von Wikipedia nicht zurechtfinde, wuerde Wikipedia sich zum Mittaeter machen. Finanzielle Unterstützung für Wikipedia fände ich dann falsch. Bitte hilf mir, diese Grafik zu erhalten.

Vielen Dank. --Amica 2467 (talk) 07:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

@ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hedwig_in_Washington : It's real pity that you deleted my self-made chart of a soil profile and the contaminant content. / Schade, dass Du mein selbst erstelltes Bild doch, und ohne Erklärung, gelöscht hast.

Die Menschen in dieser Region wurden um diese Informationen betrogen - nun auch von Wikipedia. Meine Wertschätzung wurde gleich mit gelöscht: Ich werde keine Zeit, Arbeit und kein Geld mehr investieren.--Amica 2467 (talk) 12:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Amica 2467, du hast bei deinem letzten Edit auf Hedwigs Disku alle möglichen anderen Beiträge geändert und gelöscht, siehe [1]. Vermutlich war das unbeabsichtigt. Ich habe jedenfalls alles rückgängig gemacht. Deshalb musst du deine letzte Nachricht erneut posten, aber möglichst etwas vorsichtiger. --Túrelio (talk) 12:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

@ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:T%C3%BArelio Entschuldigung, ich weiß nicht, wie das passieren konnte. WP wird mir immer unheimlicher. --Amica 2467 (talk) 12:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Kein Problem. Das kommt immer wieder mal vor. --Túrelio (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

:-) --Amica 2467 (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Talk page edits of Hedwig in Washington

I don't understand why you did it, but your two recent edits to Hedwig's talk page caused several paragraphs to be deleted, including one I wrote asking for undeletion of a file. I do not think you did this intentionally, so I am contacting you to ask you to be more careful in the future. You have made a mess here and now I must try to sort some of it out so that Hedwig can actually read what I wrote. KDS4444 (talk) 13:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

I am sorry, I didn't do it on purpose. It just seems to happen without a sign to me. It didn't happen on other sites, yet. --Amica 2467 (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

{{YGM}}

@https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hedwig_in_Washington: Danke, Deine Mail hat mich erreicht, und ich habe sie beantwortet. Soweit ich verstanden habe, schickst Du mir jetzt eine email ueber das "OTRS System" und erst darin fuelle ich die "Vorlage" aus?! (Nicht schon in Deiner Mail, richtig?) --Amica 2467 (talk) 06:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Amica 2467. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Gesendet 17.10. Hier den Text ausgefuellt einbauen. LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hedwig_in_Washington , Du hattest mir eine "OTRS mail" angekuendigt!? Ist das jetzt ein alternativer Weg?

I hereby affirm that I, Amica 2467, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work File:Phoenixsee Bodenprofil.JPG.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications of others made to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Amica 2467, 21.10.2015 Okay? Ist es damit geschafft? --Amica 2467 (talk) 07:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)