User talk:Botaurus-stellaris/Archiv 3

      Archiv 1      

      Archiv 2      



 
File:Eugène Boudin - Vue depuis les hauteurs de Camaret.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.2.35.15 21:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Sotheby's

Dear Botaurus, please, if you can also put a few pictures from the site www.sothebys.com

Important Old Master Paintings and Sculpture [N08825], New York. It's lots 66, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 219, 223, 224.

Help, help, help!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 14. Mär. 2012 (UTC)

You can download it yourself. Here are the links: 66, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 223, 224. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very, very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 10:57, 16. Mär. 2012‎ (UTC)

A new point (Sothebys images)

Dear Botaurus, please, help me again. I need:

Auction [N08869], New York, lots: 7, 12, 13, 15, 20, 25, 27, 33, 51, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60, 61, 64, 67, 70, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 96, 103, 104, 111, 113, 114, 115.
Auction [L12112], London, lots: 101, 107, 109, 110, 111, 117, 120, 127, 133, 227, 228.

Perform this please my request.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs)

I've seen not at all, because it is under an old point. Sorry, but a new problem always create of a new chapter.
Can you please send me the links to these images?. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 21:24, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
The paintings of Auction [N08869], New York, lots: 7, 13, 33, 51, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 89 and from Auction [L12112], London, lots: 107 and 117 are now on Commons.

The other paintings mybee later. Here are the weblinks for the JPEG-files: Auction [N08869], New York, lots: 12, 15, 20, 25, 27, 61, 64, 67, 70, 87, 88, 90, 95, 96, 103, 104, 111, 113, 114, 115
and Auction [L12112], London, lots: 101, 109, 110, 111, 120, 127, 133, 227, 228 (the paining in the number 228 is not free, the painter Feodot V. Sychkov was death in 1958!. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Dear Botaurus,share with me the secret of how to download the most Sothebys? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 30. Mai 2012‎ (UTC)

Withe this: DounloadHelper 4.9.9 --Botaurus (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Explained how to use this popular prog. On the fingers so to speak.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 30. Mai 2012‎ (UTC)

The addon installs itself in the top of the Firefox-browser. You see it when it is ready to download media. You click on it then.
I use this Sotheby's-page and previously operable the zoom-function. You can also use this page. Then you click on the image. Now you have the URL http://www.sothebys.com/content/dam/stb/lots/MI0/MI0292/MI0292-142-lr-1.jpg.thumb.500.500.png. Then delete the back thurs .thumb.500.500.png. The remainder of the URL http://www.sothebys.com/content/dam/stb/lots/MI0/MI0292/MI0292-142-lr-1.jpg is the big picture. regards --Botaurus (talk) 22:36, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Minneapolis Institute of Arts

Hi Botaurus! Again I have to ask you about the service. Please put the following pictures from www.artsconnected.org. There are:

  • André Hercule de Fleury, cardinal Accession Number: P.1,461
  • Charles I, King of Great Britain Accession Number: P.3,363
  • Jacques Bénigne Bossuet Accession Number: P.1,449
  • Jules Mazarin, Cardinal, Ministre d 'Etat Accession Number: P.1,650
  • Marie Antoinette Accession Number: P.17,049
  • Louis de France, le Grand Dauphin Accession Number: P.1,464
  • Louis XIV Accession Number: P.14,506
  • Louis XVI Accession Number: P.1,750
  • Abel François Poisson de Vandières, Marquis de Marigny Accession Number: P.1,711
  • Anne d 'Autriche, Reine de France Accession Number: P.1,552  reduced version (1.824 × 2.377px)
  • The Marriage of Psyche and Cupid, from The Gems of Marlborough Accession Number: P.17,339  reduced version (942 × 1.188px)
  • Nymphs at the Bath Accession Number: 70.70  
  • Portrait of Countess Maria Theresia Bucquoi Accession Number: 78.7  
  • Telemachus and Eucharis Accession Number: 78.25   reduced version (1.064 × 1.238 px)
  • The Bath of Diana Accession Number: 64.37.2 
  • The Death of Germanicus Accession Number: 58.28 
  • The Comtesse d'Egmont Pignatelli in Spanish Costume Accession Number: 2006.33  reduced version (1.284 × 1.694 px)
  • The Marriage of the Duke and Duchess of York Accession Number: 68.46
Help, help, help me please!!!!


Hello Lois 976, I know this site is not. Can you please give me a better link. --Botaurus (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
So it does not help me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 11:17, 26. Apr. 2012‎ (UTC)

Sorry, here is my tool not functionable. --Botaurus (talk) 21:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

PD-art/1923

Einen schönen guten Abend! Ich habe gerade Deine Schiffsbilder von Henry Scott Tuke gefunden und wollte dir einen Tip zum "Platzsparen" bei der Lizenz geben. Es gibt auch {{PD-art/1923}}, wo man das Sterbejahr des Urhebers als Parameter einträgt. Dann muss nicht PD-art-two nehmen. Gruß, De728631 (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. 1923 bezieht sich aber wohl nicht auf das Sterbejahr, sondern darauf, daß das Werk vor 1923 veröffentlicht wurde, denn z.B {{PD-art/1920}} oder {{PD-art/1930}} gibt es nicht. Gruß --Botaurus (talk) 05:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

A new point (Sothebys images) 2

My dear, I have nothing. Help again. Auction PF 1209, lots: 6;   17;   19; 20; 22;  23;  24; 26; 33; 35; 36; 38; 39; 40; 44;   45; 49;  51;   53; 54; 55; 57;  59; 60; 66; 68; 72;  73a; 78; 83;  88; 89;  96 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 31. May. 2012‎ (UTC)

Could you beginning with nothing I've written above? --Botaurus (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
I do not work. When I go to the site of Sotheby's prog is not spinning, and writes that the media files were found.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 02. Jun. 2012‎ (UTC)

You must try it. The second method works well.
Please sign your edits by clicking this toolbar buttons   in the top. --Botaurus (talk) 19:29, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi! How to download pictures in high resolution with Sotheby's with DounloadHelper 4.9.9? When I enter the site and increase Sotheby liked my picture does not work, and when you press the issue that the media files were found. Please describe in detail how to download pictures from Sotheby's, auctions, which have not passed. Please help, I can not understand. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 4 June 2012 (UTC)
And what about the other pictures? Upload, help me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Here are the links: 19, 20, 24, 26, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 44, 53, 54, 55, 59, 60, 66, 58, 73a, 78, 88, 96 --Botaurus (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

http://www.bonhams.com/auctions

There are some numbers of images on this site that I want to upload. Can you help me?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

I can. example:
Website: http://www.bonhams.com/auctions/15996/lot/752/
little image http://images1.bonhams.com/erez4/erez?src=Images/live/2008-10/07/94429388-44-1.JPG.tif&tmp=web300&top=0.000000&left=0.000000&right=1.000000&bottom=1.000000
large Image http://images1.bonhams.com/erez4/erez?src=Images/live/2008-10/07/94429388-44-1.JPG
If the image URL must be deleted, the rear end. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 00:21, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Can you help me with these? I am not sure which is the better one on the first. Can you upload their largest resolution onto the image files under the links. Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:42, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

These are different cases. In the small pictures of the big Bonhams you can simply upload over it .. In the hand-colored etchings, prints or lithographs from other sources are independent works of art. Here you can upload the other images separately as a new file. Please excuse for my bad English.--Botaurus (talk) 01:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

How? I don't see a pattern in the links you gave me above, so I don't know how to get the biggest resolution. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:22, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Here the same example with one of your pictures you want:

Website: http://www.bonhams.com/auctions/17538/lot/177/
little image http://images2.bonhams.com/erez4/erez?src=Images/live/2009-10/20/7951175-2-1.jpg.tif&tmp=web300&top=0.000000&left=0.000000&right=1.000000&bottom=1.000000
large image http://images2.bonhams.com/erez4/erez?src=Images/live/2009-10/20/7951175-2-1.jpg

Now I put the large-image-links behind the websites-links. Greetings --Botaurus (talk) 10:41, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Bremen (ship, 1897) - SLV H91.108-1577.jpg

Are You shure of uploading a picture of Bremen. It seems to me the ship is lower, has a different bow, and less lifeboats then Bremen--Erb34 (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

After 1901, the ship was rebuilt (extended). --Botaurus (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Dein Eintrag

Hallo Botaurus, dein Eintrag des Schiffs Oregon [1] auf der Seite New ships war nicht notwendig. Die Seite wird vom Category Bot befüllt. Habe den doppelten Eintrag soeben entfernt. VG --Rolf H. (talk) 02:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Danke, habe ich schon gemerkt. --Botaurus (talk) 06:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

thank-you

Thank-you for cleaning up my little mess. I did notice it, and would have gotten to it at some point, but you beat me to it. Good people like you are the reason slightly lesser people like me are known as procrastinators ;-) – JBarta (talk) 23:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

(: --Botaurus (talk) 01:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

My dear! Download the following images from the site http://www.tretyakovgallery.ru: 1,  2, 3, 4, 5,  6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36,  37

There are many images already on commons, see for example here 36. --Botaurus (talk) 06:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, there are some, but not all that I have.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 20. Jun. 2012‎ (UTC)

Выложи, пожалуйста, картинки, которые я указал. Спасибо тебе большое. Ты классный.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.122.47.109 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 22. Jun. 2012 (UTC)
Laid out, please, picture that I have. Thank you very much. You are cool.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 30. Jun. 2012‎ (UTC)
And the other pictures? Overlaid them too please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 10:23, 11. Jul. 2012‎ (UTC)
I can not download the images. I'll make screenshots and put the pictures together from four pieces. That's why I can not do that many. --Botaurus (talk) 09:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Two descriptions so you can patch as you see fit

== {{int:filedesc}} == {{Information |Description = ''In the lee of the port bow of the 'Parma' while becalmed''<br/> Reproduction ID: N61346 {{Creator:Alan Villiers}} [http://www.nmm.ac.uk/visit/exhibitions/past/villiers-display/ Villiers collection] |Source=originally posted to '''[[Flickr|Flickr]]''' as [http://www.flickr.com/photos/nationalmaritimemuseum/4149290249/ In the lee of the port bow of the 'Parma' while becalmed] |Date = {{other date|between|1932|1933}} |Author = [http://www.flickr.com/photos/11334970@N05 National Maritime Museum] from Greenwich, United Kingdom |Permission = |other_versions = }}

=={{int:license-header}}== {{PD-author|National Maritime Museum}} {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}} {{User:Flickr upload bot/upload-pd|date=03:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)|reviewer=Motacilla}}

[[Category:Parma (ship, 1902)]] [[Category:Photographs by Alan Villiers]] [[Category:Photographs in the National Maritime Museum, London]] [[Category:Black and white photographs]]


{{Information |Description= {{en|1=In the lee of the port bow of the 'Parma' while becalmed.}}'''Reproduction ID:''' N61346<br />'''Maker:''' [[:en:Alan Villiers|Alan Villiers]]<br />Villiers collection [http://www.nmm.ac.uk/visit/exhibitions/past/villiers-display/ www.nmm.ac.uk/visit/exhibitions/past/villiers-display/] |Source=[http://www.flickr.com/photos/nationalmaritimemuseum/4149290249/ In the lee of the port bow of the 'Parma' while becalmed] |Date=1932<nowiki>-33 |Author=National Maritime Museum from Greenwich, United Kingdom |Permission= |other_versions= }}</nowiki>

=={{int:license-header}}== {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}} {{User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-pass-change|National Maritime Museum|http://flickr.com/photos/11334970@N05/4149290249|23:15, 7 November 2010 (UTC)|No known copyright restrictions|}}


[[Category:Parma (ship, 1902)]] [[Category:Photographs by Alan Villiers]] [[Category:Photographs in the National Maritime Museum, London]] [[Category:Black and white photographs]]

Thanks, but in both cases is the description of me. The actual from yesterday. --Botaurus (talk) 14:29, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Alexej von Jawlensky - Sitzender weiblicher Akt.jpg

Defaultsort nach Vornamen macht nicht wirklich Sinn ?Oursana (talk) 00:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Nach Jahreszahl auch nicht. Die gesamte Kategorie ist jedoch thematisch sortiert. --Botaurus (talk) 00:32, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

==File:Alexej von Jawlensky - Spanierin.jpg DEFAULTSORT:Spanierin, da nur Jawlensky cat;Entfernung cat A..Jawlensky, da speziellere cat Paintings by Alexej von Jawlensky in the Lenbachhaus,Vermeidung v ÜbersortierungOursana (talk) 07:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories#Over-categorizationOursana (talk) 07:35, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Lass einfach die Hände von der Kategorie und kümmere Dich um Dein eigenes Zeug. --Botaurus (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

Amazing uploads! It's people like you who make wikimedia so great! Palosirkka (talk) 19:41, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

(: --Botaurus (talk) 04:46, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

John Constable's Images of DEDHAM, England

Hi there, Botaurus, I hope this is the right way to contact you; it's my first time trying something like this! I noticed you were listed as the user for the jpeg's of some of John Constable's images around Dedham, England. The problem is that in the file name itself (but not necessarily in the text of the page) the location name has been misspelled "Deadham". This means searches for the proper name will not find the image. There are other Dedham/Deadham files with other users, but they don't seem to be active. Can you help clean this up, please? Danke vielmals! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Libri293 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 26. Jul. 2012 (UTC)

I think, you mean File:Constable-deadham-from-langam.jpg. The picture was not named by me. I've just uploaded a larger version. However, I will cause a renaming in File:John Constable, Dedham from Langham.jpg . Thanks for the information and greetings. --Botaurus (talk) 16:07, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely cmadler (talk) 15:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Traktor rs08-3.jpg

 
File:Traktor rs08-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 08:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Traktor rs08-2.jpg

 
File:Traktor rs08-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 08:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Traktor rs08-4.jpg

 
File:Traktor rs08-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 08:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Potsdam - Lange Brücke 1907.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Potsdam - Lange Brücke 1907.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Potsdam - Lange Brücke 1907.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 09:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Priwall - Flying P-Liner.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Smooth_O (talk) 09:55, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Bruun Rasmussen

Hello! Maybe there's a chance to see this picture. Thanks in advance. Regards, Igor http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:IgorSokol

1235/194: Painter unknown, 19th century: Portrait of King Frederik V, 1746-1766. http://www.bruun-rasmussen.dk/search.do?pg=8&iid=300496217&cid=453&mode=detail

The painting is now here. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I hope that future similar requests will not be left without your attention. I wish you all the best. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:IgorSokol


Привет! Приятно, что можно общаться на русском.

Если Вас не затруднит, скачать ещё два изображения, буду признателен.

831/125: Christian Hornemann: Portrait of the young King Christian VIII (1786-1848) http://www.bruun-rasmussen.dk/search.do?pg=13&iid=300480410&cid=453&mode=detail


831/116: Christoph Wilhelm Wohlien: Portrait of Frederik VI (1784-1839) in a red jacket and with the Order of the Elephant 1809. http://www.bruun-rasmussen.dk/search.do?pg=12&iid=300480411&cid=453&mode=detail

Пытался самостоятельно разобраться. Не получилось. Не могу понять, как пользоваться программой: Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic, чтобы перевести в JPEG и скачать большую картинку. Программу скачал, как работает не пойму. Может быть, возможно, подробно объяснить.

С уважением, Игорь Соколов.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:IgorSokol

Пожалуйста, войдите подпись, нажав на эту кнопок на панели инструментов в верхней  , этой последовательности символов --~~~~, автоматически создается ваша подпись.
Картины здесь отображается:    . --Botaurus (talk) 21:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


Спасибо за портреты. С подписью ничего не понял. Sorry. Я учитель истории. С компьютерными технологиями и точными науками у меня плохо. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:IgorSokol

нажмите на кнопку назначенные. Затем наступает символ --~~~~ и сделано (готово?). Подпись затем автоматически. --Botaurus (talk) 06:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Понятно. Спасибо. --IgorSokol (talk) 18:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Bruun & Rasmussen

Уважаемый Botaurus подскажите как вы скачиваете картинки с сайта Bruun & Rasmussen? Буду вам очень признателен за подробный ответ. Благодарю. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lois976 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 3. Sep. 2012‎ (UTC)

Принцип описаны здесь, на немецком языке. --Botaurus (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

File:James Clarke Hook - The landing party.jpg

 
File:James Clarke Hook - The landing party.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rsberzerker (talk) 17:12, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


 

Hi Botaurus-stellaris, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry 05:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks --Botaurus (talk) 05:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

File:The Junkerboden under snow.jpg

 
File:The Junkerboden under snow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Jean de Labadie by Emil Puls.jpg

 
File:Jean de Labadie by Emil Puls.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vsop.de (talk) 20:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Warum bist du eigentlich immer so aggressiv?? Warum willst du Category:Virgin and Child between St Anthony of Padua and St Roque nicht wahrnehmen, die i ü. nicht meine Erfindung ist. Und warum soll ein Bildtitel wie immer keine Kategorie sein?? Einfaches Rücksetzen ist keine Lösung.--Oursana (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Die Lösung ist ein richtiger Kategoriename. Einfach einen Bildtitel ohne Künstlernamen bzw. Museum oder Jahr dazu, und auch noch in Englisch (bei Bildern anderssprachiger Maler), macht das Bild über das Kategoriesystem gegebenenfalls unauffindbar. Es ist eine Bilderversteckkategorie. Außerdem kann es zufällig noch ein anderes Bild gleichen Namens geben. --Botaurus (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC) (PS. Eine Diskusion führt man besser dort weiter, wo sie angefangen wurde.)
Vielen Dank, so ist es perfekt. Jedenfalls in dieser Kategorie. Bleibt der Löschantrag. Das ältere Bild hat nur Vorrang bei identischer oder besserer Auflösung. Woran siehst du, dass File:The Virgin and Child between Saint Anthony of Padua and Saint Roque.jpg bearbeitet ist? Das Entfernen meines Löschantrages ist nun aber wirklich Vandalismus. Ich möchte gerne das Bild mit der geringeren Auflösung, und das ist leider Deines, löschen lassen. Kannst Du bitte meinen Löschantrag wiederherstellen. Wenn Du recht hast, wird der Administrator dies berücksichtigen.--Oursana (talk) 22:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Die Auflösung ist keineswegs geringer. Die Seitenlängen sind die Gleichen. Es ist ja auch die selbe Quelle. Das andere Bild ist vom Megabite-Bereich her größer, weil es nicht verlustfrei bearbeitet wurde. Du könntest mit dem gleichen Argument duplicate-Anträge gegen alle anderen Bilder in der Kategorie stellen. Damit wirst Du Dir hier jedoch keine Freunde machen. Ein duplicate-Antrag ist übrigens kein eigentlicher Löschantrag, bei dem man etwas begründen muß. Insofern würde kaum ein Admin irgendwas berücksichtigen. Er würde einfach löschen. --Botaurus (talk) 22:47, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Habsburger

Hello! Maybe you can get high-resolution images from this source. Thanks in advance.

König Albrecht II., 16. http://text.habsburger.net/habsburger-herrscher/albrecht-ii.-v.-habsburg/originalbild


Herzog Friedrich IV. von Tirol "mit der leeren Tasche", 16. Jahrhundert http://text.habsburger.net/habsburger-im-familienportraet/friedrich-iv.-habsburg/originalbild

Johann Bocksberger der Ältere: Kaiser Ferdinand I., Mitte 16. Jahrhundert http://text.habsburger.net/habsburger-herrscher/ferdinand-i.-habsburg-oesterreichische-linie/originalbild

Frans Luycx: Kaiser Ferdinand III., Ölgemälde, um 1637/1638 http://text.habsburger.net/habsburger-herrscher/ferdinand-iii.-habsburg-oesterreichische-linie/originalbild

Joachim von Sandrart: Duke Maximilian I, Prince-Elector of Bavaria, c. 1643 http://english.habsburger.net/module-en/bila-hora-2013-ein-tschechisches-trauma/bila-hora-2013-ein-tschechisches-trauma/MB-ST_D13-MOD2-01.jpg/?size=preview&plus=1

Nicolas Neufchatel (attr.): Emperor Maximilian II (1527-1576) at the age of around forty, oil painting, after 1566 http://english.habsburger.net/module-en/endlich-beamter-die-verweltlichung-der-hofmusikkapelle/endlich-beamter-die-verweltlichung-der-hofmusikkapelle/MB-ST_K20-MOD2-02.png/?size=preview&plus=1


Archduke Charles II with a distant prospect of Graz, 1569 http://english.habsburger.net/module-en/dreiteilung-des-oesterreichischen-erbes/dreiteilung-des-oesterreichischen-erbes/MB-ST_D11-MOD5-02.jpg/?size=preview&plus=1


Kaiser Joseph I. als römisch-deutscher Kaiser im Krönungsornat, gekrönt mit der Reichskrone, die ungarische Stephanskrone ist am Tisch zu sehen http://text.habsburger.net/module/reformeifer-im-barock-joseph-i/reformeifer-im-barock-joseph-i/MB-ST_D12-MOD4-03.jpg/?size=preview&plus=1


Hans Maler: Erzherzog Ferdinand, 1521, Lindenholz http://text.habsburger.net/module/der-vollender-ferdinand-i/der-vollender-ferdinand-i/MB-ST_K11-MOD4-01.jpg/?size=preview&plus=1

--IgorSokol (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Since I have to disappoint you, unfortunately. Here I have found no way to figure out the big picture. regards --Botaurus (talk) 02:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

I get it. Thanks for your attempt. Good luck. One comment. The increase is not visible in the browser Opera. I'm on my computer, I see an increase in Google Chrome. --IgorSokol (talk) 09:50, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Bruun Rasmussen

Hello! Huge request, please put this picture. 836/171: Martin van Meytens II, ascribed to: Portrait of Charles VI (1685-1740), Holy Roman Emperor. http://www.bruun-rasmussen.dk/search.do?pg=15&iid=300507148&cid=453&mode=detail --IgorSokol (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

:Hallo Igor, my comuter does not create this file (to big?). Try this link with you and write to me if he can. --Botaurus (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

  here is it. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 19:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks.--IgorSokol (talk) 19:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 03:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Danke

Thanks for adding information to one of my uploads. I haven't been on Commons for very long and I am still trying to figure things out... it was the first thing I put any effort into. I couldn't find much information about this painting myself. My German is almost non-existent :) —Moogsi (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

(: --Botaurus (talk) 03:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Hirschjagd des Kurfürsten Friedrich des Weisen (Kunsthistorisches Museum).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:37, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Sündenfall und Erlösung (Národní galerie v Praze).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Die Früchte der Eifersucht (Das silberne Zeitalter), Schlossmuseum Weimar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Bildnis einer Frau.jpg

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Bildnis einer Frau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Katharinenaltar (Dresden & London).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Sybille von Cleve (Veste Coburg).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Katharinenaltar (Dresden) linker Flügel, innen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Katharinenaltar (Dresden) rechter Flügel, innen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Das Martyrium der heiligen Katarina (Ráday Library, Budapest).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Venus mit Amor (Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Katharinenaltar (Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:46, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Hercules und Antaeus.jpg

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Hercules und Antaeus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:47, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. 026.jpg

 
File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. 026.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. - Quellnymphe (Veste Coburg).jpg

 
File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. - Quellnymphe (Veste Coburg).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Lot und seine Töchter (Kunsthistorisches Museum).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Lot und seine Töchter (Staatsgalerie Aschaffenburg).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Das Jesuskind mit dem jugendlichen Johannes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Lot und seine Töchter (Veste Coburg).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Lot und seine Töchter (Alte Pinakothek).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Ruhe-auf-der-Flucht.jpg

 
File:Ruhe-auf-der-Flucht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Der-Sterbende-1518.jpg

 
File:Der-Sterbende-1518.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Gesetz und Gnade (Lutherhaus Wittenberg).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:56, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Verdammnis und Erlösung (Schloss Friedenstein).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:56, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

 
File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. (Werkstatt) - Hirschjagd (Kunstmuseum Basel).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 14:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Botaurus-stellaris/Archiv 3".