Gridge

Talk archive
First archive
Second archive

Image:Austrian_Post_Office_(Jerusalem).jpg סימון התמונה

.קובץ זה עלול להימחק

הנאמר להלן נכתב למען הנוחות בלשון זכר, ויכול להתאים לשני המינים.

תודה לך על העלאת Image:Austrian_Post_Office_(Jerusalem).jpg. שמתי לב שדף התמונה אינו כולל את פרטי יוצר התמונה, וכן גם מעמדה מבחינת זכויות היוצרים אינו ברור. אם לא יצרת את המדיה בעצמך אז עליך לנמק מדוע יש לנו הזכות לכלול אותה בוויקישיתוף (ראה תגי זכויות יוצרים בהמשך). אם לא יצרת את התמונה בעצמך, עליך גם לרשום במדויק היכן מצאת אותה, וברוב המקרים מדובר בקישור לאתר בו מופיעה התמונה, והוספת התניות השימוש מדף זה. אם התוכן שהוספת הוא יצירה נגזרת של יצירה בעלת זכויות יוצרים, עליך לרשום את הפרטים של יוצרי היצירה ואת הרישיון שבו בחרו.

אם מדיה זו אינה כוללת תג זכויות יוצרים, עליך להוסיף אחד בעצמך. אם יצרת/הפקת את התמונה, סרטון או קובץ קול, תוכל לסמן אותו בתג {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} בכדי להפיץ אותו ברשיון Creative Commons או לסמן אותו כ-{{PD-self}} כדי לשחרר אותו לרשות הציבור. ראה Commons:Copyright tags עבור הרשימה המלאה של תגי זכויות היוצרים, העומדים לרשותך.

שים לב, שכל תמונה בלי ציון פרטים ורישיון תימחק שבוע לאחר העלאתה, כפי שרשום בקריטריונים למחיקה מהירה. אם אתה מעלה מדיה נוספת, בדוק בבקשה שרשמת את המקור וסטטוס זכויות היוצרים שלה. תוכל למצוא את כל הקבצים שהעלית באמצעות שימוש בכלי הגלריה.

תודה.

Ecemaml (talk to me/habla conmigo) 00:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Fine :-) I didn't know what to look for :-) Please, mind that in the lower part of the page, you can find the "permanent" URL to the photo. This time is http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/matpc.08716. And what's better, there is a template to properly source this kind of images: {{LOC-image}}. An example of use can be seen here. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk to me/habla conmigo) 00:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC) PS: I think you've uploaded other images from the same source. Would you mind updating the source information in them?

I didn't find the '"permanent" URL to the photo'. Gridge 00:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC).

I will look for more images from this source. Gridge 00:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC).

Image:Above Tel-Aviv (and Ramat-Gan).jpg

I'm afraid that the source you've provided is wrong. It's The Sopranos' house! Best regards --Ecemaml (talk to me/habla conmigo) 21:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I fixed the source.

That's because I copied the infrastructure... You know, I change my mind, you can delete this image, it's not worth the "weight". Gridge 22:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC).

Well, I've preferred to leave it. As we have it and it's properly sourced and tagged... Best regards --Ecemaml (talk to me/habla conmigo) 22:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Fine. Gridge 22:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC).

Jam in Flickr review needed category

Hi Gridge, the problem seem to be that the most of the reviews were done by a bot, FlickreviewR (talk · contribs) which, unfortunately, was deactivated all Christmas time (up to Epiphany). Its controller, Bryan (talk · contribs) is back and FlickreviewR has begun to work again, as you can see here. The jam should disappeard in a few hours. Best regards --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 13:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Gridge 14:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC).

Re: Copyright violation of the IDF

 Done

Hi Ave, I've removed all the images. May I suppose that you've already talked to the uploader and therefore no explaination from my side is needed? Anyway, at your service --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 17:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC) PS: if you talk to him again, please, ask him to use descriptive names

Thanks, and yes, I did talk to him. Gridge 17:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC).

Re: What Seems To Be The Problem?

Well, I don't really know. It's not the first time I've been warned of such warnings from the bot and in all cases, the image seemed to be OK. Therefore, I've reviewed your photo and now it's all right. Best regards --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 12:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, man. Gridge 16:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC).

Image Tagging Image:Moshe_Katsav_2,_by_Amir_Gilad.JPG

I have a permission for the entire category. Gridge 20:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC).

Image Tagging Image:Moshe_Katsav,_by_Amir_Gilad.JPG

I have a permission for the entire category. Gridge 20:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC).

Category:Photos by Idobi

היי גרידג', מה עושים בשביל למחוק את הקטגוריה הזאת ?

(נורא מוזר שאין לי כפתור של "מחק" במקום הזה) Idobi 12:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

חייו הקשים של לא-מפעיל... רוקן את הקטגוריה מהקטגוריה שמופיעה בה, סמן אותה בתבנית {{speedy}} והמתן. הייתי עושה זאת בעצמי, אך אתה יצרת אותה והחבר'ה פה לא מאוד "קלים". Gridge 15:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC).

police memorial

לא ברור לי מה הם רוצים ממני. צילמתי את התמונה בעצמי אתמול וכתבתי את זה. מה לא בסדר כאן?

Avi1111 15:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

You wrote "public domaine". You should have write "{{PD-self}}". But now it's fine - just like I said. Gridge 19:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC).

Image Tagging Image:Cambridge, Massachusetts City Hall.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cambridge, Massachusetts City Hall.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Infrogmation 19:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but I can't help. You can delete it. Gridge 23:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC).

Oh, I see you managed anyway. Good. Gridge 23:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC).

Yes. When moving images, please be sure to copy complete information-- source & license are especially important, but I'd reccomend it best to copy whatever descriptive text is there. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 23:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure. Regards, Gridge 14:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC).

Image:Rear Admiral Ze'ev Almog.jpg

Hello Aviad,

Why do you think this pic was made by the US Navy? the source link lead to the homepage of the US Navy but in a search of their photo archive this pic doesn't seem to appear.סוצנג 14:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I know this photo was made by the US Navy because Mr. Almog told me so. And I prefer to communicate in Hebrew. Gridge 17:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC).

היי גרידג'

אתה יודע אולי איפה מבקשים פה להחליף שם משתמש? כל פעם שאני נכנס לשיתוף אני אוטומטית משתמש:עידו, ואז אני צריך להתנתק ולהתחבר מחדש כמשתמש:idobi, וכשאני חוזר לוויקיפדייתנו אני שוב צריך לעשות לוג אין מחדש. נורא מתיש. Idobi (talk) 20:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

היי עידו. הדף הוא: Commons:Changing username. בהצלחה. Gridge (talk) 21:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC).

Majdi Halabi

Hi! I noticed that you obtained permission for and uploaded the images for Ehud Goldwasser (Image:Ehud Goldwasser.jpg) and Eldad Regev (Image:Eldad Regev.jpg). Since you have some experience in this area, I wondered whether you could do the same for Majdi Halabi. Thank you, Black Falcon (talk) 05:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Well in fact I didn't get that permission, but I do have some experience in that area. I'll see what I can do, no promises. Gridge (talk) 13:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC).

Sorry, I saw that you uploaded the images and just assumed... By the way, there is a photo of Halabi available online for which a non-free use rationale could be written, but a free image would naturally be more desirable. I really appreciate you taking the time to seek one. Thanks again, Black Falcon (talk) 22:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but my contact man failed to reach Halabi's familiy. Gridge (talk) 08:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC).

OK, thank you for trying. Best, Black Falcon (talk) 05:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ken Follett 2007.JPG

Hi! You've stated that you obtained permission from the author to release Image:Ken Follett 2007.JPG under a CC license. Since the original Flickr image is still marked as "all rights reserved", could you please forward that permission to OTRS? Otherwise, the image might be deleted. Thanks, Pruneau^talk 16:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Just did. Gridge (talk) 19:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC).

Image:Candace Bushnell 2003.jpg

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses

Image:Candace Bushnell 2003.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.

-Sterkebaktalk 18:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi Gridge, nice to hear from you again. As far as I can see, the problem is that the license of the picture is not compatible with that of commons. CC licenses that does not allow modification (that is, those marked as ND, non-derivative) are not compatible. More information here. Best regards --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 16:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I understand. Thank you, Gridge (talk) 22:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC).

Image:The_Palestine_Post,_ISRAEL_IS_BORN.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:The_Palestine_Post,_ISRAEL_IS_BORN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

sугсго 10:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

re: Edith Stein

Helo! It's father Jerzy Zieliński OCD, carmelite, who have chosen the license of this photo. But also I think those could be wrong... Paterm (talk) 21:56, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Could be. Gridge (talk) 00:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC).

File source is not properly indicated: File:Atila_Shumplevi.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Atila_Shumplevi.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 23:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

The license is complete, it's customary to uploaded photos from different language editions of Wikipedia. Gridge (talk) 00:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC).

Gridge,

אנא הצץ בדף השיחה שלי. מכיר פה מישהו שיכול לסייע? Idobi (talk) 09:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

היי עידו. שייכתי את התמונה לשתי קטגוריות כלליות, בהן היא תשכון, עד שיימצא מי שיודע לאן בדיוק לשייך אותה. אם אינך יודע לאן לשייך תמונה, עדיף לשייכה לקטגוריה כללית, ולא להותירה ללא שיוך. השמועה מספרת שיש כאן גמדים שעוברים על הקטגוריות הכלליות, ומשייכים את התמונות לקטגוריות יותר מתאימות. זאת לעומת רובוטים שפונים למשתמשים במטרה שיעשו זאת בעצמם. אם יש צורך במומחים, לדעתי עדיף לחפש אותם בוויקיפדיה העברית, למשל דרך "הכה". אפשר גם לפתוח קטגוריה חדשה. Gridge (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC).

תודה. הייתי שולח לך זר כרמליות נאות, אבל ייתכן שמדובר בצמח מוגן. Idobi (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Gridge!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 14:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Kinderfreund Schirim.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:StressPerformance.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:BechirX04.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Governors.Blue+Red.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Square07.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

File:A_Retrospective_Exhibition,_Tel_Aviv_Museum_of_Art.jpg

File:A_Retrospective_Exhibition,_Tel_Aviv_Museum_of_Art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Some of your images for Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari

Some of your images for Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File tagging Image:Pnina Rosenblum.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pnina Rosenblum.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Okki (talk) 14:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Fine, give me a week or two. Gridge (talk) 10:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC).

File:Cathedral_of_Learning.jpg

File:Cathedral_of_Learning.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GrapedApe (talk) 03:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Woman_redhead_natural_portrait_1.jpg

File:Woman_redhead_natural_portrait_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LMK3 (talk) 03:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Dr. King's statue in Kelly Ingram Park.jpg

File:Dr. King's statue in Kelly Ingram Park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Karppinen (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Ray_Romano_2006.jpg

File:Ray_Romano_2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixer23 (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Almahdi.jpg

File:Almahdi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rafy (talk) 02:55, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Aerial_RMC.jpg

File:Aerial_RMC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gump Stump (talk) 05:39, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:0362ManteNude.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:0362ManteNude.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:0362ManteNude.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Dominic (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

File:SynagogueT.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:SynagogueT.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

--Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

File:VFKagan.jpg

File:VFKagan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 00:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ehud Goldwasser.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ehud Goldwasser.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ehud Goldwasser.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

FunkMonk (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Jayne Mansfield 1956.jpg

File:Jayne Mansfield 1956.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Aditya (talk) 05:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Jayne Mansfield 1956.jpg

File:Jayne Mansfield 1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 06:29, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Etai Pinkas.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Etai Pinkas.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Etai Pinkas.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

-mattbuck (Talk) 12:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jeremy Langford.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremy Langford.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

VernoWhitney (talk) 17:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

File:BechirX04.jpg

File:BechirX04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 13:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Gridge (talk) 14:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC).

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Peeking Orca.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrew Gray (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Denílson Pereira Neves.jpg

File:Denílson Pereira Neves.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tonelada ^{D C @} 03:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

What the hell. Gridge (talk) 11:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC).

File:Kupka planes by colors.jpg

File:Kupka planes by colors.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 17:00, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Fine. Gridge (talk) 17:44, 17 November 2014 (UTC).

File:HamRadioGirl.jpg

File:HamRadioGirl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

192.131.44.33 03:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Mark_Zuckerberg

Mark Zuckerberg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

95.53.35.178 14:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Amir Peretz Election.JPG

File:Amir Peretz Election.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Avital Abargil.jpg

File:Avital Abargil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 00:39, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ami Ayalon.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ami Ayalon.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Masur (talk) 12:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hexacomb.gif

And also:

• File:Monocomb.gif
• File:Pentacomb.gif
• File:Tetracomb.gif
• File:Tricomb.gif

Yours sincerely, DMacks (talk) 18:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Category:Robin_Wright_Penn

Category:Robin_Wright_Penn has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Geo Swan (talk) 03:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)