Heuschrecke

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Heuschrecke!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VDNKh alcove.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I wish you were in the centre, but QI for me. --Kadellar 11:41, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savvino Storoozhevsky Skete Planet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit of distortion, but QI for me. --Kadellar 17:39, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serg Posad Descent.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Venerable Savva 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the sky, but ok. --Mattbuck 10:19, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Novodevichy Transfiguration Dome 02 c.jpeg

Mojn,

da zwei Kommentatoren bei deinem Bild File:Novodevichy Transfiguration Dome 02.JPG bemängelt haben, dass es oben zu wenig Rand (= Himmel) gibt, habe ich mal eine Version mit einem Bisschen mehr Himmel angefertigt. Ich habe deine Informationen übernommen; was meinen Anteil betrifft, erreicht er meiner Meinung nach nicht die "Schöpfungshöhe" für einen eigenen Beitrag. Ist nur ein Beispiel.

Auflösung und Schärfe deines Bildes beeindrucken mich ebenso wie die anderen Kommentatoren! Ich war zwar mal in Moskau, aber Nowodewitschi habe ich nicht besucht.

Grüße, Aisano (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

• Dear Aisano, I'm extremely grateful for your contribution! Now I changed the nomination link to your version of the file. I was away for a while without internet, so I couldn't perform any corrections. Sorry for my misleading username, but I'm actually Russian :) Ich kenne Deutsch ein bisschen, aber nicht zu gut, um die ganze Antwort in Deutsch zu schreiben (I hope the sentence makes sence at least). Cheers, Heuschrecke (talk) 14:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

• upd: I noticed that the image contained a dust spot pointed out by Kreuzschnabel, so I re-uploaded the original image to fix that. I mentioned you in the Authors section. Thanks a lot once more! Heuschrecke (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Здравствый, Heuschrecke, твой немецкий язык – намного лучшый чем мой русский. Maybe you should create a user page with a "Babel" infobox ({{userboxtop}}{{user ru}}...) to tell people about the languages you use etc?

It was certainly the best thing that you took over my "sky" to your version. I would now like to propose my intermediate version for deletion (thanks for mentioning me in the comment to your version) but before I do that you should remove it from your page. Do you agree?

Привет, --Aisano (talk) 18:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novodevichy Transfiguration Dome 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very good sharpness, but the upper crop is too tight. --Iifar 07:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment Would be fine for me if there was a bit more space on the top side --Kreuzschnabel 07:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment If you add more sky at the top (there's enough sky in the picture) you might want to blur the extremely noisy sky --Aisano 19:47, 25 September 2012 (UTC)  Support It will be difficult to add more sky. But also without it the photo is QI. And where do you see an extremely noisy sky? -- Lothar Spurzem 22:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC) You may change your support to promotion, as nobody has voted against the picture so far. Sorry for saying "extremely noisy"; I never can see that with my eyes but Gimp tells me that the sky is noisy, which is normal at an exposure time of only 1/1000 s. I uploaded a proposal to point out how the crop at the top side might be repaired. --Aisano 19:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC) I changed to promotion. -- Lothar Spurzem 22:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC) I'm sorry, but the upper crop is too tight. --Kadellar 12:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)  Done I changed the link to Aisano's version with extended sky. Huge thanks Aisano, I was away and didn't have time to fix anything. Heuschrecke 14:37, 30 September 2012 (UTC) Now I notice Kreuzschnabel pointed out a dust spot; I removed it (and also a small piece of the building sticking out in the lower-right corner)Heuschrecke 18:02, 30 September 2012 (UTC) The crop is ok for me now, so back to Promotion. --Kadellar 21:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Heuschrecke, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khamovniki St Nicholas Church 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 13:49, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoram Soller and Ofre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to go Poco a poco 22:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palma de Mallorca cathedral view from west.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:24, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palma de Mallorca Cathedral portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

WLM Barnstar

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trevi top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tor dei Conti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty, but a bit blurry on the left. Maybe fixable? Mattbuck 04:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Uploaded a sharper shot Heuschrecke 18:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 20:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! O2 Arena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dull because of the weather, maybe it coiuld improve with a crop up and down, but QI for me. --Kadellar 13:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Providence Wharf 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 08:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenwich Foot Tunnel, Greenwich side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Naval College Greenwich view from the Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 19:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Greenwich foot tunnel, entrances (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 11:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Support : Good one! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:02, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 11:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Number 4 Princelet St.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but mildly unsharp. --Mattbuck 08:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novodevichy Transfiguration 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --The Photographer 14:52, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Shard and Southwark Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Queens College Clock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emmanuel College Chapel Top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bgag 22:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantchester Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Two images of greek islands on QIC

Hello! I don't want to start an unnecessary discussion about two of your images directly on the QIC page. But maybe, you can answer my question on your discussion page. The images File:Kelyfos sunset boat 01.jpg and File:Kelyfos sunset.jpg are promoted as QI. In both images, the colours seem way too intense to me. Did you enhance them? Maybe too much? Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with lighting conditions in greece during the summer, so I can't say, if these colours are real. In my home region something like this is impossible. --Dirtsc (talk) 12:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kelyfos sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 16:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Betty Gordon Moore Lib Cambridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CMS Central Core 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kelyfos sunset boat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Awesome! -- Felix Koenig 16:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Please go for FP --Martin Falbisoner 05:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks! Heuschrecke 08:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC) A small tilt. --Villy Fink Isaksen 10:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neos Marmaras Bay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central core, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very good, but recommended to have on the caption, a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

• Location added. Heuschrecke (talk) 14:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:41, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Betti and Gordon Moore library, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very good, but recommended to have on the caption, a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

• Location added. Heuschrecke (talk) 14:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikolskaya Tower, Novodevichy Convent.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very good, but recommended to have on the caption, a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:26, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

• Added location. Heuschrecke (talk) 14:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CMS Roof west view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The image must be QI, but it needs a little perspective correction and there are CAs. If you want, I cant write notes--Lmbuga 00:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC) I can fix the issues if you want: It's a good picture--Lmbuga 00:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Fixed what I saw. Please add a note if any CA remains. Heuschrecke 22:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok, good--Lmbuga 21:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neos Marmaras Bay 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cam Paradise Reserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Thanks

I really like the photos of Cambridge colleges you added today, they're very impressive. Thanks for uploading them. Nev1 (talk) 13:47, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Removal of QIC nominations

Hi, can you explain this? Did I do something wrong when nominating these images? I'm confused. darkweasel94 20:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

• I'm terribly sorry, I didn't want to delete anything. I was reviewing some pictures, saved my changes and it said there was an editing conflict. Then I clicked 'save' again (which as I now understand must never be done), and this deleted your nominations. Please accept my apologies. Can you just repeat your edit? Heuschrecke (talk) 20:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Ok, I've repeated it, no problem. darkweasel94 20:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
    • ... and got into an edit conflict with someone else who did the same. :) In the future, you may want to "show changes" after an edit conflict so you don't accidentally do something you don't want to do. darkweasel94 20:29, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks for advice! Heuschrecke (talk) 20:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Blank line

Hi Heuschrecke !

Thanks for sharing with us your nice photos !

Would you please be kind enough to consider, according to the QI guidelines, to leave a blank line between every of your nominations in the QIC page ?

It is less confusing, and helpful for reviewers. (I've corrected your last proposals).

Thank you very much.--Jebulon (talk) 10:06, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks! Will do in future. Heuschrecke (talk) 22:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Stadtwache view from Marktplatz Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--ArildV 13:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Ehrenbreischein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:43, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. -- Felix Koenig 14:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --Christian Ferrer 11:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Schloss Drachenburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support there's a smidge blue veil, but very nice photo nonetheless --A.Savin 17:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Rhein Mosel Schlossgarten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Preußisches Regierungsgebäude Koblenz Tower Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 12:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Niederhutstrasse from Marktplatz Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality.-ArildV 19:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Pfarrhaus Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Belfry of St Laurentius Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 12:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 St. Laurentius Kirche Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Bonner Munster Top 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and sharp !--Jebulon 09:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Lion Deutsches Eck 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very interesting element. Crop a bit tight below maybe, but very good sharpness and level of details.--Jebulon 09:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
King's College Chapel, Cambridge, south view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alt St. Heribert southwest view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It lacks the geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 Done. Heuschrecke (talk) 19:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Chapel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 17:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130406 Ely Cathedral 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sharp, but I don't like the composition, sorry. Also, the building of the right is a bit tilted CCW. I'm thinking of declining the proposal--Lmbuga 21:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC) Too tight at bottom IMO--Lmbuga 21:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC) Tilt corrected. Crop cannot be made better (below are chaotic roofs, unpleasant). Let's discuss. Heuschrecke 23:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC) New review: weak  Support It's a good image IMO --Lmbuga 00:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC) I accept your opinion and your criterion, but the picture could be better with a little less of sky--Lmbuga 01:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Niederhutstrasse from Marktplatz Ahrweiler 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130808 Kings Back Court 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 St. Laurentius Kirche Ahrweiler view from above.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130215 Kings College Chapel Hi-res 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 11:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130808 Castle End from Kings Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 17:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment yes very good but tilted on right --Christian Ferrer 05:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Lion Deutsches Eck 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I like the details, QI for me. --J. Lunau 16:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Rhein Mosel Schlossgarten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 05:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Adenbachviadukt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130215 Kings College Chapel Hi-res 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Dirtsc 15:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Roofs StadtMueum Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but the left window is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC) It's barely noticable, and is impeccable otherwise. Mattbuck 21:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130406 Ely Cathedral 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130215 Kings College Chapel Hi-res 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Vry good quality. -- Felix Koenig 14:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Drachenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Heuschrecke, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Heuschrecke, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tavira Street 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro Marim Fort 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 10:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tavira Street 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tavira river bank 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Awsome picture. Nice work! Jakec 14:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro Marina and Pedestrian area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ria Formosa Castro Marim 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro Marim Castle Inside 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tavira river bank 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ria Formosa Castro Marim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro Marim Fort 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Entrance Hi-res.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Front Court Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro Beach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:51, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro Stranded Boat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro Marim Fort 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 22:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI

Dear Heuschrecke! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status are automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos accumulates on this page time to time… --Bff (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction. One dust spot. --Cccefalon 09:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Done, thanks. --Heuschrecke 22:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ria Formosa Tavira 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro Marim Fort 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMO it would be better with less sky. --XRay 09:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro Marim Church and Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 18:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro Marim Castle Inside 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 18:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130826 Statue Alt Markt Cologne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please add the geo location. --XRay 16:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pub signboard cup Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but geolocation should be appreciated. --JLPC 16:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Chapel Closeup 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Front Court Fountain Crop 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:01, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro Beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130816 Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:01, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Heuschrecke,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Heuschrecke,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)