User talk:MGA73/Archive 31

License Review

I really ask me why I created a bot and went through the bot-approval process. Commons:Bots/Requests/IndareviewR -- RE rillke questions? 18:58, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Because you wanted to help I guess :-) --MGA73 (talk) 19:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

You could at least have had a look at Commons:Bots/Requests or Commons:Bots/Work requests. Did the bot or script you run under your normal account check the licenses and authors? Regards RE rillke questions? 19:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

I asked User:Betacommand more than a week ago about reviewing images with a bot and some days ago he made a list of images that was 100 % the same but there was an issue with the license of some of the images. So yesterday I prepared a list to work on today. I did not know you had made a bot to work on the images when I started reviewing today. I check the license and the author. So far all authors was correct and the license was ok in 99,5 % of the cases. If your bot is ready to run you may review the rest. --MGA73 (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

The bot approval-process seems to take some time. The community should review the bot, but there aren't a lot of community-members on the bot-approval page. So free to review the images since I can't until it passed the "review process". -- RE rillke questions? 19:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Would you mind undeleting File:Angel Crest Cemetery Porter County Indiana.jpg? Last month, the image was discussed at en:WP:PUF, and it was concluded that this is a case of de minimis, since the photo is of the cemetery, which happens to include the statue, and the statue isn't at all the focus of the image. Nyttend (talk) 01:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. --MGA73 (talk) 09:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Boratto1.jpg

File:Boratto1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Yeah and it is unused. Can't remember if it was used when I moved it. --MGA73 (talk) 09:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Comment

It looks like some Indafoto images mentioned by Samat should be reviewed manually. Feel free to review them before the license changes again. I don't have the Indafoto template to mark them unlike ipernity, picasa or panoramio and only have the flickr reviewbot. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:56, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

This is 'cc by 2.5 generic' now on Indafoto although Samat made a response to your ARR mark:

• File:Szélmalom (3534. számú műemlék) 6.jpg

Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Here are some photos which so far haven't been marked on the list given by Samat. Maybe someone will mark them when you get this message...I don't know.

• File:Hollandi-ház (3601. számú műemlék) 5.jpg
• File:Országház (509. számú műemlék) 46.jpg
• File:Szabadság híd (410. számú műemlék) 8.jpg
• File:Jezsuita templom romjai (10712. számú műemlék) 30.jpg
• File:Volt Királyi palota (138. számú műemlék) 38.jpg

There may be more photos as I just checked some of the photos on the long list. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:43, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Wëll_Lann_001.jpg

File:Wëll_Lann_001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

File:I10_Eurofima.jpg

File:I10_Eurofima.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Asp. (talk) 22:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello!

A while back, you helped move some things from Iranian Wikipedia to Commons. Can you move http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Logo_sich.gif from Ukrainian Wikipedia to Commons? Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Sure... See File:Logo sich.gif. I have no idea what the text say so I do not know if it is correct. --MGA73 (talk) 19:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 19:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Azerbaijan_022.jpg

File:Azerbaijan_022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Vampire2.jpg

File:Vampire2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lobo (howl?) 21:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

OTRS ticket discussion

Hello, I started an OTRS ticket discussion regarding Cinefundas at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Cinefundas_OTRS. I forgot to notify you earlier (you are the OTRS owner). I'm a little concerned about the ticket itself (we've ignored those from two websites before Kollywoodtoday and Bollywoodblog) as they had similar problems (the latter was the result of about three months of discussions on en.wiki and with the site while the former just had DRs associated with the images). I wasn't entirely sure where this discussion should be, if you think it should be at the OTRS wiki instead, let me know and I'll open it there. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 13:29, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. No here on Commons is just fine :-) --MGA73 (talk) 17:32, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Total Lunar Eclipse - December 2011.ogv

Would you like to mark this image which no one has wanted to mark for several days? The flickr account owner says "ARR" at the end of the short movie (c.23-30 seconds) but he licenses it as 'cc by generic' on flickr. Computer Hotline also told him about the picture's use here on the flickrlink and he just said 'cool.' All the trusted users are too scared to mark it...as am I. I marked another image from thsi source but maybe an Admin should mark this one? Just curious. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:43, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed :-) --MGA73 (talk) 20:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

• Thank You very much. I thought that it had been sitting in the flickr review category for too long now. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

• File:Côtes d'Auvergne 2004 Cave de Saint-Verny.jpg

One final comment. Should this close up of a wine bottle be passed or be considered a copy vio (of the wine bottle maker's rights? Its been here for more than 1 week and no one is sure about its copyright status. Thank You in advance, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks for your help once again. I have nothing more of concern. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Please STOP immediately that completely misleading categorisations respectively transfers !!

(just) on November 7, 2011, i re-categorized about 200-300 completely misleading categorisations (a 'typical' example) of your transfers (dd. Nov. 6/7) from Wikipedia's to Wikimedia commons, as reported more then a year ago before, again and again :-(((( And, please, no repeated references to the categories proposed by another xxxx bot, Roland 19:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

First of all I would like to thank you that you do a lot of work to fix categories. I'm really happy that you do. Some find one or two files and then complaint. 200-300 files before you came here is really impressive. So thank you very much!

I'm sorry that the bot messes up in some cases. I would ofcourse hope that the categories was always correct but sadly that is not the case. I have 2 alternatives: 1) Let the bot try to find the best categories or 2) Remove all categories and let add an {{Uncategorized}} instead. If I choose the first option some files will have perfect categories, some will have a to general category but still not directly wrong, some will have a wrong category and some will have no category at all. If I choose the second option then all files will have no category. Do you think option 2 is better? Or do you have other suggestions?

Info: The files I'm moving at the moment is a "help hi-wiki clean up their files"-project. --MGA73 (talk) 19:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

help hi-wiki is a good idea. That project has a lot of copyvios, they have a lot of untagged (possibly fair use) files and they make use of fair use tags on e.g. press photos of people far beyond the scope of foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy #3. Thanks for doing this work. --Martin H. (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah more than 1.000 files are deleted so far :-) --MGA73 (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your answer respectively information - guessed that Hindi- and Kannada-Wikipedia related media have been mass-transferred, honestly getting frustrated ...

What about option 3 ?!

Some people don't prefer to have files 'uncategorized' - personally i would prefer that option ... but:

Files of "India" related wiki's you may, instead, categorise as p.e. Category:Unidentified locations in India, and from time to time, i'll try (maybe some other 'enthusiasts'??) to categorise those media as accurate as possible ...

Regards, Roland 21:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

All the India related files are uploaded for now so no more files should be uploaded at the moment. It would be nice if there were other users than just you and me that would help. Your idea of Category:Unidentified locations in India is not bad at all. But it will not be today. I'm to tired now and will most likely just make it worse... --MGA73 (talk) 22:02, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, as you did "option 3" on Nov. 9, 2011, please categorize ONLY Category:Unidentified locations in India, and not as p.e. that wikipedia {mass} transfer, thanks, Roland 18:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I found another user that has uploaded a lot of files from India. The reason I added more than one category was that I knew it was a temple but not where in India. I thought doing it this way there was 2 chances that someone found and fixed the category. --MGA73 (talk) 19:04, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

So when you do like this the file is no longer categorized as a temple. I asume you put a temple category back on later? Another way was to remove Category:Unidentified locations in India and leave the temple category if you do not like it that there is 2 categories on the file. --MGA73 (talk) 19:09, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, please read 'my' "option 3", i'll categorize all those India-related wikipedia {mass} transfers later as accurate as possible - don't really have so much time for fixing your bot's, hmm, "amok-transfers" :-( Thanks for "respecting" my oppinion, Roland 19:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

I did read it. And I do not think there is any harm in files having the temple category on it. But it is really nice that you take care of the files :-) --MGA73 (talk) 19:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

For the very last time, please, p.e. that "amok-categorization" :-(((( >>>>> Category:Unidentified locations in India <<<<< Roland 00:15, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

I did that here and still you complaint in the edit summary!?! And how many images with "bad" categories was it this time? 1, 2, 5, 100? --MGA73 (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

>>> 'reminder' referring to our 'deal', as you 'bot-started' again :-((( Roland 20:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Once more, please, p.e. that "amok-categorization" (one of around more than 50 on December 2011 :-(((( >>>>> Category:Unidentified locations in India <<<<< Roland 21:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) As far as I know I moved 2 files to Commons from hi-wiki and both files was added to Category:Unidentified locations in India. --MGA73 (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

as mentioned: >>>> p.e. that "amok-categorization" (one of around more than 50 on December 2011 <<< Roland 21:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I checked around and it turns out that the 428 files here are related to India. Once they are all uploaded I can have my bot to move them all to Category:Unidentified locations in India. It will only take a few minutes. So just leave the files for now and they will be fixed. --MGA73 (talk) 21:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Before, take notice that around 100 are already 'fixed' on December 18 and avoid a lot of work, once more, Roland 21:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you for fixing that... I will see if I can find a good way not to remove categories on files you have allready checked. --MGA73 (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

---

MGA73, this problem was brought to COM:AN/U#User:MGA73. If you fix it, I see no requirement for a long discussion there. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 23:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. --MGA73 (talk) 19:30, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

* Frohe Weihnacht und einen guten Start ins neue Jahr
* Prettige Kerstdagen en een gelukkig nieuw jaar
* Merry Christmas and a happy New Year
from --Neozoon (talk) 23:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

---

Thank you very much :-) And I also wish you all the best! --MGA73 (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Erik Wallenberg inventor of Tetra Pak first package.jpg

Sometimes I wonder if this image is OK. It looks OK and the image seems to be from Tetra Pak's flickr account but this account has very few images. So does one pass the image? Tough question. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

• By the way, this Category is interesting. No one marks the 300 images for days and maybe only Rillke knows what we are supposed to do to be certain an image is OK. Another interesting case. I don't mark things I don't understand. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I think the Tetra Pak image looks ok so I reviewed it. And I know the category. I fixed the review template a few days ago for Logan so I asumed that he was working on the files. I'll ask him when I see him on IRC. --MGA73 (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment: Thank You for marking the image. Its strange that Tetra Pak has a flickr account but post only a few images here. So, I was cautious. On the Filmitadka category, Its good that you know what its about. Best Regards and Merry Christmas, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Sasebo Heavy Industries 01.jpg

Do you see a license for this picasa photo? I can't. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:56, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

No... I wonder if you need to sign up for Google+ to see the info. --MGA73 (talk) 20:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Strange... It worked now :-o --MGA73 (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment: Well that's interesting. I checked now and I still don't see the license though I can see the license for the other picture the Japanese uploader uploaded. Very strange. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

 Comment: Hi, I'm the uploader. If you use FireFox, accessing the site with Java-script turned off, and reloading the page with the script on, might work. --トトト (talk) 05:53, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Your bot skipped some pics

I see that your bot did some cleanup work on File:The Miller Place Pond 2.jpg, but not File:The Miller Place Pond 1.jpg. Why is that? ----DanTD (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. We have the license migration project (that seems to be a never ending project) related to the GFDL license. The first file had the license GFDL and the second file did not. --MGA73 (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Canadian files

I'll see when I have the time if I can add some cats. Canada is a big place and I live on the west coast of Canada only. And its Christmas. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:08, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment: I gave cats to 50-55 images. By the way, it seems to me that maybe 14 blank images here should be deleted. They have sat here for days. If you wish you can delete them as an Admin. It looks like some were uploaded in the wrong file format. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
• Thanks for dealing with them. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Simple_Facebook_logo.jpg

File:Simple_Facebook_logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, MGA73!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Tiz zaqyah (5709239974) - crop.jpg was uncategorized on 28 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Lage magellansche wolken.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lage magellansche wolken.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lage magellansche wolken.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

JuTa 09:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Hm... Think I misread something that day... --MGA73 (talk) 13:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Cosmos hotel in Moscow.jpg

Is this image OK with no COM:FOP problems since its in Russia? I notice there is a category for this hotel but doubt its even 70 years old. PS: According to one of the cats here this hotel was built in 1979 and its not a generic looking building at all. Its very distinctive and should be subject to copyright. So all the Cosmos hotel images should be deleted but one...where De Minimis can apply. But you should decide since this picture (above) was uploaded by an Admin. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:45, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I may remember wrong but as far as I remember the Russian Wikipedia is discussing the FOP issue with the government and if all goes well they will allow FOP. But as long as rules are not changed then FOP may be a problem. Personally I would put it on my to do list and choose to work on some of the other tasks first. Like reviewing files etc. :-) But if you find any close up files feel free to tag them. --MGA73 (talk) 13:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment: I contacted High Contrast about the image and advised that perhaps he should contact EugeneZelenko about it. I said all the info. I have says the image can't be kept here but I won't tag it for deletion and will let him decide what to do. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Have you noticed Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Russian_copyright_law? --MGA73 (talk) 11:38, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/All uploads by User:Anatomist90

Do you have any thoughts on how to deal with that one, possible OTRS permissions etc.? Regards --Rosenzweig τ 12:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Oops. Forgot all about that permission. I left a comment on the DR. --MGA73 (talk) 18:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Picasa message

DCoetzee sent me a message here on the picasa bot. If you can fix it, feel free to try. If not, its OK. Thank You in advance--whatever you do. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Singapore MRT logo.svg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Singapore MRT logo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Singapore MRT logo.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

— Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 08:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

I changed to a DR because I think it may be PD-ineligible. --MGA73 (talk) 09:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Immagine da Flickr

Ciao MGA73, brevemente mi potresti spiegare come prendere e caricare, su Wikipedia, una o più immagini da Flickr? Aspetto al più presto una tua risposta. :D P.S: rispondimi qui. Devil90 (talk) 11:08, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I need Google translation to help me here... I will have a look at the page you linked to. --MGA73 (talk) 07:44, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Picture in file history

File:Pine grosbeak17g.jpg | There is a picture in the file history of this image, which needs deleting. Snowmanradio (talk) 23:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done --MGA73 (talk) 07:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Sammenlægning af kategorier

Hej MGA73

For noget tid siden bad jeg om at få lagt de to kategorier Category:S-train stations in Denmark og Category:S-train stations in Copenhagen sammen. Det vil jeg stadig gerne have gjort. S-banen udgør et samlet netværk, der ikke tager hensyn til by- og kommunegrænser, så det giver ikke mening at dele. Desuden er det ikke klart, om der med København tænkes på byen eller kommunen, som mange roder sammen, hvilket så igen gør det svært at vurdere, hvor en given station hører hjemme. Så hellere samle det hele i en kategori.

Den samlede kategori bør nok være Copenhagen-kategorien. Ganske vist er der som bekendt ikke andre S-baner i Danmark, men sådanne kategorier opkaldes normalt efter de byer de kredser om, her altså København.

En anden sag jeg også har på hjerte: jeg har tidligere lavet en serie kortskitser, hvor forskellige danske jernbaner er markeret. Nu er jeg imidlertid i gang med at erstatte dem for eksisterende baner med nye opdaterede kort. Bla.a. fordi at trafikken på Gedserbanen blev indstillet for et par år siden, så en del af de gamle kort var blevet lidt misvisende. Men med indsættelsen af de nye kort, er de gamle blevet overflødige og bør derfor for de flestes vedkommende slettes. Er der en bestemt skabelon, jeg kan sætte ved de pågældende kort for at markere, at de kan slettes? Eller skal jeg oprette et samlet sletningsforslag, eller kan du slette dem, hvis jeg peger dem ud? --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 13:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Hej! Det var vist længe siden :-) Jeg mener at kunne huske, at jeg dengang nævnte, at det korrekte var at lave et flytteforslag, så andre kunne kommentere. Udfordringen er jo at S-tog kører til Køge, Høje-Taastrup osv. og jeg er ikke sikker på, at alle stationerne ligger i det man normalt kalder København. Personligt har jeg ikke nogle stærke preferencer for det ene eller det andet. Så jeg foreslår et flytteforslag.

Mht. kortene så plejer vi at beholde gamle kort, idet de kan være med til at illustrere udviklingen. Vi har jo også kort over gamle kommuner mv. Det kan så være, at de burde omdøbes. --MGA73 (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Første punkt... Commons:Categories for discussion/2012/01/Category:S-train stations in Denmark --MGA73 (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Items missing OTRS ticket ID

Hi MGA73. Your bot is filling up this category. --Leyo 17:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

I had hoped that Zscout would have checked the files after they were moved to Commons. I cleaned up a bit. --MGA73 (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. --Leyo 20:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:All-Ukrainian_organization_Sich_(Січ).gif

File:All-Ukrainian_organization_Sich_(Січ).gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Милан Јелисавчић (talk) 11:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Presidents_Harrison_and_McKinley_at_Presidential_Museum_Picture_1863.jpg

File:Presidents_Harrison_and_McKinley_at_Presidential_Museum_Picture_1863.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

cmadler (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

12 millionth picture

Is there anything special about the 12 millionth picture on Commons. I don't know where one finds these images. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Not sure if that is a milestone. --MGA73 (talk) 20:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

• I guess its so so. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Præcisering af filnavn

Har du mulighed for at se på denne forespørgsel. På forhånd tak. Froztbyte (talk) 03:39, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Jeg kom for sent :-) Den var allerede flyttet. --MGA73 (talk) 08:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Railway_bridges_in_the_Orkney_Islands

Category:Railway_bridges_in_the_Orkney_Islands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

S a g a C i t y (talk) 23:22, 17 January 2012 (UTC)