Mouagip

Amino Acids Table

UAC and UAU are Tyr, not Thr! thank you. best regards Daniel Kutscher

Thanks for the note. --Mouagip (talk) 23:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AntigenicShift HiRes vector.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AntigenicShift HiRes vector.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:58, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Canvas

Hi Mouagip. I've noticed that you have updated file:Lichtreaktion-z-schema.svg. It seems like that you have removed the frame. Is that true? The frame is necessary, as you can see on one of your pics: File:Transmembrane receptor.svg, where the "P" is cutted a little bit. Likewise the "p" on the left "Standardredoxpotential" is sliced a little bit... Cheers, --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

You're right. I'll see to it. --Mouagip (talk) 11:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Fort-basses-perches-fr-FR.svg

Hello.

If you want to modify a file :

1) download it

2) modifiy it

3) upload it AS A NEW NAME.

Thanks.

--ComputerHotline (talk) 14:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

If you say so. Since the SVG is obviously broken, I intended to fix it. But it's your work... you can do with it what you want. --Mouagip (talk) 20:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DNA decryption.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• I'm sorry, I'm not a specialist in protein biosynthesis, and I don't understand nothing. What means " 5' ", " 3' ", "G", "U", "A", "C"  ? Something like a Da Vinci code ? --Jebulon (talk) 23:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  •  Info A protein is built of amino acids. In a gene every amino acid is encoded in a triplet of bases (these are the "bars" you see in every diagram of a DNA). This diagram shows you which base triplet encodes which protein. The Diagram is read from inside to outside; for example is AUG mostly the start codon of every protein. You can look here for a simplified Version of the process. --Mouagip (talk) 09:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Scope needs to be fixed. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  •  Question Is it better now? I didn't really understood what the scope is. I thought it was kind of a description of the image.--Mouagip (talk) 09:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
    •  Support Fixed now. See COM:VIS for more info on the scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support It is a good and clean overview. However, I would remove the 2nd "start". If every exception is indicated, then one have to add far more than that (situation in mitochondria, chloroplasts, some procaryotes). Hence I would stress that what we see here is not what rules in all organisms in the world. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • You're right. I changed it. --Mouagip (talk) 11:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Scope should probably be DNS description. Yann (talk) 02:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I think "decryption" is still right but I shortened the scope now. --Mouagip (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Map

Hi Mouagip! Can you verctorize this map? Thank you very much!--Paris 16 (talk) 12:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Hm, I think I've got a vector world map. Give me a few days and I'll see what I can do ;-) --Mouagip (talk) 21:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Is this ok? It's from my world map and not exactly as precise as your PNG. --Mouagip (talk) 11:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ReverseGeneticsFlu.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ReverseGeneticsFlu.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dragonfly anatomy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It's on Czech now. Maybe someone could translate it? --Mouagip (talk) 15:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment The right strategy is to put numbers ...Like this : « Anatomie Cétoine (face dorsale).jpg » --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Good idea. I'll change it. --Mouagip (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Well done. Useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Reassortment.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reassortment.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Datei:Mureine_de.svg

Hallo Mouagip. In der vorigen Woche hast Du eine Bearbeitung (Umformatierung) der Datei Murein2j.JPG unter dem Dateinamen Mureine_de.svg hochgeladen. Dabei hast Du den Urheber der ursprünglichen Datei nicht erwähnt. Weiterhin hast Du die Creative Commons-Lizenz (Weitergabe mit Namensnennung unter gleichen Bedingungen) in CCO 1.0 (gemeinfrei) geändert, was nicht zulässig ist. Bitte, bring das in Ordnung. Danke im Voraus. -- Brudersohn (talk) 19:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Brudersohn, genau genommen ist das Bild als Vektordatei komplett neu von mir gezeichnet worden. Aber ich gebe dich gerne als Autor der ursprünglichen Bitmap Version an und schränke die Lizenz ein. Tut mir Leid, dass ich da nicht direkt drauf geachtet habe ;-) Ich denke immer, wenn ich es selbst gezeichnet habe, dann ist es auch meins.

Beste Grüße --Mouagip (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Danke, Mouagip! Zu Deinem Einwand: Man muss ja nur beide Grafiken nebeneinander sehen, dann erkennt man, dass da außer der Schriftgröße und dem Entfernen der Unterschrift alles weitgehend deckungsgleich ist. Wenn Du ohne Kenntnis meiner Grafik eine neue zum Thema anfertigen solltest, wären die Unterschiede größer. Das wird deutlich, wenn man etwa in Lehrbüchern die Grafiken dazu ansieht, die sehen alle anders aus. Wenn man frei neu zeichnet, ist man der Urheber, wenn man kopiert, ist man es nicht. Gruß, -- Brudersohn (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

about File:Lichtreaktion-z-schema.svg

I marked it so that I could keep track of SVG files that cause problems with rsvg rendering. These reveal bugs in rsvg that I hope to be able to get fixed.

On this particular file, only the first few revisions are problems. If you want to take the tag off the file, please re-upload the first revidion to a seperate name and tag *that* un-fixed file. Thanks for your help on this.

Also, I didn't realize you were vectorizing files. Thanks for that awesome work! -- ☠MarkAHershberger☢(talk)☣ 13:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Ah, it's ok, I thought there was a problem with the file I made. And thank you very much for your appreciation! Of course everyone here works voluntarily but it's nevertheless always nice to get positive feedback about the things you do :-) --Mouagip (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

This tag is here not needed, it is the old and well-known text-flow bug, s. Help:SVG#Fonts. I would also propose to convert the text to font back. To further good work. Greetings -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 19:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Mouagip⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Mouagip,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User VG-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?

VG-4

This user is able to contribute with an expert level on vector graphics.

--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the suggestion but since I can only vectorize images and can't create new ones in such a quality, I'd rather stick with level 3. --Mouagip (talk) 20:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Mouagip,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Source of colors in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scriabin-Circle.svg

Hi,

I'm trying to figure out where did you get color values you have used in: File:Scriabin-Circle.svg

I got them from the original PNG image File:Scriabin-Circle.png --Mouagip (talk) 18:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Thx. Looks like those colors are mostly author perception :D

Are the colors wrong somehow? If so, do you have a source that describes what the "correct" colors should be? --Mouagip (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

They are "listed" in the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromesthesia and corresponding publication [26]. Basically the colors names there are very broad, that's why I wanted ask an author of the .png why he choose those exact colors..

File:Scriabin-Circle.svg

File:Scriabin-Circle.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—Dominus (talk) 12:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Can you help?

Hi there, as you are the last user who has edited File:Lichtreaktion-z-schema.svg, you seem to have tools for editing SVG files which I don't have. So could you please correct at the above mentioned file the "2e^-" to "4e^-" at the very last reaction of the 2nd chain where reduced ferredoxin reduces 2 NADP⁺ + 2 H⁺ to 2 NADPH? Because this reaction actually consumes not just 2, but 4 electrons (the same ones produced at the very beginning of the entire scheme), provided by 4 reduced ferredoxins (see w:en:Ferredoxin—NADP(+) reductase). Greetings, Qniemiec (talk) 22:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I moved this to the discussion page of the file. --Mouagip (talk) 17:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)