Onel5969
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:12, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 |
File:CharlieKadau.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
| |
File:Memories-the-68-comeback-special-CD.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
), No derivative works (
), or All Rights Reserved (
), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as 
(CC BY), 
(CC BY-SA), 
(CC0) and 
(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.
File source is not properly indicated: File:Petsmart001.jpg
edit
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Petsmart001.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Petsmart001.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
editRound 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
edit- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Onel5969⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
|
File:SunCityAZ.989,mcclean4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
| |
File:Rocky horror picture show tim curry susan sarandon2.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
| |
File:Rocky horror picture show meat loaf.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
And also:
- File:Rocky horror picture show tim curry susan sarandon.JPG
- File:Rocky horror picture show susan sarandon 1.JPG
- File:RockyHorror03.140311.jpg
- File:RockyHorror02.140311.jpg
- File:RockyHorror01.140311.jpg
Yours sincerely, Jespinos (talk) 18:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
editPicture of the Year 2013 Results
edit- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Onel5969,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Your user page states that advice would be welcome, so...
editHi! I love some of those old pictures of Phoenix that you've been uploading, being a fan of old pictures myself. Here's a few things I would point out that might save some work for you and other people on commons:
- Date field should be the date of the work itself, not the upload date. See Commons:First_steps/Quality_and_description for more info.
- Avoid redundant or overly vague categories (Phoenix, Arizona is redundant if it's already in "Phoenix in the 1900s"). See COM:OVERCAT for more info.
- I believe there is effort underway to mass upload images from the Library of Congress, so you might not want to expend too much effort on those, unless you're in a hurry to use one in an article. :)
--Junkyardsparkle (talk) 05:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
@Junkyardsparkle: Hiǃ And absolutely, advice, hints, etc. are always welcome. Regarding your first point, I will remember that, absolutely. And on your second point, after having people add categories to items I uploaded, I had gotten exactly the opposite impression, that you should put as many possible categories on an item, in order to make it easier to find. I will look at your link, definitely. And regarding your third point, thanks for the info. I was going to get back to uploading images from the LOC, but will limit it only to ones I wish to use right away. Thanks for taking the time to help. Onel5969 (talk) 12:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- I certainly didn't mean to imply that a photo shouldn't be in multiple categories, just not in parent categories of the more specific ones that it's in, as a rule - hopefully the provided link explains it well enough. Those general categories tend to become dumping grounds, being the easiest to find, and need diffusing into more specific cats from time to time... especially categories like "Phoenix", which is supposed to be about the mythical bird. That's what I was cleaning up when I saw your uploads - it's a fun way to see some random pictures at least. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- I made a few changes to the info section of File:Winfield & Helen Scott, 1900.jpg as a sort of example of what's nice to include from an image archive like that... basically, as much description as they give of the subject (since the idea with commons is for the files to be useful to posterity, beyond whatever your immediate purposes may be), and preferably a direct source link to that object, to make it easy for someone to find their way back to it. A stable reference URL is usually available on sites like that (upper left corner in this case). There are also some tricks for getting the highest resolution images possible from those types of AJAX viewers... let me know if you want gory details. :) --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Again thanks. Your Winfield example has giving me a good idea of what I'll do from now on when I upload. Onel5969 (talk) 22:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Category:Lakes in Arizona
editPlease note there is already a Category:Lakes of Arizona, so your new category is redundant. Also, you don't need to add the images directly to that category if the lake category is already in there. I've marked the new one with {{Category redirect}}. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 20:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for pointing that out. Thought it was strange there wasn't that category already. And thanks for cleaning up the mess. Quick question. On one of the files File:Tempe Town Lake (1).jpg, you deleted the category artificial lake, might I ask why? -- Onel5969 (talk) 22:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Ah, I was going to add the category to Category:Tempe Town Lake, but I'd forgotten, so that's done now. Here's a tip: if you can't find a category "X in Y" then try "X of Y" or "X from Y" (for people). It's usually one of those. —howcheng {chat} 16:14, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
ːThanks User:Howcheng for that, and also the tip. Onel5969 (talk) 17:36, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to point out that there's nothing to indicate authorship or licensing of the images on that page as stated in your uploads. In fact, if you click the links under the images, most of them are clearly copyrighted to someone else. You'll probably want to check all of those, as they may be copyright violations. Be careful not to assume that someone posting an image on a website is the author of that image... in fact, it's much better to assume the opposite unless there's a clear indication. --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 21:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hi jnkyrdsprklǃ If you look at the bottom of the page, the site is clearly marked, "Contributions to http://jayworldgepgraphy.wikispaces.com/ are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 License". Am I missing something? If I am, since I am still trying to figure this all out, please let me know. --Onel5969 (talk) 22:02, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, but unfortunately, the pictures don't appear to be "contributions" by their authors, just images grabbed from elsewhere on the web, as indicated by the links appearing beneath the photos. If you view the linked pages, this one for instance, you'll often see that there's no indication of free licensing (in the linked example, there's even an explicit copyright notice, and clicking on the author's name leads to a page indicating that they would very much like to sell their photos). A similar situation is "flickrwashing", where photos are posted to that site with CC licenses, in spite of the uploader not being the author, and therefore not legally able to apply the license. Hope that makes sense. --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 22:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation jnkyrdsprkl, I did not know that. I thought we only had to verify from the site we pulled it from. Will do the extra steps you suggest in the future. Could you mark those 5 photos for quick deletion then? Thanks. Onel5969 (talk) 17:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- Since they're recent uploads, the easiest way to speedydelete them would be for you, as the uploader, to paste {{speedydelete|Uploader requests deletion (accidental copyvio).}} or similar into the file pages. This would avoid all the formalities involved with somebody else making the request, and a bunch of warnings on your talk page, etc... just make sure they're not in use on any pages first. Incidentally, you may or may not have noticed the recent influx of HABS/HAER photos from the Library of Congress... the housekeeping on them is still ongoing, and most are still in county categories at the moment... might be of interest to you. --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 21:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Railroad bridges has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
| |
File:ArizonaCardinals.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Jespinos (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
ːYes it should be deleted. I thought I was pulling it off http://www.practicalpedal.com/, which has a CC BY-SA 3.0; but I can see now that it was originally pulled off the IBT site, which retains copyright. Sorry.
|
|
File:Las Vegas Montage 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Papago-park.ca2010.2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Mint chocolate chip ice cream.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
| |
File:Arizona-monument-valley.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
| |
File:MeteorCrater1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
|
|
File:Mint-chocolate-chip-ice-cream.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:EveBrent.1959.jpg
edit
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:EveBrent.1959.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:EveBrent.1959.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Ske.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Arizona senators
editNice job! Don't forget to add the images to Wikidata and add a category when you have more than one image. See what I did at Category:Charles Hayes Rutherford. Get a free Familysearch account and you can fill in missing birth and death dates. RAN (talk) 18:37, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
File:Christmas tree in field.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Schilling Ranch Historic District photos
edit{{subst:Copyvionote|1=File:Schilling Ranch Historic District.001.jpg|2=This and related photos taken from the NRHP registration document for w:Schilling Ranch Historic District are NOT in the public domain. The assertion displayed by template Template:Tl PD-USGov
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Doncram.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
{{subst:Copyvionote|1=File:Schilling Ranch Historic District.002.Rock House.jpg|2=This and related photos taken from the NRHP registration document for w:Schilling Ranch Historic District are NOT in the public domain. The assertion displayed by template Template:Tl PD-USGov
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Doncram.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
{{subst:Copyvionote|1=File:Schilling Ranch Historic District.005.Tack Room.jpg|2=This and related photos taken from the NRHP registration document for w:Schilling Ranch Historic District are NOT in the public domain. The assertion displayed by template Template:Tl PD-USGov
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Doncram.
And also:
- File:Schilling Ranch Historic District.004.Bunk House.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : This and related photos taken from the NRHP registration document for w:Schilling Ranch Historic District are NOT in the public domain. The assertion displayed by template {{tl PD-USGov )
- File:Schilling Ranch Historic District.003.Hay Barn.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : This and related photos taken from the NRHP registration document for w:Schilling Ranch Historic District are NOT in the public domain. The assertion displayed by template {{tl PD-USGov )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
edit|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
| |
File:W. D. Martinez General Merchandise Store 03.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Doncram.
And also:
- File:Evergreen Cemetery2.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:WalterDouglasHouse.005.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:WalterDouglasHouse.001.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:WalterDouglasHouse.003.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:W. D. Martinez General Merchandise Store 02.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:W. D. Martinez General Merchandise Store 01.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:WalterDouglasHouse.002.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:WalterDouglasHouse.007.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:WalterDouglasHouse.006.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:WalterDouglasHouse.004.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
- File:Evergreen Cemetery1.jpg ( Nominator : Doncram | Reason : Please delete as not Public Domain after all. Per cooperative discussion with uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded from npgallery.nps.gov or catalog.archives.gov, where uploader just gave blanket agreement (at bottom) after invited to comment specifically about 12 photos in 3 photosets. There are more to evaluate further there; these 12 are resolved however. )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
