User talk:Ralf Roletschek/Archive/2016

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-12-20-Helsinki-Vantaan-Lentoasema-N3S 3109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but WB is too much on the yellow side --Uoaei1 19:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)}  Comment Uoaei1, you are right, even the "white" areas are yellow --Hasenläufer 23:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)  Done right, correctet. --Ralf Roletschek 12:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)  Support --Uoaei1 14:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, good perspective --Michielverbeek 21:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice, even on this foggy day --Hubertl 18:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 19:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GC Ezarate 00:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp image, but unfortunately sky is too white (use a bit more highlights?) --Michielverbeek 06:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-12-20-Helsinki-Vantaan-Lentoasema-N3S 3110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 19:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:14-02-06-Parlement-europ%C3%A9en-Strasbourg-RalfR-003.jpg

Lieber Ralf,

ich werde o. g. Bild mit entsprechender Lizenz- und Namensnennung in einem Buch verwenden. Gerne lasse ich Dir dann ein Belegexemplar zukommen, bitte unter info@jmb-verlag.de melden, wenn gewünscht. Ein Hinweis des Autors: In der Beschreibung des Bildes steht "Europäisches Parlament", aber es handelt sich um das Gebäude des "Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte", dies sollte ggf. in der Beschreibung geändert werden. Gruß --Jmb1982 (talk) 09:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Die Bildbeschreibung habe ich geändert. --Ralf Roleček 14:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-11-25-Mureck-Steiermark-RalfR-WMA 4060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 12:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:16-01-14-gelbe Säcke-RalfR-DSCF7264.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:16-01-14-gelbe Säcke-RalfR-DSCF7264.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-12-20-Helsinki-Vantaan-Lentoasema-N3S 3120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photo is tilted and I think a higher f-value would have been better --Michielverbeek 07:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC) ok, tilt is corrected. It was too dark for other f, in December in Helsinki is Polarnight. --Ralf Roletschek 18:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Perspective looks much better and I think it also looks a bit sharper, so Q1 --Michielverbeek 23:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RalfR-im-buero-koethen.jpg

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Ralf, in der Löschdiskussion bemängelt Stefan2 – leider ohne dich zu informieren – dass seiner Meinung nach in den Angaben zum Bild eine Erlaubnis von Ladycharmed (upps, Ladycharmed) fehlt, da sie als Urheberin angegeben ist, das Bild aber nicht hochgeladen hat. --Speravir (Talk) 18:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Meine Güte, wir haben jahrelang gemeinsam fotografiert und auch unsere Kameras geteilt. Hätte ich "own" hingeschrieben, würde niemand fragen. Mir ist es zu kindisch, da mitzustreiten. Das ist Krümelkackerei. --Ralf Roleček 19:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Ich wollt’s nur mitteilen. Hast Du noch Kontakt zu ihr? Erteilt eine Freigabe (hast Du sogar für ein eigenes Bild schon mal gemacht: File:12-01-21-yog-506.jpg), oder sie loggt sich nach Jahren mal wieder ein und erteilt sie selbst in der Beschreibung. --Speravir (Talk) 20:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Entschuldige bitte, das war nicht gegen dich gerichtet! Sie wohnt jetzt ganz woanders und statt Internet macht sie jetzt Pferdezucht. Ich versuchs mal. Finde es aber dennoch albern. --Ralf Roleček 20:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

File:12-03-17-aktstudien-nuernberg-by-RalfR-12.jpg

File:12-03-17-aktstudien-nuernberg-by-RalfR-12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.44.201.141 16:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Immer wenn man denkt, dümmer geht's nicht mehr, kommt von irgendwo ein Löschtroll her... --Stepro (talk) 03:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Stimmt. Es gibt nichts, was nicht passieren kann. --Ralf Roleček 04:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Welche Bilder?

Hallo Ralf,

welche Bilder meinst du es jetzt üblich, daß benutzte Bilder gelöscht werden, ohne daß ein Löschantrag entschieden wird? --Hystrix (talk) 06:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Zum Beispiel File:Morgane Gudin.jpg. Die Disk. verläuft alles andere als eindeutig, warum die Eile?Die Bilder tun niemandem weh. Es gibt keinen Grund, da was zu löschen. --Ralf Roleček 09:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Lizensierung Deiner Bilder

Hallo Ralf, das ist wirklich ein tolles Bild - angesichts der Tatsache, dass dieser Teil von Sylt wohl langsam verschwindet umso besser, dass Du das noch rechtzeitig und frei dokumentiert hast.

Was wir aber auf der Bildbeschreibung aufgefallen ist, ist folgendes: Du hast dort einen eigenen Hinweis unter dem Stichwort "Genehmigung" eingefügt, der Nachnutzern erklären soll, wie sie das Bild korrekt nutzen. Dann kommt die GNU-Lizenz und dann an dritter Stelle erst die entsprechende CC-Lizenz. Da das Bild offensichtlich im Rahmen eines von WMDE bezahlten Fotofluges entstanden ist, ist m.E. die entsprechende Förderrichtlinie des Vereins anwendbar. Diese regelt, dass der Hinweis auf die CC-Lizenzen als erstes da stehen sollte, um so eine einheitliche Weiternutzung zu ermöglichen. Das ist hier aber nicht der Fall.--Schreibvieh (talk) 09:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Als das Bild entstand, gab es die Richtlinien noch nicht. --Ralf Roleček 09:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Die Forderung, die Lizenz habe an erster Stelle zu stehen, hat sich 2014 irgendjemand bei WMDE ausgedacht, ohne die Gepflogenheiten auf commons zu berücksichtigen und ohne darüber nachzudenken, daß viele Fotoknipser eigene Erklärbärbausteine entwickelt haben, die dazu inkompatibel sind. Diese Forderung ist ebenso unsinnig wie die ursprünglich mal angedachte Forderung, Bilder müßten immer in maximaler Auflösung hochgeladen werden. Man könnte nun fordern, daß Ralf allen seinen Fotoflugbildern einen anderen Lizenzbaustein verpaßt oder generell seine Bausteine ändert oder aber alles einzeln nachpflegt. Angesichts seiner Uploadzahlen halte ich das für absolut unverhältnismäßig. Seine Lizenzierung entspricht dem Wesen nach den Förderrichtlinien, nur eine willkürliche, sachlich schwer begründbare politisch bedingte Bestimmung ("CC nach oben!!!!!11111") wird nicht erfüllt. Willst du dafür ein Faß aufmachen? Ernsthaft? -- Smial (talk) 10:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Ps: Was genau ist mit "[...] so eine einheitliche Weiternutzung zu ermöglichen" gemeint?

Das habe ich mich auch gerade gefragt. --Ralf Roleček 11:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Eigentlich ist es ja auch egal, außer dem Festivalsommer gibts ja keine Fotoprojekte mehr. Und der ist weit älter als die Förderbedingungen. Die Seite kann eigentlich gelöscht werden. Außerdem, was soll das?

alle weiteren verwendeten Lizenzen müssen nach den Standards von Wikimedia Commons als frei anerkannt sein.

Damit ist WMDE weit strenger als Commons, mit welchem Recht? Und unten dann die Empfehlung von CC4 und CC0 - nein danke. CC0 müßte verboten werden, da das den Grundprinzipien des Vereins widerspricht. Aber das ist ja auch mittlerweile egal. --Ralf Roleček 12:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Es hat sich nie jemand daran gestört, daß ich seit langem artlibre nehme, auch bei geförderten Projekten, außer den üblichen Stänkerern. Ich kann dir sagen, daß ich mich beinahe gekringelt habe nach all den artlibre-Anfeindungen, als CC und artlibre sich gegenseitig als miteinander voll kompatibel (für cc-by-sa) anerkannten, denn das bestätigte meine Auffassung, die ich von Anfang an vetreten hatte, was die Gültigkeit von artlibre als freie Lizenz angeht. ;-) -- Smial (talk) 14:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Der Inhalt der Wikipedia unterliegt der GNU-Lizenz für freie Dokumentation. Das bedeutet: Er ist frei und wird es für immer bleiben. - es gab mal Zeiten, wo alle Inhalte der Wikipedia, auch Bilder, unter GFDL standen. Heute soll diese Lizenz nun verboten sein. Sie wird heute nicht mal mehr erwähnt. Da braucht sich doch niemand wundern, wenn man Lizenzen mit Katze im Sack mißtraut. --Ralf Roleček 14:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

hallo aus moabit

hey die idee mit calvendo ist super!

Philipp von Ostau (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-13-Grégory-Beron- RR25300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 21:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-14-Innsbruck-Bahnhof- RR25724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 13:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-14-Innsbruck-Bahnhof- RR25722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

SW - Sehr charmant...

@Cccefalon: und ich haben und deine Bilder angeschaut und sind der Meinung, dass der Prozess vom Fotografieren über das Belichten udn dem nachfolgenden Scan nicht optimal gelaufen ist. Die Körnung für 100 ASA stimmt nicht, es ist einfach zu stark. Das merkt man zB bei starken Kontrasten (Schrift/Hintergrund beim Fiakerbild). Bist du dir sicher, dass der gesamte Prozess korrekt ist? Wenn Zweifel, dann solltest du dir die Negtive mal mit einem 10x-Fadenzähler genau anschaun. Oder einfach mal einen Probescan mit einem Negativ in Berlin machen, Jennys Familie wird dich beraten! --Hubertl 16:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

bei diesen SW-Bildern wäre ich sogar der Auffassung, dass eine Komprimierung auf 3000x2000 px gerechtfertigt ist und die Körnung dadurch feiner und samtiger rüberkommt. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 16:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Ich bin auch sehr über das Wahnsinnskorn erstaunt. Bin aber gerade in Palma, werde mir das noch ansehen müssen. Ich beschreite jetzt mehrere Wege... --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Etwas länger... In der Tat erscheint mir das Korn zu groß. Ich habe vom Negativ gescannt und das dann außer Tonwertkurve weitgehend unbehandelt gelassen. Ausbelichtet ist das Korn weit weniger heftig (Minilab), ich habe den Film nun auch noch in die Tschechei geschickt, wo echte S/W-Bilder beliochtet werden. Meine Vermutung ist, daß Scans vom Papierbild besser sind als vom Negativ. Hinzu kommt, daß ich vermute, daß das 2,8/24-70 ziemlich erbarmungslos ist, wenn Tärfenschiefe erzwungen wird. Aber das Ganze ist nur der Beginn von Experimenten mit Film, ich muß mich da erst mal wieder reinfuchsen. Der erste war ein gnadenloser Reinfall, der Film lag 20 Jahre im Schrank und ist weich wie ein gekochter Flummiball, Bilder unbrauchbar. Ich experimentiere auch mit verschiedenen Filmen herum. Das Ganze ist ganz schön zeit- und finanzaufwendeig. --Ralf Roleček 09:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Ich finde die Aktion mutig und gut und bestärke Dich gerne darin, weiter zu experimentieren. Ich habe die Nassphotographie in frühester Kindheit mitgemacht, deshalb ist mir die Unstimmigkeit im Korn direkt aufgefallen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Ich halte das für ein Problem beim Scannen. Möglicherweise ist der verwendete Scanner nicht für SW geeignet. Solche mit automagischer Kratzerentfernung und/oder LED-Beleuchtung sollen nur für Farbe tauglich sein. Ich finde das Korn gar nicht einmal unmäßig grob, aber die Form der "Körner" ist großenteils sehr eigenartig und die Tonwertabrisse seltsam. Man vergleiche mit den Beispielen in de:Korn (Foto) bzw. de:Runzelkorn, die halbwegs "natürliche" Kornstrukturen zeigen, auch wenn der damals verwendete Dia-Scanner mit ccfl-Beleuchtung gerade einmal 1350 ppi optische Auflösung bot (und selbst die waren gelogen, real wohl eher 800 ppi oder so). --Smial (talk) 11:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-01-11-Wien-Schwarzweißfilm-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This shot has character! --Hubertl 23:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Lizenzbaustein User:Ralf Roletschek/Autor2

Hallo, Du sage mal, wie bastelt man sich denn einen solchen Lizenzbaustein? Ich würde dergleichen gerne für mich verwenden. Haster (talk) 13:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Könnte ich mir den Text kopieren und für mich passend zurechtbasteln? Haster (talk) 13:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Natürlich kannst du! Kein Problem. --Ralf Roleček 20:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-01-11-Wien-Schwarzweißfilm-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-01-11-Wien-Schwarzweißfilm-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-01-11-Wien-Schwarzweißfilm-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-01-11-Wien-Schwarzweißfilm-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Fulica-cristata-RalfR RR26156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Was issn los? Sogar Kategorien und aussagekräftige Dateinamen! --Hubertl 22:10, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Sa-Pobla-Mallorca-RalfR RR26406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit on the dark side, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Sa-Pobla-Mallorca-RalfR RR26415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo with objects which need different focuses, only the train and Bahnsteig might have been a bit brighter and warmer --Michielverbeek 10:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Playa-de-Muro-Mallorca-RalfR RR26397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Alcudia-RalfR RR26191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 12:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Muy bonito. Buena cualidad. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Sa-Pobla-Mallorca-RalfR RR26414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Alcudia-RalfR RR26186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Alcudia-RalfR RR26190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 15:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Ulrike-Liedtke RR26463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Mike-Bischoff RR26435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Björn-Lakenmacher RR26508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Elisabeth-Alter RR26578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Britta-Müller RR27272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Daniel-Kurth RR27211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Simona-Koß RR27151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Gerrit-Große RR26995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Axel-Vogel RR26864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:41, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:41, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Playa-de-Muro-Mallorca-RalfR RR26339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautifull composition. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Sa-Pobla-Mallorca-RalfR RR26408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just good enough --Daniel Case 04:53, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Playa-de-Muro-Mallorca-RalfR RR26404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Andreas-Bernig RR26808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Björn-Lüttmann RR26649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Christian-Görke RR26732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Danny-Eichelbaum RR26457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Holger-Rupprecht RR26642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Playa-de-Muro-Mallorca-RalfR RR26396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now --Hubertl 09:33, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Playa-de-Muro-Mallorca-RalfR RR26399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Tina-Fischer RR26828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Sven-Schröder RR26801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Andreas-Bernig RR26808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Björn-Lüttmann RR26649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Danny-Eichelbaum RR26868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Tina-Fischer RR26828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Matthias-Loehr RR26875.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-09-Sven-Petke RR26481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:11, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 016-03-10-Daniela-Trochowski RR27244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Britta-Stark RR27079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective and sharp enough for Q1. I would only crop the bottom (foreground is blurring a bit) and I would crop the sky a bit--Michielverbeek 06:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-René-Wilke RR27134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Andrea-Johlige RR27161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Wolfgang-Roick RR27252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Elisabeth-Alter RR27288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Kathrin-Dannenberg RR27060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Alcudia-RalfR RR26194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Wiki-Cup

hi, wie kommst du hier auf 65 Punkte und hier auf 50 Punkte? Wenn du Erweiterungen machst, dann must du das dann dort eintragen. --Hubertl 17:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

QI solo sind 5 Punkte, verwendet in irgendeinem Projekt sind 10. --Ralf Roleček 18:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Ich denke, dass du das getrennt anführen solltest, da gibts eine eigene Kategorie. Aber du hast ja mehr Erfahrung. Das mit den 5 Zusatzpunkten ist/war mir auch klar. --Hubertl 05:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Gegen Ende der Runden gab es meist jemanden, der die Punkte kontrolliert und ggf. korrigiert. Bisher hatte niemand was auszusetzen. --Ralf Roleček 09:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Alcudia-RalfR RR26193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Alcudia-RalfR RR26192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-10-Britta-Müller RR27273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-07-14-Campeche-Luftbild-RalfR-WMA 0529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Playa-de-Muro-Mallorca-RalfR RR26381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Playa-de-Muro-Mallorca-RalfR RR26379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment Please check the image. IMO it's tilted CCW. --XRay 09:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC) schau mal auf die Fensterholme im Hintergrund, die Zäume rechts und links am Rand - das täuscht. --Ralf Roletschek 17:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment Die Fenster links kippen ein wenig nach außen. Das sehe ich noch immer. Aber es ist recht wenig. Ein Contra wollte ich deswegen aber nicht geben. So schlimm finde ich es nicht. --XRay 18:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-S-Albufera-Mallorca-RalfR RR26144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Sa-Pobla-Mallorca-RalfR RR26416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Poŀlèntia-RalfR RR26214-26222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-22-Playa-de-Muro-Mallorca-RalfR RR26398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-01-03-autostadtl-by-RalfR-39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 02:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Altstadt-RalfR-DSCF7683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-Mauer-RalfR-WMA 1100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-Mauer-RalfR-WMA 1091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-Mauer-RalfR-WMA 1097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Straßenszene-Jerusalem-WAT 6631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Hy, you forgot the bicycle category :)) --Cccefalon 03:33, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-mit-Kettendom-RalfR-WAT 6524-6530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side leaning in a little bit (while right side is perfect). Saturation on top too much, it is almost looking like vignetting. Elsewhere good and non-centered compo very appealing. --Cccefalon 03:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC) Done the sky was so blue, i don't use any filter --Ralf Roletschek 13:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC) Ok, dann ist das so :-) --Cccefalon 16:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Altstadt-RalfR-DSCF7645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-09 Nikon F5 RalfR WAT 6948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5843.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little noise, but good for me.--Famberhorst 06:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-Mauer-RalfR-WMA 1109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:28, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-Mauer-RalfR-WMA 1111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 17:28, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Colorful, really good- Archi38 18:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Colorful, really good- Archi38 18:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Acerca de nominación a QI del file:Anciana fumando Tabaco.jpg

Sí, por supuesto que tengo el RAW, pesa cerca de 6 MB y mi conexión es aún vía modem, por lo que me sería muy engorroso subirlo, pero le confieso que es un tanto posible lo que usted dice, yo corregí en Photoshop la croma y el contraste, que en realidad estaban algo bajo, y aunque en el rojo esta casi tal cual, quizás el contraste puede habérseme pasado para gusto y ojos de algunas personas, lo siento, y le agradezco su apreciación, un saludo. --Ivan2010 20:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Yo creo, el photo es muy bien pero con RAW es mejor ;) Si tu puedes, enviar mi tu fichero? ralf@roletschek.de --Ralf Roleček 20:43, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Igual con mi limitante de conexión enviar un fichero grande me seria de mucho tiempo y muy engorroso, quizás pudiera achicarlo para poder darlo o quizás esta idea que ahora le expongo

Me he decidido a subir una nueva versión de la misma serie de fotografías que realicé como retratos, esta vez con menos corrección de croma y contraste para que sea valorada. Una vez más gracias, y apreciaría mucho su opinión. Un saludo. --Ivan2010 17:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Si tu tienes Adobe Photoshop CC, yo puedo escribir instrucciones para editar este photo? --Ralf Roleček 19:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Sí, yo uso el Photoshop CC en español. De todas formas he intentado enviarle a la dirección de correo que me escribió aquí, el .RAW original de la foto, pero por las limitaciones de mi servidor me la devuelve. Por eso le agradezco mucho sus promociones a mis dos fotos. Intentaré al menos una, la segunda, nominarla también para FP. Un saludo y muchas gracias, por acá me tiene para lo que usted necesite. --Ivan2010 20:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice motive. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 08:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-03-Straßenszene-Jerusalem-WAT 6067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 08:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better --Ermell 21:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very impressive --Moroder 09:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:00, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Hubertl 13:18, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5545-5549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:23, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steschke 17:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steschke 17:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5561-5568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-09 Nikon F5 RalfR WAT 6877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-23-Feldweg-Angermünde-RalfR-WP 20160423 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-23-Feldweg-Angermünde-RalfR-WP 20160423 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-23-Feldweg-Angermünde-RalfR-WP 20160423 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-26-luettich-RalfR-125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo Ralf Roletschek,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spots at the right, otherwise okay --A.Savin 00:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 07:17, 26 April 2016 (UTC) Promoted --A.Savin 14:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. It's a little bit noisy but IMO for this kind of photo OK. --XRay 15:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Es ist zwar die Neustadt, aber wir wollen nicht so pingelig sein... --Hubertl 08:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-29-Festina Tour de France-RalfR-N3S 3753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5544.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Dust spots to be removed, slightly tilted CW and I would denoise the sky. --C messier 17:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 07:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)  Support OK now. --C messier 10:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-03-Letisko Milana Rastislava Štefánika-RalfR-DSCF7939 40 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-09 Nikon F5 RalfR WAT 6933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-04-Winterreifen-mit-Spikes-RalfR-N3S 3772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but see note --Jacek Halicki 21:18, 4 May 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 22:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-03-Letisko Milana Rastislava Štefánika-RalfR-DSCF7942 3 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but see note --Jacek Halicki 21:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 22:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:34, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:34, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 07:06, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-04-Winterreifen-mit-Spikes-RalfR-N3S 3776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-03-Letisko Milana Rastislava Štefánika-RalfR-DSCF7954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5693.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI, IMO --Hubertl 13:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-02-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 5972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some noise but still acceptable IMO --Poco a poco 17:52, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments al-Chalīl, here I come. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for me. --Peulle 11:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5692.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI. --Hubertl 19:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-02-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 5967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6516.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry, there are some dust spots in the sky and a large one in the wire. Can you correct them? --Basotxerri 20:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 21:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC) OK now! --Basotxerri 17:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 07:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6385.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6385.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Altstadt-RalfR-DSCF7721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for me --Hubertl 16:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ElBute 09:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-02-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 5982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sorry, bad description. I'm thinking that the subject is a car--Lmbuga 14:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment Only german description, can you add a spanish, portuguesh, galician, italian or english description?, thanks--Lmbuga 15:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Perhaps "Altstadt von Hebron" it's the same than "car in Hebron"...--Lmbuga 15:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC) + ca/cs/es/ru - description is unimportant --Ralf Roletschek 15:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment I'm not agree, but thanks and clear QI:  Support Good picture--Lmbuga 15:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Your five pictures have the same description. Sorry, the categorization of this picture is good, why have they a bad description or the same description?  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 14:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment The subject is a car IMO: Bad description--Lmbuga 14:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This seems slightly tilted, could you check this? --Basotxerri 15:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)  Done you're right, it was tilted. --Ralf Roletschek 16:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC) OK now. Please have a look at the crop suggestion of Jebulon, too, seems to be a good idea, see notes on the picture. --Basotxerri 18:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Yes, crop is a good idea :-) --Ralf Roletschek 19:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-02-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Main object is sharp enough, but other parts might have been sharper. You have dealed quiet well with contrast differences  Support --Michielverbeek 07:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-02-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 5963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)  Oppose Tilted CW little bit. Also, sky needs denoising. Both problems can be easly fixed. --Halavar 12:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)  Done sky denoised. The image looks like a problem, that's true - but it is exactly straight. --Ralf Roletschek 16:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)  Support OK. Can pass as QI (but I still think, that with fixed tilt image would be better) --Halavar 18:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC) lets discuss backside here? --Ralf Roletschek 19:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC) First I also thought it's tilted but it is straight. --Berthold Werner 10:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Dust spots. Fix it, fix it, fix it! :) --Peulle 14:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC) ok, i fix it tomorrow. --Ralf Roletschek 19:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 07:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)  Support OK for QI. --Peulle 12:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:24, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Altstadt-RalfR-DSCF7786.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 20:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-26-Gare de Liège-Guillemins de Santiago Calatrava-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-12-26-Gare de Liège-Guillemins de Santiago Calatrava-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (fixed the grama/spelling) --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 08:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oh, that dust spot again... :-) --Basotxerri 15:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 04:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC) OK now! --Basotxerri 06:27, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Susanne Graf (2013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-07-15-wikimania-wdc-by-RalfR-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. File name could be better. --XRay 15:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-07-15-wikimania-wdc-by-RalfR-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. File name could be better. --XRay 15:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-07-15-arlington-friedfhof-RalfR-022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-06-05-innsbruck-by-ralfr-231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for a Q1photo, not a very easy perspective, large contrast between sun and shadow --Michielverbeek 20:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-02-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 08:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-07-12-wikimania-wdc-by-RalfR-027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted --A.Savin 13:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 14:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC) ok now --A.Savin 14:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-08-11-tampere-RalfR-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs an accurate description. --Peulle 22:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)  Support That's better. OK now. --Peulle 11:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-28-breda-by-RalfR-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not bad, but the categorization and description needs to be more specific: This is a "Panther" tank, I believe. --Peulle 12:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)  Support With the description and category now accurate, the image is good enough for QI. --Peulle 11:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-28-eindhoven-by-RalfR-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-27-Kranbau Eberswalde-WP 20160527 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough to be a Q1photo, good perspective. Dark clouds are making the composition much better --Michielverbeek 18:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-27-Kranbau Eberswalde-WP 20160527 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

EXIF

Hallo Ralf, könntest du bei zukünftigen Uploads auch die (Himmels-)richtung aus den EXIF-Daten in die Vorlage {{Location}} übernehmen? Der UploadWizard macht das mittlerweile auch. Danke und Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 14:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Der Commonist übernimmt meines Wissens nur die Koordinaten, ich lade alle Fotos damit hoch. --Ralf Roleček 14:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

@Aschroet: Auf github ist der Quellcode, solltest du die Funktion hinufügen wollen :-). --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

@Steinsplitter: , würde ich gern - bin aber nicht clever genug für Scala. --Arnd (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

zK: https://github.com/ritschwumm/commonist/issues/6 --Arnd (talk) 05:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-29-eindhoven-50mm-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Please remove first the two dust spots. Elsewhere, I agree with Johann. --Cccefalon 12:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 12:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Thanks! --Cccefalon 13:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-29-eindhoven-50mm-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The composition does not really impressed me, but I cannot deny it is a good focus to the main object. Please remove branches in left and right top corner --Michielverbeek 14:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC) The branches are not random in the image I wanted that. --Ralf Roletschek 14:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Ok, a diffeent taste --Michielverbeek 15:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC) thanks. the branches are a "fame". Without it's many sky with a bit church ;) --Ralf Roletschek 18:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-28-breda-by-RalfR-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Wow, Ralf can do verticals. --Cccefalon 11:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-07-Oldtimertreffen-Eberswalde-Škoda 14Tr-RalfR-N3S 3802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-27-breda-by-RalfR-127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 10:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-27-breda-by-RalfR-096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-27-breda-by-RalfR-124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-28-breda-by-RalfR-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-07-Oldtimertreffen-Eberswalde-allgemein-N3S 3854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-29-JAK-28-LHS-Finowfurt-RalfR-DSCF8146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-29-JAK-28-LHS-Finowfurt-RalfR-DSCF8150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Images

I added a new version with bug fixes, if you want, check them.. thanks --Harpagornis (talk) 23:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, in my eyes it's too gray. --Ralf Roleček 08:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-27-breda-by-RalfR-089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:56, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-27-breda-by-RalfR-086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:21, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-13-Ostfriedhof Innsbruck- RR24588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-12-21-Hotel katajanokka-RalfR-N3S 3298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, good perspective, good contrast shadowed versus lightened parts --Michielverbeek 09:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-12-21-Hotel katajanokka-RalfR-N3S 3300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 20:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-07-15-arlington-friedfhof-RalfR-031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-27-breda-by-RalfR-047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-13-Ostfriedhof Innsbruck- RR24597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-12-21-Helsingin päärautatieasema-RalfR-N3S 3327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-13-Ostfriedhof Innsbruck- RR24586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Detail-Felsendom-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-13-Ostfriedhof Innsbruck- RR24589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-13-Ostfriedhof Innsbruck- RR24580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-29-JAK-28-LHS-Finowfurt-RalfR-DSCF8178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 12:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-12-21-Hotel katajanokka-RalfR-N3S 3303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Look to the left side of the image. It's is tilted nad needs perspective correction. --Halavar 09:49, 3 June 2016 (UTC) no, the wall of dome is 100% vertical --Ralf Roletschek 11:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)  Support No serious tilt for me. --Milseburg 13:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Konditorei

Hallo Ralf, du warst vor zwei Tagen da drinnen, weißt du noch, wo das ist? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Das ist in der Siebensterngasse, hier diese Ecke. Eigentlich sollte die Kamera GPS-Daten speichern aber irgendwie stelle ich mich dazu zu blöd an. --Ralf Roleček 11:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Danke, manchmal hat die Kamera keinen Satellitenkontakt oder noch die alten Koordinaten gespeichert. Ohne individuelle Kontrolle sind die Koordinaten immer mit Vorsicht zu genießen, irgendwo im 12. waren sie auch zwei Straßen daneben. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Ich habe auch schon Bilder von Nürnberg, die noch die Koordinaten von Tel Aviv hatten, die Kamera hat da einfach noch verträumt in der Vergangenheit geschwelgt. GPS blieb für fast eine Woche in Israel hängen, offenbar hat es der Kamera dort gefallen. Ist ja auch nur ein Mensch ;) Ubrigens vielen Dank für dein Hinterherräumen bei meinen Bildern! --Ralf Roleček 21:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13-06-27-breda-by-RalfR-083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-06-08-Wien-RalfR-DSC 0392-0397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-02-13-Ostfriedhof Innsbruck- RR24577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Could be sharper, but QI for me. --C messier 07:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition (Israelean flag and people waiting in the background), but it might have been sharper --Michielverbeek 20:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6559-6565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Metadaten

Hallo! Eine Frage: Ich hab letztens mit der Nikon von WMAT Hunderte von Fotos während der Wind Music Awards 2016 in Verona gemacht, die ich nun nach und nach hochladen möchte. Allerdings ist mir aufgefallen, dass in den Metadaten du als Urheber aufscheinst. Das wirkt jetzt etwas seltsam, sollte man da was ändern? Gruß--XanonymusX (talk) 17:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Mist. Sorry, hab ich vergessen zu löschen. Man kann das nachträglich ändern, ich würde dazu ACDSee nehmen, es geht aber wohl auch mit Lightroom. Welche Software nutzt du? --Ralf Roleček 21:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Gar keine, leider (hab überhaupt keine Software zur Bildbearbeitung); etwaige Nachbearbeitungen ließ ich bis dato die Fotowerkstatt erledigen, ich kümmere mich nur ums Ablichten und Auswählen … --XanonymusX (talk) 09:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Okay, zu kompliziert gedacht; die Daten kann ich ganz einfach über die Hausmittel von Windows ändern! Damit ist ja alles gut, muss ich halt die bereits hochgeladenen Bilder nochmal ändern. Gruß--XanonymusX (talk) 12:28, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Daß Windows das kann, wußte ich noch nicht. Wenn es eine größere Menge an Fotos sind, macht sich aber sicher eine Software besser. --Ralf Roleček 12:33, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Eigentlich egal; ich brauche nur alle Dateien in der gewöhnlichen Ansicht markieren und kann dann alle Infos einheitlich ändern! Hätte auch nicht geglaubt, dass das so simpel geht.--XanonymusX (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Hmmm, Windows ist manchmal besser, als man denkt ;) --Ralf Roleček 16:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this kind of photos. This photo is sharp, only the walking person is blurred (but I know long exposure 1/20 time is absolutely necessary). You might improve crop at the left; is that a Rollator? --Michielverbeek 06:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)  Done Ralf Roletschek 06:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut für eine Knipse. --Hubertl 07:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-27-Kranbau Eberswalde-WP 20160527 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. Nice dark clouds, but unfortunately too noisy --Michielverbeek 05:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)  Done new version --Ralf Roletschek 06:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC) Now I think it's good enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 06:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Danke Ralf für deine Hilfe zu dem Problem mit den Lizenzen. Deine Ratschläge auf Benutzer:Ralf Roletschek/Kommerzielle Bilder haben mir sehr geholfen! Danke! Rogi (talk) 11:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Naja, ich habe mir dafür auch schon jahrelang Anfeindungen anhören dürfen. Die Freibierfraktion ist einfach lebensfremd. --Ralf Roleček 13:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Soll doch jeder sein Bier brauen. Ich bin dir jedenfalls dankbar, da mich die CC-Lizenzen immer etwas gestört haben. Danke, --Rogi (talk) 11:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Wirklich stören tun mich nur CC0 und CC4. Was mir jedoch gehörig auf den Senkel geht, ist die nachträgliche Lizenzänderung hier, deshalb sind meine Bilder jetzt immer GFDL. --Ralf Roleček 12:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 13:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-06-08-Wien-RalfR-DSC 0344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:57, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-05-07-Oldtimertreffen-Eberswalde-Škoda 14Tr-RalfR-N3S 3817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-06-23-Montageeber-Eberswalde-RalfR-RR2 9558-9565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Bethlehem-RalfR-WAT 5543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Approved. --Peulle 12:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-06-21-Eberswalde-RalfR-WP 20160621 16 55 57 Pro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Самолеты на Аэропорт имени Бен-Гуриона-WAT 6675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Самолеты на Аэропорт имени Бен-Гуриона-WAT 6672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is there a reason why the description is only in Russian? --Poco a poco 19:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC) Na ja, wenn es wenigstens korrekt wäre --A.Savin 21:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC) Was habe ich falsch gemacht? --Ralf Roletschek 23:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-12-21-Hotel katajanokka-RalfR-N3S 3302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-06-27-Angermünde Marktplatz RalfR-WP 20160627 16 01 26-40 Pro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-06-27-Angermünde Marktplatz RalfR-WP 20160627 16 05 07 Pro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Самолеты на Аэропорт имени Бен-Гуриона-WAT 6705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Hebron-Altstadt-RalfR-WAT 5762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportDistortion at right, but not very visible, and as there is no way for a perspective correction with this photographer I would say it is a QI.--Jebulon 09:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Самолеты на Аэропорт имени Бен-Гуриона-WAT 6700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Despite the shutter speed this looks a bit overexposed, can you fix it in the edit? --Peulle 15:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC) Done new version. --Ralf Roletschek 15:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)  Support Yes, better now. :) --Peulle 13:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now, good quality. --Cayambe 12:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Altstadt-RalfR-DSCF7667.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 15:25, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Helmuth Bohm.jpg

File:Helmuth Bohm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 @xqt 09:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-Herodium-RalfR-WAT 5579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 08:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 23:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0262-0264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0275.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0275.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:16-07-05-Ursula-Lackner-RR2 9840.jpg

I expanded the description of File:16-07-05-Ursula-Lackner-RR2 9840.jpg by adding the first sentence of the German Wikipedia article de:Ursula Lackner. Nigel David Allen (talk) 07:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0259-0265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-05-Flughafen-Graz-RR2 0375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Landtagsgebäude Graz-RR2 0056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-04-Abflug-Berlin-DSC 0090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Yerpo 04:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem-Innenstadt-RalfR-DSCF7591.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good technical quality, but I think you should remove the "Jerusalem" category. --Peulle 13:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 15:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7634.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-05-plenarsaal-BT0A9912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-20-Marktplatz-Eberswalde-RalfR-WP 20160720 17 32 30 Pro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Neues Fahrradbild

Hallo Ralf, da Du auf fahrradmonteur.de noch keinen Eintrag für die Electra Bicycle Company hast, hatte ich schon lange vor, Dir mal ein Foto eines Beachcruisers zukommen zu lassen. Anlässlich der letztlichen schönen Sommertage bin ich endlich dazu gekommen

File:Electra Bike.JPG

Ich hoffe, das Bild gefällt Dir und es regt Dich dazu an, diesen (zumindest hier oben im Norden sehr beliebten) Hersteller mit auf Deine sehr interessante website aufzunehmen! Grüße, --Enter (talk) 19:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Na dann werde ich das wohl jetzt mal machen müssen ;) --Ralf Roleček 19:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Viele Infos habe ich noch nicht gefunden: http://www.fahrradmonteur.de/Electra --Ralf Roleček 15:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Das sieht aber schon prima aus & kommt alles genau so hin - insbesondere die bis ins letzte Detail hochwertigen Materialien und die erstklassige (wenn auch manchmal etwas kreative) Verarbeitung kann ich bestätigen. Die "Anatomie" der Räder ist tatsächlich leider nicht tourenfreundlich - die Damenräder mit ihren Körben entwickeln eine solche Umwucht, dass jede leichte Lenkerbewegung sofort zur Kurve wird und zur raschen Ermüdung kommen noch Knieschmerzen hinzu - ich glaube, weil man praktisch "wie in der Hocke" radelt. Aber "für die Stadt" liebe ich mein Delivery 3i (ach dafür steht das i, wusste ich noch nicht!) und mache bei Gelegenheit auch davon mal ein schönes Foto. Grüße, --Enter (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Als ich das mit der Kniebelastung in den WP-Artikel geschrieben habe, gabs erstmal Meckereien ;) Hab mal noch ne Handvoll Fotos bei Stadler gemacht. --Ralf Roleček 20:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Ich fahre seit über zehn Jahren Cruiser: Felt & Electra, customized & "von der Stange" und halte es für eine unbestreitbare Tatsache. Ist aber auch eine Altersfrage, denn wenn einer 20-25 Jahre alt ist und fünf, sechs, sieben Hunderter für sein Traumrad hingelegt hat, wertet er die Beschreibung "alltagsfernes Spaßbike für mal Zwischendurch" glatt als Abqualifizierung seiner gefühlt-bedeutsamen Lebensentscheidung und reagiert (altersgemäß) mit Ignoranz, Schmollen, Bockigkeit :-) Du hast nun schon ziemlich Vieles gesammelt, aber ich denke, ich finde im Bekanntenkreis noch zwei, drei Modelle, die Deine Galerie ergänzen. Ich melde mich! Grüße, --Enter (talk) 13:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-20-Marktplatz-Eberswalde-RalfR-WP 20160720 17 30 57 Pro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Abmahnung

Hallo Ralf, du weißt da vielleicht besser bescheid. Ich habe grad das Foto File:Gaukler Cyrano – Hörnerfest 2016 02.jpg gesehen, schau dir das Credit an. Ich bild mir ein, dass wir bei Fotos die von WMAT und ich weiß nicht WMDE unterstützt werden, solche Formulierungen "ohne Vorwarnung abgemahnt" eher unterlassen, sondern eher aufklärend wirken wollen. Ich persönlich halte es so (auch ohne WMAT Förderung) und bin da immer besser gefahren - gruß K@rl (talk) 18:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Aber gleich noch eine Frage zu dem File:European Comission HD2-RR2.jpg - wer ist da jetzt der Fotograf, jener von Flickr oder du? - da kenne ich mich nicht ganz aus --lg K@rl (talk) 18:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Hmmm, schwierig schwierig. Man kann sowas schreiben, es ist nicht verboten. Aber das schreckt Nachnutzer ab. Ich würde es nicht so machen. Das zweite habe ich korrigiert, ich bin natürlich nicht der Urheber. --Ralf Roleček 06:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but please, remove the dust spots (see notes) --Poco a poco 11:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 17:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-20-Marktplatz-Eberswalde-RalfR-WP 20160720 17 31 14 Pro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr schön! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-04-01-Hackathon-Jerusalem-Hanse-House-WAT 5840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some of the darker parts a bit grainy and olive tree leaves are always a tad glarey but overall a good pic. Sort of Wikipedia meets Renoir. ;) --W.carter 09:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Das kann doch nicht sein...

Dieser User macht ganz offenbar dramatische Bedienungsfehler. Denn mit einer 2014er Crop-Kamera muss man bessere Ergebnisse bekommen, auch mit einem Kit-Objektiv. Schau dir das mal an... Da ist ja jede Handykamera besser! Meine Meinung dazu ist, dass er ständig auf Unterbelichtung fährt - und dann natürlich das volle Rauschen einfängt, wenn der Regler nach rechts geht. Aber offenbar lernt er nicht aus Fehlern. Und wenn man mit der Kamera wild in der Welt herumfuchtelt, dann wirds auch mit 1:1000tel nix. --Hubertl 07:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Mach ma ein Projekt zusammen: Fotografierschule in der dritten Welt (oder dort, wo es zumindest vom Ergebnis her dritte Welt ist). --Hubertl 07:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Irgendwas stimmt da wirklich nicht. ISO ist ziemlich wahllos hochgedreht. Ich tippe darauf, daß er seine Kamera einfach nicht beherrscht. Aber das ist keine Frage erster oder dritter Welt. Für solche Fälle habe ich ja eigentlich das Video gemacht. --Ralf Roleček 08:52, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Vielleich garnicht so dumm... Wenn das gut organisiert wird, könnte es wirklich sinnvoll sein. Also nicht nur ein Workshop. Man könnte Leute von "überall" einladen, die Grundlagen vermitteln und man müßte ihnen Möglichkeiten geben, das in ihrem Land weiterzugeben, also Vortragsmaterial, was weltweit benutzbar ist. Photoschool Austria. --Ralf Roleček 22:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent composition, a very interesting object to make a photo from. A good focus to main object and quality is also high enough for a Q1photo. --Michielverbeek 14:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent photograph. --Johann Jaritz 13:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very special! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This where I'm supposed to say "It's tilted", but because of the vertigo angle it actually works. Good quality. W.carter 15:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Klagemauer Jerusalem RalfR-DSCF7706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7637.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7637.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Balkon-RR2 0185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd have cropped the bottom right, but QI --Poco a poco 09:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I see this as one of those impossible shots, either the lamp or the castle is straight... I totally understand that you chose the castle. Good quality. W.carter 19:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 09:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-30-Jerusalem Mishkenot Sha’ananim-RalfR-DSCF7621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some dark spots in the sky, would you please get rid of them. Don't you check your photos for such obvious thing like this before you nominate them? It is a courtesy to the other editors who review your photos to at least give them a once over in full size before submitting them. W.carter 19:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 21:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Nice, thanks! Good quality, but I think the photo could be even better with a little more light in the darker areas. W.carter 11:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7550.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:16-03-30-Ben Gurion International Airport-RalfR-DSCF7550.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:11-07-29-helsinki-by-RalfR-007.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:11-07-29-helsinki-by-RalfR-007.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6559-6565.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT 6559-6565.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Wie bekomme ich den Fratzenbuchhinweis unter meine Bilder?

Moin Ralf,

ich bin da nicht so versiert hierzucommons, hätte aber gerne auch Deinen Fratzenbuchhinweis unter meinen Bildern stehen. Gibt es da was zu beachten? Wo und wie schreibe ich den am besten hin? Sänger (talk) 09:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Die bequemste Version wäre so. Wenn ich allerdings irgendwann meine Vorlage ändere, ändert sich auch der Baustein unter deinen Bildern. Deshalb wäre es besser, wenn du einen eigenen Baustein hast. Soll ich das machen? --Ralf Roleček 09:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Wenn das für die paar Bilder lohnt, gerne, bzw. mal kontrollieren ob mein C'n'P keine URV von Dir ist und so geht. Sänger (talk) 10:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Genau so ist es richtig. --Ralf Roleček 10:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Dann herzlichen Dank! Sänger (talk) 10:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Gemeinderatssitzungssaal-Graz-RR2 0097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think it was made with a tripod? DoF a little bit small, tilted CCW (or leaning out). Please check your image. --XRay 13:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Stativ ging nicht, es ist aus der Hand, deshalb 2,8 --Ralf Roletschek 15:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)  Support Acceptable now. Monopod instead of tripod? --XRay 15:52, 21 August 2016 (UTC) Ich war nicht drauf vorbereitet, hatte kein Stativ dabei. --Ralf Roletschek 17:51, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-05-Flughafen-Graz-RR2 0338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-05-Flughafen-Graz-RR2 0407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:44, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Balkon-RR2 0214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Could be sharper too. --XRay 13:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-05-Flughafen-Graz-RR2 0362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:53, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Balkon-RR2 0192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Landtagsgebäude Graz-RR2 0058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-07-06-Rathaus Graz Turmblick-RR2 0285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

---

Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming! Dear Ralf Roletschek/Archive, As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again. We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. We look forward to your free images! Sincerely, The team of Wiki Loves Monuments edition in Spain

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:13-04-13-st-poelten-landhausviertel-628.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:13-04-13-st-poelten-landhausviertel-628.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4219.jpg

And also:

• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4220.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4221.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4222.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4224.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4226.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4227.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4228.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4229.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4230.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4352.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4353.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4354.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4355.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4356.jpg
• File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4357.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 21:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Carola-Veit-BSPC-RR2 3410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-29-Stephan-Toivonen-BSPC-RR2 3283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)  Done categories fixed. --Ralf Roletschek 21:50, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-29-Soeren-Schumacher-BSPC-RR2 2943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Wahlkampfabschluß Landtagswahl der SPD in Warnemünde 2016

Hallo Herr Roletschek,

kann es sein, dass beim Datum "2016" statt "2015" stehen müsste?--Börsensocke (talk) 09:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

oops, hab ich mich da vertippt? Korrigiere ich abends, bin grad bei der kanzlerin. Ralf Roleček 09:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Es ist die Kamerauhr. --Ralf Roleček 12:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4229.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

File:16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4357.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija-RR2 4357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-02-Wahlkampfabschluß in Warnemünde-RR2 4733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-02-Wahlkampfabschluß in Warnemünde-RR2 4727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ArildV 13:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-02-Wahlkampfabschluß in Warnemünde-RR2 4768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-02-Wahlkampfabschluß in Warnemünde-RR2 4804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Ralf Roletschek!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Szczecin

ist sehr shön. Ich möchte das auf der Seite [1] = [2] zeigen. Stimmen Sie zu? Wik55a (talk) 17:43, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Das kannst du machen, ohne mich zu fragen. Das ist der Sinn von Commons. --Ralf Roleček 10:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Vakabulli Beach-Riga-RR2 3743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Vakabulli Beach-Riga-RR2 3764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Babīte railway station-RR2 3646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment Not bad, but slightly unsharp on the left & right edges (gentle USM should help), and leans in (perspective correction necessary). --Jacek79 18:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Vakabulli Beach-Riga-RR2 3766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Klasse! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Vakabulli Beach-Riga-RR2 3726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly surreal. --Daniel Case 17:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Vakabulli Beach-Riga-RR2 3730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Clouds a little blown near the top but great late-summer late-afternoon mood. --Daniel Case 17:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Moskauer Vorort Riga-RR2 4212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Moskauer Vorort Riga-RR2 4363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Hesburger Riga Latvia-RR2 3694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 16:20, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Moskauer Vorort Riga-RR2 4223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Moskauer Vorort Riga-RR2 4206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Moskauer Vorort Riga-RR2 4210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Moskauer Vorort Riga-RR2 4233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Moskauer Vorort Riga-RR2 4364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Something alien, sharp textured, surrounded by contemporary architecture.--Aeou 12:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-28-Schloß Rundāle-RR2 2578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Riga Daugavgrīva-RR2 3710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Riga Daugavgrīva-RR2 3716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Babīte railway station-RR2 3637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Babīte railway station-RR2 3688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Babīte railway station-RR2 3679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's a photographer on the image... Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Riga Daugavgrīva-RR2 3709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment Perhaps it would be better to tag some road sign category in this type of photo. --Basotxerri 15:20, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-View from Latvian Academy of Sciences building-RR2 4235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-01-Rīgas Starptautiskā Lidosta-RR2 4550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Vakabulli Beach-Riga-RR2 3754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor unsharpness on the right but OK. --King of Hearts 05:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Moskauer Vorort Riga-RR2 4214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Riga Daugavgrīva-RR2 3713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Normal every-day scene, I think it would be better if you cropped out that half front of the yellow car (see note). If you could also tone up a bit more detail in the clouds, that would be great. W.carter 21:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC) right, i correct it monday. Every-day-scene is right but this type of bus-stations are old and there gone in Latvia. I see it as a documentation. --Ralf Roletschek 20:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC) And I think it is great that you do documentation, I haven't said anything else. Nothing wrong with every-day-scenes at all! It was only an observation. :) Looking forward to new version. W.carter 20:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Done new Version. --Ralf Roletschek 17:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 19:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-22-Flugplatz-Graz-RR2 6112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-29-Bahnhof Falkenberg-Elster-RR2 6591-6596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-25-Graz-Ostbahnhof-RR2 6399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-16-Flugplatz Tegel-RR2 5839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-28-Schloß Rundāle-RR2 2597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-View from Latvian Academy of Sciences building-RR2 4248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-22-Flugplatz-Graz-RR2 6109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-01-Rīgas Starptautiskā Lidosta-RR2 4552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-31-Moskauer Vorort Riga-RR2 4351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Riga Daugavgrīva-RR2 3794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - The sky is a bit noisy, but overall, a very nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 08:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-01-Rīgas Starptautiskā Lidosta-RR2 4578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-09-22-Flugplatz-Graz-RR2 6108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-08-30-Vakabulli Beach-Riga-RR2 3762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16-03-31-israelische Siedlungen bei Za'atara-WMA 1178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - There are a whole bunch of big dust spots that must be cleaned before this picture could be promoted. -- Ikan Kekek 08:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 09:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC) - You got the ones that were closest to the top of the photo, but you didn't get them all by a long shot. -- Ikan Kekek 09:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC) corrected. --Ralf Roletschek 10:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC) - Looks like you got 'em all this time. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Fæ ([[User talk:Fæ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Fæ ([[User talk:Fæ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

File:2010-09-07-pilze-by-RalfR-01.jpg etc

Hallo Ralf. Ich bin grad ein bißchen beim Pize einsortieren. Wo hast du diese Pilze in der Reihe denn fotografiert? Brandenburg? Kennst du ein Tool, bei dem man die Kategorie gleich bei vielen Fotos eintragen kann und nicht bei allen einzeln? Danke für die tollen Bilder und Grüße --Josef Papi ([[User talk:Josef Papi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Das war im Wald nördlich von Klobbicke bei Eberswalde. Mit Kategorien habe ich es nicht so, wenn ich Massenbearbeitungen mache, nehme ich Help:Commons Commander. --Ralf Roleček 19:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Ich habs mal jetzt händisch gemacht, scheint aber ein interessantes Tool zu sein. Grüße --Josef Papi ([[User talk:Josef Papi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

moving categories

Hi Ralf,

I noticed that a number of categories like Category:Chinesischer_Pavillon_am_Grazer_Schlossberg were renamed to correct German spelling. Which is of course fine by me, but this type of categories is typically linked from all kind of monument lists on Wikipedia/Wikidata. I understand that they were deleted because you only emptied them without any left information. Would it be possible for you to leave a redirect in place next time you empty a category because you want to move it? That should also help people to find the category anyway. Thanks in advance! Effeietsanders ([[User talk:Effeietsanders|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Better so? --Ralf Roleček 09:44, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Commons User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Deine Bilder aus dem Isergebirge ...

... sind zwar schon von 2007, aber vielleicht erinnerst Du Dich ja noch, wo sie aufgenommen wurden, und kannst das in die Beschreibungen aufnehmen? Wäre schön, dann kann man sie "verorten". Danke schon mal im voraus! --Schlosser67 ([[User talk:Schlosser67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:54, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Welche meinst du? Davon gibts sehr viele...--Ralf Roleček 15:06, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Ich bin in der Commons-Kategorie "Unidentified locations in the Jizera Mountains" auf etliche davon gestoßen. --Schlosser67 ([[User talk:Schlosser67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Done Habe Koordinaten hinzugefügt. --Ralf Roleček 12:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Beauty-Kram

Ich hätte da gerne mal ein Problem, nämlich blaues LED-Licht. Das ist ein Ausschnitt aus dem JPG-Vorschaubild der Kamera. Hab halbwegs taugliche Schwarzweiß-Umsetzungen aus dem Raw hinbekommen, allerdings schlägt die durch das blaue Licht extrem hervortretende Grobporigkeit der Haut voll auf's Schwarzweiß durch. So möchte ich dei Bilder latürnich nicht hochladen. Nur den Grünkanal nehmen hilft nix, denn da ist (fast) nix. Ideen? --smial 17:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Ich habe mal etwas herumgespielt...

• Camera RAW Grundeinstellungen:
  • Weißabgleich auf den blanken Ring am Mikro (unter dem Gitter) Das Bild bleibt zwar blau aber deutlich ausgeglichener
  • Belichtung +0,35
  • Lichter -45
  • Tiefen +30
  • Weiß +11
  • Klarheit +10
• Camera RAW HSL/Graustufen
  • Sättigung Lila -100

Das wäre schon grenzwertig hochladbar

• NIK Silver Efex Neutral, Struktur auf -50 oder ähnlich

Jetzt könnte man die Hautstruktur selektiv per Frequenztrennung angehen. --Ralf Roleček 17:34, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Die tollen LR- oder PS-Reglerbezeichnungen habe ich hier doch nicht ;-)
Weißabgleich per Brechstangenmethode vor der SW-Umwandlung war ein guter Hinweis. Danke. Dazu noch Farbrauschunterdrückung auf Maximum und Feinschärfe auf Minimum, dann geht's. Das Beispielfoto lade ich aber trotzdem nicht hoch, hab andere, geringfügig bessere. Ich hasse monochromes LED-Licht. Noch mehr hasse ich, wenn Bands die ersten drei Lieder quasi im Finstern (dunkelblau, dunkelgrün, dunkelrot...) spielen, und sobald sich die Knipserkollegen aus dem Graben verziehen mußten, das "richtige" Licht einschalten. -- smial 10:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Das farbige Licht ist natürlich purer Zufall ;) --Ralf Roleček 10:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Es gibt auch die anderen, die es offensichtlich nicht nötig haben. Die kam auf die Bühne, da wurde weißes Licht eingeschaltet, und dann hat die gespielt. Dafür gab es dort eine andere Einschränkung: "Keine Fotografen zwischen mir und dem Publikum! Nur seitlich!". Links und rechts also Klebebänder, bis zu denen die Knipser sich aufstellen durften. Daher nur Profilbilder von dem Auftritt ;-). Da war das 60-250 Objektiv recht nützlich an der Crop-Kamera, die Profi-Kollegen mit dem üblichen 70-200 an FX haben etwas knurrig geguggt... Einer hatte aber ein xxx-400mm dabei. --smial 11:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC) (Tanzen mit Fotorucksack ist übrigens grenzwertig. Andererseits faszinierend, wenn ganz junges Publikum bei der guten alten Frau Schmitz völlig aus dem Häuschen gerät)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Use of one of your image

Hello,

For information, we plan to use one of your images https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:16-04-04-Felsendom-Tempelberg-Jerusalem-RalfR-WAT_6385.jpg in a website about arabic culture made by the Institute of the Arab World in Paris. The website will be entitled "Vous avez dit arabe ?" ("Did you say arab ?").

Thank your for sharing this beautiful picture.

Best Calame ([[User talk:Calame|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

File:16-12-22-Bundeskriminalamt-Anis-Amri-3.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Storkk ([[User talk:Storkk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC) Also affected:

• File:16-12-22-Bundeskriminalamt-Anis-Amri-1.jpg
• File:16-12-22-Bundeskriminalamt-Anis-Amri-2.jpg

I have added these to the DR, since they are in a very similar situation. Storkk ([[User talk:Storkk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Edit war

Proper procedure to contest a speedy deletion is to use the File talk page, or if the file was already deleted, to file an undeletion request. If you believe the insertion was vandalism, you may also report the user to COM:ANU, but please do not edit war. Storkk ([[User talk:Storkk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Er hätte doch einen regulären LA stellen können, wie du jetzt. --Ralf Roleček 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, he should have. You're not the only party at fault, and you were both warned (and him more "sternly", if that makes a difference). Storkk ([[User talk:Storkk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Ambiguity in your custom license template?

On a different note, the English translation of your custom template seems ambiguous to me: your requested credit line, "Ralf Roletschek / fahrradmonteur.de" does not mention a license, but right below you state "In any event, copyright and license are to be mentioned."... to me this is confusing, but perhaps I am just being dense. Cheers, and merry Christmas! Storkk ([[User talk:Storkk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

The Licens(es) are at buttom. I don't understand, sorry, my english is very bad. --Ralf Roleček 12:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Ich versuch es auf Deutsch, aber entschuldigung bitte für die Fehler: Wenn jemand dein Foto benutzen will, er lest: "Entweder wird der Hinweis entsprechend der Lizenzbedingungen angegeben oder wie folgt" und kann denken, dass "Ralf Roletschek / fahrradmonteur.de" genügt, ohne Lizenz. Aber vielleicht bin ich pedantisch. Storkk ([[User talk:Storkk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you're right! I have to correct it, thank you! --Ralf Roleček 15:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

EBV-Frage (Photoshop), Bildelemente herausfiltern

Versuchsobjekt

Hallo Ralf! Ich habe eine EBV-Frage an dich. Bei dem nebenstehenden Bild befinden sich im unteren Bildteil kleine helle Punkte (Reflektionen an Eiskristallen). Fällt dir ein Weg ein, wie man selektiv (und halbautomatisch, also nicht von Hand auswählen) diese Punkte herausfiltern kann, so dass sie als herausgelöste Bildelemente weiterverwendet werden können? Ich habe nämlich den Plan, zwei Fotografien (hier Nummer 2) zu einem Kompositbild miteinander zu verblenden (die Reflektionen an Signal und Eis vom "Versuchsobjekt", den Rest von "Nummer "2). Meine erste Idee war es, mithilfe der Gradationskurven (auch R-G-B-kanalgetrennt) die hellen Bildteile zu filtern, das Ergebnis hat mich aber nicht überzeugt. Was fällt dir als Verfahren ein? Über Tipps würde ich mich sehr freuen. Liebe (nachweihnachtliche) Grüße, Grand-Duc ([[User talk:Grand-Duc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

So ganz verstehe ich nicht, worauf du aus bist ;) Ich hab mal etwas herumgespielt:

• neue Ebene, Rauschfilter - Staub und Kratzer - 3 Pixel, 24 Stufen
• Ebenenmodus Differenz

Willst du so etwas erreichen? --Ralf Roleček 20:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)