Open main menu


Deutsch | English | español | français | magyar | +/−

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trevj!

TUSC token 0c9ff71b20ffc4239a15953d1bf9055dEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --Trevj (talk) 09:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hielo-azul.svg edit notificationEdit

Hi, thank you for your feedback, you have contacted me to alter File:Hielo-azul.svg because the preview image was too dark compared to File:Hielo.png. I have edited the file and I think it is lighter now, I have also added color-interpolation to the filter section of this file, so what you see should be what Wiki's preview image will look like.

If you still want to modify the lightness more to your liking, than I suggest that you look for the following line of code, inside the file, opened up in a text-editor, and alter its k1-4 attributes up and down slightly until it's to your liking.

<feComposite in="r1" in2="r3" operator="arithmetic" k1="1" k2=".3" k3=".6" k4="-.1" result="r4"/>

Or, contact me again. Regards --Wgabrie (talk) 14:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the amendment. I'll have another look at this. --Trevj (talk) 11:58, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Commons talk:Chris's_AcornsEdit

Hallo Trevj, please have a look at Commons talk:Chris's_Acorns. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 22:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. -- Trevj (talk) 09:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


  Hello, Trevj. You have new messages at Svgalbertian's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Re: Commons talk:SVG CheckEdit

Firstly I'd like to apologise for not getting back to you sooner on this one; I completely manage to miss your post. Looking at the issue now, I can't recreate the problem you were having, can you? Or does it seem to have resolved itself in the mean time? Regards, Jarry1250 (talk) 22:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the message - no problem about the delay. I'll have a look at this again and see if it's still applicable. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 13:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50 and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 02:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Hard reset BBC Micro 32K Acorn DFS.gifEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Just caught up on that now, thanks! -- Trevj (talk) 12:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Vorsprung durch Graffit - geograph.org.uk - 1670605.jpgEdit

 
File:Vorsprung durch Graffit - geograph.org.uk - 1670605.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 04:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

This sounds like a fair cop. I uploaded it a year ago, and would like to think I'm less naive now! -- Trevj (talk) 21:09, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Don't worry, we all make small mistakes, no harm done. :-) Dcoetzee (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Reuse authorizationsEdit

Thanks for warning me about the reuse authorization of

May I say that it is a little surprising to have a 7 days time to prove authorization for files which have been submitted 5 years ago? I understand you are not making the rules here, but well, seems incoherent all the same.

Here is the e-mail exchange with Fang Chung Graham, the photographer. If it is not enough, would you mind sending her an e-mail explaining what she has to do?

Email exchange
Dear Mrs Graham,
I'm a french contributor to the french encyclopedia Wikipedia ( http://wikipedia.org/ )
We would be happy to include some photographies of Ronald Graham on its article page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Graham and on its translated versions in other languages.
I've found, using Google, some interesting pictures on two pages hosted on your website.
http://math.ucsd.edu/~fan/ron/jug.html
http://www.math.ucsd.edu/~fan/photo/ep.html
Could you possibly give us the permission to put some of them on Wikipedia, under a free license ? ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_license#Free_content_licenses )
Thank you in advance for your answer,
Best regards,
xxx
Dear xxx,
Sure, you are welcome using these photos.
Fan
Thank you very much.
They will be published on Wikimedia Commons under a copyleft license, unless you prefer another license.

Regards, --Pethrus (talk) 09:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for the message - sorry if the tagging was an impersonal way of doing this. Don't worry about the timescale, as I'm sure files can be undeleted if the permissions arrive later. Anyway, I've emailed as suggested, but note that Mrs Graham's website warns about spam filters. -- Trevj (talk) 13:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Anti-spam was not an issue 5 years ago at this same address, let's hope it won't be this time either. Thanks for emailing. --Pethrus (talk) 15:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
The email address used is at laposte.net, which has caused some problems for me in the past. If we've heard nothing in a few days, perhaps you could drop Mrs Graham a note asking to check the spam folder for that domain. Cordialement. -- Trevj (talk) 15:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Is'nt Fan Chung email adress at math.ucsd.edu ?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pethrus (talk • contribs) 09:51, 30 March 2012‎ (UTC)
I used fan at ucsd.edu. I meant the laposte address is for incoming mail from me! Sorry for the ambiguity. -- Trevj (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Oh, allright. Should you have no answer in a couple days, I will send her another mail. --Pethrus (talk) 11:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Hi again. The date has now expired and so these have been deleted. They could be reinstated via Undeletion requests if the permission is received. If you could please check whether my email was received that'd be helpful. Thanks very much. -- Trevj (talk) 07:56, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Sure. Could you send me the e-mail you sent her? Thanks. --Pethrus (talk) 13:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
No problem:
Email dated 29/03/12

Message du 29/03/12 15:24 De : "Trevor Johnson" A : fan@ucsd.edu Copie à : Objet : RE: Ronald Graham photographs for Wikipedia

Hello

In connection with the conversation linked below, I understand that you've previously authorised reuse of three photos by Wikimedia:http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Trevj#Reuse_authorizations

Unfortunately, the full licensing conditions have not been demonstrably met. Therefore, it would be greatly appreciated if you could please forward permissions again to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (template message from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates/Consent follows below).

If there are any problems with this, please let me know by email or on my talk page there. (Please note that even though the files may be deleted after 7 days, if your permission follows *after* that date, it's my understanding that the files could be undeleted.)

Thanks for reading and in anticipation of your cooperation.

Kind regards

Trevor Johnson

-oOo-

To: permissions-commonswikimedia.org


I hereby affirm that CHOOSE ONE: [I, (name here) am] OR [(copyright holder's name)] is the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of [SPECIFY THE WORK HERE - describe the work to be released in detail, attach the work to the email, or give the URL of the work if online]

I agree to STANDARD CHOICE; SEE BELOW FOR MORE INFORMATION ON TYPE OF LICENSE: [publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).]

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

[SENDER'S NAME AND DETAILS (to allow future verification of authenticity)] [SENDER'S AUTHORITY (Are you the copyright-holder, director, appointed representative of, etc.)] [DATE]

-oOo-

-- Trevor JOHNSON

I hope this works OK. Sorry again for the hassle, but as you said, I don't make the rules... -- Trevj (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. We'll see if I am more lucky with it ;). --Pethrus (talk) 13:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
OK. -- Trevj (talk) 17:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
I've just noticed that these are now sorted. Good news! :-) -- Trevj (talk) 13:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Rover Chair 2-seat sofa Ron Arad.jpgEdit

 
File:Rover Chair 2-seat sofa Ron Arad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 11:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I've commented there. -- Trevj (talk) 13:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Nelson Street, Bristol - geograph.org.uk - 2595105.jpgEdit

 
File:Nelson Street, Bristol - geograph.org.uk - 2595105.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 13:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I've commented there. -- Trevj (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ghouston (talk) 07:19, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I commented (supporting deletion) there. -- Trevj (talk) 08:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Venice floating city satellite view 2008.jpgEdit

 
File:Venice floating city satellite view 2008.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 04:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Trevj".