Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vojtěch Zavadil!

Contents

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Vojtěch Zavadil!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 09:44, 21 September 2009 (UTC)


Don't over-categorizeEdit

Hi Vojtěch, please don't over-categorize your images. For instance

Before you make more mistakes please read Commons:Categories and particularly paragraph over-categorization. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 21:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

O.K. I'l change it. Thanks!
Vojtěch Zavadil (talk) 21:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Brya ebenus 01.jpgEdit

 
File:Brya ebenus 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Krdbot 15:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Viola kitaibeliana - Pálava - determinaceEdit

Dobrý den, v letošním roce jsme na Pálavě v rámci průzkumu jarních efemér mj. bádali na violkách a nyní řešíme, co je ještě V. kitaibeliana a co už ne. Koncem března 2015 jsme našli na Martince populaci údajně V. kitaibeliana a pak porovnali s populací pod Děvičkami. Shodují se. Ale fotky na botany.cz a fotky kolegy J. Kmeta jsou trošku odlišné, více rozmytě růžové květy. Jedinci, které jsme našli letos my se s těmi na Vaší fotce shodují. Konzultoval jste s někým determinaci? Konzultujeme to mezi botaniky a dalšími kolegy v rámci RP JM AOPK ČR, dále s Jirkou Danihelkou, ČSOP Hořepník aj. Rádi bychom měli jasno, co je ještě V. kitaibeliana a co již není, nebo se s něčím kříží. Pokud můžeme prosit o konzultace, můžete se mi ozvat na mail zdenek.musil@nature.cz nebo na zdenalm@seznam.cz? Děkuji Vám a zdravím z Moravského krasu. Zdeněk Musil

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Balanops australiana 02.jpgEdit

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Balanops australiana 02.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA) or   (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Leoboudv (talk) 06:15, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Balanops australiana 01.jpgEdit

 
File:Balanops australiana 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 06:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Balanops australiana 01.jpgEdit

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Balanops australiana 01.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA) or   (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 17:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

BocconiaEdit

Thanks. I had to be blind. Kenraiz (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Vojtěch Zavadil".